Stricker学习跨度标准有效性:一种远程自我管理、多设备兼容的数字词表记忆测量方法在区分淀粉样蛋白和tau PET定义的生物标志物组别方面显示出与亲临现场的听觉言语学习测试相似的能力。

IF 2.6 4区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-30 DOI:10.1017/S1355617723000322
Nikki H Stricker, John L Stricker, Ryan D Frank, Winnie Z Fan, Teresa J Christianson, Jay S Patel, Aimee J Karstens, Walter K Kremers, Mary M Machulda, Julie A Fields, Jonathan Graff-Radford, Clifford R Jack, David S Knopman, Michelle M Mielke, Ronald C Petersen
{"title":"Stricker学习跨度标准有效性:一种远程自我管理、多设备兼容的数字词表记忆测量方法在区分淀粉样蛋白和tau PET定义的生物标志物组别方面显示出与亲临现场的听觉言语学习测试相似的能力。","authors":"Nikki H Stricker, John L Stricker, Ryan D Frank, Winnie Z Fan, Teresa J Christianson, Jay S Patel, Aimee J Karstens, Walter K Kremers, Mary M Machulda, Julie A Fields, Jonathan Graff-Radford, Clifford R Jack, David S Knopman, Michelle M Mielke, Ronald C Petersen","doi":"10.1017/S1355617723000322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Stricker Learning Span (SLS) is a computer-adaptive digital word list memory test specifically designed for remote assessment and self-administration on a web-based multi-device platform (Mayo Test Drive). We aimed to establish criterion validity of the SLS by comparing its ability to differentiate biomarker-defined groups to the person-administered Rey's Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants (<i>N</i> = 353; mean age = 71, SD = 11; 93% cognitively unimpaired [CU]) completed the AVLT during an in-person visit, the SLS remotely (within 3 months) and had brain amyloid and tau PET scans available (within 3 years). Overlapping groups were formed for 1) those on the Alzheimer's disease (AD) continuum (amyloid PET positive, A+, <i>n</i> = 125) or not (A-, <i>n</i> = 228), and those with biological AD (amyloid and tau PET positive, A+T+, <i>n</i> = 55) vs no evidence of AD pathology (A-T-, <i>n</i> = 195). Analyses were repeated among CU participants only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SLS and AVLT showed similar ability to differentiate biomarker-defined groups when comparing AUROCs (<i>p</i>'s > .05). In logistic regression models, SLS contributed significantly to predicting biomarker group beyond age, education, and sex, including when limited to CU participants. Medium (A- vs A+) to large (A-T- vs A+T+) unadjusted effect sizes were observed for both SLS and AVLT. Learning and delay variables were similar in terms of ability to separate biomarker groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remotely administered SLS performed similarly to in-person-administered AVLT in its ability to separate biomarker-defined groups, providing evidence of criterion validity. Results suggest the SLS may be sensitive to detecting subtle objective cognitive decline in preclinical AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10756923/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stricker Learning Span criterion validity: a remote self-administered multi-device compatible digital word list memory measure shows similar ability to differentiate amyloid and tau PET-defined biomarker groups as in-person Auditory Verbal Learning Test.\",\"authors\":\"Nikki H Stricker, John L Stricker, Ryan D Frank, Winnie Z Fan, Teresa J Christianson, Jay S Patel, Aimee J Karstens, Walter K Kremers, Mary M Machulda, Julie A Fields, Jonathan Graff-Radford, Clifford R Jack, David S Knopman, Michelle M Mielke, Ronald C Petersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1355617723000322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Stricker Learning Span (SLS) is a computer-adaptive digital word list memory test specifically designed for remote assessment and self-administration on a web-based multi-device platform (Mayo Test Drive). We aimed to establish criterion validity of the SLS by comparing its ability to differentiate biomarker-defined groups to the person-administered Rey's Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants (<i>N</i> = 353; mean age = 71, SD = 11; 93% cognitively unimpaired [CU]) completed the AVLT during an in-person visit, the SLS remotely (within 3 months) and had brain amyloid and tau PET scans available (within 3 years). Overlapping groups were formed for 1) those on the Alzheimer's disease (AD) continuum (amyloid PET positive, A+, <i>n</i> = 125) or not (A-, <i>n</i> = 228), and those with biological AD (amyloid and tau PET positive, A+T+, <i>n</i> = 55) vs no evidence of AD pathology (A-T-, <i>n</i> = 195). Analyses were repeated among CU participants only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SLS and AVLT showed similar ability to differentiate biomarker-defined groups when comparing AUROCs (<i>p</i>'s > .05). In logistic regression models, SLS contributed significantly to predicting biomarker group beyond age, education, and sex, including when limited to CU participants. Medium (A- vs A+) to large (A-T- vs A+T+) unadjusted effect sizes were observed for both SLS and AVLT. Learning and delay variables were similar in terms of ability to separate biomarker groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remotely administered SLS performed similarly to in-person-administered AVLT in its ability to separate biomarker-defined groups, providing evidence of criterion validity. Results suggest the SLS may be sensitive to detecting subtle objective cognitive decline in preclinical AD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10756923/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617723000322\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617723000322","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:斯特里克学习跨度(SLS)是一种计算机自适应数字单词表记忆测试,专门设计用于远程评估和基于网络的多设备平台(梅奥测试驱动)上的自我管理。我们的目的是通过比较 SLS 与由个人操作的雷氏听觉言语学习测试(AVLT)在区分生物标志物定义的群体方面的能力,确定 SLS 的标准有效性:参与者(N = 353;平均年龄 = 71,SD = 11;93%认知功能未受损[CU])在亲临现场时完成 AVLT 测试,在 3 个月内完成 SLS 远程测试,并在 3 年内完成脑淀粉样蛋白和 tau PET 扫描。重叠组包括:1)阿尔茨海默病(AD)连续体(淀粉样蛋白 PET 阳性,A+,n = 125)或非连续体(A-,n = 228),以及生物 AD(淀粉样蛋白和 tau PET 阳性,A+T+,n = 55)与无 AD 病理证据(A-T-,n = 195)。结果显示,SLS和AVLT的结果显示,SLS和AVLT的结果均为阳性:结果:在比较 AUROCs 时,SLS 和 AVLT 在区分生物标记物定义的组别方面表现出相似的能力(P>0.05)。在逻辑回归模型中,除年龄、教育程度和性别外,SLS 对预测生物标志物组别也有显著作用,包括在仅限于 CU 参与者的情况下。在 SLS 和 AVLT 中都观察到了中等(A- vs A+)到较大(A-T- vs A+T+)的未调整效应大小。学习和延迟变量在区分生物标志物组别方面的能力相似:远程管理的 SLS 与亲自管理的 AVLT 在区分生物标志物定义的组别方面表现相似,为标准有效性提供了证据。结果表明,SLS可以灵敏地检测出临床前AD患者细微的客观认知能力下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stricker Learning Span criterion validity: a remote self-administered multi-device compatible digital word list memory measure shows similar ability to differentiate amyloid and tau PET-defined biomarker groups as in-person Auditory Verbal Learning Test.

Objective: The Stricker Learning Span (SLS) is a computer-adaptive digital word list memory test specifically designed for remote assessment and self-administration on a web-based multi-device platform (Mayo Test Drive). We aimed to establish criterion validity of the SLS by comparing its ability to differentiate biomarker-defined groups to the person-administered Rey's Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT).

Method: Participants (N = 353; mean age = 71, SD = 11; 93% cognitively unimpaired [CU]) completed the AVLT during an in-person visit, the SLS remotely (within 3 months) and had brain amyloid and tau PET scans available (within 3 years). Overlapping groups were formed for 1) those on the Alzheimer's disease (AD) continuum (amyloid PET positive, A+, n = 125) or not (A-, n = 228), and those with biological AD (amyloid and tau PET positive, A+T+, n = 55) vs no evidence of AD pathology (A-T-, n = 195). Analyses were repeated among CU participants only.

Results: The SLS and AVLT showed similar ability to differentiate biomarker-defined groups when comparing AUROCs (p's > .05). In logistic regression models, SLS contributed significantly to predicting biomarker group beyond age, education, and sex, including when limited to CU participants. Medium (A- vs A+) to large (A-T- vs A+T+) unadjusted effect sizes were observed for both SLS and AVLT. Learning and delay variables were similar in terms of ability to separate biomarker groups.

Conclusions: Remotely administered SLS performed similarly to in-person-administered AVLT in its ability to separate biomarker-defined groups, providing evidence of criterion validity. Results suggest the SLS may be sensitive to detecting subtle objective cognitive decline in preclinical AD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
185
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society is the official journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, an organization of over 4,500 international members from a variety of disciplines. The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society welcomes original, creative, high quality research papers covering all areas of neuropsychology. The focus of articles may be primarily experimental, applied, or clinical. Contributions will broadly reflect the interest of all areas of neuropsychology, including but not limited to: development of cognitive processes, brain-behavior relationships, adult and pediatric neuropsychology, neurobehavioral syndromes (such as aphasia or apraxia), and the interfaces of neuropsychology with related areas such as behavioral neurology, neuropsychiatry, genetics, and cognitive neuroscience. Papers that utilize behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological measures are appropriate. To assure maximum flexibility and to promote diverse mechanisms of scholarly communication, the following formats are available in addition to a Regular Research Article: Brief Communication is a shorter research article; Rapid Communication is intended for "fast breaking" new work that does not yet justify a full length article and is placed on a fast review track; Case Report is a theoretically important and unique case study; Critical Review and Short Review are thoughtful considerations of topics of importance to neuropsychology and include meta-analyses; Dialogue provides a forum for publishing two distinct positions on controversial issues in a point-counterpoint format; Special Issue and Special Section consist of several articles linked thematically; Letter to the Editor responds to recent articles published in the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society; and Book Review, which is considered but is no longer solicited.
期刊最新文献
Adherence to high-frequency ecological momentary assessment in persons with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. The Grenada Learning and Memory Scale: Psychometric features and normative data in Caribbean preschool children. Beyond brain injury: Examining the neuropsychological and psychosocial sequelae of post-traumatic epilepsy. Psychometric and adherence considerations for high-frequency, smartphone-based cognitive screening protocols in older adults. Comparing and linking the Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1