术后甲氨氨基酚与术后疼痛阿片类药物剂量需求之间的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Clinical Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1097/AJP.0000000000001137
Ryu Komatsu, Michael D Singleton, Jiang Wu, Emily M Dinges, Laurent A Bollag
{"title":"术后甲氨氨基酚与术后疼痛阿片类药物剂量需求之间的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Ryu Komatsu,&nbsp;Michael D Singleton,&nbsp;Jiang Wu,&nbsp;Emily M Dinges,&nbsp;Laurent A Bollag","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We tested the hypothesis that patients who received methocarbamol postoperatively experience less severe pain and require smaller doses of opioids than those who did not receive methocarbamol.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing surgery involving the musculoskeletal system. Of 9089 patients, 704 received methocarbamol during 48 hours postoperatively, while 8385 did not receive methocarbamol. The patients who received methocarbamol postoperatively and the patients who did not receive methocarbamol were compared on the time-weighted average (TWA) pain score and opioid dose requirements in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) during the first 48 hours postoperatively, using propensity score-weighted regression models to adjusting for preoperative and intraoperative covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative 48-hour TWA pain scores were 5.5±1.7 (mean±SD), and 4.3±2.1 for methocarbamol and non-methocarbamol patients. Postoperative 48-hour opioid dose requirements in MME were 276 [170-347] (median [interquartile range (IQR)]) mg, and 190 [60-248] mg for methocarbamol and non-methocarbamol patients. In propensity score-weighted regression models, receiving methocarbamol postoperatively was associated with 0.97-point higher postoperative TWA pain score (95% CI, 0.83-1.11; P <0.001), and 93.6-MME higher postoperative opioid dose requirements (95% CI, 79.9 to 107.4; P <0.001), compared with not receiving methocarbamol postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Postoperative methocarbamol was associated with significantly higher acute postoperative pain burden and opioid dose requirements. Although the results of the study are influenced by residual confounding, they suggest a limited-if any-benefit of methocarbamol as an adjunct of postoperative pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Postoperative Methocarbamol and Postoperative Pain Opioid Dose Requirements: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ryu Komatsu,&nbsp;Michael D Singleton,&nbsp;Jiang Wu,&nbsp;Emily M Dinges,&nbsp;Laurent A Bollag\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We tested the hypothesis that patients who received methocarbamol postoperatively experience less severe pain and require smaller doses of opioids than those who did not receive methocarbamol.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing surgery involving the musculoskeletal system. Of 9089 patients, 704 received methocarbamol during 48 hours postoperatively, while 8385 did not receive methocarbamol. The patients who received methocarbamol postoperatively and the patients who did not receive methocarbamol were compared on the time-weighted average (TWA) pain score and opioid dose requirements in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) during the first 48 hours postoperatively, using propensity score-weighted regression models to adjusting for preoperative and intraoperative covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative 48-hour TWA pain scores were 5.5±1.7 (mean±SD), and 4.3±2.1 for methocarbamol and non-methocarbamol patients. Postoperative 48-hour opioid dose requirements in MME were 276 [170-347] (median [interquartile range (IQR)]) mg, and 190 [60-248] mg for methocarbamol and non-methocarbamol patients. In propensity score-weighted regression models, receiving methocarbamol postoperatively was associated with 0.97-point higher postoperative TWA pain score (95% CI, 0.83-1.11; P <0.001), and 93.6-MME higher postoperative opioid dose requirements (95% CI, 79.9 to 107.4; P <0.001), compared with not receiving methocarbamol postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Postoperative methocarbamol was associated with significantly higher acute postoperative pain burden and opioid dose requirements. Although the results of the study are influenced by residual confounding, they suggest a limited-if any-benefit of methocarbamol as an adjunct of postoperative pain management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001137\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们验证了一种假设,即术后接受甲氨氨基酚治疗的患者比未接受甲氨氨基酚治疗的患者疼痛更轻,需要更小剂量的阿片类药物。材料和方法:这是一项涉及肌肉骨骼系统手术患者的回顾性队列研究。9089例患者中,704例患者在术后48小时内接受甲氨氨基酚治疗,8385例患者未接受甲氨氨基酚治疗。采用倾向评分加权回归模型对术前和术中协变量进行调整,比较术后接受甲氨卡bamol治疗的患者和未接受甲氨卡bamol治疗的患者术后48小时内的时间加权平均(TWA)疼痛评分和吗啡毫克当量(MME)阿片类药物剂量需求。结果:甲氨氨基酚组和非甲氨氨基酚组术后48小时TWA疼痛评分分别为5.5±1.7 (mean±SD)和4.3±2.1。MME术后48小时阿片类药物剂量需求为276[170-347](中位数[四分位数范围(IQR)]) mg,甲氨氨基酚和非甲氨氨基酚患者为190 [60-248]mg。在倾向评分加权回归模型中,术后接受甲氨氨基酚与术后TWA疼痛评分升高0.97分相关(95% CI, 0.83-1.11;P讨论:术后甲氨氨基酚与术后急性疼痛负担和阿片类药物剂量需求显著增加相关。尽管该研究的结果受到残留混杂因素的影响,但它们表明甲氨氨基酚作为术后疼痛管理辅助治疗的益处有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association Between Postoperative Methocarbamol and Postoperative Pain Opioid Dose Requirements: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objectives: We tested the hypothesis that patients who received methocarbamol postoperatively experience less severe pain and require smaller doses of opioids than those who did not receive methocarbamol.

Materials and methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing surgery involving the musculoskeletal system. Of 9089 patients, 704 received methocarbamol during 48 hours postoperatively, while 8385 did not receive methocarbamol. The patients who received methocarbamol postoperatively and the patients who did not receive methocarbamol were compared on the time-weighted average (TWA) pain score and opioid dose requirements in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) during the first 48 hours postoperatively, using propensity score-weighted regression models to adjusting for preoperative and intraoperative covariates.

Results: Postoperative 48-hour TWA pain scores were 5.5±1.7 (mean±SD), and 4.3±2.1 for methocarbamol and non-methocarbamol patients. Postoperative 48-hour opioid dose requirements in MME were 276 [170-347] (median [interquartile range (IQR)]) mg, and 190 [60-248] mg for methocarbamol and non-methocarbamol patients. In propensity score-weighted regression models, receiving methocarbamol postoperatively was associated with 0.97-point higher postoperative TWA pain score (95% CI, 0.83-1.11; P <0.001), and 93.6-MME higher postoperative opioid dose requirements (95% CI, 79.9 to 107.4; P <0.001), compared with not receiving methocarbamol postoperatively.

Discussion: Postoperative methocarbamol was associated with significantly higher acute postoperative pain burden and opioid dose requirements. Although the results of the study are influenced by residual confounding, they suggest a limited-if any-benefit of methocarbamol as an adjunct of postoperative pain management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Journal of Pain
Clinical Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Clinical Journal of Pain explores all aspects of pain and its effective treatment, bringing readers the insights of leading anesthesiologists, surgeons, internists, neurologists, orthopedists, psychiatrists and psychologists, clinical pharmacologists, and rehabilitation medicine specialists. This peer-reviewed journal presents timely and thought-provoking articles on clinical dilemmas in pain management; valuable diagnostic procedures; promising new pharmacological, surgical, and other therapeutic modalities; psychosocial dimensions of pain; and ethical issues of concern to all medical professionals. The journal also publishes Special Topic issues on subjects of particular relevance to the practice of pain medicine.
期刊最新文献
Application of the IASP Grading System to Identify Underlying Pain Mechanisms in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Cohort Study. Retrospective Analysis of Fibromyalgia: Exploring the Interplay Between Various Triggers and Fibromyalgia's Severity. Genicular Nerve Block for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Is Social Support Associated With Clinical Outcomes in Adults With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain? A Systematic Review. Narrative Accounts of Youth and Their Mothers With Chronic Headache: Application of a Socio-narratology Framework to Pain Narratives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1