物理治疗师通过视频分析对冻结步态进行评分的可靠性和可变性。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-28 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2023.2252059
Aileen E Scully, Kenneth Neo, Eunice Lim, Prakash K Manharlal, Beatriz de Oliveira, Keith D Hill, Ross Clark, Yong Hao Pua, Dawn Tan
{"title":"物理治疗师通过视频分析对冻结步态进行评分的可靠性和可变性。","authors":"Aileen E Scully, Kenneth Neo, Eunice Lim, Prakash K Manharlal, Beatriz de Oliveira, Keith D Hill, Ross Clark, Yong Hao Pua, Dawn Tan","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2023.2252059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The \"gold standard\" marker for freezing of gait severity is percentage of time spent with freezing observed through video analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined inter- and intra-rater reliability and variability of physiotherapists rating freezing of gait severity through video analysis and explored the effects of experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty physiotherapists rated 14 videos of Timed Up and Go performance by people with Parkinson's and gait freezing. Ten videos were unique, while four were repeated. Freezing frequency, total duration, and percentage of time spent with freezing were computed. Reliability and variability were estimated using ICC (2,1) and mean absolute differences. Between-group differences were calculated with the one-way ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inter- and intra-rater reliability ranged from moderate to good (ICC: inter-rater frequency = 0.63, duration = 0.78, percentage = 0.50; intra-rater frequency = 0.84, duration = 0.89, percentage = 0.50). Variability for freezing frequency was two episodes. Inter- and intra-rater variability for total freezing duration was 18.8 and 12.3  seconds, respectively. For percentage of time spent with freezing, this was 15.2% and 13.5%. Physiotherapy experience had no effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physiotherapists demonstrated sufficient reliability, but variability was large enough to cause changes in severity classifications on existing rating scales. Percentage of time spent with freezing was the least reliable marker, supporting the use of freezing frequency or total duration instead.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"2641-2651"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and variability of physiotherapists scoring freezing of gait through video analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Aileen E Scully, Kenneth Neo, Eunice Lim, Prakash K Manharlal, Beatriz de Oliveira, Keith D Hill, Ross Clark, Yong Hao Pua, Dawn Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593985.2023.2252059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The \\\"gold standard\\\" marker for freezing of gait severity is percentage of time spent with freezing observed through video analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined inter- and intra-rater reliability and variability of physiotherapists rating freezing of gait severity through video analysis and explored the effects of experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty physiotherapists rated 14 videos of Timed Up and Go performance by people with Parkinson's and gait freezing. Ten videos were unique, while four were repeated. Freezing frequency, total duration, and percentage of time spent with freezing were computed. Reliability and variability were estimated using ICC (2,1) and mean absolute differences. Between-group differences were calculated with the one-way ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inter- and intra-rater reliability ranged from moderate to good (ICC: inter-rater frequency = 0.63, duration = 0.78, percentage = 0.50; intra-rater frequency = 0.84, duration = 0.89, percentage = 0.50). Variability for freezing frequency was two episodes. Inter- and intra-rater variability for total freezing duration was 18.8 and 12.3  seconds, respectively. For percentage of time spent with freezing, this was 15.2% and 13.5%. Physiotherapy experience had no effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physiotherapists demonstrated sufficient reliability, but variability was large enough to cause changes in severity classifications on existing rating scales. Percentage of time spent with freezing was the least reliable marker, supporting the use of freezing frequency or total duration instead.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2641-2651\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2252059\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2252059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:冻结步态严重程度的 "金标准 "指标是通过视频分析观察到的冻结时间百分比:冻结步态严重程度的 "金标准 "是通过视频分析观察到的冻结时间百分比:本研究考察了物理治疗师通过视频分析评定冻结步态严重程度的评分者之间和评分者内部的可靠性和变异性,并探讨了经验的影响:30名物理治疗师对14段帕金森症患者的定时起立和走动表现以及步态冻结进行了评分。其中 10 个视频是唯一的,4 个视频是重复的。计算冻结频率、总持续时间和冻结时间所占百分比。使用 ICC (2,1) 和平均绝对差异估算信度和变异性。组间差异采用单因素方差分析计算:评分者之间和评分者内部的可靠性从中等到良好不等(ICC:评分者之间频率 = 0.63,持续时间 = 0.78,百分比 = 0.50;评分者内部频率 = 0.84,持续时间 = 0.89,百分比 = 0.50)。冻结频率的变异为两次。总冻结时间的评分者之间和评分者内部差异分别为 18.8 秒和 12.3 秒。至于凝滞时间的百分比,则分别为 15.2% 和 13.5%。物理治疗经验没有影响:结论:物理治疗师表现出足够的可靠性,但差异性较大,足以导致现有评分量表的严重程度分类发生变化。冰冻时间百分比是最不可靠的指标,因此支持使用冰冻频率或总持续时间来代替。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability and variability of physiotherapists scoring freezing of gait through video analysis.

Background: The "gold standard" marker for freezing of gait severity is percentage of time spent with freezing observed through video analysis.

Objective: This study examined inter- and intra-rater reliability and variability of physiotherapists rating freezing of gait severity through video analysis and explored the effects of experience.

Methods: Thirty physiotherapists rated 14 videos of Timed Up and Go performance by people with Parkinson's and gait freezing. Ten videos were unique, while four were repeated. Freezing frequency, total duration, and percentage of time spent with freezing were computed. Reliability and variability were estimated using ICC (2,1) and mean absolute differences. Between-group differences were calculated with the one-way ANOVA.

Results: Inter- and intra-rater reliability ranged from moderate to good (ICC: inter-rater frequency = 0.63, duration = 0.78, percentage = 0.50; intra-rater frequency = 0.84, duration = 0.89, percentage = 0.50). Variability for freezing frequency was two episodes. Inter- and intra-rater variability for total freezing duration was 18.8 and 12.3  seconds, respectively. For percentage of time spent with freezing, this was 15.2% and 13.5%. Physiotherapy experience had no effect.

Conclusion: Physiotherapists demonstrated sufficient reliability, but variability was large enough to cause changes in severity classifications on existing rating scales. Percentage of time spent with freezing was the least reliable marker, supporting the use of freezing frequency or total duration instead.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of pain activity patterns, disability, body awareness, proprioception and function in individuals with and without lumbar spinal decompression surgery. Variation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis presentation and outcomes based on phenotype and physical therapy movement system diagnosis: a case series. The prevalence, characteristics, and associated factors of pain in individuals with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Association between varus thrust and foot alignment and flexibility in knee osteoarthritis. Fear of movement interacts with trunk mobility, and pain intensity to predict disability in patients with chronic low back pain: a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1