是什么使“分心”能够减少鸽子的延迟折扣(Columba livia)。

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Journal of Comparative Psychology Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1037/com0000337
Peyton M Mueller, Daniel N Peng, Thomas R Zentall
{"title":"是什么使“分心”能够减少鸽子的延迟折扣(Columba livia)。","authors":"Peyton M Mueller,&nbsp;Daniel N Peng,&nbsp;Thomas R Zentall","doi":"10.1037/com0000337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a successive delay-discounting task, a small reward can be obtained immediately but a larger reward can be obtained if one waits. There is evidence that the larger reward can be obtained more easily if one is \"distracted\" from obtaining the small reward. It is proposed here that a distractor stimulus may function as a Pavlovian conditioned stimulus (sign tracking) because orienting to it may be directly associated with the larger reinforcer. In the present study with pigeons, we examined two successive procedures: (a) a peck to a red light resulted in one pellet of food, and waiting for the red light to turn off resulted in five pellets (Red-Only). (b) If the pigeon pecked a red light, it received one pellet of food, and if it waited for the red light to turn to green, a peck to the green light resulted in five pellets of food (Red-Green). For both groups, on some trials, a concurrent (distractor) stimulus appeared with the red light but responses to it had no programed consequence. Results indicated that the pigeons in both groups waited for the larger reward more often when the distractor was present than when it was absent and that pigeons in the Red-Only group waited longer than those in the Red-Green group. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that the concurrent stimulus served as a conditioned stimulus for the Red-Only group and as a higher order conditioned stimulus for the Red-Green group. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":"137 3","pages":"148-154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What enables \\\"distraction\\\" to reduce delay discounting for pigeons (Columba livia).\",\"authors\":\"Peyton M Mueller,&nbsp;Daniel N Peng,&nbsp;Thomas R Zentall\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/com0000337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In a successive delay-discounting task, a small reward can be obtained immediately but a larger reward can be obtained if one waits. There is evidence that the larger reward can be obtained more easily if one is \\\"distracted\\\" from obtaining the small reward. It is proposed here that a distractor stimulus may function as a Pavlovian conditioned stimulus (sign tracking) because orienting to it may be directly associated with the larger reinforcer. In the present study with pigeons, we examined two successive procedures: (a) a peck to a red light resulted in one pellet of food, and waiting for the red light to turn off resulted in five pellets (Red-Only). (b) If the pigeon pecked a red light, it received one pellet of food, and if it waited for the red light to turn to green, a peck to the green light resulted in five pellets of food (Red-Green). For both groups, on some trials, a concurrent (distractor) stimulus appeared with the red light but responses to it had no programed consequence. Results indicated that the pigeons in both groups waited for the larger reward more often when the distractor was present than when it was absent and that pigeons in the Red-Only group waited longer than those in the Red-Green group. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that the concurrent stimulus served as a conditioned stimulus for the Red-Only group and as a higher order conditioned stimulus for the Red-Green group. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Comparative Psychology\",\"volume\":\"137 3\",\"pages\":\"148-154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Comparative Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000337\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000337","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在连续延迟贴现任务中,可以立即获得较小的奖励,但如果等待则可以获得较大的奖励。有证据表明,如果一个人在获得小奖励时“分心”,那么获得大奖励就会更容易。本文提出,干扰物刺激可能具有巴甫洛夫条件刺激(符号跟踪)的功能,因为对它的定向可能与较大的强化物直接相关。在目前对鸽子的研究中,我们检查了两个连续的过程:(a)啄红灯导致一个食物颗粒,等待红灯关闭导致五个颗粒(仅限红色)。(b)如果鸽子啄红灯,它会得到一粒食物,如果它等待红灯变成绿灯,啄绿灯会得到五粒食物(红绿)。对两组来说,在一些试验中,一个同时出现的(干扰物)刺激与红灯同时出现,但对它的反应没有程序化的后果。结果表明,两组鸽子在有干扰物时比没有干扰物时等待更大奖励的次数要多,而且只有红色干扰物组的鸽子等待的时间比红绿干扰物组的鸽子要长。结果与同时刺激在红绿组和红绿组中分别作为条件刺激和高阶条件刺激的假设一致。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What enables "distraction" to reduce delay discounting for pigeons (Columba livia).

In a successive delay-discounting task, a small reward can be obtained immediately but a larger reward can be obtained if one waits. There is evidence that the larger reward can be obtained more easily if one is "distracted" from obtaining the small reward. It is proposed here that a distractor stimulus may function as a Pavlovian conditioned stimulus (sign tracking) because orienting to it may be directly associated with the larger reinforcer. In the present study with pigeons, we examined two successive procedures: (a) a peck to a red light resulted in one pellet of food, and waiting for the red light to turn off resulted in five pellets (Red-Only). (b) If the pigeon pecked a red light, it received one pellet of food, and if it waited for the red light to turn to green, a peck to the green light resulted in five pellets of food (Red-Green). For both groups, on some trials, a concurrent (distractor) stimulus appeared with the red light but responses to it had no programed consequence. Results indicated that the pigeons in both groups waited for the larger reward more often when the distractor was present than when it was absent and that pigeons in the Red-Only group waited longer than those in the Red-Green group. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that the concurrent stimulus served as a conditioned stimulus for the Red-Only group and as a higher order conditioned stimulus for the Red-Green group. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Comparative Psychology publishes original research from a comparative perspective on the behavior, cognition, perception, and social relationships of diverse species.
期刊最新文献
The effect of delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol and methamphetamine on sustained attention in the jumping spider (Trite planiceps). Cyclical variations in acoustic features within the song sessions of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). Effect of resource-associated signals on producer responses: Insights from golden fish (Carassius auratus) and an agent-based model. Beyond the information (not) given: Associative mechanisms versus representations of uncertainty in extinction in laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus). Differences in paradoxical choice between pigeons (Columba livia) and rats (Rattus norvegicus): The problem of cue trackability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1