{"title":"犬CRP定量荧光免疫测定方法的建立及临床评价。","authors":"Jawun Choi, Min-Jae Yoo, Ye-Ji Jang, Byeonghak Na, Seul-Ki Seo, Joungdae Moon, Jihoo Lee, Jae-Won Seol","doi":"10.1080/23144599.2023.2247250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Canine C-reactive protein (cCRP) is one of the major positive acute phase proteins in dogs and is commonly measured to detect and monitor systemic inflammation as well as the efficacy of treatment. Traditional methods for testing cCPR, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), have some drawbacks, such as a long time for diagnosis and the requirement of well-equipped laboratories. Therefore, there is a need for a rapid and precise diagnostic test for cCRP at point-of-care. This study assessed the accuracy, precision, and validated clinical effectiveness of a diagnostic test based on fluorescent lateral flow immunoassay to detect cCRP. For the standard cCRP concentration ranging from 0 to 200 μg/mL, the cCRP diagnostic test showed strong linearity with R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9977 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and both inter- and intra-assay CVs were <14%. The limit of detection and limit of quantitation were found to be 4.0 μg/mL and 5.0 μg/mL, respectively. The cCRP serum concentration was evaluated in 21 client-owned dogs and the results were compared to a previously validated ELISA. The Pearson Correlation Coefficient between the diagnostic test kit and ELISA was 0.942 [95% confidence interval: 0.859 to 0.976, <i>p</i> < 0.001], and the Bland-Altman plot indicated a bias of 26.82% [95% limits of agreement: -56.03 to 109.67], indicating a significant correlation and the agreement between the data from the cCRP diagnostic test and ELISA. In conclusion, the fluorescent immunoassay based diagnostic test is a suitable option for rapidly and precisely detecting cCRP in dogs, providing a convenient alternative to traditional methods for diagnosing acute inflammation.</p>","PeriodicalId":45744,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Veterinary Science and Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"87-93"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and clinical evaluation of a quantitative fluorescent immunoassay for detecting canine CRP.\",\"authors\":\"Jawun Choi, Min-Jae Yoo, Ye-Ji Jang, Byeonghak Na, Seul-Ki Seo, Joungdae Moon, Jihoo Lee, Jae-Won Seol\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23144599.2023.2247250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Canine C-reactive protein (cCRP) is one of the major positive acute phase proteins in dogs and is commonly measured to detect and monitor systemic inflammation as well as the efficacy of treatment. Traditional methods for testing cCPR, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), have some drawbacks, such as a long time for diagnosis and the requirement of well-equipped laboratories. Therefore, there is a need for a rapid and precise diagnostic test for cCRP at point-of-care. This study assessed the accuracy, precision, and validated clinical effectiveness of a diagnostic test based on fluorescent lateral flow immunoassay to detect cCRP. For the standard cCRP concentration ranging from 0 to 200 μg/mL, the cCRP diagnostic test showed strong linearity with R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9977 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and both inter- and intra-assay CVs were <14%. The limit of detection and limit of quantitation were found to be 4.0 μg/mL and 5.0 μg/mL, respectively. The cCRP serum concentration was evaluated in 21 client-owned dogs and the results were compared to a previously validated ELISA. The Pearson Correlation Coefficient between the diagnostic test kit and ELISA was 0.942 [95% confidence interval: 0.859 to 0.976, <i>p</i> < 0.001], and the Bland-Altman plot indicated a bias of 26.82% [95% limits of agreement: -56.03 to 109.67], indicating a significant correlation and the agreement between the data from the cCRP diagnostic test and ELISA. In conclusion, the fluorescent immunoassay based diagnostic test is a suitable option for rapidly and precisely detecting cCRP in dogs, providing a convenient alternative to traditional methods for diagnosing acute inflammation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Veterinary Science and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"87-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464547/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Veterinary Science and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23144599.2023.2247250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Veterinary Science and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23144599.2023.2247250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
犬C反应蛋白(cCRP)是犬的主要阳性急性期蛋白之一,通常用于检测和监测全身炎症以及治疗效果。传统的cCPR检测方法,包括酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA),存在一些缺点,如诊断时间长,需要设备齐全的实验室。因此,需要在护理点对cCPR进行快速准确的诊断测试。本研究评估了基于荧光侧流免疫测定法检测cCPR的诊断测试的准确性、精密度和经验证的临床有效性。对于0至200μg/mL的标准cCPR浓度,cCPR诊断试验显示出强线性,R2为0.9977(p p
Development and clinical evaluation of a quantitative fluorescent immunoassay for detecting canine CRP.
Canine C-reactive protein (cCRP) is one of the major positive acute phase proteins in dogs and is commonly measured to detect and monitor systemic inflammation as well as the efficacy of treatment. Traditional methods for testing cCPR, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), have some drawbacks, such as a long time for diagnosis and the requirement of well-equipped laboratories. Therefore, there is a need for a rapid and precise diagnostic test for cCRP at point-of-care. This study assessed the accuracy, precision, and validated clinical effectiveness of a diagnostic test based on fluorescent lateral flow immunoassay to detect cCRP. For the standard cCRP concentration ranging from 0 to 200 μg/mL, the cCRP diagnostic test showed strong linearity with R2 of 0.9977 (p < 0.001), and both inter- and intra-assay CVs were <14%. The limit of detection and limit of quantitation were found to be 4.0 μg/mL and 5.0 μg/mL, respectively. The cCRP serum concentration was evaluated in 21 client-owned dogs and the results were compared to a previously validated ELISA. The Pearson Correlation Coefficient between the diagnostic test kit and ELISA was 0.942 [95% confidence interval: 0.859 to 0.976, p < 0.001], and the Bland-Altman plot indicated a bias of 26.82% [95% limits of agreement: -56.03 to 109.67], indicating a significant correlation and the agreement between the data from the cCRP diagnostic test and ELISA. In conclusion, the fluorescent immunoassay based diagnostic test is a suitable option for rapidly and precisely detecting cCRP in dogs, providing a convenient alternative to traditional methods for diagnosing acute inflammation.