抗抑郁药或跑步疗法:比较抑郁症和焦虑症患者的精神和身体健康效果

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of affective disorders Pub Date : 2023-05-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2023.02.064
Josine E. Verhoeven , Laura K.M. Han , Bianca A. Lever-van Milligen , Mandy X. Hu , Dóra Révész , Adriaan W. Hoogendoorn , Neeltje M. Batelaan , Digna J.F. van Schaik , Anton J.L.M. van Balkom , Patricia van Oppen , Brenda W.J.H. Penninx
{"title":"抗抑郁药或跑步疗法:比较抑郁症和焦虑症患者的精神和身体健康效果","authors":"Josine E. Verhoeven ,&nbsp;Laura K.M. Han ,&nbsp;Bianca A. Lever-van Milligen ,&nbsp;Mandy X. Hu ,&nbsp;Dóra Révész ,&nbsp;Adriaan W. Hoogendoorn ,&nbsp;Neeltje M. Batelaan ,&nbsp;Digna J.F. van Schaik ,&nbsp;Anton J.L.M. van Balkom ,&nbsp;Patricia van Oppen ,&nbsp;Brenda W.J.H. Penninx","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2023.02.064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Antidepressant medication and running therapy are both effective treatments for patients with depressive and anxiety disorders. However, they may work through different pathophysiological mechanisms and could differ in their impact on physical health. This study examined effects of antidepressants versus running therapy on both mental and physical health.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>According to a partially randomized patient preference design, 141 patients with depression and/or anxiety disorder were randomized or offered preferred 16-week treatment: antidepressant medication (escitalopram or sertraline) or group-based running therapy ≥2 per week. Baseline (T0) and post-treatment assessment at week 16 (T16) included mental (diagnosis status and symptom severity) and physical health indicators (metabolic and immune indicators, heart rate (variability), weight, lung function, hand grip strength, fitness).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 141 participants (mean age 38.2 years; 58.2 % female), 45 participants received antidepressant medication and 96 underwent running therapy. Intention-to-treat analyses showed that remission rates at T16 were comparable (antidepressants: 44.8 %; running: 43.3 %; p = .881). However, the groups differed significantly on various changes in physical health: weight (d = 0.57; p = .001), waist circumference (d = 0.44; p = .011), systolic (d = 0.45; p = .011) and diastolic (d = 0.53; p = .002) blood pressure, heart rate (d = 0.36; p = .033) and heart rate variability (d = 0.48; p = .006).</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>A minority of the participants was willing to be randomized; the running therapy was larger due to greater preference for this intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>While the interventions had comparable effects on mental health, running therapy outperformed antidepressants on physical health, due to both larger improvements in the running therapy group as well as larger deterioration in the antidepressant group.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>Trialregister.nl Number of identification: NTR3460.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"329 ","pages":"Pages 19-29"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antidepressants or running therapy: Comparing effects on mental and physical health in patients with depression and anxiety disorders\",\"authors\":\"Josine E. Verhoeven ,&nbsp;Laura K.M. Han ,&nbsp;Bianca A. Lever-van Milligen ,&nbsp;Mandy X. Hu ,&nbsp;Dóra Révész ,&nbsp;Adriaan W. Hoogendoorn ,&nbsp;Neeltje M. Batelaan ,&nbsp;Digna J.F. van Schaik ,&nbsp;Anton J.L.M. van Balkom ,&nbsp;Patricia van Oppen ,&nbsp;Brenda W.J.H. Penninx\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jad.2023.02.064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Antidepressant medication and running therapy are both effective treatments for patients with depressive and anxiety disorders. However, they may work through different pathophysiological mechanisms and could differ in their impact on physical health. This study examined effects of antidepressants versus running therapy on both mental and physical health.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>According to a partially randomized patient preference design, 141 patients with depression and/or anxiety disorder were randomized or offered preferred 16-week treatment: antidepressant medication (escitalopram or sertraline) or group-based running therapy ≥2 per week. Baseline (T0) and post-treatment assessment at week 16 (T16) included mental (diagnosis status and symptom severity) and physical health indicators (metabolic and immune indicators, heart rate (variability), weight, lung function, hand grip strength, fitness).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 141 participants (mean age 38.2 years; 58.2 % female), 45 participants received antidepressant medication and 96 underwent running therapy. Intention-to-treat analyses showed that remission rates at T16 were comparable (antidepressants: 44.8 %; running: 43.3 %; p = .881). However, the groups differed significantly on various changes in physical health: weight (d = 0.57; p = .001), waist circumference (d = 0.44; p = .011), systolic (d = 0.45; p = .011) and diastolic (d = 0.53; p = .002) blood pressure, heart rate (d = 0.36; p = .033) and heart rate variability (d = 0.48; p = .006).</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>A minority of the participants was willing to be randomized; the running therapy was larger due to greater preference for this intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>While the interventions had comparable effects on mental health, running therapy outperformed antidepressants on physical health, due to both larger improvements in the running therapy group as well as larger deterioration in the antidepressant group.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>Trialregister.nl Number of identification: NTR3460.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"volume\":\"329 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 19-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032723002239\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032723002239","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景抗抑郁药物和跑步疗法都是治疗抑郁症和焦虑症的有效方法。然而,它们可能通过不同的病理生理机制发挥作用,对身体健康的影响也可能不同。这项研究考察了抗抑郁药与跑步疗法对身心健康的影响。方法根据部分随机患者偏好设计,141名抑郁症和/或焦虑症患者被随机分配或接受16周的首选治疗:抗抑郁药物(艾司西酞普兰或舍曲林)或每周≥2次的团体跑步治疗。第16周(T16)的基线(T0)和治疗后评估包括心理(诊断状态和症状严重程度)和身体健康指标(代谢和免疫指标、心率(变异性)、体重、肺功能、握力、体能)。结果141名参与者(平均年龄38.2岁,女性58.2%)中,45名参与者接受了抗抑郁药物治疗,96名参与者接受跑步治疗。意向治疗分析显示,T16时的缓解率具有可比性(抗抑郁药:44.8%;跑步:43.3%;p=.881)。然而,两组在身体健康的各种变化方面存在显著差异:体重(d=0.57;p=.001)、腰围(d=0.44;p=.011)、收缩压(d=0.45;p=0.011)和舒张压(d=0.53;p=0.002),心率(d=0.36;p=0.033)和心率变异性(d=0.48;p=.006)。限制少数参与者愿意被随机分组;由于更倾向于这种干预,跑步疗法的规模更大。结论虽然干预措施对心理健康的影响相当,但跑步治疗在身体健康方面优于抗抑郁药,这是因为跑步治疗组的改善幅度更大,而抗抑郁药组的病情恶化幅度更大。试验注册Trialregister.nl身份证号码:NTR3460。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antidepressants or running therapy: Comparing effects on mental and physical health in patients with depression and anxiety disorders

Background

Antidepressant medication and running therapy are both effective treatments for patients with depressive and anxiety disorders. However, they may work through different pathophysiological mechanisms and could differ in their impact on physical health. This study examined effects of antidepressants versus running therapy on both mental and physical health.

Methods

According to a partially randomized patient preference design, 141 patients with depression and/or anxiety disorder were randomized or offered preferred 16-week treatment: antidepressant medication (escitalopram or sertraline) or group-based running therapy ≥2 per week. Baseline (T0) and post-treatment assessment at week 16 (T16) included mental (diagnosis status and symptom severity) and physical health indicators (metabolic and immune indicators, heart rate (variability), weight, lung function, hand grip strength, fitness).

Results

Of the 141 participants (mean age 38.2 years; 58.2 % female), 45 participants received antidepressant medication and 96 underwent running therapy. Intention-to-treat analyses showed that remission rates at T16 were comparable (antidepressants: 44.8 %; running: 43.3 %; p = .881). However, the groups differed significantly on various changes in physical health: weight (d = 0.57; p = .001), waist circumference (d = 0.44; p = .011), systolic (d = 0.45; p = .011) and diastolic (d = 0.53; p = .002) blood pressure, heart rate (d = 0.36; p = .033) and heart rate variability (d = 0.48; p = .006).

Limitations

A minority of the participants was willing to be randomized; the running therapy was larger due to greater preference for this intervention.

Conclusions

While the interventions had comparable effects on mental health, running therapy outperformed antidepressants on physical health, due to both larger improvements in the running therapy group as well as larger deterioration in the antidepressant group.

Trial registration

Trialregister.nl Number of identification: NTR3460.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
期刊最新文献
Association between body fat percentage and depression: A cross-sectional study of NHANES Editorial Board Anhedonia in flux: Understanding the associations of emotion regulation and anxiety with anhedonia dynamics in a sample with major depressive disorder. Blood cytokines in major depressive disorder in drug-naïve adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Multiple pathways to suicide: A network analysis based on three components of psychological pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1