在围绕人类生殖细胞基因编辑的社会对话中,“如果”应该先于“是否”和“如何”。

IF 1.5 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY Journal of Community Genetics Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s12687-023-00652-0
Diewertje Houtman, Wendy Geuverink, Isabel Rosalie Arianne Retel Helmrich, Boy Vijlbrief, Martina Cornel, Sam Riedijk
{"title":"在围绕人类生殖细胞基因编辑的社会对话中,“如果”应该先于“是否”和“如何”。","authors":"Diewertje Houtman,&nbsp;Wendy Geuverink,&nbsp;Isabel Rosalie Arianne Retel Helmrich,&nbsp;Boy Vijlbrief,&nbsp;Martina Cornel,&nbsp;Sam Riedijk","doi":"10.1007/s12687-023-00652-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the potential large ethical and societal implications of human germline gene editing (HGGE) the urgent need for public and stakeholder engagement (PSE) has been repeatedly expressed. In this short communication, we aim to provide directions for broad and inclusive PSE by emphasizing the importance of futures literacy, which is a skill to imagine diverse and multiple futures and to use these as lenses to look at the present anew. By first addressing \"what if\" questions in PSE, different futures come into focus and limitations that arise when starting with the \"whether\" or \"how\" questions about HGGE can be avoided. Futures literacy can also aid in the goal of societal alignment, as \"what if\" questions can be answered in many different ways, thereby opening up the conversation to explore a multitude of values and needs of various publics. Broad and inclusive PSE on HGGE starts with asking the right questions.</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10444910/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"What if\\\" should precede \\\"whether\\\" and \\\"how\\\" in the social conversation around human germline gene editing.\",\"authors\":\"Diewertje Houtman,&nbsp;Wendy Geuverink,&nbsp;Isabel Rosalie Arianne Retel Helmrich,&nbsp;Boy Vijlbrief,&nbsp;Martina Cornel,&nbsp;Sam Riedijk\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12687-023-00652-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Given the potential large ethical and societal implications of human germline gene editing (HGGE) the urgent need for public and stakeholder engagement (PSE) has been repeatedly expressed. In this short communication, we aim to provide directions for broad and inclusive PSE by emphasizing the importance of futures literacy, which is a skill to imagine diverse and multiple futures and to use these as lenses to look at the present anew. By first addressing \\\"what if\\\" questions in PSE, different futures come into focus and limitations that arise when starting with the \\\"whether\\\" or \\\"how\\\" questions about HGGE can be avoided. Futures literacy can also aid in the goal of societal alignment, as \\\"what if\\\" questions can be answered in many different ways, thereby opening up the conversation to explore a multitude of values and needs of various publics. Broad and inclusive PSE on HGGE starts with asking the right questions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Community Genetics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10444910/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Community Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-023-00652-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-023-00652-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

鉴于人类生殖系基因编辑(HGGE)潜在的巨大伦理和社会影响,公众和利益相关者参与(PSE)的迫切需要已被反复表达。在这个简短的交流中,我们的目标是通过强调未来素养的重要性,为广泛和包容性的PSE提供方向,这是一种想象多样化和多重未来的技能,并将这些作为重新审视现在的镜头。通过首先解决PSE中的“如果”问题,不同的未来将成为焦点,并且可以避免从关于HGGE的“是否”或“如何”问题开始时出现的限制。未来素养还可以帮助实现社会统一的目标,因为“如果”问题可以用许多不同的方式回答,从而开启对话,探索各种公众的多种价值观和需求。对HGGE进行广泛而包容的PSE首先要提出正确的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"What if" should precede "whether" and "how" in the social conversation around human germline gene editing.

Given the potential large ethical and societal implications of human germline gene editing (HGGE) the urgent need for public and stakeholder engagement (PSE) has been repeatedly expressed. In this short communication, we aim to provide directions for broad and inclusive PSE by emphasizing the importance of futures literacy, which is a skill to imagine diverse and multiple futures and to use these as lenses to look at the present anew. By first addressing "what if" questions in PSE, different futures come into focus and limitations that arise when starting with the "whether" or "how" questions about HGGE can be avoided. Futures literacy can also aid in the goal of societal alignment, as "what if" questions can be answered in many different ways, thereby opening up the conversation to explore a multitude of values and needs of various publics. Broad and inclusive PSE on HGGE starts with asking the right questions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Community Genetics
Journal of Community Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Genetics is an international forum for research in the ever-expanding field of community genetics, the art and science of applying medical genetics to human communities for the benefit of their individuals. Community genetics comprises all activities which identify persons at increased genetic risk and has an interest in assessing this risk, in order to enable those at risk to make informed decisions. Community genetics services thus encompass such activities as genetic screening, registration of genetic conditions in the population, routine preconceptional and prenatal genetic consultations, public education on genetic issues, and public debate on related ethical issues. The Journal of Community Genetics has a multidisciplinary scope. It covers medical genetics, epidemiology, genetics in primary care, public health aspects of genetics, and ethical, legal, social and economic issues. Its intention is to serve as a forum for community genetics worldwide, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries. The journal features original research papers, reviews, short communications, program reports, news, and correspondence. Program reports describe illustrative projects in the field of community genetics, e.g., design and progress of an educational program or the protocol and achievement of a gene bank. Case reports describing individual patients are not accepted.
期刊最新文献
The mentee report: outcomes from implementing a mentorship program for international genetic counseling applicants. Raising awareness and education of genetic testing and counseling through fotonovelas among Latina women at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. From stigma to increased social acceptance? Living with Machado-Joseph disease in São Miguel, Azores, Portugal. Deciphering the needs of patients with hereditary breast and ovarian Cancer in the Process of Genetic Counseling to Inform the Development of a Mobile Support App: a qualitative study in Germany. The importance of geographic and sociodemographic aspects in the characterization of mucopolysaccharidoses: a case series from Ceará state (Northeast Brazil).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1