从先前房间居住者那里获得生物体的风险:一项最新的系统综述。

IF 2.7 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Infection Disease & Health Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.idh.2023.06.001
Brett G. Mitchell , Julee McDonagh , Stephanie J. Dancer , Sindi Ford , Jenny Sim , Bismi Thottiyil Sultanmuhammed Abdul Khadar , Philip L. Russo , Jean-Yves Maillard , Helen Rawson , Katrina Browne , Martin Kiernan
{"title":"从先前房间居住者那里获得生物体的风险:一项最新的系统综述。","authors":"Brett G. Mitchell ,&nbsp;Julee McDonagh ,&nbsp;Stephanie J. Dancer ,&nbsp;Sindi Ford ,&nbsp;Jenny Sim ,&nbsp;Bismi Thottiyil Sultanmuhammed Abdul Khadar ,&nbsp;Philip L. Russo ,&nbsp;Jean-Yves Maillard ,&nbsp;Helen Rawson ,&nbsp;Katrina Browne ,&nbsp;Martin Kiernan","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2023.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Evidence from a previous systematic review indicates that patients admitted to a room where the previous occupant had a multidrug-resistant bacterial infection resulted in an increased risk of subsequent colonisation and infection with the same organism for the next room occupant. In this paper, we have sought to expand and update this review.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken. A search using Medline/PubMed, Cochrane and CINHAL databases was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed by the ROB-2 tool for randomised control studies and ROBIN-I for non-randomised studies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 5175 identified, 12 papers from 11 studies were included in the review for analysis. From 28,299 patients who were admitted into a room where the prior room occupant had any of the organisms of interest, 651 (2.3%) were shown to acquire the same species of organism. In contrast, 981,865 patients were admitted to a room where the prior occupant did not have an organism of interest, 3818 (0.39%) acquired an organism(s). The pooled acquisition odds ratio (OR) for all the organisms across all studies was 2.45 (95% CI: 1.53–3.93]. There was heterogeneity between the studies (I<sup>2</sup> 89%, P &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The pooled OR for all the pathogens in this latest review has increased since the original review. Findings from our review provide some evidence to help inform a risk management approach when determining patient room allocation. The risk of pathogen acquisition appears to remain high, supporting the need for continued investment in this area.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45006,"journal":{"name":"Infection Disease & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of organism acquisition from prior room occupants: An updated systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Brett G. Mitchell ,&nbsp;Julee McDonagh ,&nbsp;Stephanie J. Dancer ,&nbsp;Sindi Ford ,&nbsp;Jenny Sim ,&nbsp;Bismi Thottiyil Sultanmuhammed Abdul Khadar ,&nbsp;Philip L. Russo ,&nbsp;Jean-Yves Maillard ,&nbsp;Helen Rawson ,&nbsp;Katrina Browne ,&nbsp;Martin Kiernan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.idh.2023.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Evidence from a previous systematic review indicates that patients admitted to a room where the previous occupant had a multidrug-resistant bacterial infection resulted in an increased risk of subsequent colonisation and infection with the same organism for the next room occupant. In this paper, we have sought to expand and update this review.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken. A search using Medline/PubMed, Cochrane and CINHAL databases was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed by the ROB-2 tool for randomised control studies and ROBIN-I for non-randomised studies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 5175 identified, 12 papers from 11 studies were included in the review for analysis. From 28,299 patients who were admitted into a room where the prior room occupant had any of the organisms of interest, 651 (2.3%) were shown to acquire the same species of organism. In contrast, 981,865 patients were admitted to a room where the prior occupant did not have an organism of interest, 3818 (0.39%) acquired an organism(s). The pooled acquisition odds ratio (OR) for all the organisms across all studies was 2.45 (95% CI: 1.53–3.93]. There was heterogeneity between the studies (I<sup>2</sup> 89%, P &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The pooled OR for all the pathogens in this latest review has increased since the original review. Findings from our review provide some evidence to help inform a risk management approach when determining patient room allocation. The risk of pathogen acquisition appears to remain high, supporting the need for continued investment in this area.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection Disease & Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection Disease & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246804512300038X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Disease & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246804512300038X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:来自先前系统综述的证据表明,入住前一位入住者患有耐多药细菌感染的房间的患者会增加下一位入住患者随后定植和感染同一生物体的风险。在本文中,我们试图扩大和更新这篇综述。方法:进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。使用Medline/PubMed、Cochrane和CINHAL数据库进行搜索。随机对照研究采用ROB-2工具评估偏倚风险,非随机研究采用ROBIN-I工具评估偏激风险。结果:在5175篇已鉴定的论文中,11项研究的12篇论文被纳入综述进行分析。在28299名患者中,651名(2.3%)患者被证明获得了相同种类的生物体。相比之下,981865名患者被送入先前居住者没有感兴趣的生物体的房间,3818名(0.39%)患者获得了生物体。所有研究中所有生物体的合并获得优势比(OR)为2.45(95%CI:1.53-3.93])。研究之间存在异质性(I2 89%,P结论:自最初的审查以来,本次最新审查中所有病原体的合并OR都有所增加。我们的审查结果提供了一些证据,有助于在确定病房分配时为风险管理方法提供信息。病原体获得的风险似乎仍然很高,支持在该领域继续投资的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk of organism acquisition from prior room occupants: An updated systematic review

Background

Evidence from a previous systematic review indicates that patients admitted to a room where the previous occupant had a multidrug-resistant bacterial infection resulted in an increased risk of subsequent colonisation and infection with the same organism for the next room occupant. In this paper, we have sought to expand and update this review.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken. A search using Medline/PubMed, Cochrane and CINHAL databases was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed by the ROB-2 tool for randomised control studies and ROBIN-I for non-randomised studies.

Results

From 5175 identified, 12 papers from 11 studies were included in the review for analysis. From 28,299 patients who were admitted into a room where the prior room occupant had any of the organisms of interest, 651 (2.3%) were shown to acquire the same species of organism. In contrast, 981,865 patients were admitted to a room where the prior occupant did not have an organism of interest, 3818 (0.39%) acquired an organism(s). The pooled acquisition odds ratio (OR) for all the organisms across all studies was 2.45 (95% CI: 1.53–3.93]. There was heterogeneity between the studies (I2 89%, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The pooled OR for all the pathogens in this latest review has increased since the original review. Findings from our review provide some evidence to help inform a risk management approach when determining patient room allocation. The risk of pathogen acquisition appears to remain high, supporting the need for continued investment in this area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infection Disease & Health
Infection Disease & Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The journal aims to be a platform for the publication and dissemination of knowledge in the area of infection and disease causing infection in humans. The journal is quarterly and publishes research, reviews, concise communications, commentary and other articles concerned with infection and disease affecting the health of an individual, organisation or population. The original and important articles in the journal investigate, report or discuss infection prevention and control; clinical, social, epidemiological or public health aspects of infectious disease; policy and planning for the control of infections; zoonoses; and vaccination related to disease in human health. Infection, Disease & Health provides a platform for the publication and dissemination of original knowledge at the nexus of the areas infection, Disease and health in a One Health context. One Health recognizes that the health of people is connected to the health of animals and the environment. One Health encourages and advances the collaborative efforts of multiple disciplines-working locally, nationally, and globally-to achieve the best health for people, animals, and our environment. This approach is fundamental because 6 out of every 10 infectious diseases in humans are zoonotic, or spread from animals. We would be expected to report or discuss infection prevention and control; clinical, social, epidemiological or public health aspects of infectious disease; policy and planning for the control of infections; zoonosis; and vaccination related to disease in human health. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in this ever-changing field. The audience of the journal includes researchers, clinicians, health workers and public policy professionals concerned with infection, disease and health.
期刊最新文献
Mapping Australia's COVID-19 quarantine cohort journeys Reducing candidaemia risk in urology patients: Revised algorithm & Pharmacist-Led Implementation Designing for transparency and trust: Next steps for healthcare associated infection surveillance in Queensland The experience of infection prevention and control nurse (IPCN) in conducting post-discharge surveillance (PDS) of surgical site infections (SSI): A qualitative study From basic research to clinical practice: The impact of laminar airflow filters on surgical site infection in vascular surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1