{"title":"植入过程中血清雌二醇和孕酮水平对冷冻胚胎移植的产科并发症和围产期结果的影响。","authors":"Yi-Lun Lin, Chung-Han Ho, Ming-Ting Chung, Liang-Yin Lin, Tsun-Wen Hsiao, Yi-Ting Chen, Jen-Yu Wen, Yung-Chieh Tsai","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study sought to evaluate obstetric complications and perinatal outcomes in frozen embryo transfer (FET) using either a natural cycle (NC-FET) or a hormone therapy cycle (HT-FET). Furthermore, we investigated how serum levels of estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) on the day of and 3 days after embryo transfer (ET) correlated with clinical outcomes in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, single-center study from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019. The study included couples who underwent NC-FET or HT-FET resulting in a singleton live birth. Serum levels of E2 and P4 were measured on the day of and 3 days after ET. The primary outcomes assessed were preterm birth rate, low birth weight, macrosomia, hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus, postpartum hemorrhage, and placenta-related complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 229 singletons were included, with 49 in the NC-FET group and 180 in the HT-FET group. There were no significant differences in obstetric complications and perinatal outcomes between the two groups. The NC-FET group had significantly higher serum levels of P4 (17.2 ng/mL vs 8.85 ng/mL; p < 0.0001) but not E2 (144 pg/mL vs 147 pg/mL; p = 0.69) on the day of ET. Additionally, 3 days after ET, the NC-FET group had significantly higher levels of both E2 (171 pg/mL vs 140.5 pg/mL; p = 0.0037) and P4 (27.3 ng/mL vs 11.7 ng/mL; p < 0.0001) compared with the HT-FET group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study revealed that although there were significant differences in E2 and P4 levels around implantation between the two groups, there were no significant differences in obstetric complications and perinatal outcomes. Therefore, the hormonal environment around implantation did not appear to be the primary cause of differences in obstetric and perinatal outcomes between the two EM preparation methods used in FET.</p>","PeriodicalId":17251,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of serum estradiol and progesterone levels during implantation on obstetrical complications and perinatal outcomes in frozen embryo transfer.\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Lun Lin, Chung-Han Ho, Ming-Ting Chung, Liang-Yin Lin, Tsun-Wen Hsiao, Yi-Ting Chen, Jen-Yu Wen, Yung-Chieh Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study sought to evaluate obstetric complications and perinatal outcomes in frozen embryo transfer (FET) using either a natural cycle (NC-FET) or a hormone therapy cycle (HT-FET). Furthermore, we investigated how serum levels of estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) on the day of and 3 days after embryo transfer (ET) correlated with clinical outcomes in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, single-center study from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019. The study included couples who underwent NC-FET or HT-FET resulting in a singleton live birth. Serum levels of E2 and P4 were measured on the day of and 3 days after ET. The primary outcomes assessed were preterm birth rate, low birth weight, macrosomia, hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus, postpartum hemorrhage, and placenta-related complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 229 singletons were included, with 49 in the NC-FET group and 180 in the HT-FET group. There were no significant differences in obstetric complications and perinatal outcomes between the two groups. The NC-FET group had significantly higher serum levels of P4 (17.2 ng/mL vs 8.85 ng/mL; p < 0.0001) but not E2 (144 pg/mL vs 147 pg/mL; p = 0.69) on the day of ET. Additionally, 3 days after ET, the NC-FET group had significantly higher levels of both E2 (171 pg/mL vs 140.5 pg/mL; p = 0.0037) and P4 (27.3 ng/mL vs 11.7 ng/mL; p < 0.0001) compared with the HT-FET group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study revealed that although there were significant differences in E2 and P4 levels around implantation between the two groups, there were no significant differences in obstetric complications and perinatal outcomes. Therefore, the hormonal environment around implantation did not appear to be the primary cause of differences in obstetric and perinatal outcomes between the two EM preparation methods used in FET.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000988\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000988","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The impact of serum estradiol and progesterone levels during implantation on obstetrical complications and perinatal outcomes in frozen embryo transfer.
Background: This study sought to evaluate obstetric complications and perinatal outcomes in frozen embryo transfer (FET) using either a natural cycle (NC-FET) or a hormone therapy cycle (HT-FET). Furthermore, we investigated how serum levels of estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) on the day of and 3 days after embryo transfer (ET) correlated with clinical outcomes in the two groups.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center study from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019. The study included couples who underwent NC-FET or HT-FET resulting in a singleton live birth. Serum levels of E2 and P4 were measured on the day of and 3 days after ET. The primary outcomes assessed were preterm birth rate, low birth weight, macrosomia, hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus, postpartum hemorrhage, and placenta-related complications.
Results: A total of 229 singletons were included, with 49 in the NC-FET group and 180 in the HT-FET group. There were no significant differences in obstetric complications and perinatal outcomes between the two groups. The NC-FET group had significantly higher serum levels of P4 (17.2 ng/mL vs 8.85 ng/mL; p < 0.0001) but not E2 (144 pg/mL vs 147 pg/mL; p = 0.69) on the day of ET. Additionally, 3 days after ET, the NC-FET group had significantly higher levels of both E2 (171 pg/mL vs 140.5 pg/mL; p = 0.0037) and P4 (27.3 ng/mL vs 11.7 ng/mL; p < 0.0001) compared with the HT-FET group.
Conclusion: Our study revealed that although there were significant differences in E2 and P4 levels around implantation between the two groups, there were no significant differences in obstetric complications and perinatal outcomes. Therefore, the hormonal environment around implantation did not appear to be the primary cause of differences in obstetric and perinatal outcomes between the two EM preparation methods used in FET.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, previously known as the Chinese Medical Journal (Taipei), has a long history of publishing scientific papers and has continuously made substantial contribution in the understanding and progress of a broad range of biomedical sciences. It is published monthly by Wolters Kluwer Health and indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), MEDLINE®, Index Medicus, EMBASE, CAB Abstracts, Sociedad Iberoamericana de Informacion Cientifica (SIIC) Data Bases, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Global Health.
JCMA is the official and open access journal of the Chinese Medical Association, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China and is an international forum for scholarly reports in medicine, surgery, dentistry and basic research in biomedical science. As a vehicle of communication and education among physicians and scientists, the journal is open to the use of diverse methodological approaches. Reports of professional practice will need to demonstrate academic robustness and scientific rigor. Outstanding scholars are invited to give their update reviews on the perspectives of the evidence-based science in the related research field. Article types accepted include review articles, original articles, case reports, brief communications and letters to the editor