一只海鸟在日本本土上空遭遇巨大台风的旋涡飞行。

IF 4.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecology Pub Date : 2023-09-06 DOI:10.1002/ecy.4161
Kozue Shiomi
{"title":"一只海鸟在日本本土上空遭遇巨大台风的旋涡飞行。","authors":"Kozue Shiomi","doi":"10.1002/ecy.4161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Catastrophic weather events influence the movement of wild animals. In particular, airborne animals such as birds and insects are expected to occasionally face challenging flights because of unfavorable atmospheric currents such as hurricanes, cyclones, and typhoons. The frequency of intense storms has increased and is predicted to further increase due to climate change (e.g., Mei &amp; Xie, <span>2016</span>). Consequently, it is essential to understand how volant animals survive and navigate under such unusual conditions and evaluate how the increasing frequency of severe storms affects wildlife. However, information on the behavioral reactions of animals to extreme weather is still limited given the unpredictability of its occurrence. Bio-logging studies on seabirds have provided some insights: adult red-footed boobies and great frigatebirds avoid cyclones by staying in the breeding colony or circumventing the moving cyclones while climbing to higher altitudes (Weimerskirch &amp; Prudor, <span>2019</span>), and Eastern brown pelicans tend to be inactive during the passage of a cyclone (Wilkinson et al., <span>2019</span>). Additionally, some seabird species move toward and stay within the eye of the storms rather than circumventing them probably to avoid being blown by strong winds (Lempidakis et al., <span>2022</span>; Nourani et al., <span>2023</span>). Here, I report on a rare case that implies the upper limit of the seabird capacity to tolerate a storm. A GPS-equipped streaked shearwater (<i>Calonectris leucomelas</i>) was apparently caught in a huge typhoon (Figure 1), showing swirling flight high over the mainland of Japan. It finally came through without landfalls when the typhoon returned to the sea.</p><p>In summer, especially from August to September, typhoons frequently occur in the Pacific Ocean and pass through Japan. Breeding activities and foraging movements of seabirds around Japan are expected to be physically influenced by the occurrence of typhoons, which may exert selective pressure. In the present study, adult streaked shearwaters (<i>N</i> = 14 birds) were captured on a breeding island in Japan (Mikurajima; 33°52′ N, 139°38′ E) from 25 August to 29 August 2019. GPS loggers (13–14 g, 2%–3% of body mass; PinPoint VHF-GPS, LOTEK) were attached to the back feathers using waterproof tape (Tesa). The loggers were set to record the geographic position every 15 min and send data via radio communication to the receiver placed within the breeding colony when birds returned from the sea. The tracking duration of the birds ranged from 8.9 to 34.2 days (mean ± SD: 24.8 ± 6.8 days).</p><p>A typhoon formed in the western Pacific (19°36′ N, 155°24′ E) on 5 September 2019 (JST), which was named “FAXAI.” It originated from a tropical depression occurring on 30 August. The typhoon moved northward, passing about 60 km west of Mikurajima between 18:00 and 21:00 on 8 September, and reached mainland Japan around 03:00 on 9 September (Figure 2, Video S1). After crossing the land, it exited the ocean between 06:00 and 09:00. FAXAI was one of the largest typhoons to hit this area of Japan, with a maximum wind speed of 213 km h<sup><b>−</b>1</sup> (International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship; Knapp et al., <span>2010</span>).</p><p>During this period, one GPS-deployed shearwater (male, body mass: 585 g) left the sea near the breeding island at approximately 17:00, flying northward. It started a circling movement in the northeast of the eye of the typhoon around 20:30 and stopped at the water surface for 1 h between 22:00 and 23:00. After restarting flight, the overall direction of the bird's movement overlapped the path of the typhoon, with a sequence of five anticlockwise circles  50–80 km in diameter (Figure 2, Video S1). While swirling, the movement speed of the bird was between 80 and 170 km h<sup>−1</sup>, with a GPS-based altitude record of up to 4700 m (Figure 3). These speeds and altitudes were much higher than those recorded during regular flights (flight speed: 10–60 km h<sup>−1</sup>, altitude: &lt;100 m; Figure 4), even though the accuracy of altitude estimation based on GPS is generally low compared with that of horizontal positioning (possible estimation errors: up to 50 m; personal communication with LOTEK). The bird finally returned to sea at the same time as the typhoon and landed on the water around 08:00. The straight-line distance from the start to the end of the circling was 222 km, and the total distance traveled during the 11-h period was 1146 km. After escaping the typhoon, the bird stayed at the water surface for 5 h to rest and/or wait for the typhoon to leave and then departed for its usual foraging area in the north (Figures 2 and 5a). The other GPS-equipped birds that were tracked during the same typhoon period (<i>N</i> = 12 birds), behaved in different ways. Nine birds were located far from the typhoon track (Figure 5b) and were probably little affected by it. The remaining three birds were relatively close to the typhoon track but appeared to have successfully circumvented it (Figure 5b).</p><p>As adult streaked shearwaters usually fly only at sea relatively close to the water surface, the observed overland flight with swirling movements at high altitudes was quite unusual, and such an event has not been reported before. Trajectory estimation using NOAA's HYSPLIT Trajectory Model, which is based on archived atmospheric data (see Appendix S1 for details), demonstrated that the simulated air parcel would have moved along a path similar to the shearwater track, but it was estimated to rapidly increase its altitude up to &gt;10,000 m, unlike that observed for the shearwater (Figure 6). Thus, the horizontal movement directions and high speeds of the shearwater were likely to be passively determined, whereas the altitude might have been partially self-controlled. It remains unknown whether the bird could not or chose not to escape from the typhoon; once caught in the storm and displaced toward land, it might have been safer to stay within the storm rather than to resist it until it returned to the ocean with reduced wind speeds. This speculation was supported by the fact that the bird landed on the water as soon as it returned to the sea.</p><p>The early evening departure of the bird from the breeding area was also unusual for this species, which usually departs for foraging for several hours before sunrise (Shiomi et al., <span>2012</span>). This might indicate that the bird attempted to circumnavigate the harsh conditions in advance but failed. Lempidakis et al. (<span>2022</span>) suggested that to avoid landfall due to the strong winds of the storms, the bird would require navigational ability for the recognition of its positional relationship with the landmasses. The bird in the present study might have had a relatively low navigational ability because it tended to fly close to the coast and not offshore during its northward foraging trips (<i>N</i> = 2 trips; Figure 5a). Although the coastline could function as a navigational guide for long-distance travel (Shiomi et al., <span>2019</span>), a lack of spatial cognitive ability would lead to a higher risk of failure in avoiding landfalls due to irregular strong winds.</p><p>While this particular bird survived the unfavorable weather event, streaked shearwaters, especially juveniles, are often found to fall inland and weaken after the occurrence of typhoons or disturbed weather with stronger winds (e.g., Kuroda, <span>1966</span>). The present study appears to demonstrate an example of the behavior of seabirds at the extreme edge between failure and success of survival during a storm. Further accumulation of such data would contribute toward an understanding of whether and how seabirds manage to survive frequent but irregular weather events.</p><p><b>Kozue Shiomi</b>: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing—Original Draft, Review and Editing, Project Administration, Funding Acquisition.</p><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p><p>All procedures in the field study were conducted with permission from the Tokyo Metropolitan Government and Mikurajima Village Office and were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee, National Institute of Polar Research (R1-3).</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"104 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.4161","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Swirling flight of a seabird caught in a huge typhoon high over mainland Japan\",\"authors\":\"Kozue Shiomi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecy.4161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Catastrophic weather events influence the movement of wild animals. In particular, airborne animals such as birds and insects are expected to occasionally face challenging flights because of unfavorable atmospheric currents such as hurricanes, cyclones, and typhoons. The frequency of intense storms has increased and is predicted to further increase due to climate change (e.g., Mei &amp; Xie, <span>2016</span>). Consequently, it is essential to understand how volant animals survive and navigate under such unusual conditions and evaluate how the increasing frequency of severe storms affects wildlife. However, information on the behavioral reactions of animals to extreme weather is still limited given the unpredictability of its occurrence. Bio-logging studies on seabirds have provided some insights: adult red-footed boobies and great frigatebirds avoid cyclones by staying in the breeding colony or circumventing the moving cyclones while climbing to higher altitudes (Weimerskirch &amp; Prudor, <span>2019</span>), and Eastern brown pelicans tend to be inactive during the passage of a cyclone (Wilkinson et al., <span>2019</span>). Additionally, some seabird species move toward and stay within the eye of the storms rather than circumventing them probably to avoid being blown by strong winds (Lempidakis et al., <span>2022</span>; Nourani et al., <span>2023</span>). Here, I report on a rare case that implies the upper limit of the seabird capacity to tolerate a storm. A GPS-equipped streaked shearwater (<i>Calonectris leucomelas</i>) was apparently caught in a huge typhoon (Figure 1), showing swirling flight high over the mainland of Japan. It finally came through without landfalls when the typhoon returned to the sea.</p><p>In summer, especially from August to September, typhoons frequently occur in the Pacific Ocean and pass through Japan. Breeding activities and foraging movements of seabirds around Japan are expected to be physically influenced by the occurrence of typhoons, which may exert selective pressure. In the present study, adult streaked shearwaters (<i>N</i> = 14 birds) were captured on a breeding island in Japan (Mikurajima; 33°52′ N, 139°38′ E) from 25 August to 29 August 2019. GPS loggers (13–14 g, 2%–3% of body mass; PinPoint VHF-GPS, LOTEK) were attached to the back feathers using waterproof tape (Tesa). The loggers were set to record the geographic position every 15 min and send data via radio communication to the receiver placed within the breeding colony when birds returned from the sea. The tracking duration of the birds ranged from 8.9 to 34.2 days (mean ± SD: 24.8 ± 6.8 days).</p><p>A typhoon formed in the western Pacific (19°36′ N, 155°24′ E) on 5 September 2019 (JST), which was named “FAXAI.” It originated from a tropical depression occurring on 30 August. The typhoon moved northward, passing about 60 km west of Mikurajima between 18:00 and 21:00 on 8 September, and reached mainland Japan around 03:00 on 9 September (Figure 2, Video S1). After crossing the land, it exited the ocean between 06:00 and 09:00. FAXAI was one of the largest typhoons to hit this area of Japan, with a maximum wind speed of 213 km h<sup><b>−</b>1</sup> (International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship; Knapp et al., <span>2010</span>).</p><p>During this period, one GPS-deployed shearwater (male, body mass: 585 g) left the sea near the breeding island at approximately 17:00, flying northward. It started a circling movement in the northeast of the eye of the typhoon around 20:30 and stopped at the water surface for 1 h between 22:00 and 23:00. After restarting flight, the overall direction of the bird's movement overlapped the path of the typhoon, with a sequence of five anticlockwise circles  50–80 km in diameter (Figure 2, Video S1). While swirling, the movement speed of the bird was between 80 and 170 km h<sup>−1</sup>, with a GPS-based altitude record of up to 4700 m (Figure 3). These speeds and altitudes were much higher than those recorded during regular flights (flight speed: 10–60 km h<sup>−1</sup>, altitude: &lt;100 m; Figure 4), even though the accuracy of altitude estimation based on GPS is generally low compared with that of horizontal positioning (possible estimation errors: up to 50 m; personal communication with LOTEK). The bird finally returned to sea at the same time as the typhoon and landed on the water around 08:00. The straight-line distance from the start to the end of the circling was 222 km, and the total distance traveled during the 11-h period was 1146 km. After escaping the typhoon, the bird stayed at the water surface for 5 h to rest and/or wait for the typhoon to leave and then departed for its usual foraging area in the north (Figures 2 and 5a). The other GPS-equipped birds that were tracked during the same typhoon period (<i>N</i> = 12 birds), behaved in different ways. Nine birds were located far from the typhoon track (Figure 5b) and were probably little affected by it. The remaining three birds were relatively close to the typhoon track but appeared to have successfully circumvented it (Figure 5b).</p><p>As adult streaked shearwaters usually fly only at sea relatively close to the water surface, the observed overland flight with swirling movements at high altitudes was quite unusual, and such an event has not been reported before. Trajectory estimation using NOAA's HYSPLIT Trajectory Model, which is based on archived atmospheric data (see Appendix S1 for details), demonstrated that the simulated air parcel would have moved along a path similar to the shearwater track, but it was estimated to rapidly increase its altitude up to &gt;10,000 m, unlike that observed for the shearwater (Figure 6). Thus, the horizontal movement directions and high speeds of the shearwater were likely to be passively determined, whereas the altitude might have been partially self-controlled. It remains unknown whether the bird could not or chose not to escape from the typhoon; once caught in the storm and displaced toward land, it might have been safer to stay within the storm rather than to resist it until it returned to the ocean with reduced wind speeds. This speculation was supported by the fact that the bird landed on the water as soon as it returned to the sea.</p><p>The early evening departure of the bird from the breeding area was also unusual for this species, which usually departs for foraging for several hours before sunrise (Shiomi et al., <span>2012</span>). This might indicate that the bird attempted to circumnavigate the harsh conditions in advance but failed. Lempidakis et al. (<span>2022</span>) suggested that to avoid landfall due to the strong winds of the storms, the bird would require navigational ability for the recognition of its positional relationship with the landmasses. The bird in the present study might have had a relatively low navigational ability because it tended to fly close to the coast and not offshore during its northward foraging trips (<i>N</i> = 2 trips; Figure 5a). Although the coastline could function as a navigational guide for long-distance travel (Shiomi et al., <span>2019</span>), a lack of spatial cognitive ability would lead to a higher risk of failure in avoiding landfalls due to irregular strong winds.</p><p>While this particular bird survived the unfavorable weather event, streaked shearwaters, especially juveniles, are often found to fall inland and weaken after the occurrence of typhoons or disturbed weather with stronger winds (e.g., Kuroda, <span>1966</span>). The present study appears to demonstrate an example of the behavior of seabirds at the extreme edge between failure and success of survival during a storm. Further accumulation of such data would contribute toward an understanding of whether and how seabirds manage to survive frequent but irregular weather events.</p><p><b>Kozue Shiomi</b>: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing—Original Draft, Review and Editing, Project Administration, Funding Acquisition.</p><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p><p>All procedures in the field study were conducted with permission from the Tokyo Metropolitan Government and Mikurajima Village Office and were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee, National Institute of Polar Research (R1-3).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology\",\"volume\":\"104 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.4161\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.4161\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.4161","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

灾难性的天气事件影响野生动物的活动。特别是鸟类和昆虫等空中动物,由于飓风、旋风、台风等不利的大气气流,预计偶尔会遇到飞行困难。由于气候变化,强风暴的频率增加了,预计还会进一步增加(例如,Mei &谢,2016)。因此,有必要了解狂暴的动物如何在这种不寻常的条件下生存和航行,并评估日益频繁的强风暴如何影响野生动物。然而,由于极端天气的不可预测性,关于动物对极端天气的行为反应的信息仍然有限。对海鸟的生物记录研究提供了一些见解:成年红脚鲣鸟和大军舰鸟通过留在繁殖地或在爬升到更高海拔时避开移动的气旋来避免气旋。Prudor, 2019),而东部褐鹈鹕在气旋通过期间往往不活跃(Wilkinson等人,2019)。此外,一些海鸟物种向风暴眼移动并停留在风暴眼内,而不是绕过它们,这可能是为了避免被强风吹走(Lempidakis et al., 2022;Nourani et al., 2023)。在这里,我报告了一个罕见的案例,它暗示了海鸟容忍风暴的能力上限。一只装备了gps的斑纹鹱(Calonectris leucomelas)显然被一场巨大的台风困住了(图1),它在日本大陆上空盘旋飞行。当台风返回大海时,它最终没有登陆。在夏季,特别是8 - 9月,台风频繁出现在太平洋并经过日本。预计日本各地海鸟的繁殖活动和觅食活动将受到台风的物理影响,这可能会产生选择压力。本研究在日本的一个繁殖岛(Mikurajima;北纬33°52 ',东经139°38 '),2019年8月25日至29日。GPS记录仪(13-14克,占体重的2%-3%;使用防水胶带(Tesa)将PinPoint VHF-GPS, LOTEK)固定在后毛上。记录器每15分钟记录一次地理位置,当鸟类从海上返回时,通过无线电通信将数据发送到放置在繁殖地内的接收器。追踪时间为8.9 ~ 34.2天(平均±SD: 24.8±6.8天)。2019年9月5日(JST)在西太平洋(北纬19°36′,东经155°24′)形成的台风,被命名为“法茜”。它起源于8月30日发生的热带低气压。台风向北移动,于9月8日18:00至21:00从宫岛以西约60公里处经过,并于9月9日03:00左右到达日本本土(图2,视频S1)。穿过陆地后,它在6点到9点之间离开了海洋。“法茜”是袭击日本这一地区的最大台风之一,最大风速为213公里每小时(国际气候管理最佳轨迹档案;Knapp et al., 2010)。在此期间,一只装有gps的海鸥(雄性,体重585克)于17:00左右离开繁殖岛附近的海域,向北飞行。它于20:30左右在台风风眼东北方向开始盘旋运动,并于22:00至23:00期间在水面停留了1小时。重新开始飞行后,这只鸟的整体运动方向与台风的路径重叠,形成了一个由五个直径为50-80公里的逆时针圆圈组成的序列(图2,视频S1)。在旋转时,鸟的运动速度在80 - 170 km h - 1之间,基于gps的高度记录高达4700 m(图3)。这些速度和高度远高于常规飞行时的记录(飞行速度:10-60 km h - 1,高度:100 m;图4),尽管与水平定位相比,基于GPS的高度估计精度普遍较低(可能的估计误差:高达50 m;与LOTEK的个人沟通)。这只鸟最终与台风同时返回大海,并在8点左右降落在水面上。从开始到结束的直线距离为222公里,11小时内行驶的总距离为1146公里。逃离台风后,鸟在水面停留5小时休息或等待台风离开,然后飞向其北部的觅食区(图2和5a)。在同一台风期间追踪的其他配备gps的鸟类(N = 12只)表现出不同的方式。有九只鸟位于远离台风路径的地方(图5b),可能受影响不大。其余3只雀鸟相对靠近台风路径,但似乎已成功绕过它(图5b)。 由于成年斑鹱通常只在相对靠近水面的海上飞行,因此在高海拔地区观察到的陆地上的旋涡运动是非常不寻常的,这种事件以前没有报道过。利用NOAA的HYSPLIT轨迹模型(基于存档的大气数据,详见附录S1)进行的轨迹估计表明,模拟的气团将沿着与剪切水轨迹相似的路径移动,但估计其高度将迅速增加至10,000 m,这与剪切水的观测结果不同(图6)。因此,剪切水的水平运动方向和高速可能是被动确定的。然而高度可能部分是自我控制的。目前尚不清楚这只鸟是不能还是没有选择逃离台风;一旦陷入风暴并向陆地移动,留在风暴中可能比抵抗它直到它以降低的风速返回海洋更安全。这一推测得到了这只鸟一回到海里就降落在水面上的事实的支持。傍晚时分离开繁殖区对这种鸟类来说也是不寻常的,它们通常在日出前几个小时就出发觅食(Shiomi et al., 2012)。这可能表明这只鸟试图提前绕过恶劣的环境,但失败了。Lempidakis et al.(2022)认为,为了避免因风暴的强风而登陆,鸟类需要导航能力来识别其与陆地的位置关系。本研究中的鸟可能具有相对较低的导航能力,因为它在向北觅食的过程中倾向于靠近海岸而不是离岸飞行(N = 2次;图5 a)。虽然海岸线可以作为长途旅行的导航指南(Shiomi等人,2019),但缺乏空间认知能力会导致由于不规则强风而无法避免登陆的风险更高。虽然这种特殊的鸟在不利的天气事件中幸存下来,但斑纹鹱,尤其是幼鸟,经常被发现在台风或强风扰动天气发生后降落到内陆并减弱(例如,Kuroda, 1966)。目前的研究似乎证明了海鸟在风暴中生存失败和成功之间的极端边缘的行为。这些数据的进一步积累将有助于了解海鸟是否以及如何在频繁但不规律的天气事件中生存下来。Kozue Shiomi:概念化,形式分析,调查,写作-原稿,审查和编辑,项目管理,资金获取。作者声明无利益冲突。实地研究的所有程序均获得东京都政府和三岛村办事处的许可,并得到国家极地研究所动物护理和使用委员会(R1-3)的批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Swirling flight of a seabird caught in a huge typhoon high over mainland Japan

Catastrophic weather events influence the movement of wild animals. In particular, airborne animals such as birds and insects are expected to occasionally face challenging flights because of unfavorable atmospheric currents such as hurricanes, cyclones, and typhoons. The frequency of intense storms has increased and is predicted to further increase due to climate change (e.g., Mei & Xie, 2016). Consequently, it is essential to understand how volant animals survive and navigate under such unusual conditions and evaluate how the increasing frequency of severe storms affects wildlife. However, information on the behavioral reactions of animals to extreme weather is still limited given the unpredictability of its occurrence. Bio-logging studies on seabirds have provided some insights: adult red-footed boobies and great frigatebirds avoid cyclones by staying in the breeding colony or circumventing the moving cyclones while climbing to higher altitudes (Weimerskirch & Prudor, 2019), and Eastern brown pelicans tend to be inactive during the passage of a cyclone (Wilkinson et al., 2019). Additionally, some seabird species move toward and stay within the eye of the storms rather than circumventing them probably to avoid being blown by strong winds (Lempidakis et al., 2022; Nourani et al., 2023). Here, I report on a rare case that implies the upper limit of the seabird capacity to tolerate a storm. A GPS-equipped streaked shearwater (Calonectris leucomelas) was apparently caught in a huge typhoon (Figure 1), showing swirling flight high over the mainland of Japan. It finally came through without landfalls when the typhoon returned to the sea.

In summer, especially from August to September, typhoons frequently occur in the Pacific Ocean and pass through Japan. Breeding activities and foraging movements of seabirds around Japan are expected to be physically influenced by the occurrence of typhoons, which may exert selective pressure. In the present study, adult streaked shearwaters (N = 14 birds) were captured on a breeding island in Japan (Mikurajima; 33°52′ N, 139°38′ E) from 25 August to 29 August 2019. GPS loggers (13–14 g, 2%–3% of body mass; PinPoint VHF-GPS, LOTEK) were attached to the back feathers using waterproof tape (Tesa). The loggers were set to record the geographic position every 15 min and send data via radio communication to the receiver placed within the breeding colony when birds returned from the sea. The tracking duration of the birds ranged from 8.9 to 34.2 days (mean ± SD: 24.8 ± 6.8 days).

A typhoon formed in the western Pacific (19°36′ N, 155°24′ E) on 5 September 2019 (JST), which was named “FAXAI.” It originated from a tropical depression occurring on 30 August. The typhoon moved northward, passing about 60 km west of Mikurajima between 18:00 and 21:00 on 8 September, and reached mainland Japan around 03:00 on 9 September (Figure 2, Video S1). After crossing the land, it exited the ocean between 06:00 and 09:00. FAXAI was one of the largest typhoons to hit this area of Japan, with a maximum wind speed of 213 km h1 (International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship; Knapp et al., 2010).

During this period, one GPS-deployed shearwater (male, body mass: 585 g) left the sea near the breeding island at approximately 17:00, flying northward. It started a circling movement in the northeast of the eye of the typhoon around 20:30 and stopped at the water surface for 1 h between 22:00 and 23:00. After restarting flight, the overall direction of the bird's movement overlapped the path of the typhoon, with a sequence of five anticlockwise circles  50–80 km in diameter (Figure 2, Video S1). While swirling, the movement speed of the bird was between 80 and 170 km h−1, with a GPS-based altitude record of up to 4700 m (Figure 3). These speeds and altitudes were much higher than those recorded during regular flights (flight speed: 10–60 km h−1, altitude: <100 m; Figure 4), even though the accuracy of altitude estimation based on GPS is generally low compared with that of horizontal positioning (possible estimation errors: up to 50 m; personal communication with LOTEK). The bird finally returned to sea at the same time as the typhoon and landed on the water around 08:00. The straight-line distance from the start to the end of the circling was 222 km, and the total distance traveled during the 11-h period was 1146 km. After escaping the typhoon, the bird stayed at the water surface for 5 h to rest and/or wait for the typhoon to leave and then departed for its usual foraging area in the north (Figures 2 and 5a). The other GPS-equipped birds that were tracked during the same typhoon period (N = 12 birds), behaved in different ways. Nine birds were located far from the typhoon track (Figure 5b) and were probably little affected by it. The remaining three birds were relatively close to the typhoon track but appeared to have successfully circumvented it (Figure 5b).

As adult streaked shearwaters usually fly only at sea relatively close to the water surface, the observed overland flight with swirling movements at high altitudes was quite unusual, and such an event has not been reported before. Trajectory estimation using NOAA's HYSPLIT Trajectory Model, which is based on archived atmospheric data (see Appendix S1 for details), demonstrated that the simulated air parcel would have moved along a path similar to the shearwater track, but it was estimated to rapidly increase its altitude up to >10,000 m, unlike that observed for the shearwater (Figure 6). Thus, the horizontal movement directions and high speeds of the shearwater were likely to be passively determined, whereas the altitude might have been partially self-controlled. It remains unknown whether the bird could not or chose not to escape from the typhoon; once caught in the storm and displaced toward land, it might have been safer to stay within the storm rather than to resist it until it returned to the ocean with reduced wind speeds. This speculation was supported by the fact that the bird landed on the water as soon as it returned to the sea.

The early evening departure of the bird from the breeding area was also unusual for this species, which usually departs for foraging for several hours before sunrise (Shiomi et al., 2012). This might indicate that the bird attempted to circumnavigate the harsh conditions in advance but failed. Lempidakis et al. (2022) suggested that to avoid landfall due to the strong winds of the storms, the bird would require navigational ability for the recognition of its positional relationship with the landmasses. The bird in the present study might have had a relatively low navigational ability because it tended to fly close to the coast and not offshore during its northward foraging trips (N = 2 trips; Figure 5a). Although the coastline could function as a navigational guide for long-distance travel (Shiomi et al., 2019), a lack of spatial cognitive ability would lead to a higher risk of failure in avoiding landfalls due to irregular strong winds.

While this particular bird survived the unfavorable weather event, streaked shearwaters, especially juveniles, are often found to fall inland and weaken after the occurrence of typhoons or disturbed weather with stronger winds (e.g., Kuroda, 1966). The present study appears to demonstrate an example of the behavior of seabirds at the extreme edge between failure and success of survival during a storm. Further accumulation of such data would contribute toward an understanding of whether and how seabirds manage to survive frequent but irregular weather events.

Kozue Shiomi: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing—Original Draft, Review and Editing, Project Administration, Funding Acquisition.

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

All procedures in the field study were conducted with permission from the Tokyo Metropolitan Government and Mikurajima Village Office and were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee, National Institute of Polar Research (R1-3).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
期刊最新文献
Canids as pollinators? Nectar foraging by Ethiopian wolves may contribute to the pollination of Kniphofia foliosa Resting in plain sight: Dormancy ecology of the intermediate snail host of Schistosoma haematobium Cover Image Issue Information Urbanization drives partner switching and loss of mutualism in an ant–plant symbiosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1