锁骨下动脉放射后狭窄的经皮腔内血管成形术和支架植入术:匹配病例对照研究

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.neurad.2023.06.004
Chun-Chao Huang , Hsin-Fan Chiang , Cheng‑Chih Hsieh , Hui-Chen Lin , Chia-Hung Wu , Te-Ming Lin , Jung-Hsuan Chen , Chao-Bao Luo , Feng-Chi Chang
{"title":"锁骨下动脉放射后狭窄的经皮腔内血管成形术和支架植入术:匹配病例对照研究","authors":"Chun-Chao Huang ,&nbsp;Hsin-Fan Chiang ,&nbsp;Cheng‑Chih Hsieh ,&nbsp;Hui-Chen Lin ,&nbsp;Chia-Hung Wu ,&nbsp;Te-Ming Lin ,&nbsp;Jung-Hsuan Chen ,&nbsp;Chao-Bao Luo ,&nbsp;Feng-Chi Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.neurad.2023.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Although radiotherapy is common for head/neck and chest cancers (HNCC), it can result in post-irradiation stenosis of the subclavian artery (PISSA). The efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) to treat severe PISSA is not well-clarified.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To compare the technical safety and outcomes of PTAS between patients with severe PISSA (RT group) and radiation-naïve counterparts (non-RT group).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>During 2000 and 2021, we retrospectively enrolled patients with severe symptomatic stenosis (&gt;60%) of the subclavian artery who underwent PTAS. The rate of new recent vertebrobasilar ischaemic lesions (NRVBIL), diagnosed on diffusion-weight imaging (DWI) within 24 h of postprocedural brain MRI; symptom relief; and long-term stent patency were compared between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Technical success was achieved in all 61 patients in the two groups. Compared with the non-RT group (44 cases, 44 lesions), the RT group (17 cases, 18 lesions) had longer stenoses (22.1 vs 11.1 mm, <em>P</em> = 0.003), more ulcerative plaques (38.9% vs 9.1%, <em>P</em> = 0.010), and more medial- or distal-segment stenoses (44.4% vs 9.1%, <em>P</em>&lt;0.001). The technical safety and outcome between the non-RT group and the RT group were NRVBIL on DWI of periprocedural brain MRI 30.0% vs 23.1%, <em>P</em> = 0.727; symptom recurrence rate (mean follow-up 67.1 ± 50.0 months) 2.3% vs 11.8%, <em>P</em> = 0.185; and significant in-stent restenosis rate (&gt;50%) 2.3% vs 11.1%, <em>P</em> = 0.200.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The technical safety and outcome of PTAS for PISSA were not inferior to those of radiation-naïve counterparts. PTAS for PISSA is an effective treatment for medically refractory ischaemic symptoms of HNCC patients with PISSA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroradiology","volume":"51 1","pages":"Pages 66-73"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of post-irradiated stenosis of subclavian artery: A matched case-control study\",\"authors\":\"Chun-Chao Huang ,&nbsp;Hsin-Fan Chiang ,&nbsp;Cheng‑Chih Hsieh ,&nbsp;Hui-Chen Lin ,&nbsp;Chia-Hung Wu ,&nbsp;Te-Ming Lin ,&nbsp;Jung-Hsuan Chen ,&nbsp;Chao-Bao Luo ,&nbsp;Feng-Chi Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neurad.2023.06.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Although radiotherapy is common for head/neck and chest cancers (HNCC), it can result in post-irradiation stenosis of the subclavian artery (PISSA). The efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) to treat severe PISSA is not well-clarified.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To compare the technical safety and outcomes of PTAS between patients with severe PISSA (RT group) and radiation-naïve counterparts (non-RT group).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>During 2000 and 2021, we retrospectively enrolled patients with severe symptomatic stenosis (&gt;60%) of the subclavian artery who underwent PTAS. The rate of new recent vertebrobasilar ischaemic lesions (NRVBIL), diagnosed on diffusion-weight imaging (DWI) within 24 h of postprocedural brain MRI; symptom relief; and long-term stent patency were compared between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Technical success was achieved in all 61 patients in the two groups. Compared with the non-RT group (44 cases, 44 lesions), the RT group (17 cases, 18 lesions) had longer stenoses (22.1 vs 11.1 mm, <em>P</em> = 0.003), more ulcerative plaques (38.9% vs 9.1%, <em>P</em> = 0.010), and more medial- or distal-segment stenoses (44.4% vs 9.1%, <em>P</em>&lt;0.001). The technical safety and outcome between the non-RT group and the RT group were NRVBIL on DWI of periprocedural brain MRI 30.0% vs 23.1%, <em>P</em> = 0.727; symptom recurrence rate (mean follow-up 67.1 ± 50.0 months) 2.3% vs 11.8%, <em>P</em> = 0.185; and significant in-stent restenosis rate (&gt;50%) 2.3% vs 11.1%, <em>P</em> = 0.200.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The technical safety and outcome of PTAS for PISSA were not inferior to those of radiation-naïve counterparts. PTAS for PISSA is an effective treatment for medically refractory ischaemic symptoms of HNCC patients with PISSA.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 66-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0150986123002195\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0150986123002195","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景虽然放疗是头颈部和胸部癌症(HNCC)的常见治疗方法,但放疗可能导致锁骨下动脉放疗后狭窄(PISSA)。目的 比较重度 PISSA 患者(RT 组)和放射治疗无效患者(非 RT 组)PTAS 的技术安全性和疗效。方法 2000 年至 2021 年期间,我们回顾性地纳入了接受 PTAS 的锁骨下动脉重度无症状狭窄(60%)患者。比较了两组患者术后 24 小时内脑核磁共振弥散加权成像(DWI)诊断的新近椎基底动脉缺血性病变(NRVBIL)发生率、症状缓解率和支架长期通畅率。与非 RT 组(44 例,44 个病灶)相比,RT 组(17 例,18 个病灶)的血管狭窄时间更长(22.1 mm vs 11.1 mm,P = 0.003),溃疡性斑块更多(38.9% vs 9.1%,P = 0.010),内侧或远端血管狭窄更多(44.4% vs 9.1%,P<0.001)。非 RT 组与 RT 组的技术安全性和结果分别为:围手术期脑 MRI DWI 上的 NRVBIL 为 30.0% vs 23.1%,P = 0.727;症状复发率(平均随访 67.1 ± 50.0 个月)为 2.结论PISSA的PTAS的技术安全性和结果并不逊色于未接受放射治疗的同行。PISSA的PTAS是治疗HNCC患者PISSA药物难治性缺血症状的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of post-irradiated stenosis of subclavian artery: A matched case-control study

Background

Although radiotherapy is common for head/neck and chest cancers (HNCC), it can result in post-irradiation stenosis of the subclavian artery (PISSA). The efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) to treat severe PISSA is not well-clarified.

Aims

To compare the technical safety and outcomes of PTAS between patients with severe PISSA (RT group) and radiation-naïve counterparts (non-RT group).

Methods

During 2000 and 2021, we retrospectively enrolled patients with severe symptomatic stenosis (>60%) of the subclavian artery who underwent PTAS. The rate of new recent vertebrobasilar ischaemic lesions (NRVBIL), diagnosed on diffusion-weight imaging (DWI) within 24 h of postprocedural brain MRI; symptom relief; and long-term stent patency were compared between the two groups.

Results

Technical success was achieved in all 61 patients in the two groups. Compared with the non-RT group (44 cases, 44 lesions), the RT group (17 cases, 18 lesions) had longer stenoses (22.1 vs 11.1 mm, P = 0.003), more ulcerative plaques (38.9% vs 9.1%, P = 0.010), and more medial- or distal-segment stenoses (44.4% vs 9.1%, P<0.001). The technical safety and outcome between the non-RT group and the RT group were NRVBIL on DWI of periprocedural brain MRI 30.0% vs 23.1%, P = 0.727; symptom recurrence rate (mean follow-up 67.1 ± 50.0 months) 2.3% vs 11.8%, P = 0.185; and significant in-stent restenosis rate (>50%) 2.3% vs 11.1%, P = 0.200.

Conclusion

The technical safety and outcome of PTAS for PISSA were not inferior to those of radiation-naïve counterparts. PTAS for PISSA is an effective treatment for medically refractory ischaemic symptoms of HNCC patients with PISSA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroradiology
Journal of Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.70%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroradiology is a peer-reviewed journal, publishing worldwide clinical and basic research in the field of diagnostic and Interventional neuroradiology, translational and molecular neuroimaging, and artificial intelligence in neuroradiology. The Journal of Neuroradiology considers for publication articles, reviews, technical notes and letters to the editors (correspondence section), provided that the methodology and scientific content are of high quality, and that the results will have substantial clinical impact and/or physiological importance.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Efficacy, Safety, and DMSO Compatibility of Detachable vs. Non-Detachable Tip Microcatheters in Neurointerventional Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Impaired iron metabolism and cerebral perfusion patterns in unilateral middle cerebral artery stenosis or occlusion: Insights from quantitative susceptibility mapping Deep learning segmentation-based bone removal from computed tomography of the brain improves subdural hematoma detection Intra-operative use of Augmented Reality for 3D visualisation of rotational angiography data: Feasibility and workflow demonstration using a PCOM aneurysm case Editorial board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1