中轴性脊柱性关节炎的靶向治疗是进行还是不进行?

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Current opinion in rheumatology Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1097/BOR.0000000000000941
Casper Webers, Marin Been, Astrid van Tubergen
{"title":"中轴性脊柱性关节炎的靶向治疗是进行还是不进行?","authors":"Casper Webers,&nbsp;Marin Been,&nbsp;Astrid van Tubergen","doi":"10.1097/BOR.0000000000000941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>For almost a decade, treat-to-target (T2T) has been advocated as a management strategy for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), despite a lack of trial evidence. Recently, the first and only published T2T trial in axSpA did not meet its primary endpoint. The purpose of this review is to discuss whether we should continue with a T2T approach in axSpA and to describe some experiences with T2T in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The trial showed no superiority of T2T compared with usual care; however, several secondary trial outcomes and the health economic analysis actually favoured T2T, and there are conceivable reasons for the negative trial results. Furthermore, several knowledge gaps related to an optimal T2T approach in axSpA were identified. In clinical practice, a T2T approach was applied to only a limited extent, possibly because of several challenges.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Despite one negative trial, it is too early to abandon T2T in axSpA. Not only more evidence from clinical trials but also research on the optimal target and management of all facets of axSpA, are highly needed. For successful implementation of T2T in clinical practice, it is important that barriers and facilitators to application are identified and subsequently addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11145,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241428/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Go or no-go for treat-to-target in axial spondyloarthritis?\",\"authors\":\"Casper Webers,&nbsp;Marin Been,&nbsp;Astrid van Tubergen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BOR.0000000000000941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>For almost a decade, treat-to-target (T2T) has been advocated as a management strategy for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), despite a lack of trial evidence. Recently, the first and only published T2T trial in axSpA did not meet its primary endpoint. The purpose of this review is to discuss whether we should continue with a T2T approach in axSpA and to describe some experiences with T2T in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The trial showed no superiority of T2T compared with usual care; however, several secondary trial outcomes and the health economic analysis actually favoured T2T, and there are conceivable reasons for the negative trial results. Furthermore, several knowledge gaps related to an optimal T2T approach in axSpA were identified. In clinical practice, a T2T approach was applied to only a limited extent, possibly because of several challenges.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Despite one negative trial, it is too early to abandon T2T in axSpA. Not only more evidence from clinical trials but also research on the optimal target and management of all facets of axSpA, are highly needed. For successful implementation of T2T in clinical practice, it is important that barriers and facilitators to application are identified and subsequently addressed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current opinion in rheumatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241428/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current opinion in rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOR.0000000000000941\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOR.0000000000000941","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

回顾目的:近十年来,尽管缺乏试验证据,治疗-靶向治疗(T2T)一直被提倡作为轴性脊柱炎(axSpA)的治疗策略。最近,第一个也是唯一一个在axSpA发表的T2T试验没有达到其主要终点。本综述的目的是讨论我们是否应该在axSpA中继续使用T2T方法,并描述T2T在临床实践中的一些经验。最近的发现:该试验显示T2T与常规治疗相比没有优势;然而,几个次要试验结果和卫生经济分析实际上有利于T2T,并且可以想象试验结果为阴性的原因。此外,还确定了axSpA中与最佳T2T方法相关的几个知识缺口。在临床实践中,T2T入路的应用范围有限,可能是因为存在一些挑战。总结:尽管有一项阴性试验,但在axSpA中放弃T2T还为时过早。不仅需要更多的临床试验证据,而且还需要对axSpA各方面的最佳靶点和管理进行研究。为了在临床实践中成功实施T2T,重要的是确定并随后解决应用的障碍和促进因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Go or no-go for treat-to-target in axial spondyloarthritis?

Purpose of review: For almost a decade, treat-to-target (T2T) has been advocated as a management strategy for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), despite a lack of trial evidence. Recently, the first and only published T2T trial in axSpA did not meet its primary endpoint. The purpose of this review is to discuss whether we should continue with a T2T approach in axSpA and to describe some experiences with T2T in clinical practice.

Recent findings: The trial showed no superiority of T2T compared with usual care; however, several secondary trial outcomes and the health economic analysis actually favoured T2T, and there are conceivable reasons for the negative trial results. Furthermore, several knowledge gaps related to an optimal T2T approach in axSpA were identified. In clinical practice, a T2T approach was applied to only a limited extent, possibly because of several challenges.

Summary: Despite one negative trial, it is too early to abandon T2T in axSpA. Not only more evidence from clinical trials but also research on the optimal target and management of all facets of axSpA, are highly needed. For successful implementation of T2T in clinical practice, it is important that barriers and facilitators to application are identified and subsequently addressed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current opinion in rheumatology
Current opinion in rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: A high impact review journal which boasts an international readership, Current Opinion in Rheumatology offers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and exciting developments within the field of rheumatology. Published bimonthly, each issue features insightful editorials and high quality invited reviews covering two or three key disciplines which include vasculitis syndromes, medical physiology and rheumatic diseases, crystal deposition diseases and rheumatoid arthritis. Each discipline introduces world renowned guest editors to ensure the journal is at the forefront of knowledge development and delivers balanced, expert assessments of advances from the previous year.
期刊最新文献
Juvenile Behçet syndrome: a contemporary view and differential diagnosis in pediatric practice. The role of neutrophil extracellular traps in inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Calcinosis in systemic sclerosis. Updates in the care and management of children and adolescents with systemic lupus erythematosus. Renal disease in pediatric rheumatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1