基于腹部乳房重建的血管测绘:当前和即将到来的成像方式的综合回顾。

Eplasty Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Taylor J Ibelli, Sumanth Chennareddy, Max Mandelbaum, Peter W Henderson
{"title":"基于腹部乳房重建的血管测绘:当前和即将到来的成像方式的综合回顾。","authors":"Taylor J Ibelli,&nbsp;Sumanth Chennareddy,&nbsp;Max Mandelbaum,&nbsp;Peter W Henderson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preoperative vascular imaging is a very common element of surgical planning for abdominal-based breast reconstruction (ABBR). Surgeons must tailor which flap is best suited for each respective patient based on the patient's health and vascular anatomy. The goal of this review is to give surgeons practical tools for choosing which imaging technology best suits their patient's needs for successful breast reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of literature was undertaken on Google scholar to assess preoperative imaging modalities used for ABBR. Search terms included <i>breast reconstruction, deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap,</i> and <i>abdominal imaging.</i> Articles were included based on relevance and significance to ABBR. Advantages and disadvantages of each imaging modality were then classified according to clinically relevant utility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, imaging technologies that produce 3-dimensional images were found to have greater resolution for identifying perforators and the pedicle network than 2- dimensional images.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This paper addresses the strengths and weaknesses of the currently used imaging modalities described and also discusses new technologies that may be helpful in the future for planning of ABBR.</p>","PeriodicalId":11687,"journal":{"name":"Eplasty","volume":"23 ","pages":"e44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472443/pdf/eplasty-23-e44.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vascular Mapping for Abdominal-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comprehensive Review of Current and Upcoming Imaging Modalities.\",\"authors\":\"Taylor J Ibelli,&nbsp;Sumanth Chennareddy,&nbsp;Max Mandelbaum,&nbsp;Peter W Henderson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preoperative vascular imaging is a very common element of surgical planning for abdominal-based breast reconstruction (ABBR). Surgeons must tailor which flap is best suited for each respective patient based on the patient's health and vascular anatomy. The goal of this review is to give surgeons practical tools for choosing which imaging technology best suits their patient's needs for successful breast reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of literature was undertaken on Google scholar to assess preoperative imaging modalities used for ABBR. Search terms included <i>breast reconstruction, deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap,</i> and <i>abdominal imaging.</i> Articles were included based on relevance and significance to ABBR. Advantages and disadvantages of each imaging modality were then classified according to clinically relevant utility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, imaging technologies that produce 3-dimensional images were found to have greater resolution for identifying perforators and the pedicle network than 2- dimensional images.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This paper addresses the strengths and weaknesses of the currently used imaging modalities described and also discusses new technologies that may be helpful in the future for planning of ABBR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eplasty\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"e44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472443/pdf/eplasty-23-e44.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术前血管成像是腹部乳房重建(ABBR)手术计划中非常常见的元素。外科医生必须根据病人的健康状况和血管解剖结构为每个病人量身定制最适合的皮瓣。这篇综述的目的是给外科医生提供实用的工具,帮助他们选择最适合患者需要的成像技术,以获得成功的乳房重建。方法:在Google scholar上查阅文献,评估ABBR术前影像学方式。检索词包括乳房重建、上腹部深下穿支(DIEP)皮瓣和腹部影像学。根据ABBR的相关性和重要性纳入文章,然后根据临床相关效用对每种成像方式的优缺点进行分类。结果:总的来说,与二维图像相比,三维成像技术在识别穿支和椎弓根网络方面具有更高的分辨率。结论:本文阐述了目前使用的成像模式的优缺点,并讨论了可能有助于未来ABBR规划的新技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vascular Mapping for Abdominal-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comprehensive Review of Current and Upcoming Imaging Modalities.

Background: Preoperative vascular imaging is a very common element of surgical planning for abdominal-based breast reconstruction (ABBR). Surgeons must tailor which flap is best suited for each respective patient based on the patient's health and vascular anatomy. The goal of this review is to give surgeons practical tools for choosing which imaging technology best suits their patient's needs for successful breast reconstruction.

Methods: A review of literature was undertaken on Google scholar to assess preoperative imaging modalities used for ABBR. Search terms included breast reconstruction, deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap, and abdominal imaging. Articles were included based on relevance and significance to ABBR. Advantages and disadvantages of each imaging modality were then classified according to clinically relevant utility.

Results: Overall, imaging technologies that produce 3-dimensional images were found to have greater resolution for identifying perforators and the pedicle network than 2- dimensional images.

Conclusions: This paper addresses the strengths and weaknesses of the currently used imaging modalities described and also discusses new technologies that may be helpful in the future for planning of ABBR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does Size Really Matter? A Review on How to Determine the Optimal Umbilical Size During an Abdominoplasty. The 5 D's to Dunk the Dog: A Retrospective Clinical Review to Prevent Dog-Ear Contour Abnormalities in Vertical Breast Reductions and Breast Lifts. Beneficial Impact of "Supercharged" Pectoralis Major Musculocutaneous Flap With Indocyanine Green Angiography on Reconstruction in a Patient at High Risk for Necrosis. The Safety of Long Inframammary Fold to Nipple Lengths in Inferior Pedicle Breast Reductions: A Decade of Experience. Are Large Intraoperative Fill Volumes Associated With Increased Complications After Tissue Expander Placement?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1