用“培训培训者”的协作模式本土化系统审查。

IF 1 Q3 NURSING Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2023-12-07 Epub Date: 2023-08-24 DOI:10.7748/nr.2023.e1882
Preethy D'Souza, Baby Nayak, Bhumika Tv, Kelly Dickson, Sandy Oliver
{"title":"用“培训培训者”的协作模式本土化系统审查。","authors":"Preethy D'Souza, Baby Nayak, Bhumika Tv, Kelly Dickson, Sandy Oliver","doi":"10.7748/nr.2023.e1882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Developing a workforce with the skills to produce and make judicious use of evidence for policy and practice decisions requires trainers who can tailor evidence and training to policy and practice priorities.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe how a collaborative learning model adapted a systematic review course to suit Indian nurse educators and research scholars in the conduct and use of systematic reviews.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A collaborative learning team of academics and research scholars brought together expertise in nursing education in India, and evidence synthesis in India and the UK. Participants found the course was highly beneficial, enhanced independent and critical thinking, and instilled them with the confidence and skills to deliver such courses to Indian researchers, nurses and other healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Contextualising materials and methods to participants' experiences made learning more relatable. The use of adult learning approaches enabled participants to apply the same approaches when leading training in their own institutions and underpinned long-term sustainable working relationships between facilitators and learners, leading to new studies and new resources to support evidence-informed decision-making.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>An educational intervention on 'indigenising systematic reviews' with online collaborative learning can produce improvements in the knowledge and skills of participants. Advantages of this educational approach include its flexibility, active involvement of participants and sustainable partnership building. The principles and methods used could be replicated in any setting to train trainers.</p>","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indigenising systematic reviews with a collaborative model of 'training the trainers'.\",\"authors\":\"Preethy D'Souza, Baby Nayak, Bhumika Tv, Kelly Dickson, Sandy Oliver\",\"doi\":\"10.7748/nr.2023.e1882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Developing a workforce with the skills to produce and make judicious use of evidence for policy and practice decisions requires trainers who can tailor evidence and training to policy and practice priorities.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe how a collaborative learning model adapted a systematic review course to suit Indian nurse educators and research scholars in the conduct and use of systematic reviews.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A collaborative learning team of academics and research scholars brought together expertise in nursing education in India, and evidence synthesis in India and the UK. Participants found the course was highly beneficial, enhanced independent and critical thinking, and instilled them with the confidence and skills to deliver such courses to Indian researchers, nurses and other healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Contextualising materials and methods to participants' experiences made learning more relatable. The use of adult learning approaches enabled participants to apply the same approaches when leading training in their own institutions and underpinned long-term sustainable working relationships between facilitators and learners, leading to new studies and new resources to support evidence-informed decision-making.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>An educational intervention on 'indigenising systematic reviews' with online collaborative learning can produce improvements in the knowledge and skills of participants. Advantages of this educational approach include its flexibility, active involvement of participants and sustainable partnership building. The principles and methods used could be replicated in any setting to train trainers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Researcher\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Researcher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2023.e1882\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Researcher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2023.e1882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:培养一支具有为政策和实践决策提供和明智地使用证据技能的劳动力队伍,需要能够根据政策和实践重点调整证据和培训的培训人员。目的:描述协作学习模式如何适应系统回顾课程,以适应印度护士教育工作者和研究学者进行和使用系统回顾。讨论:一个由学者和研究学者组成的协作学习小组汇集了印度护理教育方面的专业知识,以及印度和英国的证据综合。与会者发现,该课程非常有益,增强了独立和批判性思维,并使他们有信心和技能向印度研究人员、护士和其他保健专业人员提供此类课程。结论:将材料和方法与参与者的经历相结合,使学习更具相关性。使用成人学习方法使参与者能够在自己的机构中采用相同的方法进行培训,并巩固了促进者和学习者之间长期可持续的工作关系,从而导致新的研究和新的资源,以支持循证决策。对实践的启示:通过在线协作学习对“本土化系统评价”进行教育干预可以提高参与者的知识和技能。这种教育方法的优点包括灵活性、参与者的积极参与和可持续伙伴关系的建立。所使用的原则和方法可以在任何环境中复制,以培训教员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Indigenising systematic reviews with a collaborative model of 'training the trainers'.

Background: Developing a workforce with the skills to produce and make judicious use of evidence for policy and practice decisions requires trainers who can tailor evidence and training to policy and practice priorities.

Aim: To describe how a collaborative learning model adapted a systematic review course to suit Indian nurse educators and research scholars in the conduct and use of systematic reviews.

Discussion: A collaborative learning team of academics and research scholars brought together expertise in nursing education in India, and evidence synthesis in India and the UK. Participants found the course was highly beneficial, enhanced independent and critical thinking, and instilled them with the confidence and skills to deliver such courses to Indian researchers, nurses and other healthcare professionals.

Conclusion: Contextualising materials and methods to participants' experiences made learning more relatable. The use of adult learning approaches enabled participants to apply the same approaches when leading training in their own institutions and underpinned long-term sustainable working relationships between facilitators and learners, leading to new studies and new resources to support evidence-informed decision-making.

Implications for practice: An educational intervention on 'indigenising systematic reviews' with online collaborative learning can produce improvements in the knowledge and skills of participants. Advantages of this educational approach include its flexibility, active involvement of participants and sustainable partnership building. The principles and methods used could be replicated in any setting to train trainers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Researcher
Nurse Researcher NURSING-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Additionally, the website provides a range of Internet links to the latest research news, conference information, jobs and grants, and other resources. We hope that this site becomes an invaluable interactive resource for both novice and experienced researchers. If you have any comments or suggestions to improve the site, or details of additional websites that could be usefully added, please let us know. We very much welcome your ideas so that we can provide the kind of online resource that will best help you to develop your research.
期刊最新文献
Theoretical sensitivity and reflexivity in grounded theory. The methodological challenges faced when conducting hydration research in UK care homes. Reflections on being an insider researcher: a study exploring the experiences of men accessing rural mental health services. A reflection on the use of virtual nominal group technique in health policy and research priority consensus studies. A worked example of contextualising and using reflexive thematic analysis in nursing research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1