在氯胺酮和难治性抑郁症的背景下探索动图。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research Pub Date : 2023-09-05 DOI:10.1002/mpr.1984
Claire Punturieri, Wallace C. Duncan Jr., Dede Greenstein, Gavi Shandler, Carlos A. Zarate Jr., Jennifer W. Evans
{"title":"在氯胺酮和难治性抑郁症的背景下探索动图。","authors":"Claire Punturieri,&nbsp;Wallace C. Duncan Jr.,&nbsp;Dede Greenstein,&nbsp;Gavi Shandler,&nbsp;Carlos A. Zarate Jr.,&nbsp;Jennifer W. Evans","doi":"10.1002/mpr.1984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study explored the potential of non-parametric and complexity analysis metrics to detect changes in activity post-ketamine and their association with depressive symptomatology.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Individuals with treatment-resistant depression (TRD: <i>n</i> = 27, 16F, 35.9 ± 10.8 years) and healthy volunteers (HVs: <i>n</i> = 9, 4F, 36.4 ± 9.59 years) had their activity monitored during an inpatient, double-blind, crossover study where they received an infusion of ketamine or saline placebo. All participants were 18–65 years old, medication-free, and had a MADRS score ≥20. Non-parametric metrics averaged over each study day, metrics derived from complexity analysis, and traditionally calculated non-parametric metrics averaged over two weeks were calculated from the actigraphy time series. A separate analysis was conducted for a subsample (<i>n</i> = 17) to assess the utility of these metrics in a hospital setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In HVs, lower intradaily variability was observed within daily rest/activity patterns post-ketamine versus post-placebo (<i>F</i> = 5.16(1,15), <i>p</i> = 0.04). No other significant effects of drug or drug-by-time or correlations between depressive symptomatology and activity were detected.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Weak associations between non-parametric variables and ketamine were found but were not consistent across actigraphy measures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Clinical Trial registration</h3>\n \n <p>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00088699.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50310,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10804352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An exploration of actigraphy in the context of ketamine and treatment-resistant depression\",\"authors\":\"Claire Punturieri,&nbsp;Wallace C. Duncan Jr.,&nbsp;Dede Greenstein,&nbsp;Gavi Shandler,&nbsp;Carlos A. Zarate Jr.,&nbsp;Jennifer W. Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mpr.1984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study explored the potential of non-parametric and complexity analysis metrics to detect changes in activity post-ketamine and their association with depressive symptomatology.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Individuals with treatment-resistant depression (TRD: <i>n</i> = 27, 16F, 35.9 ± 10.8 years) and healthy volunteers (HVs: <i>n</i> = 9, 4F, 36.4 ± 9.59 years) had their activity monitored during an inpatient, double-blind, crossover study where they received an infusion of ketamine or saline placebo. All participants were 18–65 years old, medication-free, and had a MADRS score ≥20. Non-parametric metrics averaged over each study day, metrics derived from complexity analysis, and traditionally calculated non-parametric metrics averaged over two weeks were calculated from the actigraphy time series. A separate analysis was conducted for a subsample (<i>n</i> = 17) to assess the utility of these metrics in a hospital setting.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In HVs, lower intradaily variability was observed within daily rest/activity patterns post-ketamine versus post-placebo (<i>F</i> = 5.16(1,15), <i>p</i> = 0.04). No other significant effects of drug or drug-by-time or correlations between depressive symptomatology and activity were detected.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Weak associations between non-parametric variables and ketamine were found but were not consistent across actigraphy measures.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Clinical Trial registration</h3>\\n \\n <p>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00088699.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10804352/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mpr.1984\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mpr.1984","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究探讨了非参数和复杂性分析指标检测氯胺酮后活动变化的潜力及其与抑郁症状的关联:在一项住院、双盲、交叉研究中,接受氯胺酮或生理盐水安慰剂输注的耐药抑郁症患者(TRD:n = 27,16F,35.9 ± 10.8 岁)和健康志愿者(HVs:n = 9,4F,36.4 ± 9.59 岁)接受了活动监测。所有参与者的年龄均为 18-65 岁,未服用药物,MADRS 评分≥20 分。从动电图时间序列中计算出了每个研究日的平均非参数指标、从复杂性分析中得出的指标以及传统计算的两周平均非参数指标。对一个子样本(n = 17)进行了单独分析,以评估这些指标在医院环境中的效用:在高危人群中,观察到氯胺酮后与安慰剂后相比,每日休息/活动模式的日内变异性较低(F = 5.16(1,15),P = 0.04)。没有发现药物或药物时间的其他明显影响,也没有发现抑郁症状与活动之间的相关性:结论:非参数变量与氯胺酮之间存在微弱的关联,但在各种动图测量中并不一致:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT00088699。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An exploration of actigraphy in the context of ketamine and treatment-resistant depression

Objectives

This study explored the potential of non-parametric and complexity analysis metrics to detect changes in activity post-ketamine and their association with depressive symptomatology.

Methods

Individuals with treatment-resistant depression (TRD: n = 27, 16F, 35.9 ± 10.8 years) and healthy volunteers (HVs: n = 9, 4F, 36.4 ± 9.59 years) had their activity monitored during an inpatient, double-blind, crossover study where they received an infusion of ketamine or saline placebo. All participants were 18–65 years old, medication-free, and had a MADRS score ≥20. Non-parametric metrics averaged over each study day, metrics derived from complexity analysis, and traditionally calculated non-parametric metrics averaged over two weeks were calculated from the actigraphy time series. A separate analysis was conducted for a subsample (n = 17) to assess the utility of these metrics in a hospital setting.

Results

In HVs, lower intradaily variability was observed within daily rest/activity patterns post-ketamine versus post-placebo (F = 5.16(1,15), p = 0.04). No other significant effects of drug or drug-by-time or correlations between depressive symptomatology and activity were detected.

Conclusions

Weak associations between non-parametric variables and ketamine were found but were not consistent across actigraphy measures.

Clinical Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00088699.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research (MPR) publishes high-standard original research of a technical, methodological, experimental and clinical nature, contributing to the theory, methodology, practice and evaluation of mental and behavioural disorders. The journal targets in particular detailed methodological and design papers from major national and international multicentre studies. There is a close working relationship with the US National Institute of Mental Health, the World Health Organisation (WHO) Diagnostic Instruments Committees, as well as several other European and international organisations. MPR aims to publish rapidly articles of highest methodological quality in such areas as epidemiology, biostatistics, generics, psychopharmacology, psychology and the neurosciences. Articles informing about innovative and critical methodological, statistical and clinical issues, including nosology, can be submitted as regular papers and brief reports. Reviews are only occasionally accepted. MPR seeks to monitor, discuss, influence and improve the standards of mental health and behavioral neuroscience research by providing a platform for rapid publication of outstanding contributions. As a quarterly journal MPR is a major source of information and ideas and is an important medium for students, clinicians and researchers in psychiatry, clinical psychology, epidemiology and the allied disciplines in the mental health field.
期刊最新文献
Introducing the “IJMPR Didactic Papers” Network analysis: An overview for mental health research Are there subgroup differences in the accuracy of ‘screening’ questions for mood and anxiety disorder diagnostic interviews? A prediction model for differential resilience to the effects of combat-related stressors in US army soldiers A control theoretic approach to evaluate and inform ecological momentary interventions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1