Heini Törnqvist, Gray S Atherton, Liam Cross, Sanni Somppi, Jarkko Hautala, Miiamaaria V Kujala
Emotional expressions play an important part in social communication of dogs and humans, but comparative studies between dogs and humans are rare. In addition, little is known about how emotions are perceived across species and how attention is divided among different parts of faces. Here, we compared the gazing behavior of dogs and adult humans toward emotional dog and human facial expressions. Dogs mostly gazed at the eye and nose areas, whereas the humans' focus also included the mouth area. The gazing behavior of both species was affected by the facial expressions and species presented, and they gazed at emotional more than neutral stimuli. Dogs and humans demonstrated attentional bias toward angry and happy eyes of their own species, which highlights the ecological salience of the species and the importance of eyes in reading conspecifics' emotional expressions. For both species, mouths of aggressive dogs were gazed at more than those of angry humans, whereas mouths of happy humans were gazed at more than happy dog mouths. Thus, the mouth area provides important emotional cues for recognizing emotions across species, suggesting the ecological salience of facial expressions connecting to the subcortical visual pathway across mammalian species. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Species-dependent gazing behavior of emotional facial expressions in dogs (Canis familiaris) and adult humans (Homo sapiens).","authors":"Heini Törnqvist, Gray S Atherton, Liam Cross, Sanni Somppi, Jarkko Hautala, Miiamaaria V Kujala","doi":"10.1037/com0000433","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000433","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emotional expressions play an important part in social communication of dogs and humans, but comparative studies between dogs and humans are rare. In addition, little is known about how emotions are perceived across species and how attention is divided among different parts of faces. Here, we compared the gazing behavior of dogs and adult humans toward emotional dog and human facial expressions. Dogs mostly gazed at the eye and nose areas, whereas the humans' focus also included the mouth area. The gazing behavior of both species was affected by the facial expressions and species presented, and they gazed at emotional more than neutral stimuli. Dogs and humans demonstrated attentional bias toward angry and happy eyes of their own species, which highlights the ecological salience of the species and the importance of eyes in reading conspecifics' emotional expressions. For both species, mouths of aggressive dogs were gazed at more than those of angry humans, whereas mouths of happy humans were gazed at more than happy dog mouths. Thus, the mouth area provides important emotional cues for recognizing emotions across species, suggesting the ecological salience of facial expressions connecting to the subcortical visual pathway across mammalian species. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146127639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Many species forage collectively, and this will shape how they search for prey. However, theories of visual attention and search image formation have not considered social foraging, and studies of collective foraging rarely consider cognitive constraints. Here, we connected these ideas and present an agent-based model of collective foraging on cryptic prey in agents that either can or cannot form search images. Agents focused on one prey type reduce its local density, biasing other agents to form search images for other prey types. This effect, attentional character displacement, may reduce competition, as foragers occupy separate regions of "attention-space." We found that the ability to modulate attention increases distance in attention-space and reduces competition, improving success rates. Agents that cannot modulate their attention benefit from foraging with those that can. We also found that some top-down control of search is critical to taking advantage of this effect. This cognitive-ecological approach to modeling collective foraging suggests that competition is a critical driver of the evolution of search images. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
许多物种集体觅食,这将决定它们寻找猎物的方式。然而,视觉注意和搜索图像形成理论并没有考虑到社会觅食,集体觅食的研究也很少考虑到认知约束。在这里,我们将这些想法联系起来,并提出了一个基于代理的集体觅食模型,该模型在代理中可以或不能形成搜索图像。专注于一种猎物类型的代理降低了其局部密度,使其他代理偏向于形成其他猎物类型的搜索图像。这种注意力特征转移的效应可能会减少竞争,因为觅食者占据了“注意力空间”的不同区域。我们发现调节注意力的能力增加了注意力空间中的距离,减少了竞争,提高了成功率。那些不能调节注意力的个体从那些可以调节注意力的个体中获益。我们还发现,一些自上而下的搜索控制对于利用这种效应至关重要。这种模拟集体觅食的认知生态学方法表明,竞争是搜索图像进化的关键驱动力。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"How search images limit competition: The role of attention in collective foraging.","authors":"Keren Ighalo, Noam Miller","doi":"10.1037/com0000438","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000438","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many species forage collectively, and this will shape how they search for prey. However, theories of visual attention and search image formation have not considered social foraging, and studies of collective foraging rarely consider cognitive constraints. Here, we connected these ideas and present an agent-based model of collective foraging on cryptic prey in agents that either can or cannot form search images. Agents focused on one prey type reduce its local density, biasing other agents to form search images for other prey types. This effect, attentional character displacement, may reduce competition, as foragers occupy separate regions of \"attention-space.\" We found that the ability to modulate attention increases distance in attention-space and reduces competition, improving success rates. Agents that cannot modulate their attention benefit from foraging with those that can. We also found that some top-down control of search is critical to taking advantage of this effect. This cognitive-ecological approach to modeling collective foraging suggests that competition is a critical driver of the evolution of search images. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145758312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jessica Crimston, Sue Tonga, Jonathan Redshaw, Thomas Suddendorf
Probabilistic reasoning-the ability to predict outcomes based on the likelihood of different possibilities-is a key component of numerical cognition and is critical for navigating uncertain environments. However, it is unclear whether this capacity is shared with our closest relatives, the great apes, or with even more distantly related species such as the small apes. Here, we presented two gibbons (Nomascus leucogenys), two siamangs (Symphalangus syndactylus), and three chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) with a proportional probability task requiring them to reason from the distribution of items in a population to the likely contents of a sample. In contrast to previous research, we ensured that participants could not rely on two salient heuristics-the absolute quantity of the preferred item or majority sampling-to solve the task. We found that individuals of all species were able to distinguish between 0% versus 50% and 50% versus 100%, and that two individuals (one chimpanzee and one siamang) were able to convincingly distinguish between 33% versus 67%. These results suggest that an antecedent to probabilistic reasoning was shared by a common ancestor of humans, great apes, and small apes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
概率推理——基于不同可能性的可能性预测结果的能力——是数字认知的关键组成部分,对于导航不确定的环境至关重要。然而,目前尚不清楚这种能力是否与我们最近的亲戚类人猿,或者与我们关系更远的物种,如小类人猿,有同样的能力。在这里,我们提出了两个长臂猿(Nomascus leucogenys),两个象鼻猿(Symphalangus syndactylus)和三个黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)的比例概率任务,要求他们从种群中物品的分布推断出样本的可能内容。与之前的研究相反,我们确保参与者不能依赖于两个显著的启发式——首选项目的绝对数量或多数抽样——来解决任务。我们发现,所有物种的个体都能够区分0%和50%,50%和100%,两个个体(一只黑猩猩和一只暹逻)能够令人信服地区分33%和67%。这些结果表明,概率推理的前身是人类、类人猿和小类人猿的共同祖先。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Gibbons (Nomascus leucogenys), siamangs (Symphalangus syndactylus), and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) account for proportional probabilities in a two-choice task.","authors":"Jessica Crimston, Sue Tonga, Jonathan Redshaw, Thomas Suddendorf","doi":"10.1037/com0000437","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000437","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Probabilistic reasoning-the ability to predict outcomes based on the likelihood of different possibilities-is a key component of numerical cognition and is critical for navigating uncertain environments. However, it is unclear whether this capacity is shared with our closest relatives, the great apes, or with even more distantly related species such as the small apes. Here, we presented two gibbons (<i>Nomascus leucogenys</i>), two siamangs (<i>Symphalangus syndactylus</i>), and three chimpanzees (<i>Pan troglodytes</i>) with a proportional probability task requiring them to reason from the distribution of items in a population to the likely contents of a sample. In contrast to previous research, we ensured that participants could not rely on two salient heuristics-the absolute quantity of the preferred item or majority sampling-to solve the task. We found that individuals of all species were able to distinguish between 0% versus 50% and 50% versus 100%, and that two individuals (one chimpanzee and one siamang) were able to convincingly distinguish between 33% versus 67%. These results suggest that an antecedent to probabilistic reasoning was shared by a common ancestor of humans, great apes, and small apes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145710102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Perceptual categorization is grouping objects based on similar physical features. Otters may use categorization to classify predators, prey, and conspecifics. This study was the first to examine whether North American river otters (Lontra canadensis) are capable of perceptual categorization. Previously, otters at the Seneca Park Zoo were trained to discriminate between a circle and an equilateral triangle in a two-alternative forced-choice task. In the present study, these otters were presented with novel geometric shapes (e.g., an oval and a right triangle) in Experiment 1 and novel drawings of real-world objects (e.g., a tomato and a tent) in Experiment 2 that could be classified into the circle or triangle category. Two otters performed significantly better than chance during Experiment 1 on subsets of the novel test stimuli. In Experiment 2, one otter was able to categorize drawings of real-world objects into two shape categories of circles and triangles, but only when the triangle-like stimuli were composed of straight lines, not when stimuli were composed of curved lines. The results from both experiments suggest that line type (straight vs. curved) and symmetry may have been salient features for the otters. It appears that otters have the ability to perceptually categorize two-dimensional shapes and line drawings, though further research with additional subjects and different stimuli is needed. Better understanding this ability in otters can expand our knowledge of categorization behavior in a variety of nonhuman animals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
感知分类是基于相似的物理特征对对象进行分组。水獭可以用分类来对捕食者、猎物和同种生物进行分类。这项研究是第一个检验北美河獭(Lontra canadensis)是否有知觉分类能力的研究。此前,塞内卡公园动物园的水獭被训练在一个两种选择的强制选择任务中区分圆形和等边三角形。在本研究中,在实验1中向这些水獭展示了新的几何形状(如椭圆形和直角三角形),在实验2中向这些水獭展示了可分为圆形或三角形类别的现实世界物体的新图形(如西红柿和帐篷)。在实验1中,两只水獭在新测试刺激的子集上的表现明显优于机会。在实验2中,一只水獭能够将现实世界物体的图画分为圆形和三角形两类,但仅限于三角形刺激由直线组成的情况下,而不是由曲线组成的刺激。这两个实验的结果都表明,直线类型(直线与曲线)和对称性可能是水獭的显著特征。水獭似乎有能力对二维形状和线条画进行感知分类,尽管需要更多的受试者和不同的刺激进行进一步的研究。更好地理解水獭的这种能力可以扩展我们对各种非人类动物分类行为的认识。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Learning to discriminate between shapes generalizes to novel stimuli in North American river otters (Lontra canadensis): A preliminary study on perceptual categorization.","authors":"Jessica J Wegman, Catina Wright, Kenneth Tyler Wilcox, Caroline M DeLong","doi":"10.1037/com0000436","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000436","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perceptual categorization is grouping objects based on similar physical features. Otters may use categorization to classify predators, prey, and conspecifics. This study was the first to examine whether North American river otters (<i>Lontra canadensis</i>) are capable of perceptual categorization. Previously, otters at the Seneca Park Zoo were trained to discriminate between a circle and an equilateral triangle in a two-alternative forced-choice task. In the present study, these otters were presented with novel geometric shapes (e.g., an oval and a right triangle) in Experiment 1 and novel drawings of real-world objects (e.g., a tomato and a tent) in Experiment 2 that could be classified into the circle or triangle category. Two otters performed significantly better than chance during Experiment 1 on subsets of the novel test stimuli. In Experiment 2, one otter was able to categorize drawings of real-world objects into two shape categories of circles and triangles, but only when the triangle-like stimuli were composed of straight lines, not when stimuli were composed of curved lines. The results from both experiments suggest that line type (straight vs. curved) and symmetry may have been salient features for the otters. It appears that otters have the ability to perceptually categorize two-dimensional shapes and line drawings, though further research with additional subjects and different stimuli is needed. Better understanding this ability in otters can expand our knowledge of categorization behavior in a variety of nonhuman animals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145514552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-03-03DOI: 10.1037/com0000412
Ferran Mayayo, Juan M Toro
Humans are capable of recognizing the temporal organization of a rhythm by perceiving its metrical structure even when it is evoked only by temporal alterations. There is also plenty of data suggesting that several animal species can track different rhythmic cues. However, there is no clear evidence that nonhuman animals can extract metrical information from an auditory rhythm. To explore this issue, we familiarized rats (Rattus norvegicus) to auditory rhythmic sequences. We then tested them with novel sequences that presented temporal variations at the metrical, grouping, or tone duration level. We observed that the animals responded differently to the familiar versus the novel sequences, suggesting that temporal alterations are sufficient for the animals to discriminate between auditory rhythmic sequences. Likewise, the use of temporal accents could be relevant to provide metrical information, although it is still an open issue the extent to which the animals are able to induce meter from rhythmic sequences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
人类能够通过感知节奏的韵律结构来识别节奏的时间组织,即使它只是由时间变化引起的。还有大量数据表明,一些动物物种可以追踪不同的节奏线索。然而,没有明确的证据表明非人类动物可以从听觉节奏中提取韵律信息。为了探讨这个问题,我们让大鼠(褐家鼠)熟悉听觉节奏序列。然后,我们用新的序列来测试它们,这些序列在格律、分组或音调持续时间水平上呈现时间变化。我们观察到动物对熟悉序列和新序列的反应不同,这表明时间的改变足以使动物区分听觉节奏序列。同样,时间重音的使用可能与提供韵律信息有关,尽管动物能够在多大程度上从节奏序列中感应出节拍仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Changes in temporal cues elicit rhythmic discrimination in rats (Rattus norvegicus).","authors":"Ferran Mayayo, Juan M Toro","doi":"10.1037/com0000412","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000412","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humans are capable of recognizing the temporal organization of a rhythm by perceiving its metrical structure even when it is evoked only by temporal alterations. There is also plenty of data suggesting that several animal species can track different rhythmic cues. However, there is no clear evidence that nonhuman animals can extract metrical information from an auditory rhythm. To explore this issue, we familiarized rats (<i>Rattus norvegicus</i>) to auditory rhythmic sequences. We then tested them with novel sequences that presented temporal variations at the metrical, grouping, or tone duration level. We observed that the animals responded differently to the familiar versus the novel sequences, suggesting that temporal alterations are sufficient for the animals to discriminate between auditory rhythmic sequences. Likewise, the use of temporal accents could be relevant to provide metrical information, although it is still an open issue the extent to which the animals are able to induce meter from rhythmic sequences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"260-267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143544530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative psychology has its share of historical ironies. A particularly delightful one comes from Lloyd Morgan himself. In Animal Behavior, which was published after An Introduction to Comparative Psychology (which contains Morgan's Canon), he marvels at a digger wasp that picks up a small pebble in her mandibles and uses it as a hammer to pound and tamp the earth sealing her burrow. what does the Canon mean to the scientists who use it today? A recent article in this issue by Voudouris et al. (2025) gives us a first empirical insight. Using systematic surveys, they shed light on what comparative cognition researchers actually think about Morgan's Canon, the associative-cognitive distinction, and the role of parsimony in interpreting animal behavior. Morgan's Canon began as a plea for rigor. Over time, it became a slogan, sometimes a straitjacket, occasionally a scapegoat. But it remains also a guardrail, a guide, and a goad: it guards against overreach, guides control design and interpretation, and goads us to spell out mechanisms. The new survey shows that researchers still value the Canon but use it with more flexibility and less dogmatism than in the past. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
比较心理学也有它的历史讽刺。一个特别令人愉快的例子来自劳埃德·摩根本人。在《比较心理学导论》(包含了摩根的佳能)之后出版的《动物行为》一书中,他惊叹于一只挖土黄蜂,它用下颚叼起一块小鹅卵石,把它当作锤子来敲击和夯土,从而封住了它的洞穴。佳能对今天使用它的科学家来说意味着什么?最近由Voudouris等人(2025)发表的一篇文章为我们提供了第一个实证见解。通过系统的调查,他们揭示了比较认知研究人员对摩根准则、联想-认知区别以及简约在解释动物行为中的作用的实际看法。摩根的《佳能》一开始是对严谨的要求。随着时间的推移,它变成了一个口号,有时是一件紧身衣,偶尔是一个替罪羊。但它仍然是一道护栏、一个向导和一根鞭策:它防止过度扩张,指导控制设计和解释,并激励我们阐明机制。新的调查显示,研究人员仍然重视《正典》,但使用它比过去更灵活,更少教条主义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Morgan's ghosts: On canon, cognition, and what we still do not know.","authors":"Alice Auersperg","doi":"10.1037/com0000435","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000435","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comparative psychology has its share of historical ironies. A particularly delightful one comes from Lloyd Morgan himself. In Animal Behavior, which was published after An Introduction to Comparative Psychology (which contains Morgan's Canon), he marvels at a digger wasp that picks up a small pebble in her mandibles and uses it as a hammer to pound and tamp the earth sealing her burrow. what does the Canon mean to the scientists who use it today? A recent article in this issue by Voudouris et al. (2025) gives us a first empirical insight. Using systematic surveys, they shed light on what comparative cognition researchers actually think about Morgan's Canon, the associative-cognitive distinction, and the role of parsimony in interpreting animal behavior. Morgan's Canon began as a plea for rigor. Over time, it became a slogan, sometimes a straitjacket, occasionally a scapegoat. But it remains also a guardrail, a guide, and a goad: it guards against overreach, guides control design and interpretation, and goads us to spell out mechanisms. The new survey shows that researchers still value the Canon but use it with more flexibility and less dogmatism than in the past. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":"139 4","pages":"239-241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145410828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-03-13DOI: 10.1037/com0000410
Devin J Goodson, Daniel Hanley, Jeffrey P Hoover, Abbigail M Turner, Carena J van Riper, Mark E Hauber
Uncovering the cognitive bases of egg rejection behavior in avian hosts of brood parasites carries significant comparative implications not only for our understanding of host-parasite coevolution but also for cross-species research aimed at assessing decision-making. In this study, we focused on the American robin (Turdus migratorius), a species that lays large, elongated, and immaculate blue eggs and is well studied for its robust rejection of smaller, rounder, white, and maculated eggs laid by the brood parasitic brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater). Employing a randomized multiple simultaneous parasitism paradigm, we experimentally investigated how model egg color, dimensions, and maculation influenced the rejection rates of eight distinct egg types across 28 different pairings of two eggs at a time. First, we assessed whether egg rejection decisions depended on model egg features. Then, for a subset of trials (36%) where one egg was accepted and the other was rejected, we utilized a conjoint design analysis, a methodology borrowed from economics and marketing. Using the conjoint analysis, we showed that white model eggs were 50% more likely to be rejected relative to blue eggs, small-round eggs were 39% more likely to be rejected compared to large-elongated model eggs, and maculated eggs were 19% more likely to be rejected compared to immaculate eggs. These findings reaffirmed the roles of egg color, dimension, and maculation as key visual cues influencing egg rejection behavior in American robins. These findings also offer methodological advancements to study egg rejection behavior and lend themselves to future comparisons of human and nonhuman decision-making processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
揭示鸟类宿主排斥卵行为的认知基础,不仅对我们理解宿主-寄生虫共同进化,而且对旨在评估决策的跨物种研究具有重要的比较意义。在这项研究中,我们重点研究了美洲知更鸟(Turdus migratorius),这是一种产大的、细长的、无斑点的蓝色蛋的物种,它对寄生褐头牛鹂(Molothrus ater)产的更小的、更圆的、白色的、有斑点的蛋有很强的拒斥能力。采用随机多重同时寄生模式,我们实验研究了模型卵的颜色、尺寸和斑纹如何影响8种不同类型的卵在28对不同配对中的排异率。首先,我们评估了卵子排斥决定是否取决于模型卵子的特征。然后,对于一个鸡蛋被接受而另一个鸡蛋被拒绝的试验子集(36%),我们使用了联合设计分析,这是一种借鉴经济学和市场营销的方法。通过联合分析,我们发现白色模型蛋被拒绝的可能性比蓝色模型蛋高50%,小圆形模型蛋被拒绝的可能性比大细长模型蛋高39%,有斑点的模型蛋被拒绝的可能性比无斑点的模型蛋高19%。这些发现重申了蛋的颜色、尺寸和斑纹作为影响美洲知更鸟弃卵行为的关键视觉线索的作用。这些发现也为研究卵子排斥行为提供了方法上的进步,并有助于将来对人类和非人类决策过程的比较。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Decoding the dilemma: Exploring the rules and cues of egg rejection in the American robin (Turdus migratorius) through conjoint experimentation.","authors":"Devin J Goodson, Daniel Hanley, Jeffrey P Hoover, Abbigail M Turner, Carena J van Riper, Mark E Hauber","doi":"10.1037/com0000410","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000410","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Uncovering the cognitive bases of egg rejection behavior in avian hosts of brood parasites carries significant comparative implications not only for our understanding of host-parasite coevolution but also for cross-species research aimed at assessing decision-making. In this study, we focused on the American robin (<i>Turdus migratorius</i>), a species that lays large, elongated, and immaculate blue eggs and is well studied for its robust rejection of smaller, rounder, white, and maculated eggs laid by the brood parasitic brown-headed cowbird (<i>Molothrus ater</i>). Employing a randomized multiple simultaneous parasitism paradigm, we experimentally investigated how model egg color, dimensions, and maculation influenced the rejection rates of eight distinct egg types across 28 different pairings of two eggs at a time. First, we assessed whether egg rejection decisions depended on model egg features. Then, for a subset of trials (36%) where one egg was accepted and the other was rejected, we utilized a conjoint design analysis, a methodology borrowed from economics and marketing. Using the conjoint analysis, we showed that white model eggs were 50% more likely to be rejected relative to blue eggs, small-round eggs were 39% more likely to be rejected compared to large-elongated model eggs, and maculated eggs were 19% more likely to be rejected compared to immaculate eggs. These findings reaffirmed the roles of egg color, dimension, and maculation as key visual cues influencing egg rejection behavior in American robins. These findings also offer methodological advancements to study egg rejection behavior and lend themselves to future comparisons of human and nonhuman decision-making processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"315-324"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143627059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-03-24DOI: 10.1037/com0000407
Nancy Rebout, Alexander Baxter, Karen L Bales, Pauline Zablocki-Thomas
Recent research has shown that personality similarity between pair-bonded individuals can lead to better compatibility and well-being in humans. In our study, we explored the personality of 27 pairs of captive coppery titi monkeys (Plecturocebus cupreus), using a Hominoid Personality Questionnaire of 54 personality items. We also examined the effect of pair duration, pair affiliation, and the presence of offspring on the personality of these pairs. We built a model with five components to describe titi monkey personality structure in our colony and labeled these components as aggressive, cool, cautious, innovative, and helpful. Helpful, which we relate to "agreeableness," was significantly higher in males than in females. Aggressive and helpful were correlated within couples. Helpful was also negatively related to the time spent since pairing. Innovative was higher for pairs with higher affiliation. Additionally, we compared personality similarity between a group of pairs that were created based on initial compatibility (determined via a "speed-dating" experiment), and a group of tenure-matched pairs that were determined quasirandomly. Pairs determined from speed dating were more helpful than pairs from the colony comparison group, which suggests that high levels of initial attraction may facilitate an increase in prosocial personality traits. Our findings, including the negative correlation of "helpful" with time since pairing and the heightened "innovative" trait in pairs with stronger affiliation, may suggest subtle dynamics within titi monkey personalities. These insights contribute to a broader understanding of nonhuman primate personalities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
最近的研究表明,成对结合的个体之间的性格相似性可以导致人类更好的兼容性和幸福感。本研究采用包含54个人格项目的《类人猿人格问卷》,对27对圈养铜猴(Plecturocebus cupreus)进行了人格调查。我们还研究了配对持续时间、配对隶属关系和后代的存在对这些配对个性的影响。我们建立了一个包含五个组成部分的模型来描述我们群体中的titi猴的性格结构,并将这些组成部分标记为好斗、冷静、谨慎、创新和乐于助人。乐于助人,也就是我们所说的“宜人性”,在男性中明显高于女性。在夫妻之间,攻击性和乐于助人是相关的。乐于助人也与结对后花费的时间呈负相关。关联度越高的配对,创新能力越强。此外,我们比较了一组基于初始兼容性(通过“速配”实验确定)创建的配对和一组准随机确定的终身配对之间的个性相似性。从速配中确定的配对比从群体对照组中确定的配对更有帮助,这表明高水平的初始吸引力可能促进亲社会人格特征的增加。我们的发现,包括“乐于助人”与结对时间的负相关,以及在结对关系更强的结对中,“创新”特征的增强,可能表明了titi猴性格中微妙的动态。这些见解有助于更广泛地理解非人类灵长类动物的性格。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Exploring personality structure and similarity in coppery titi monkeys (Plecturocebus cupreus).","authors":"Nancy Rebout, Alexander Baxter, Karen L Bales, Pauline Zablocki-Thomas","doi":"10.1037/com0000407","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000407","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent research has shown that personality similarity between pair-bonded individuals can lead to better compatibility and well-being in humans. In our study, we explored the personality of 27 pairs of captive coppery titi monkeys (<i>Plecturocebus cupreus</i>), using a Hominoid Personality Questionnaire of 54 personality items. We also examined the effect of pair duration, pair affiliation, and the presence of offspring on the personality of these pairs. We built a model with five components to describe titi monkey personality structure in our colony and labeled these components as aggressive, cool, cautious, innovative, and helpful. Helpful, which we relate to \"agreeableness,\" was significantly higher in males than in females. Aggressive and helpful were correlated within couples. Helpful was also negatively related to the time spent since pairing. Innovative was higher for pairs with higher affiliation. Additionally, we compared personality similarity between a group of pairs that were created based on initial compatibility (determined via a \"speed-dating\" experiment), and a group of tenure-matched pairs that were determined quasirandomly. Pairs determined from speed dating were more helpful than pairs from the colony comparison group, which suggests that high levels of initial attraction may facilitate an increase in prosocial personality traits. Our findings, including the negative correlation of \"helpful\" with time since pairing and the heightened \"innovative\" trait in pairs with stronger affiliation, may suggest subtle dynamics within titi monkey personalities. These insights contribute to a broader understanding of nonhuman primate personalities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"301-314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143694332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-05-05DOI: 10.1037/com0000411
Benjamin Norton, Anna Zamansky, Brittany Florkiewicz, Teddy Lazebnik
Social negotiation is crucial in human interactions and often involves clear communication, strong socialization skills, adept problem-solving abilities, and strategic planning. Chimpanzees exhibit evidence of social negotiation through manual gesturing to achieve imperative goals. Chimpanzee social negotiations are influenced by demographic factors like age, sex, social rank, and identity, as well as communicative properties such as gesture type, gesture modality, gesture position, and context. In our study, we build on prior research by analyzing how chimpanzees use facial signals during social negotiations. We used machine learning models and sequential pattern analysis to analyze the combined effects of facial signals and manual gesturing properties, along with demographic factors. Our analyses revealed that facial signals and manual gesturing are important for predicting the success of chimpanzee social negotiations. We also found that clear communication (using distinct facial signals and manual gestures in each context) is important for navigating social negotiations, much like is true for humans. Our research showcases the immense value of machine learning techniques in exploring the evolution of social behavior in primates. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
社会谈判在人际交往中至关重要,通常涉及清晰的沟通、强大的社交技能、熟练的解决问题的能力和战略规划。黑猩猩表现出社会协商的证据,通过手势来实现必要的目标。黑猩猩的社会谈判受到年龄、性别、社会地位和身份等人口统计学因素的影响,也受到手势类型、手势形态、手势位置和语境等交际属性的影响。在我们的研究中,我们通过分析黑猩猩在社会谈判中如何使用面部信号来建立先前的研究。我们使用机器学习模型和顺序模式分析来分析面部信号和手动手势属性以及人口统计因素的综合影响。我们的分析表明,面部信号和手势对于预测黑猩猩社会谈判的成功是很重要的。我们还发现,清晰的沟通(在每种情况下使用不同的面部信号和手势)对于进行社交谈判很重要,就像人类一样。我们的研究展示了机器学习技术在探索灵长类动物社会行为进化方面的巨大价值。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The art of chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) diplomacy: Unraveling the secrets of successful negotiations using machine learning.","authors":"Benjamin Norton, Anna Zamansky, Brittany Florkiewicz, Teddy Lazebnik","doi":"10.1037/com0000411","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000411","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social negotiation is crucial in human interactions and often involves clear communication, strong socialization skills, adept problem-solving abilities, and strategic planning. Chimpanzees exhibit evidence of social negotiation through manual gesturing to achieve imperative goals. Chimpanzee social negotiations are influenced by demographic factors like age, sex, social rank, and identity, as well as communicative properties such as gesture type, gesture modality, gesture position, and context. In our study, we build on prior research by analyzing how chimpanzees use facial signals during social negotiations. We used machine learning models and sequential pattern analysis to analyze the combined effects of facial signals and manual gesturing properties, along with demographic factors. Our analyses revealed that facial signals and manual gesturing are important for predicting the success of chimpanzee social negotiations. We also found that clear communication (using distinct facial signals and manual gestures in each context) is important for navigating social negotiations, much like is true for humans. Our research showcases the immense value of machine learning techniques in exploring the evolution of social behavior in primates. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"287-300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143992835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-06-26DOI: 10.1037/com0000408
Rachael F Kinnaird, Deborah L Wells
Domestic dogs have been shown to respond to their auditory environment, with different genres of music triggering different behavioral and physiological responses. It is still unknown, however, whether the auditory environment can influence canine affect. This study therefore explored the influence of auditory stimulation on the short-term mood of dogs. Forty-five pet dogs were randomly assigned to one of the three conditions of auditory stimulation (a control of silence, classical music, or audiobook). While being exposed to the auditory stimulus relevant to their condition, each subject animal participated in a commonly employed cognitive bias test, during which their latency to approach a bowl placed in one of the three ambiguous positions was recorded. All dogs were successfully trained, with intact animals taking fewer sessions to reach criterion than neutered subjects. As expected, dogs became increasingly slower to reach the bowl the further it was positioned from the positive location. The animals' latency to reach the bowl placed in the ambiguous positions did not differ significantly between auditory conditions. The study suggests that canine affect is not influenced by the auditory environment, at least in the short term. Methodological issues, both in relation to the protocol adopted in the present investigation and the cognitive bias test more generally, are considered. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
研究表明,家养狗会对它们的听觉环境做出反应,不同类型的音乐会引发不同的行为和生理反应。然而,听觉环境是否会影响犬类的情绪,目前尚不清楚。因此,本研究探讨了听觉刺激对狗短期情绪的影响。45只宠物狗被随机分配到三种听觉刺激条件中的一种(沉默、古典音乐或有声读物的控制)。当被暴露在与它们的情况相关的听觉刺激下时,每只受试动物都参加了一个常用的认知偏差测试,在这个测试中,它们接近放置在三个模糊位置之一的碗的潜伏期被记录下来。所有的狗都被成功地训练,完整的狗比绝育的狗需要更少的时间来达到标准。正如预期的那样,狗狗到达碗的速度越来越慢,碗离积极的位置越远。动物到达放置在模糊位置的碗的等待时间在不同的听觉条件下没有显著差异。这项研究表明,狗的情感不受听觉环境的影响,至少在短期内是这样。方法学问题,无论是在目前的调查中采用的协议和更普遍的认知偏差测试,考虑。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Auditory stimulation and cognitive bias in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris).","authors":"Rachael F Kinnaird, Deborah L Wells","doi":"10.1037/com0000408","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000408","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Domestic dogs have been shown to respond to their auditory environment, with different genres of music triggering different behavioral and physiological responses. It is still unknown, however, whether the auditory environment can influence canine affect. This study therefore explored the influence of auditory stimulation on the short-term mood of dogs. Forty-five pet dogs were randomly assigned to one of the three conditions of auditory stimulation (a control of silence, classical music, or audiobook). While being exposed to the auditory stimulus relevant to their condition, each subject animal participated in a commonly employed cognitive bias test, during which their latency to approach a bowl placed in one of the three ambiguous positions was recorded. All dogs were successfully trained, with intact animals taking fewer sessions to reach criterion than neutered subjects. As expected, dogs became increasingly slower to reach the bowl the further it was positioned from the positive location. The animals' latency to reach the bowl placed in the ambiguous positions did not differ significantly between auditory conditions. The study suggests that canine affect is not influenced by the auditory environment, at least in the short term. Methodological issues, both in relation to the protocol adopted in the present investigation and the cognitive bias test more generally, are considered. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"278-286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144509498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}