新诊断多发性骨髓瘤的反应适应疗法。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-04 DOI:10.1007/s11899-023-00704-9
Winnie Z Y Teo, Ian Y E Ong, Jason W Y Tong, Wan Li Ong, Adeline Lin, Fangfang Song, Bee Choo Tai, Melissa Ooi, Cinnie Yentia Seokojo, Yunxin Chen, Chandramouli Nagarajan, Wee Joo Chng, Sanjay de Mel
{"title":"新诊断多发性骨髓瘤的反应适应疗法。","authors":"Winnie Z Y Teo,&nbsp;Ian Y E Ong,&nbsp;Jason W Y Tong,&nbsp;Wan Li Ong,&nbsp;Adeline Lin,&nbsp;Fangfang Song,&nbsp;Bee Choo Tai,&nbsp;Melissa Ooi,&nbsp;Cinnie Yentia Seokojo,&nbsp;Yunxin Chen,&nbsp;Chandramouli Nagarajan,&nbsp;Wee Joo Chng,&nbsp;Sanjay de Mel","doi":"10.1007/s11899-023-00704-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The development of potent novel agents has improved outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Heterogeneity of response to therapy, an expanding arsenal of treatment options, and cost are however major challenges for physicians making treatment decisions. Response-adapted therapy is hence an attractive strategy for sequencing of therapy in MM. Despite its successful application in other haematologic malignancies, response-adapted therapy is yet to become a standard of care for MM. We provide our perspective on response-adapted therapeutic strategies evaluated thus far and how they may be implemented and improved on in treatment algorithms of the future.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>While older studies suggested that early response based on International Myeloma Working Group response criteria could impact long-term outcomes, recent data have contradicted these findings. The advent of minimal residual disease (MRD) as a powerful prognostic factor in MM has raised the promise of MRD-adapted treatment strategies. The development of more sensitive techniques for paraprotein quantification as well as imaging modalities to detect extramedullary disease is likely to change response assessment in MM. These techniques combined with MRD assessment may provide sensitive and holistic response assessments which could be evaluated in clinical trials. Response-adapted treatment algorithms have the potential to allow an individualised treatment strategy, maximising efficacy, while minimising toxicities and cost. Standardisation of MRD methodology, incorporation of imaging into response assessment, and the optimal management of MRD positive patients are key questions to be addressed in future trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":10852,"journal":{"name":"Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports","volume":"18 5","pages":"190-200"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response-Adapted Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.\",\"authors\":\"Winnie Z Y Teo,&nbsp;Ian Y E Ong,&nbsp;Jason W Y Tong,&nbsp;Wan Li Ong,&nbsp;Adeline Lin,&nbsp;Fangfang Song,&nbsp;Bee Choo Tai,&nbsp;Melissa Ooi,&nbsp;Cinnie Yentia Seokojo,&nbsp;Yunxin Chen,&nbsp;Chandramouli Nagarajan,&nbsp;Wee Joo Chng,&nbsp;Sanjay de Mel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11899-023-00704-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The development of potent novel agents has improved outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Heterogeneity of response to therapy, an expanding arsenal of treatment options, and cost are however major challenges for physicians making treatment decisions. Response-adapted therapy is hence an attractive strategy for sequencing of therapy in MM. Despite its successful application in other haematologic malignancies, response-adapted therapy is yet to become a standard of care for MM. We provide our perspective on response-adapted therapeutic strategies evaluated thus far and how they may be implemented and improved on in treatment algorithms of the future.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>While older studies suggested that early response based on International Myeloma Working Group response criteria could impact long-term outcomes, recent data have contradicted these findings. The advent of minimal residual disease (MRD) as a powerful prognostic factor in MM has raised the promise of MRD-adapted treatment strategies. The development of more sensitive techniques for paraprotein quantification as well as imaging modalities to detect extramedullary disease is likely to change response assessment in MM. These techniques combined with MRD assessment may provide sensitive and holistic response assessments which could be evaluated in clinical trials. Response-adapted treatment algorithms have the potential to allow an individualised treatment strategy, maximising efficacy, while minimising toxicities and cost. Standardisation of MRD methodology, incorporation of imaging into response assessment, and the optimal management of MRD positive patients are key questions to be addressed in future trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports\",\"volume\":\"18 5\",\"pages\":\"190-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11899-023-00704-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11899-023-00704-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:强效新药的开发改善了多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的预后。然而,对治疗反应的异质性、不断扩大的治疗选择和成本是医生做出治疗决策的主要挑战。因此,反应适应疗法是MM治疗序列的一种有吸引力的策略。尽管它在其他血液系统恶性肿瘤中成功应用,但反应适应疗法尚未成为MM的标准护理。我们提供了我们对迄今为止评估的适应反应的治疗策略的看法,以及如何在未来的治疗算法中实施和改进这些策略。最近的发现:虽然以前的研究表明,基于国际骨髓瘤工作组反应标准的早期反应可能会影响长期结果,但最近的数据与这些发现相矛盾。微小残留病(MRD)作为MM的一个强大预后因素的出现,提高了适应MRD的治疗策略的前景。副蛋白定量的更敏感技术以及检测髓外疾病的成像模式的发展可能会改变MM的反应评估。这些技术与MRD评估相结合,可以提供敏感和全面的反应评估,可以在临床试验中进行评估。适应反应的治疗算法有可能实现个性化的治疗策略,最大限度地提高疗效,同时将毒性和成本降至最低。MRD方法的标准化、将成像纳入反应评估以及MRD阳性患者的最佳管理是未来试验中需要解决的关键问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Response-Adapted Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.

Purpose of review: The development of potent novel agents has improved outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Heterogeneity of response to therapy, an expanding arsenal of treatment options, and cost are however major challenges for physicians making treatment decisions. Response-adapted therapy is hence an attractive strategy for sequencing of therapy in MM. Despite its successful application in other haematologic malignancies, response-adapted therapy is yet to become a standard of care for MM. We provide our perspective on response-adapted therapeutic strategies evaluated thus far and how they may be implemented and improved on in treatment algorithms of the future.

Recent findings: While older studies suggested that early response based on International Myeloma Working Group response criteria could impact long-term outcomes, recent data have contradicted these findings. The advent of minimal residual disease (MRD) as a powerful prognostic factor in MM has raised the promise of MRD-adapted treatment strategies. The development of more sensitive techniques for paraprotein quantification as well as imaging modalities to detect extramedullary disease is likely to change response assessment in MM. These techniques combined with MRD assessment may provide sensitive and holistic response assessments which could be evaluated in clinical trials. Response-adapted treatment algorithms have the potential to allow an individualised treatment strategy, maximising efficacy, while minimising toxicities and cost. Standardisation of MRD methodology, incorporation of imaging into response assessment, and the optimal management of MRD positive patients are key questions to be addressed in future trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: his journal intends to provide clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts that review the most important, recently published clinical findings related to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of hematologic malignancy. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as leukemia, lymphoma, myeloma, and T-cell and other lymphoproliferative malignancies. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
期刊最新文献
Pulmonary, Hepatic, and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Telomere Biology Disorders. Management of Toxicities Associated with BCMA, GPRC5D, and FcRH5-Targeting Bispecific Antibodies in Multiple Myeloma. Advances in Stem Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis. JAK Inhibitors for Myelofibrosis: Strengths and Limitations. Maintenance Therapy Post-Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with T-Cell Lymphomas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1