2019冠状病毒病大流行期间孟加拉国废物和环卫工人的卫生知识和做法以及职业安全的决定因素

Mahbub-Ul Alam , Fazle Sharior , Dewan Muhammad Shoaib , Mehedi Hasan , Kazy Farhat Tabassum , Sharika Ferdous , Moushumi Hasan , Mahbubur Rahman , James B. Tidwell , Mariam Zaqout , Makfie Farah , Md. Azizur Rahman , Alauddin Ahmed , Tanvir Ahmed
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病大流行期间孟加拉国废物和环卫工人的卫生知识和做法以及职业安全的决定因素","authors":"Mahbub-Ul Alam ,&nbsp;Fazle Sharior ,&nbsp;Dewan Muhammad Shoaib ,&nbsp;Mehedi Hasan ,&nbsp;Kazy Farhat Tabassum ,&nbsp;Sharika Ferdous ,&nbsp;Moushumi Hasan ,&nbsp;Mahbubur Rahman ,&nbsp;James B. Tidwell ,&nbsp;Mariam Zaqout ,&nbsp;Makfie Farah ,&nbsp;Md. Azizur Rahman ,&nbsp;Alauddin Ahmed ,&nbsp;Tanvir Ahmed","doi":"10.1016/j.heha.2022.100022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Waste and sanitation workers provide essential services to society. In most low-and middle-income countries, they are often mistreated and lack access to necessary personal protective equipment (PPE) and hygiene facilities that ensure occupational safety in workplaces. COVID-19 has also imposed serious health risks upon these worker groups. This study explores factors associated with poor occupational health and safety based on a conceptual framework. We conducted 499 surveys with five categories of waste and sanitation workers across ten cities in Bangladesh. We performed descriptive analysis and used Firth's logistic regression model following the conceptual framework. The analysis revealed consistent distinctions between workers considered to be in “safe” versus “unsafe” working conditions. The result showed that workers had not been adequately trained, not provided with proper equipment, and many had an informal status that prevented access to hygiene facilities. The workers who received occupational training, knew how to prevent COVID-19 by wearing a face mask, hand washing, and maintaining social distance, maintained protective measures, and practiced proper disposing of PPEs were more likely to be in safe condition. Initiatives to improve the situation of the waste workers who work in unsafe work conditions are still inadequate. Therefore, we recommend supplying proper protective equipment, ensuring a regular supply of gender-specific PPEs, and providing functional facilities necessary to practice personal hygiene and occupational safety, such as handwashing stations, changing rooms, and disposal facilities of used PPEs at the workplace. We also urge increased institutional management procedures, infrastructure that facilitates hygiene practices, and social policies to reduce occupational hazards for the waste workers in Bangladesh during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73269,"journal":{"name":"Hygiene and environmental health advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9439861/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hygiene knowledge and practices and determinants of occupational safety among waste and sanitation workers in Bangladesh during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Mahbub-Ul Alam ,&nbsp;Fazle Sharior ,&nbsp;Dewan Muhammad Shoaib ,&nbsp;Mehedi Hasan ,&nbsp;Kazy Farhat Tabassum ,&nbsp;Sharika Ferdous ,&nbsp;Moushumi Hasan ,&nbsp;Mahbubur Rahman ,&nbsp;James B. Tidwell ,&nbsp;Mariam Zaqout ,&nbsp;Makfie Farah ,&nbsp;Md. Azizur Rahman ,&nbsp;Alauddin Ahmed ,&nbsp;Tanvir Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.heha.2022.100022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Waste and sanitation workers provide essential services to society. In most low-and middle-income countries, they are often mistreated and lack access to necessary personal protective equipment (PPE) and hygiene facilities that ensure occupational safety in workplaces. COVID-19 has also imposed serious health risks upon these worker groups. This study explores factors associated with poor occupational health and safety based on a conceptual framework. We conducted 499 surveys with five categories of waste and sanitation workers across ten cities in Bangladesh. We performed descriptive analysis and used Firth's logistic regression model following the conceptual framework. The analysis revealed consistent distinctions between workers considered to be in “safe” versus “unsafe” working conditions. The result showed that workers had not been adequately trained, not provided with proper equipment, and many had an informal status that prevented access to hygiene facilities. The workers who received occupational training, knew how to prevent COVID-19 by wearing a face mask, hand washing, and maintaining social distance, maintained protective measures, and practiced proper disposing of PPEs were more likely to be in safe condition. Initiatives to improve the situation of the waste workers who work in unsafe work conditions are still inadequate. Therefore, we recommend supplying proper protective equipment, ensuring a regular supply of gender-specific PPEs, and providing functional facilities necessary to practice personal hygiene and occupational safety, such as handwashing stations, changing rooms, and disposal facilities of used PPEs at the workplace. We also urge increased institutional management procedures, infrastructure that facilitates hygiene practices, and social policies to reduce occupational hazards for the waste workers in Bangladesh during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hygiene and environmental health advances\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9439861/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hygiene and environmental health advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773049222000228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hygiene and environmental health advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773049222000228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

废物和环卫工人为社会提供基本服务。在大多数低收入和中等收入国家,他们往往受到虐待,无法获得确保工作场所职业安全的必要个人防护装备和卫生设施。COVID-19也给这些工人群体带来了严重的健康风险。本研究在概念框架的基础上探讨与不良职业健康和安全相关的因素。我们对孟加拉国十个城市的五类垃圾和环卫工人进行了499次调查。我们进行了描述性分析,并使用Firth的逻辑回归模型遵循概念框架。分析显示,被认为处于“安全”和“不安全”工作条件的工人之间存在一致的差异。结果表明,工人没有得到充分的培训,没有得到适当的设备,许多人的身份不正式,无法使用卫生设施。接受过职业培训,知道如何戴口罩、洗手和保持社交距离,保持防护措施,并正确处理个人防护用品的工人更有可能处于安全状态。改善在不安全工作条件下工作的废物处理工人状况的举措仍然不足。因此,我们建议提供适当的防护装备,确保有针对性的个人防护用品的定期供应,并提供实践个人卫生和职业安全所需的功能设施,如洗手站、更衣室和工作场所使用过的个人防护用品的处置设施。我们还敦促加强机构管理程序、促进卫生习惯的基础设施和社会政策,以减少孟加拉国废物处理工人在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间和之后的职业危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hygiene knowledge and practices and determinants of occupational safety among waste and sanitation workers in Bangladesh during the COVID-19 pandemic

Waste and sanitation workers provide essential services to society. In most low-and middle-income countries, they are often mistreated and lack access to necessary personal protective equipment (PPE) and hygiene facilities that ensure occupational safety in workplaces. COVID-19 has also imposed serious health risks upon these worker groups. This study explores factors associated with poor occupational health and safety based on a conceptual framework. We conducted 499 surveys with five categories of waste and sanitation workers across ten cities in Bangladesh. We performed descriptive analysis and used Firth's logistic regression model following the conceptual framework. The analysis revealed consistent distinctions between workers considered to be in “safe” versus “unsafe” working conditions. The result showed that workers had not been adequately trained, not provided with proper equipment, and many had an informal status that prevented access to hygiene facilities. The workers who received occupational training, knew how to prevent COVID-19 by wearing a face mask, hand washing, and maintaining social distance, maintained protective measures, and practiced proper disposing of PPEs were more likely to be in safe condition. Initiatives to improve the situation of the waste workers who work in unsafe work conditions are still inadequate. Therefore, we recommend supplying proper protective equipment, ensuring a regular supply of gender-specific PPEs, and providing functional facilities necessary to practice personal hygiene and occupational safety, such as handwashing stations, changing rooms, and disposal facilities of used PPEs at the workplace. We also urge increased institutional management procedures, infrastructure that facilitates hygiene practices, and social policies to reduce occupational hazards for the waste workers in Bangladesh during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hygiene and environmental health advances
Hygiene and environmental health advances Environmental Science (General)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
期刊最新文献
A prospective study on the cardiorespiratory effects of air pollution among residents of the Tibetan Plateau Artificial intelligence in environmental monitoring: Advancements, challenges, and future directions Associations between exposure to multiple environmental chemicals and metabolic syndrome: A mixture analysis Assessing the multi-dimensional effects of air pollution on maternal complications and birth outcomes: A structural equation modeling approach Metabolism disruption induced by high ambient temperature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1