Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports最新文献

Purpose of the review: This study aimed to summarize evidence and provide consensus-based guidelines for management of transplantation in patients with telomere biology disorders (TBD). Specifically, this review focuses on clinical management of lung, liver, and bone marrow transplantation in TBD patients.

Recent findings: TBD patients have specific unique biological vulnerabilities such as T cell immunodeficiency, susceptibility to infections, hypersensitivity to chemotherapy and radiation, and cytopenias. Furthermore, multiple organ involvement at diagnosis makes clinical management especially challenging due to higher degree of organ damage, and stress-induced telomeric crisis. Sequential and combined organ transplants, development of novel radiation and alkylator-free conditioning regimen, and use of novel drugs for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis are some of the recent updates in the field. Multidisciplinary management is essential to optimize transplant outcomes in patients with TBD. In this review, we provide consensus-based transplant management guidelines for clinical management of transplant in TBD.

Purpose of review: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a serious complication after allogeneic HCT. Recently, several pivotal studies have been conducted demonstrating significant improvements in the management of GVHD. Here, we review important trials pertaining to GVHD prevention, acute GVHD treatment, and treatment of steroid refractory acute and chronic GVHD.

Recent findings: Clinical trials in preventing GVHD demonstrate lower rates of severe acute GVHD and chronic GVHD with post-transplant cyclophosphamide. For acute GVHD, lower risk acute GVHD appears amenable to steroid-sparing therapies, such as sirolimus and itacitinib. Combinations with novel agents such as itolizumab appear promising for high risk acute GVHD. For steroid-refractory acute GVHD, ruxolitinib should be considered first line therapy. For chronic GVHD requiring therapy beyond steroids, ruxolitinib, belumosudil, and ibrutinib are now available and should be considered. Increasingly, GVHD has become a manageable complication after allogeneic HCT potentially translating to greater success with allogeneic HCT in the future.

Purpose of review: The introduction of bispecific antibodies is one of the most significant recent advances in the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. This review will summarize the management of the toxicities associated with newly approved T cell-engaging bispecific antibodies and those which may be approved in the near future.

Recent findings: Numerous trials have shown that bispecific antibodies can be both effective and tolerable when adverse events are properly managed. Cytokine release syndrome and increased infections are observed across all bispecific antibodies. Additional adverse events are target-specific, such as the more severe hypogammaglobulinemia and infections of BCMA bispecific antibodies and the dysgeusia, nail dystrophy, and skin changes of GPRC5D bispecific antibodies. Bispecific antibodies will surely become a mainstay of multiple myeloma therapy given their efficacy and accessibility. Their unique toxicities must be carefully considered and managed to ensure they are utilized safely.

Purpose of review: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is the only potentially curative treatment for myelofibrosis. This review discusses issues not well-covered by existing guidelines: timing of transplant, pre-transplant spleen management and alternative donors; providing our approach to these situations.

Recent findings: Research continues to allow better identification, by better risk stratification and advances in understanding likelihood of durable JAKi response, which patients are likely to derive benefit from upfront transplant versus those for whom delayed transplant may be more appropriate. Several options of JAKi therapy provide a non-surgical option for pre-HCT splenomegaly management, allowing some patients to avoid risks associated with splenectomy. Recent years have also seen a sharp spike in haploidentical donor transplants, along with narrowing of the gap in outcomes between donor types. Continuous enrollment in prospective studies or well-designed registries is required to generate the high-quality data needed to develop better decision tools for these scenarios.

Purpose of review: Given the poor outcomes for peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL), stem cell transplant (SCT) remains an important therapeutic approach. Post-SCT relapse is common and maintenance therapy post-SCT is increasingly being utilized. Here we review the use of post-SCT maintenance therapy for PTCL patients.

Recent findings: Maintenance therapy is increasingly utilized to decrease post-SCT relapse and improve outcomes in PTCL. Ongoing and completed post-SCT maintenance trials utilizing agents such as romidepsin, brentuximab vedotin, duvelisib, and pembrolizumab have shown efficacy in decreasing relapse. Further, additional agents with efficacy in PTCL have emerged that may inform future maintenance approaches. Maintenance therapy is a promising approach to maintain response after SCT in PTCL. While several trials are ongoing to evaluate maintenance therapy in PTCL, current data suggests this may be an effective method to decrease post-SCT relapse.

Purpose of review: The landscape of myelofibrosis (MF) has changed since the discovery of the JAK2 V617F mutation and subsequent development of JAK inhibitors (JAKis). However, treatment with JAKis remain a challenge. In this review we critically analyze the strengths and limitations of currently available JAK inhibitors.

Recent findings: In MF patients, JAK inhibitors have been associated with reduced symptom burden and spleen size, as well as improved survival. However, durability of response and development of treatment resistance remain an issue. Recently, there has been increased efforts to optimize treatment with the development of highly selective JAK inhibitors, as well as use of combination agents to counter disease resistance through targeting aberrant signaling pathways. Treatment of MF patients with JAKi therapy can be challenging but the development of more potent and selective JAK inhibitors, as well as combination therapies, represent exciting treatment advances in this field.

Purpose of review: Since identification of Systemic mastocytosis (SM) as a distinct disease entity by the World Health Organisation (WHO), there has been a wealth of new research in therapeutic targeting of the pathogenic C-KIT D816V mutation.

Recent findings: Avapritinib, the first licensed drug in SM capable of disease modification alongside the increasingly potent, oral and highly selective KIT tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) Bezuclastinib and now Elenestinib have enabled the prospect of long-term remissions. Studies have shown improved survival and symptomatic control in patients with SM. Of great triumph, this has been achieved in an outpatient setting with apparent tolerable and minimal toxicity. The importance of molecular profiling is being demonstrated in administering combination therapies for SM with an associated haematological neoplasm (AHN), allowing more personalised and streamlined treatment regimes. This review focuses on current management strategies of SM, focusing on state-of-the-art directed therapies, the evidence behind their use with presentation of two clinical cases to highlight key messages.

Purpose of review: In this review, we aim to explore the optimal approach to patients presenting with eosinophilia, considering recent advances in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Specifically, we focus on the integration of novel therapies into clinical practice to improve patient outcomes.

Recent findings: Advanced insights into the clinical and genetic features of eosinophilic disorders have prompted revisions in diagnostic criteria by the World Health Organization classification (WHO-HAEM5) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC). These changes reflect a growing understanding of disease pathogenesis and the development of targeted treatment options. The therapeutic landscape now encompasses a range of established and novel therapies. For reactive conditions, drugs targeting the eosinophilopoiesis, such as those aimed at interleukin-5 or its receptor, have demonstrated significant potential in decreasing blood eosinophil levels and minimizing disease flare-ups and relapse. These therapies have the potential to mitigate the side effects commonly associated with prolonged use of oral corticosteroids or immunosuppressants. Myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase (TK) gene fusions are managed by various TK inhibitors with variable efficacy. Diagnosis and treatment rely on a multidisciplinary approach. By incorporating novel treatment options into clinical practice, physicians across different disciplines involved in the management of eosinophilic disorders can offer more personalized and effective care to patients. However, challenges remain in accurately diagnosing and risk-stratifying patients, as well as in navigating the complexities of treatment selection.

Purpose of review: Myelofibrosis (MF) includes prefibrotic primary MF (pre-PMF), overt-PMF and secondary MF (SMF). Median overall survival (OS) of pre-PMF, overt-PMF and SMF patients is around 14 years, seven and nine years, respectively. Main causes of mortality are non-clonal progression and transformation into blast phase.

Recent findings: Discoveries on the impact of the biological architecture on OS have led to the design of integrated scores to predict survival in PMF. For SMF, OS estimates should be calculated by the specific MYSEC-PM (MYelofibrosis SECondary-prognostic model). Information on the prognostic role of the molecular landscape in SMF is accumulating. Crucial treatment decisions for MF patients could be now supported by multivariable predictive algorithms. OS should become a relevant endpoint of clinical trials. Prognostic models guide prediction of OS and treatment planning in MF, therefore, their timely application is critical in the personalized approach of MF patients.

Purpose of review: Measurable residual disease (MRD) is integral in the management of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This review discusses the current methods used to evaluate MRD as well as the interpretation, significance, and incorporation of MRD in current practice.

Recent findings: New molecular technologies have allowed the detection of MRD to levels as low as 10^- 6. The most used techniques to evaluate MRD are multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC), quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), and high-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS). Each method varies in terms of advantages, disadvantages, and MRD sensitivity. MRD negativity after induction treatment and after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an important prognostic marker that has consistently been shown to be associated with improved outcomes. Blinatumomab, a new targeted therapy for Ph + ALL, demonstrates high efficacy in eradicating MRD and improving patient outcomes. In the relapsed/refractory setting, the use of inotuzumab ozogamicin and tisagenlecleucel has shown promise in eradicating MRD. The presence of MRD has become an important predictive measure in Ph + ALL. Current studies evaluate the use of MRD in treatment decisions, especially in expanding therapeutic options for Ph + ALL, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, targeted antibody therapies, chimeric antigen receptor cell therapy, and HCT.