三维电子衍射数据运动学精化中反射强度的最优估计标准不确定度。

IF 1.9 4区 材料科学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations and Advances Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1107/S2053273323005053
Malak Khouchen, Paul Benjamin Klar, Hrushikesh Chintakindi, Ashwin Suresh, Lukas Palatinus
{"title":"三维电子衍射数据运动学精化中反射强度的最优估计标准不确定度。","authors":"Malak Khouchen,&nbsp;Paul Benjamin Klar,&nbsp;Hrushikesh Chintakindi,&nbsp;Ashwin Suresh,&nbsp;Lukas Palatinus","doi":"10.1107/S2053273323005053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Estimating the error in the merged reflection intensities requires a full understanding of all the possible sources of error arising from the measurements. Most diffraction-spot integration methods focus mainly on errors arising from counting statistics for the estimation of uncertainties associated with the reflection intensities. This treatment may be incomplete and partly inadequate. In an attempt to fully understand and identify all the contributions to these errors, three methods are examined for the correction of estimated errors of reflection intensities in electron diffraction data. For a direct comparison, the three methods are applied to a set of organic and inorganic test cases. It is demonstrated that applying the corrections of a specific model that include terms dependent on the original uncertainty and the largest intensity of the symmetry-related reflections improves the overall structure quality of the given data set and improves the final R<sub>all</sub> factor. This error model is implemented in the data reduction software PETS2.</p>","PeriodicalId":106,"journal":{"name":"Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations and Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10483590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal estimated standard uncertainties of reflection intensities for kinematical refinement from 3D electron diffraction data.\",\"authors\":\"Malak Khouchen,&nbsp;Paul Benjamin Klar,&nbsp;Hrushikesh Chintakindi,&nbsp;Ashwin Suresh,&nbsp;Lukas Palatinus\",\"doi\":\"10.1107/S2053273323005053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Estimating the error in the merged reflection intensities requires a full understanding of all the possible sources of error arising from the measurements. Most diffraction-spot integration methods focus mainly on errors arising from counting statistics for the estimation of uncertainties associated with the reflection intensities. This treatment may be incomplete and partly inadequate. In an attempt to fully understand and identify all the contributions to these errors, three methods are examined for the correction of estimated errors of reflection intensities in electron diffraction data. For a direct comparison, the three methods are applied to a set of organic and inorganic test cases. It is demonstrated that applying the corrections of a specific model that include terms dependent on the original uncertainty and the largest intensity of the symmetry-related reflections improves the overall structure quality of the given data set and improves the final R<sub>all</sub> factor. This error model is implemented in the data reduction software PETS2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations and Advances\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10483590/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations and Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053273323005053\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations and Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053273323005053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

估计合并反射强度的误差需要充分了解测量产生的所有可能的误差来源。大多数衍射点积分方法主要集中在计数统计引起的误差上,用于估计与反射强度相关的不确定性。这种治疗可能是不完整的,部分是不充分的。为了充分理解和确定这些误差的所有贡献,我们研究了三种方法来校正电子衍射数据中反射强度的估计误差。为了进行直接比较,将这三种方法应用于一组有机和无机测试用例。结果表明,应用特定模型的校正,包括依赖于原始不确定性和对称相关反射的最大强度的项,可以改善给定数据集的整体结构质量,并提高最终的Rall因子。该误差模型在数据约简软件PETS2中实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimal estimated standard uncertainties of reflection intensities for kinematical refinement from 3D electron diffraction data.

Estimating the error in the merged reflection intensities requires a full understanding of all the possible sources of error arising from the measurements. Most diffraction-spot integration methods focus mainly on errors arising from counting statistics for the estimation of uncertainties associated with the reflection intensities. This treatment may be incomplete and partly inadequate. In an attempt to fully understand and identify all the contributions to these errors, three methods are examined for the correction of estimated errors of reflection intensities in electron diffraction data. For a direct comparison, the three methods are applied to a set of organic and inorganic test cases. It is demonstrated that applying the corrections of a specific model that include terms dependent on the original uncertainty and the largest intensity of the symmetry-related reflections improves the overall structure quality of the given data set and improves the final Rall factor. This error model is implemented in the data reduction software PETS2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations and Advances
Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations and Advances CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARYCRYSTALLOGRAPH-CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
419
期刊介绍: Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations and Advances publishes articles reporting advances in the theory and practice of all areas of crystallography in the broadest sense. As well as traditional crystallography, this includes nanocrystals, metacrystals, amorphous materials, quasicrystals, synchrotron and XFEL studies, coherent scattering, diffraction imaging, time-resolved studies and the structure of strain and defects in materials. The journal has two parts, a rapid-publication Advances section and the traditional Foundations section. Articles for the Advances section are of particularly high value and impact. They receive expedited treatment and may be highlighted by an accompanying scientific commentary article and a press release. Further details are given in the November 2013 Editorial. The central themes of the journal are, on the one hand, experimental and theoretical studies of the properties and arrangements of atoms, ions and molecules in condensed matter, periodic, quasiperiodic or amorphous, ideal or real, and, on the other, the theoretical and experimental aspects of the various methods to determine these properties and arrangements.
期刊最新文献
Instrumental broadening and the radial pair distribution function with 2D detectors. Superstructure reflections in tilted perovskites. On uniform edge-n-colorings of tilings. The description of octahedral crystals using five parameters. Development of an innovative diffraction scattering theory of X-rays and electrons in imperfect crystals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1