Esra Erğun Keşli, Bekir Güçlü, Fatih Özden, Burcu Dilek
{"title":"智能手机用户握力、疼痛阈值、疼痛耐受性和功能的调查。","authors":"Esra Erğun Keşli, Bekir Güçlü, Fatih Özden, Burcu Dilek","doi":"10.1080/08990220.2023.2186392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/aim of the study: </strong>Few studies have demonstrated the effects of smartphone use on grip strength and upper extremity function. The present study was purposed to compare smartphone users' grip/lateral pinch strength, pain threshold/tolerance and upper limb function.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with 241 individuals. Participants were divided into three groups with the cut-off values of the Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS). The Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI) was used to determine the dominant side. Thumb pain threshold and tolerance were evaluated with the algometer. A hand dynamometer measured the grip and lateral pinch strength. Upper extremity functions were evaluated with the Shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (Quick-DASH).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Handgrip strength of the dominant/non-dominant extremities and Quick-DASH scores were higher in low-level smartphone users (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups on lateral pinch strength and pain threshold/tolerance (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Smartphone usage significantly affected dominant and non-dominant hand grip strength (Standardized <i>β</i><sub>1</sub> = -0.15, <i>β</i><sub>2</sub> = -0.15, <i>p</i> < 0.05). In addition, the smartphone use level negatively affected dominant lateral pinch strength (Standardized <i>β</i> = -0.12, <i>p</i> = 0.05). On the other hand, smartphone use positively affected upper extremity function (Standardized <i>β</i> = 0.17, <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As smartphone addiction increases, standard handgrip strength and functionality decrease. Pain threshold/tolerance is not affected by smartphone use. Future studies should focus on fine motor skills to present a more comprehensive upper limb function evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49498,"journal":{"name":"Somatosensory and Motor Research","volume":"40 3","pages":"103-109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of grip strength, pain threshold, pain tolerance and function in smartphone users.\",\"authors\":\"Esra Erğun Keşli, Bekir Güçlü, Fatih Özden, Burcu Dilek\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08990220.2023.2186392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose/aim of the study: </strong>Few studies have demonstrated the effects of smartphone use on grip strength and upper extremity function. The present study was purposed to compare smartphone users' grip/lateral pinch strength, pain threshold/tolerance and upper limb function.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with 241 individuals. Participants were divided into three groups with the cut-off values of the Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS). The Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI) was used to determine the dominant side. Thumb pain threshold and tolerance were evaluated with the algometer. A hand dynamometer measured the grip and lateral pinch strength. Upper extremity functions were evaluated with the Shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (Quick-DASH).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Handgrip strength of the dominant/non-dominant extremities and Quick-DASH scores were higher in low-level smartphone users (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups on lateral pinch strength and pain threshold/tolerance (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Smartphone usage significantly affected dominant and non-dominant hand grip strength (Standardized <i>β</i><sub>1</sub> = -0.15, <i>β</i><sub>2</sub> = -0.15, <i>p</i> < 0.05). In addition, the smartphone use level negatively affected dominant lateral pinch strength (Standardized <i>β</i> = -0.12, <i>p</i> = 0.05). On the other hand, smartphone use positively affected upper extremity function (Standardized <i>β</i> = 0.17, <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As smartphone addiction increases, standard handgrip strength and functionality decrease. Pain threshold/tolerance is not affected by smartphone use. Future studies should focus on fine motor skills to present a more comprehensive upper limb function evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Somatosensory and Motor Research\",\"volume\":\"40 3\",\"pages\":\"103-109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Somatosensory and Motor Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2023.2186392\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Somatosensory and Motor Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2023.2186392","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigation of grip strength, pain threshold, pain tolerance and function in smartphone users.
Purpose/aim of the study: Few studies have demonstrated the effects of smartphone use on grip strength and upper extremity function. The present study was purposed to compare smartphone users' grip/lateral pinch strength, pain threshold/tolerance and upper limb function.
Materials and methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with 241 individuals. Participants were divided into three groups with the cut-off values of the Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS). The Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI) was used to determine the dominant side. Thumb pain threshold and tolerance were evaluated with the algometer. A hand dynamometer measured the grip and lateral pinch strength. Upper extremity functions were evaluated with the Shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (Quick-DASH).
Results: Handgrip strength of the dominant/non-dominant extremities and Quick-DASH scores were higher in low-level smartphone users (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups on lateral pinch strength and pain threshold/tolerance (p > 0.05). Smartphone usage significantly affected dominant and non-dominant hand grip strength (Standardized β1 = -0.15, β2 = -0.15, p < 0.05). In addition, the smartphone use level negatively affected dominant lateral pinch strength (Standardized β = -0.12, p = 0.05). On the other hand, smartphone use positively affected upper extremity function (Standardized β = 0.17, p < 0.05).
Conclusions: As smartphone addiction increases, standard handgrip strength and functionality decrease. Pain threshold/tolerance is not affected by smartphone use. Future studies should focus on fine motor skills to present a more comprehensive upper limb function evaluation.
期刊介绍:
Somatosensory & Motor Research publishes original, high-quality papers that encompass the entire range of investigations related to the neural bases for somatic sensation, somatic motor function, somatic motor integration, and modeling thereof. Comprising anatomical, physiological, biochemical, pharmacological, behavioural, and psychophysical studies, Somatosensory & Motor Research covers all facets of the peripheral and central processes underlying cutaneous sensation, and includes studies relating to afferent and efferent mechanisms of deep structures (e.g., viscera, muscle). Studies of motor systems at all levels of the neuraxis are covered, but reports restricted to non-neural aspects of muscle generally would belong in other journals.