精神科医生如何看待护理患有极难治愈疾病的患者?

Q1 Neuroscience AJOB Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-28 DOI:10.1080/21507740.2023.2225467
Natalie J Dorfman, Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby, Peter A Ubel, Bryanna Moore, Ryan Nelson, Brent M Kious
{"title":"精神科医生如何看待护理患有极难治愈疾病的患者?","authors":"Natalie J Dorfman, Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby, Peter A Ubel, Bryanna Moore, Ryan Nelson, Brent M Kious","doi":"10.1080/21507740.2023.2225467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Questions about when to limit unhelpful treatments are often raised in general medicine but are less commonly considered in psychiatry. Here we describe a survey of U.S. psychiatrists intended to characterize their attitudes about the management of suicidal ideation in patients with severely treatment-refractory illness. Respondents (<i>n</i> = 212) received one of two cases describing a patient with suicidal ideation due to either borderline personality disorder or major depressive disorder. Both patients were described as receiving all guideline-based and plausible emerging treatments. Respondents rated the expected helpfulness and likelihood of recommending each of four types of intervention: hospitalization, additional medication changes, additional neurostimulation, and additional psychotherapy. Across both cases, most respondents said they were likely to provide each intervention, except for additional neurostimulation in borderline personality disorder, while fewer thought each intervention would be helpful. Substantial minorities of respondents indicated that they would provide an intervention they did not think was likely to be helpful. Our results suggest that while most psychiatrists recognize the possibility that some patients are unlikely to be helped by available treatments, many would continue to offer such treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":39022,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"51-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Do Psychiatrists Think About Caring for Patients Who Have Extremely Treatment-Refractory Illness?\",\"authors\":\"Natalie J Dorfman, Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby, Peter A Ubel, Bryanna Moore, Ryan Nelson, Brent M Kious\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21507740.2023.2225467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Questions about when to limit unhelpful treatments are often raised in general medicine but are less commonly considered in psychiatry. Here we describe a survey of U.S. psychiatrists intended to characterize their attitudes about the management of suicidal ideation in patients with severely treatment-refractory illness. Respondents (<i>n</i> = 212) received one of two cases describing a patient with suicidal ideation due to either borderline personality disorder or major depressive disorder. Both patients were described as receiving all guideline-based and plausible emerging treatments. Respondents rated the expected helpfulness and likelihood of recommending each of four types of intervention: hospitalization, additional medication changes, additional neurostimulation, and additional psychotherapy. Across both cases, most respondents said they were likely to provide each intervention, except for additional neurostimulation in borderline personality disorder, while fewer thought each intervention would be helpful. Substantial minorities of respondents indicated that they would provide an intervention they did not think was likely to be helpful. Our results suggest that while most psychiatrists recognize the possibility that some patients are unlikely to be helped by available treatments, many would continue to offer such treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJOB Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"51-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJOB Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2023.2225467\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Neuroscience\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2023.2225467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于何时限制无益治疗的问题经常在普通医学中提出,但在精神病学中却较少考虑。在此,我们描述了一项针对美国精神科医生的调查,旨在了解他们对严重难治性疾病患者自杀意念的处理态度。受访者(n = 212)收到了两个病例中的一个,描述了一名因边缘型人格障碍或重度抑郁障碍而有自杀意念的患者。根据描述,这两名患者都接受了所有基于指南的治疗和新出现的合理治疗。受访者对住院治疗、额外换药、额外神经刺激和额外心理治疗这四种干预方式的预期帮助性和推荐可能性进行了评分。在这两种情况下,大多数受访者都表示他们有可能提供每种干预措施,但对边缘型人格障碍的额外神经刺激除外,而认为每种干预措施都会有帮助的受访者则较少。相当少数的受访者表示,他们会提供他们认为不太可能有帮助的干预措施。我们的研究结果表明,虽然大多数精神科医生都认识到有些患者不太可能通过现有的治疗方法获得帮助,但许多医生仍会继续提供此类治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Do Psychiatrists Think About Caring for Patients Who Have Extremely Treatment-Refractory Illness?

Questions about when to limit unhelpful treatments are often raised in general medicine but are less commonly considered in psychiatry. Here we describe a survey of U.S. psychiatrists intended to characterize their attitudes about the management of suicidal ideation in patients with severely treatment-refractory illness. Respondents (n = 212) received one of two cases describing a patient with suicidal ideation due to either borderline personality disorder or major depressive disorder. Both patients were described as receiving all guideline-based and plausible emerging treatments. Respondents rated the expected helpfulness and likelihood of recommending each of four types of intervention: hospitalization, additional medication changes, additional neurostimulation, and additional psychotherapy. Across both cases, most respondents said they were likely to provide each intervention, except for additional neurostimulation in borderline personality disorder, while fewer thought each intervention would be helpful. Substantial minorities of respondents indicated that they would provide an intervention they did not think was likely to be helpful. Our results suggest that while most psychiatrists recognize the possibility that some patients are unlikely to be helped by available treatments, many would continue to offer such treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AJOB Neuroscience
AJOB Neuroscience Neuroscience-Neuroscience (all)
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Mental Health Conditions Between Neurodiversity and the Medical Model. Neurodiversity and the Neuro-Neutral State. "Lovedrugs" May Be a Moral Imperative. "Neuro-Neutrality & Mere-Difference". A Call for Authentic Love: Is That Truly What We Want?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1