开发评估作物保护化学品安全性的现代化方法原型。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation Pub Date : 2024-01-09 Epub Date: 2023-08-31 DOI:10.14573/altex.2307181
Richard A Currie, John Abbott, David A Dreier, Haitian Lu, Tharacad Ramanarayanan, Natalia Ryan, Odette A Watkins, Douglas C Wolf
{"title":"开发评估作物保护化学品安全性的现代化方法原型。","authors":"Richard A Currie, John Abbott, David A Dreier, Haitian Lu, Tharacad Ramanarayanan, Natalia Ryan, Odette A Watkins, Douglas C Wolf","doi":"10.14573/altex.2307181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2019, the US EPA Administrator issued a directive directing the agency away from reliance on vertebrate tests by 2035, whilst maintaining high-quality human health and environmental risk assessments. There is no accepted approach to achieve this. The decade-long duration of the crop protection (CP) chemical R&D process therefore requires both the invention and application of a modernized approach to those CP chemical projects entering corporate research portfolios by the mid-2020s. We conducted problem formulation discussions with regulatory agency scientists which created the problem statement: “Develop, demonstrate, and implement a modern scientifically sound and robust strategy that applies appropriate and flexible exposure and effects characterization without chemical specific vertebrate tests to reliably address risk, uncertainties, and deficiencies in data and its interpretation with equivalent confidence as do the currently accepted test guidelines and meet the regulatory needs of the agencies”. The solution must provide the knowledge needed to confidently conclude human health and environmental protective risk assessments. Exploring this led to a conceptual model involving the creation and parallel submission of a new approach without reliance on chemical-specific vertebrate tests. Assessment in parallel to a traditional package will determine whether it supports some, or all, of the necessary risk management actions. Analysis of any deficiencies will provide valuable feedback to focus development of tools or approaches for subsequent iterations. When found to provide sufficient information, it will form the technical foun­dation of stakeholder engagement to explore acceptance of a new approach to CP chemical risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":51231,"journal":{"name":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","volume":" ","pages":"119-130"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing prototypes of a modernized approach to assess crop protection chemical safety.\",\"authors\":\"Richard A Currie, John Abbott, David A Dreier, Haitian Lu, Tharacad Ramanarayanan, Natalia Ryan, Odette A Watkins, Douglas C Wolf\",\"doi\":\"10.14573/altex.2307181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 2019, the US EPA Administrator issued a directive directing the agency away from reliance on vertebrate tests by 2035, whilst maintaining high-quality human health and environmental risk assessments. There is no accepted approach to achieve this. The decade-long duration of the crop protection (CP) chemical R&D process therefore requires both the invention and application of a modernized approach to those CP chemical projects entering corporate research portfolios by the mid-2020s. We conducted problem formulation discussions with regulatory agency scientists which created the problem statement: “Develop, demonstrate, and implement a modern scientifically sound and robust strategy that applies appropriate and flexible exposure and effects characterization without chemical specific vertebrate tests to reliably address risk, uncertainties, and deficiencies in data and its interpretation with equivalent confidence as do the currently accepted test guidelines and meet the regulatory needs of the agencies”. The solution must provide the knowledge needed to confidently conclude human health and environmental protective risk assessments. Exploring this led to a conceptual model involving the creation and parallel submission of a new approach without reliance on chemical-specific vertebrate tests. Assessment in parallel to a traditional package will determine whether it supports some, or all, of the necessary risk management actions. Analysis of any deficiencies will provide valuable feedback to focus development of tools or approaches for subsequent iterations. When found to provide sufficient information, it will form the technical foun­dation of stakeholder engagement to explore acceptance of a new approach to CP chemical risk assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"119-130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2307181\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2307181","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019 年,美国环保署署长发布指令,要求该机构在 2035 年之前不再依赖脊椎动物测试,同时保持高质量的人类健康和环境风险评估。 目前还没有公认的方法来实现这一目标。因此,作物保护 (CP) 化学品研发过程长达十年之久,这就要求在 2020 年代中期之前,对进入企业研究组合的 CP 化学品项目发明和应用现代化方法。 因此,我们与监管机构的科学家们就问题的提出进行了讨论,并提出了问题陈述:"开发、演示和实施一种科学合理且稳健的现代策略,在不进行特定于化学物质的脊椎动物试验的情况下,应用适当且灵活的暴露和效应特征描述,以可靠的方式解决数据及其解释中的风险、不确定性和缺陷,并与当前公认的试验准则具有同等的可信度,同时满足监管机构的监管需求"。 解决方案必须提供所需的知识,以便有把握地完成人类健康和环境保护风险评估。通过对这一问题的探讨,提出了一个概念模型,即创建并同时提交一种不依赖于特定脊椎动物化学试验的新方法。 与传统方法同时进行的评估将确定该方法是否支持部分或全部必要的风险管理行动。 对任何缺陷的分析都将提供有价值的反馈,以便为后续迭代集中开发工具或方法。当发现该方法能够提供足够的信息时,它将成为利益相关者参与的技术基础,以探索是否接受新的氯化石蜡化学品风险评估方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing prototypes of a modernized approach to assess crop protection chemical safety.

In 2019, the US EPA Administrator issued a directive directing the agency away from reliance on vertebrate tests by 2035, whilst maintaining high-quality human health and environmental risk assessments. There is no accepted approach to achieve this. The decade-long duration of the crop protection (CP) chemical R&D process therefore requires both the invention and application of a modernized approach to those CP chemical projects entering corporate research portfolios by the mid-2020s. We conducted problem formulation discussions with regulatory agency scientists which created the problem statement: “Develop, demonstrate, and implement a modern scientifically sound and robust strategy that applies appropriate and flexible exposure and effects characterization without chemical specific vertebrate tests to reliably address risk, uncertainties, and deficiencies in data and its interpretation with equivalent confidence as do the currently accepted test guidelines and meet the regulatory needs of the agencies”. The solution must provide the knowledge needed to confidently conclude human health and environmental protective risk assessments. Exploring this led to a conceptual model involving the creation and parallel submission of a new approach without reliance on chemical-specific vertebrate tests. Assessment in parallel to a traditional package will determine whether it supports some, or all, of the necessary risk management actions. Analysis of any deficiencies will provide valuable feedback to focus development of tools or approaches for subsequent iterations. When found to provide sufficient information, it will form the technical foun­dation of stakeholder engagement to explore acceptance of a new approach to CP chemical risk assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation
Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.90%
发文量
89
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ALTEX publishes original articles, short communications, reviews, as well as news and comments and meeting reports. Manuscripts submitted to ALTEX are evaluated by two expert reviewers. The evaluation takes into account the scientific merit of a manuscript and its contribution to animal welfare and the 3R principle.
期刊最新文献
Systematic analysis of read-across adaptations in testing proposal evaluations by the European Chemicals Agency. Impact of gut permeability on estimation of oral bioavailability for chemicals in commerce and the environment. Software tools for systematic review literature screening and data extraction: Qualitative user experiences from succinct formal tests. The Virtual Human Platform for Safety Assessment (VHP4Safety) project: Next generation chemical safety assessment based on human data. Characterization of the C17.2 cell line as testing system for endocrine disruption-induced developmental neurotoxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1