调查基因组医学实践和认知在澳大利亚非遗传学医生告知教育和实施。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY NPJ Genomic Medicine Pub Date : 2023-06-24 DOI:10.1038/s41525-023-00360-1
Amy Nisselle, Emily King, Bronwyn Terrill, Belinda Davey, Belinda McClaren, Kate Dunlop, Debra Graves, Sylvia Metcalfe, Clara Gaff
{"title":"调查基因组医学实践和认知在澳大利亚非遗传学医生告知教育和实施。","authors":"Amy Nisselle,&nbsp;Emily King,&nbsp;Bronwyn Terrill,&nbsp;Belinda Davey,&nbsp;Belinda McClaren,&nbsp;Kate Dunlop,&nbsp;Debra Graves,&nbsp;Sylvia Metcalfe,&nbsp;Clara Gaff","doi":"10.1038/s41525-023-00360-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genomic medicine is being implemented on a global scale, requiring a genomic-competent health workforce. To inform education as part of implementation strategies to optimize adoption of genomics by non-genetics physicians, we investigated current practices, perceptions and preferences relating to genomic testing and education. Australian non-genetics physicians completed an online survey; we conducted univariate and multivariate analyses of determinants of confidence and engagement with genomic medicine. Confident or engaged respondents were more likely to be pediatricians, have completed continuing genomics education (CGE) and/or have genomics research experience. Confident or engaged respondents were also more likely to prefer to request genomic testing with support from genetics services than other models. Respondents who had completed CGE and were engaged reported higher confidence than those who were not engaged. We propose a progression of genomic competence aligned with service delivery models, where education is one enabler of mastery or independence to facilitate genomic tests (from referral to requesting with or without clinical genetics support). Workplace learning could provide additional impetus for adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":19273,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Genomic Medicine","volume":"8 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10290687/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating genomic medicine practice and perceptions amongst Australian non-genetics physicians to inform education and implementation.\",\"authors\":\"Amy Nisselle,&nbsp;Emily King,&nbsp;Bronwyn Terrill,&nbsp;Belinda Davey,&nbsp;Belinda McClaren,&nbsp;Kate Dunlop,&nbsp;Debra Graves,&nbsp;Sylvia Metcalfe,&nbsp;Clara Gaff\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41525-023-00360-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Genomic medicine is being implemented on a global scale, requiring a genomic-competent health workforce. To inform education as part of implementation strategies to optimize adoption of genomics by non-genetics physicians, we investigated current practices, perceptions and preferences relating to genomic testing and education. Australian non-genetics physicians completed an online survey; we conducted univariate and multivariate analyses of determinants of confidence and engagement with genomic medicine. Confident or engaged respondents were more likely to be pediatricians, have completed continuing genomics education (CGE) and/or have genomics research experience. Confident or engaged respondents were also more likely to prefer to request genomic testing with support from genetics services than other models. Respondents who had completed CGE and were engaged reported higher confidence than those who were not engaged. We propose a progression of genomic competence aligned with service delivery models, where education is one enabler of mastery or independence to facilitate genomic tests (from referral to requesting with or without clinical genetics support). Workplace learning could provide additional impetus for adoption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Genomic Medicine\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10290687/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Genomic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41525-023-00360-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Genomic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41525-023-00360-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

基因组医学正在全球范围内实施,需要具备基因组能力的卫生工作人员。为了将教育作为实施策略的一部分,以优化非遗传学医生对基因组学的采用,我们调查了目前与基因组检测和教育相关的实践、观念和偏好。澳大利亚非遗传学医生完成了一项在线调查;我们对基因组医学的信心和参与的决定因素进行了单变量和多变量分析。自信或积极参与的受访者更有可能是儿科医生,完成了继续基因组学教育(CGE)和/或有基因组学研究经验。与其他模式相比,自信或敬业的受访者更倾向于在遗传学服务的支持下要求基因组检测。完成了CGE并参与其中的受访者比那些没有参与的受访者更有信心。我们建议基因组能力的发展与服务提供模式相一致,其中教育是掌握或独立促进基因组测试的一个促成因素(从转诊到请求有或没有临床遗传学支持)。工作场所的学习可以为采用提供额外的动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating genomic medicine practice and perceptions amongst Australian non-genetics physicians to inform education and implementation.

Genomic medicine is being implemented on a global scale, requiring a genomic-competent health workforce. To inform education as part of implementation strategies to optimize adoption of genomics by non-genetics physicians, we investigated current practices, perceptions and preferences relating to genomic testing and education. Australian non-genetics physicians completed an online survey; we conducted univariate and multivariate analyses of determinants of confidence and engagement with genomic medicine. Confident or engaged respondents were more likely to be pediatricians, have completed continuing genomics education (CGE) and/or have genomics research experience. Confident or engaged respondents were also more likely to prefer to request genomic testing with support from genetics services than other models. Respondents who had completed CGE and were engaged reported higher confidence than those who were not engaged. We propose a progression of genomic competence aligned with service delivery models, where education is one enabler of mastery or independence to facilitate genomic tests (from referral to requesting with or without clinical genetics support). Workplace learning could provide additional impetus for adoption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Genomic Medicine
NPJ Genomic Medicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
67
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Genomic Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing the most important scientific advances in all aspects of genomics and its application in the practice of medicine. The journal defines genomic medicine as "diagnosis, prognosis, prevention and/or treatment of disease and disorders of the mind and body, using approaches informed or enabled by knowledge of the genome and the molecules it encodes." Relevant and high-impact papers that encompass studies of individuals, families, or populations are considered for publication. An emphasis will include coupling detailed phenotype and genome sequencing information, both enabled by new technologies and informatics, to delineate the underlying aetiology of disease. Clinical recommendations and/or guidelines of how that data should be used in the clinical management of those patients in the study, and others, are also encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Common protein-altering variant in GFAP is associated with white matter lesions in the older Japanese population. Benchmarking nanopore sequencing and rapid genomics feasibility: validation at a quaternary hospital in New Zealand. Coding and non-coding variants in the ciliopathy gene CFAP410 cause early-onset non-syndromic retinal degeneration. Biallelic loss-of-function variants in GON4L cause microcephaly and brain structure abnormalities. Genomic variations associated with risk and protection against vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in pediatric cancer patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1