认知行为疗法(CBT)加注意偏差修正(ABM)可减少恐慌障碍患者的焦虑敏感性和抑郁症状:一项随机试验。

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Scandinavian journal of psychology Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1111/sjop.12902
Nur Hani Zainal, Samantha N Hellberg, Katherine E Kabel, Claire M Hotchkin, Amanda W Baker
{"title":"认知行为疗法(CBT)加注意偏差修正(ABM)可减少恐慌障碍患者的焦虑敏感性和抑郁症状:一项随机试验。","authors":"Nur Hani Zainal,&nbsp;Samantha N Hellberg,&nbsp;Katherine E Kabel,&nbsp;Claire M Hotchkin,&nbsp;Amanda W Baker","doi":"10.1111/sjop.12902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive bias theories propose that reducing threat hypervigilance in mental disorders can augment cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) outcomes. However, no studies have tested whether adding attention bias modification (ABM) can effectively enhance CBT's effects on anxiety sensitivity (AS), electromyography (EMG), and skin conductance (SC) for panic disorder (PD). This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) thus aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CBT + ABM (vs. CBT plus attention training placebo; PBO) on those outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study is a secondary analysis (Baker et al., 2020). Adults with PD were randomized to receive CBT + ABM (n = 11) or CBT + PBO (n = 12). Before each of the first five CBT sessions, CBT + ABM and CBT + PBO participants completed a 15-min ABM task or attention training PBO, respectively. AS and depression severity as well as SC and EMG during habituation to a loud-tone startle paradigm were assessed. Hierarchical Bayesian analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During pre-post-treatment and pre-follow-up, CBM + ABM (vs. CBT + PBO) led to a notably greater reduction in ASI-Physical (between-group d = -1.26 to -1.25), ASI-Cognitive (d = -1.16 to -1.10), and depression severity (d = -1.23 to -0.99). However, no between-group difference was observed for ASI-Social, EMG, or SC indices.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Adding a brief computerized ABM intervention to CBT for PD protocols may enhance therapeutic change.</p>","PeriodicalId":21435,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of psychology","volume":"64 4","pages":"390-400"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) plus attention bias modification (ABM) reduces anxiety sensitivity and depressive symptoms in panic disorder: A pilot randomized trial.\",\"authors\":\"Nur Hani Zainal,&nbsp;Samantha N Hellberg,&nbsp;Katherine E Kabel,&nbsp;Claire M Hotchkin,&nbsp;Amanda W Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sjop.12902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive bias theories propose that reducing threat hypervigilance in mental disorders can augment cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) outcomes. However, no studies have tested whether adding attention bias modification (ABM) can effectively enhance CBT's effects on anxiety sensitivity (AS), electromyography (EMG), and skin conductance (SC) for panic disorder (PD). This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) thus aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CBT + ABM (vs. CBT plus attention training placebo; PBO) on those outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study is a secondary analysis (Baker et al., 2020). Adults with PD were randomized to receive CBT + ABM (n = 11) or CBT + PBO (n = 12). Before each of the first five CBT sessions, CBT + ABM and CBT + PBO participants completed a 15-min ABM task or attention training PBO, respectively. AS and depression severity as well as SC and EMG during habituation to a loud-tone startle paradigm were assessed. Hierarchical Bayesian analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During pre-post-treatment and pre-follow-up, CBM + ABM (vs. CBT + PBO) led to a notably greater reduction in ASI-Physical (between-group d = -1.26 to -1.25), ASI-Cognitive (d = -1.16 to -1.10), and depression severity (d = -1.23 to -0.99). However, no between-group difference was observed for ASI-Social, EMG, or SC indices.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Adding a brief computerized ABM intervention to CBT for PD protocols may enhance therapeutic change.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian journal of psychology\",\"volume\":\"64 4\",\"pages\":\"390-400\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian journal of psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12902\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12902","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:认知偏差理论认为,降低精神障碍患者的威胁超警觉性可以提高认知行为治疗(CBT)的效果。然而,目前还没有研究检验添加注意偏置修正(ABM)是否能有效增强CBT对恐慌障碍(PD)的焦虑敏感性(AS)、肌电图(EMG)和皮肤电导(SC)的影响。该试点随机对照试验(RCT)旨在评估CBT + ABM的疗效(对比CBT +注意训练安慰剂;PBO)的结果。方法:本研究为二次分析(Baker et al., 2020)。成年PD患者随机接受CBT + ABM (n = 11)或CBT + PBO (n = 12)。在前五次CBT会议之前,CBT + ABM和CBT + PBO参与者分别完成了15分钟的ABM任务或注意训练PBO。在适应高音惊吓范式期间,评估AS和抑郁严重程度以及SC和EMG。进行了层次贝叶斯分析。结果:在治疗前后和随访前,CBM + ABM(与CBT + PBO相比)导致ASI-Physical(组间d = -1.26至-1.25),ASI-Cognitive (d = -1.16至-1.10)和抑郁严重程度(d = -1.23至-0.99)显著更大的降低。然而,在ASI-Social、EMG或SC指数方面,组间没有观察到差异。讨论:在PD方案的CBT中加入简短的计算机化ABM干预可能会增强治疗改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) plus attention bias modification (ABM) reduces anxiety sensitivity and depressive symptoms in panic disorder: A pilot randomized trial.

Background: Cognitive bias theories propose that reducing threat hypervigilance in mental disorders can augment cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) outcomes. However, no studies have tested whether adding attention bias modification (ABM) can effectively enhance CBT's effects on anxiety sensitivity (AS), electromyography (EMG), and skin conductance (SC) for panic disorder (PD). This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) thus aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CBT + ABM (vs. CBT plus attention training placebo; PBO) on those outcomes.

Method: This study is a secondary analysis (Baker et al., 2020). Adults with PD were randomized to receive CBT + ABM (n = 11) or CBT + PBO (n = 12). Before each of the first five CBT sessions, CBT + ABM and CBT + PBO participants completed a 15-min ABM task or attention training PBO, respectively. AS and depression severity as well as SC and EMG during habituation to a loud-tone startle paradigm were assessed. Hierarchical Bayesian analyses were conducted.

Results: During pre-post-treatment and pre-follow-up, CBM + ABM (vs. CBT + PBO) led to a notably greater reduction in ASI-Physical (between-group d = -1.26 to -1.25), ASI-Cognitive (d = -1.16 to -1.10), and depression severity (d = -1.23 to -0.99). However, no between-group difference was observed for ASI-Social, EMG, or SC indices.

Discussion: Adding a brief computerized ABM intervention to CBT for PD protocols may enhance therapeutic change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian journal of psychology
Scandinavian journal of psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Published in association with the Nordic psychological associations, the Scandinavian Journal of Psychology publishes original papers from Scandinavia and elsewhere. Covering the whole range of psychology, with a particular focus on experimental psychology, the journal includes high-quality theoretical and methodological papers, empirical reports, reviews and ongoing commentaries.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology is organised into four standing subsections: - Cognition and Neurosciences - Development and Aging - Personality and Social Sciences - Health and Disability
期刊最新文献
Adaptive and maladaptive pathways of COVID-19 worry on well-being: A cross-national study. Different contexts - different stories: Adolescents' experiences of how ethnicity is addressed in schools and sports and on social media in Sweden. Money talks? The motivational mechanisms of base pay on well-being and work performance. Up you get: Norwegian parents' reactions to children's negative emotions. Meaning in life after cancer: Validation of the sources of meaning card method among participants in cancer rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1