国家院外输血方案的制定:一项改进的兰德德尔菲研究。

CMAJ open Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20220151
Johannes von Vopelius-Feldt, Joel Lockwood, Sameer Mal, Andrew Beckett, Jeannie Callum, Adam Greene, Jeremy Grushka, Aditi Khandelwal, Yulia Lin, Susan Nahirniak, Katerina Pavenski, Michael Peddle, Oksana Prokopchuk-Gauk, Julian Regehr, Jo Schmid, Andrew W Shih, Justin A Smith, Jan Trojanowski, Erik Vu, Markus Ziesmann, Brodie Nolan
{"title":"国家院外输血方案的制定:一项改进的兰德德尔菲研究。","authors":"Johannes von Vopelius-Feldt,&nbsp;Joel Lockwood,&nbsp;Sameer Mal,&nbsp;Andrew Beckett,&nbsp;Jeannie Callum,&nbsp;Adam Greene,&nbsp;Jeremy Grushka,&nbsp;Aditi Khandelwal,&nbsp;Yulia Lin,&nbsp;Susan Nahirniak,&nbsp;Katerina Pavenski,&nbsp;Michael Peddle,&nbsp;Oksana Prokopchuk-Gauk,&nbsp;Julian Regehr,&nbsp;Jo Schmid,&nbsp;Andrew W Shih,&nbsp;Justin A Smith,&nbsp;Jan Trojanowski,&nbsp;Erik Vu,&nbsp;Markus Ziesmann,&nbsp;Brodie Nolan","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20220151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early resuscitation with blood components or products is emerging as best practice in selected patients with trauma and medical patients; as a result, out-of-hospital transfusion (OHT) programs are being developed based on limited and often conflicting evidence. This study aimed to provide guidance to Canadian critical care transport organizations on the development of OHT protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study period was July 2021 to June 2022. We used a modified RAND Delphi process to achieve consensus on statements created by the study team guiding various aspects of OHT in the context of critical care transport. Purposive sampling ensured representative distribution of participants in regard to geography and relevant clinical specialties. We conducted 2 written survey Delphi rounds, followed by a virtual panel discussion (round 3). Consensus was defined as a median score of at least 6 on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (\"Definitely should not include\") to 7 (\"Definitely should include\"). Statements that did not achieve consensus in the first 2 rounds were discussed and voted on during the panel discussion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen subject experts participated in the study, all of whom completed the 3 Delphi rounds. After the study process was completed, a total of 39 statements were agreed on, covering the following domains: general oversight and clinical governance, storage and transport of blood components and products, initiation of OHT, types of blood components and products, delivery and monitoring of OHT, indications for and use of hemostatic adjuncts, and resuscitation targets of OHT.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This expert consensus document provides guidance on OHT best practices. The consensus statements should support efficient and safe OHT in national and international critical care transport programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10432,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":"11 3","pages":"E546-E559"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a4/be/cmajo.20220151.PMC10310344.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a national out-of-hospital transfusion protocol: a modified RAND Delphi study.\",\"authors\":\"Johannes von Vopelius-Feldt,&nbsp;Joel Lockwood,&nbsp;Sameer Mal,&nbsp;Andrew Beckett,&nbsp;Jeannie Callum,&nbsp;Adam Greene,&nbsp;Jeremy Grushka,&nbsp;Aditi Khandelwal,&nbsp;Yulia Lin,&nbsp;Susan Nahirniak,&nbsp;Katerina Pavenski,&nbsp;Michael Peddle,&nbsp;Oksana Prokopchuk-Gauk,&nbsp;Julian Regehr,&nbsp;Jo Schmid,&nbsp;Andrew W Shih,&nbsp;Justin A Smith,&nbsp;Jan Trojanowski,&nbsp;Erik Vu,&nbsp;Markus Ziesmann,&nbsp;Brodie Nolan\",\"doi\":\"10.9778/cmajo.20220151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early resuscitation with blood components or products is emerging as best practice in selected patients with trauma and medical patients; as a result, out-of-hospital transfusion (OHT) programs are being developed based on limited and often conflicting evidence. This study aimed to provide guidance to Canadian critical care transport organizations on the development of OHT protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study period was July 2021 to June 2022. We used a modified RAND Delphi process to achieve consensus on statements created by the study team guiding various aspects of OHT in the context of critical care transport. Purposive sampling ensured representative distribution of participants in regard to geography and relevant clinical specialties. We conducted 2 written survey Delphi rounds, followed by a virtual panel discussion (round 3). Consensus was defined as a median score of at least 6 on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (\\\"Definitely should not include\\\") to 7 (\\\"Definitely should include\\\"). Statements that did not achieve consensus in the first 2 rounds were discussed and voted on during the panel discussion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen subject experts participated in the study, all of whom completed the 3 Delphi rounds. After the study process was completed, a total of 39 statements were agreed on, covering the following domains: general oversight and clinical governance, storage and transport of blood components and products, initiation of OHT, types of blood components and products, delivery and monitoring of OHT, indications for and use of hemostatic adjuncts, and resuscitation targets of OHT.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This expert consensus document provides guidance on OHT best practices. The consensus statements should support efficient and safe OHT in national and international critical care transport programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CMAJ open\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"E546-E559\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a4/be/cmajo.20220151.PMC10310344.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CMAJ open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:血液成分或制品的早期复苏正在成为选定的创伤患者和内科患者的最佳做法;因此,院外输血(OHT)方案的制定是基于有限且经常相互矛盾的证据。本研究旨在为加拿大重症监护运输组织提供OHT协议制定方面的指导。方法:研究时间为2021年7月至2022年6月。我们使用了一种改进的兰德德尔菲过程来对研究小组在重症监护运输背景下指导OHT各个方面的陈述达成共识。有目的的抽样确保了参与者在地理和相关临床专业方面的代表性分布。我们进行了两轮德尔菲书面调查,随后进行了虚拟小组讨论(第三轮)。共识被定义为在李克特量表上的中位数得分至少为6分,范围从1(“绝对不应该包括”)到7(“绝对应该包括”)。对于前两轮未能达成共识的陈述,将在小组讨论中进行讨论和投票。结果:17位受试者专家参与研究,均完成了3轮德尔菲。研究过程完成后,共达成了39项声明,涵盖以下领域:一般监督和临床治理、血液成分和制品的储存和运输、OHT的开始、血液成分和制品的类型、OHT的递送和监测、止血辅助剂的适应症和使用,以及OHT的复苏目标。解释:这份专家共识文件提供了关于OHT最佳实践的指导。共识声明应支持在国家和国际重症监护运输计划中有效和安全的OHT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of a national out-of-hospital transfusion protocol: a modified RAND Delphi study.

Background: Early resuscitation with blood components or products is emerging as best practice in selected patients with trauma and medical patients; as a result, out-of-hospital transfusion (OHT) programs are being developed based on limited and often conflicting evidence. This study aimed to provide guidance to Canadian critical care transport organizations on the development of OHT protocols.

Methods: The study period was July 2021 to June 2022. We used a modified RAND Delphi process to achieve consensus on statements created by the study team guiding various aspects of OHT in the context of critical care transport. Purposive sampling ensured representative distribution of participants in regard to geography and relevant clinical specialties. We conducted 2 written survey Delphi rounds, followed by a virtual panel discussion (round 3). Consensus was defined as a median score of at least 6 on a Likert scale ranging from 1 ("Definitely should not include") to 7 ("Definitely should include"). Statements that did not achieve consensus in the first 2 rounds were discussed and voted on during the panel discussion.

Results: Seventeen subject experts participated in the study, all of whom completed the 3 Delphi rounds. After the study process was completed, a total of 39 statements were agreed on, covering the following domains: general oversight and clinical governance, storage and transport of blood components and products, initiation of OHT, types of blood components and products, delivery and monitoring of OHT, indications for and use of hemostatic adjuncts, and resuscitation targets of OHT.

Interpretation: This expert consensus document provides guidance on OHT best practices. The consensus statements should support efficient and safe OHT in national and international critical care transport programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validity of diagnoses of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Canadian administrative health data: a multiprovince, population-based cohort study. Trends in attachment to a primary care provider in Ontario, 2008-2018: an interrupted time-series analysis. Identifying clusters of coexisting conditions and outcomes among adults admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia: a multicentre cohort study. Is the number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics in midlife associated with lower risk of cancer? Evidence from 3 European prospective cohorts. Trends in antihypertensive drug utilization in British Columbia, 2004-2019: a descriptive study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1