{"title":"潮气末氧分压是心脏病患者的一个强有力的预后预测因素。","authors":"Asami Ogura, Kazuhiro P. Izawa, Hideto Tawa, Masaaki Wada, Masashi Kanai, Ikko Kubo, Ayano Makihara, Ryohei Yoshikawa, Yuichi Matsuda","doi":"10.1111/cpf.12838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) variables represent central and peripheral factors and combined factors in the pathology of patients with cardiac disease. The difference in end-tidal oxygen partial pressure from resting to anaerobic threshold (ΔPETO<sub>2</sub>) may represent predominantly peripheral factors. This study aimed to verify the prognostic significance of ΔPETO<sub>2</sub> for major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in cardiac patients, including comparison with the minute ventilation–carbon dioxide production relationship (VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope), and peak oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 185 patients with cardiac disease who underwent CPET were consecutively enroled in this retrospective study. The primary endpoint was 3-year MACCE. The ability of ΔPETO<sub>2</sub>, VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope, and peak VO<sub>2</sub> to predict MACCE was examined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Optimal cut-off values for predicting MACCE were 2.0 mmHg for ΔPETO<sub>2</sub> (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.829), 29.8 for VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope (AUC: 0.734), and 19.0 mL/min/kg for peak VO<sub>2</sub> (AUC: 0.755). The AUC of ΔPETO<sub>2</sub> was higher than those of VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope and peak VO<sub>2</sub>. The MACCE-free survival rate was significantly lower in the ΔPETO<sub>2</sub> ≤ 2.0 group versus the ΔPETO<sub>2</sub> > 2.0 group (44.4% vs. 91.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). ΔPETO<sub>2</sub> ≤ 2.0 was an independent predictor of MACCE after adjustment for age and VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope (hazard ratio [HR], 7.28; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and after adjustment for age and peak VO<sub>2</sub> (HR, 6.52; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>ΔPETO<sub>2</sub> was a strong predictor of MACCE independent of and superior to VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope and peak VO<sub>2</sub> in patients with cardiac disease.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10504,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","volume":"43 6","pages":"404-412"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"End-tidal oxygen partial pressure is a strong prognostic predictive factor in patients with cardiac disease\",\"authors\":\"Asami Ogura, Kazuhiro P. Izawa, Hideto Tawa, Masaaki Wada, Masashi Kanai, Ikko Kubo, Ayano Makihara, Ryohei Yoshikawa, Yuichi Matsuda\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cpf.12838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) variables represent central and peripheral factors and combined factors in the pathology of patients with cardiac disease. The difference in end-tidal oxygen partial pressure from resting to anaerobic threshold (ΔPETO<sub>2</sub>) may represent predominantly peripheral factors. This study aimed to verify the prognostic significance of ΔPETO<sub>2</sub> for major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in cardiac patients, including comparison with the minute ventilation–carbon dioxide production relationship (VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope), and peak oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In total, 185 patients with cardiac disease who underwent CPET were consecutively enroled in this retrospective study. The primary endpoint was 3-year MACCE. The ability of ΔPETO<sub>2</sub>, VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope, and peak VO<sub>2</sub> to predict MACCE was examined.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Optimal cut-off values for predicting MACCE were 2.0 mmHg for ΔPETO<sub>2</sub> (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.829), 29.8 for VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope (AUC: 0.734), and 19.0 mL/min/kg for peak VO<sub>2</sub> (AUC: 0.755). The AUC of ΔPETO<sub>2</sub> was higher than those of VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope and peak VO<sub>2</sub>. The MACCE-free survival rate was significantly lower in the ΔPETO<sub>2</sub> ≤ 2.0 group versus the ΔPETO<sub>2</sub> > 2.0 group (44.4% vs. 91.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). ΔPETO<sub>2</sub> ≤ 2.0 was an independent predictor of MACCE after adjustment for age and VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope (hazard ratio [HR], 7.28; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and after adjustment for age and peak VO<sub>2</sub> (HR, 6.52; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>ΔPETO<sub>2</sub> was a strong predictor of MACCE independent of and superior to VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope and peak VO<sub>2</sub> in patients with cardiac disease.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging\",\"volume\":\"43 6\",\"pages\":\"404-412\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cpf.12838\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cpf.12838","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
End-tidal oxygen partial pressure is a strong prognostic predictive factor in patients with cardiac disease
Background
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) variables represent central and peripheral factors and combined factors in the pathology of patients with cardiac disease. The difference in end-tidal oxygen partial pressure from resting to anaerobic threshold (ΔPETO2) may represent predominantly peripheral factors. This study aimed to verify the prognostic significance of ΔPETO2 for major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in cardiac patients, including comparison with the minute ventilation–carbon dioxide production relationship (VE/VCO2 slope), and peak oxygen uptake (VO2).
Methods
In total, 185 patients with cardiac disease who underwent CPET were consecutively enroled in this retrospective study. The primary endpoint was 3-year MACCE. The ability of ΔPETO2, VE/VCO2 slope, and peak VO2 to predict MACCE was examined.
Results
Optimal cut-off values for predicting MACCE were 2.0 mmHg for ΔPETO2 (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.829), 29.8 for VE/VCO2 slope (AUC: 0.734), and 19.0 mL/min/kg for peak VO2 (AUC: 0.755). The AUC of ΔPETO2 was higher than those of VE/VCO2 slope and peak VO2. The MACCE-free survival rate was significantly lower in the ΔPETO2 ≤ 2.0 group versus the ΔPETO2 > 2.0 group (44.4% vs. 91.2%, p < 0.001). ΔPETO2 ≤ 2.0 was an independent predictor of MACCE after adjustment for age and VE/VCO2 slope (hazard ratio [HR], 7.28; p < 0.001) and after adjustment for age and peak VO2 (HR, 6.52; p < 0.001).
Conclusion
ΔPETO2 was a strong predictor of MACCE independent of and superior to VE/VCO2 slope and peak VO2 in patients with cardiac disease.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging publishes reports on clinical and experimental research pertinent to human physiology in health and disease. The scope of the Journal is very broad, covering all aspects of the regulatory system in the cardiovascular, renal and pulmonary systems with special emphasis on methodological aspects. The focus for the journal is, however, work that has potential clinical relevance. The Journal also features review articles on recent front-line research within these fields of interest.
Covered by the major abstracting services including Current Contents and Science Citation Index, Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging plays an important role in providing effective and productive communication among clinical physiologists world-wide.