{"title":"中轴性脊柱性关节炎的靶向治疗是进行还是不进行?","authors":"Casper Webers, Marin Been, Astrid van Tubergen","doi":"10.1097/BOR.0000000000000941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>For almost a decade, treat-to-target (T2T) has been advocated as a management strategy for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), despite a lack of trial evidence. Recently, the first and only published T2T trial in axSpA did not meet its primary endpoint. The purpose of this review is to discuss whether we should continue with a T2T approach in axSpA and to describe some experiences with T2T in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The trial showed no superiority of T2T compared with usual care; however, several secondary trial outcomes and the health economic analysis actually favoured T2T, and there are conceivable reasons for the negative trial results. Furthermore, several knowledge gaps related to an optimal T2T approach in axSpA were identified. In clinical practice, a T2T approach was applied to only a limited extent, possibly because of several challenges.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Despite one negative trial, it is too early to abandon T2T in axSpA. Not only more evidence from clinical trials but also research on the optimal target and management of all facets of axSpA, are highly needed. For successful implementation of T2T in clinical practice, it is important that barriers and facilitators to application are identified and subsequently addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11145,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in rheumatology","volume":"35 4","pages":"243-248"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241428/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Go or no-go for treat-to-target in axial spondyloarthritis?\",\"authors\":\"Casper Webers, Marin Been, Astrid van Tubergen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BOR.0000000000000941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>For almost a decade, treat-to-target (T2T) has been advocated as a management strategy for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), despite a lack of trial evidence. Recently, the first and only published T2T trial in axSpA did not meet its primary endpoint. The purpose of this review is to discuss whether we should continue with a T2T approach in axSpA and to describe some experiences with T2T in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The trial showed no superiority of T2T compared with usual care; however, several secondary trial outcomes and the health economic analysis actually favoured T2T, and there are conceivable reasons for the negative trial results. Furthermore, several knowledge gaps related to an optimal T2T approach in axSpA were identified. In clinical practice, a T2T approach was applied to only a limited extent, possibly because of several challenges.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Despite one negative trial, it is too early to abandon T2T in axSpA. Not only more evidence from clinical trials but also research on the optimal target and management of all facets of axSpA, are highly needed. For successful implementation of T2T in clinical practice, it is important that barriers and facilitators to application are identified and subsequently addressed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current opinion in rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"243-248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241428/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current opinion in rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOR.0000000000000941\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOR.0000000000000941","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Go or no-go for treat-to-target in axial spondyloarthritis?
Purpose of review: For almost a decade, treat-to-target (T2T) has been advocated as a management strategy for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), despite a lack of trial evidence. Recently, the first and only published T2T trial in axSpA did not meet its primary endpoint. The purpose of this review is to discuss whether we should continue with a T2T approach in axSpA and to describe some experiences with T2T in clinical practice.
Recent findings: The trial showed no superiority of T2T compared with usual care; however, several secondary trial outcomes and the health economic analysis actually favoured T2T, and there are conceivable reasons for the negative trial results. Furthermore, several knowledge gaps related to an optimal T2T approach in axSpA were identified. In clinical practice, a T2T approach was applied to only a limited extent, possibly because of several challenges.
Summary: Despite one negative trial, it is too early to abandon T2T in axSpA. Not only more evidence from clinical trials but also research on the optimal target and management of all facets of axSpA, are highly needed. For successful implementation of T2T in clinical practice, it is important that barriers and facilitators to application are identified and subsequently addressed.
期刊介绍:
A high impact review journal which boasts an international readership, Current Opinion in Rheumatology offers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and exciting developments within the field of rheumatology. Published bimonthly, each issue features insightful editorials and high quality invited reviews covering two or three key disciplines which include vasculitis syndromes, medical physiology and rheumatic diseases, crystal deposition diseases and rheumatoid arthritis. Each discipline introduces world renowned guest editors to ensure the journal is at the forefront of knowledge development and delivers balanced, expert assessments of advances from the previous year.