荷兰语版Brace问卷(BrQ)的效度与信度。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Acta Orthopaedica Pub Date : 2023-09-04 DOI:10.2340/17453674.2023.18492
Charles M M Peeters, Joshua M Bonsel, Roelina Munnik-Hagewoud, Adriaan K Mostert, Guido B Van Solinge, Joost P H J Rutges, Mark C Altena, Paul F M Krabbe, G J F Joyce Bos, Chris Faber, Frits-Hein Wapstra, Diederik H R Kempen
{"title":"荷兰语版Brace问卷(BrQ)的效度与信度。","authors":"Charles M M Peeters,&nbsp;Joshua M Bonsel,&nbsp;Roelina Munnik-Hagewoud,&nbsp;Adriaan K Mostert,&nbsp;Guido B Van Solinge,&nbsp;Joost P H J Rutges,&nbsp;Mark C Altena,&nbsp;Paul F M Krabbe,&nbsp;G J F Joyce Bos,&nbsp;Chris Faber,&nbsp;Frits-Hein Wapstra,&nbsp;Diederik H R Kempen","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2023.18492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The Brace Questionnaire (BrQ) is a disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instrument for measuring perceived health status of scoliosis patients undergoing brace treatment. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of a translated and culturally adapted Dutch version of the BrQ.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The original Greek BrQ was translated into Dutch and a cross-cultural adaptation and validation processes were conducted. Subsequently, 80 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing active brace treatment were included from 4 scoliosis centers to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the BrQ. The questionnaire's floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were assessed. Concurrent validity was evaluated by comparing the BrQ with the revised Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire (SRS-22r) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean total BrQ score was 75.9 (standard deviation [SD] 11.3) and the mean domain scores varied between 3.4 (SD 0.9) and 4.2 (SD 0.7) for the domains \"vitality\" and \"bodily pain,\" respectively. There were no floor and ceiling effects for the total BrQ score. The BrQ showed satisfactory internal consistency in most subdomains with a Cronbach's α ranging between 0.35 for the domain \"general health perception\" and 0.89 for the domain \"self-esteem and aesthetics.\" Excellent test-retest reproducibility was observed for the total BrQ score (ICC 0.91), and the BrQ was successfully validated against the SRS-22r.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The translated and culturally adapted Dutch version of the BrQ is a valid and reliable HRQOL instrument for AIS patients undergoing brace treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"94 ","pages":"460-465"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0c/3d/ActaO-94-18492.PMC10481702.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of the adapted Dutch version of the Brace Questionnaire (BrQ).\",\"authors\":\"Charles M M Peeters,&nbsp;Joshua M Bonsel,&nbsp;Roelina Munnik-Hagewoud,&nbsp;Adriaan K Mostert,&nbsp;Guido B Van Solinge,&nbsp;Joost P H J Rutges,&nbsp;Mark C Altena,&nbsp;Paul F M Krabbe,&nbsp;G J F Joyce Bos,&nbsp;Chris Faber,&nbsp;Frits-Hein Wapstra,&nbsp;Diederik H R Kempen\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/17453674.2023.18492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The Brace Questionnaire (BrQ) is a disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instrument for measuring perceived health status of scoliosis patients undergoing brace treatment. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of a translated and culturally adapted Dutch version of the BrQ.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The original Greek BrQ was translated into Dutch and a cross-cultural adaptation and validation processes were conducted. Subsequently, 80 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing active brace treatment were included from 4 scoliosis centers to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the BrQ. The questionnaire's floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were assessed. Concurrent validity was evaluated by comparing the BrQ with the revised Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire (SRS-22r) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean total BrQ score was 75.9 (standard deviation [SD] 11.3) and the mean domain scores varied between 3.4 (SD 0.9) and 4.2 (SD 0.7) for the domains \\\"vitality\\\" and \\\"bodily pain,\\\" respectively. There were no floor and ceiling effects for the total BrQ score. The BrQ showed satisfactory internal consistency in most subdomains with a Cronbach's α ranging between 0.35 for the domain \\\"general health perception\\\" and 0.89 for the domain \\\"self-esteem and aesthetics.\\\" Excellent test-retest reproducibility was observed for the total BrQ score (ICC 0.91), and the BrQ was successfully validated against the SRS-22r.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The translated and culturally adapted Dutch version of the BrQ is a valid and reliable HRQOL instrument for AIS patients undergoing brace treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"volume\":\"94 \",\"pages\":\"460-465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0c/3d/ActaO-94-18492.PMC10481702.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.18492\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.18492","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:支架问卷(BrQ)是一种疾病特异性健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)工具,用于测量接受支架治疗的脊柱侧凸患者的感知健康状况。本研究的目的是评估翻译和文化改编的荷兰语版BrQ的效度和可靠性。患者和方法:将原希腊语BrQ翻译成荷兰语,并进行跨文化适应和验证过程。随后,从4个脊柱侧凸中心纳入80名接受积极支架治疗的青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患者,以评估荷兰版BrQ的效度和可靠性。评估问卷的下限和上限效应、内部一致性和重测信度。通过比较BrQ与修订后的脊柱侧凸研究协会22项问卷(SRS-22r)得分来评估并发效度。结果:BrQ总分平均为75.9分(标准差[SD] 11.3),“活力”和“身体疼痛”领域的平均得分分别在3.4分(SD 0.9)和4.2分(SD 0.7)之间变化。BrQ总分没有下限和上限效应。BrQ在大多数子域显示出令人满意的内部一致性,“一般健康感知”和“自尊与美学”的Cronbach’s α值分别在0.35和0.89之间。BrQ总分(ICC 0.91)具有良好的重测重现性,BrQ与SRS-22r对照验证成功。结论:翻译后的荷兰语BrQ量表是AIS患者接受支具治疗时有效、可靠的HRQOL工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validity and reliability of the adapted Dutch version of the Brace Questionnaire (BrQ).

Background and purpose: The Brace Questionnaire (BrQ) is a disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instrument for measuring perceived health status of scoliosis patients undergoing brace treatment. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of a translated and culturally adapted Dutch version of the BrQ.

Patients and methods: The original Greek BrQ was translated into Dutch and a cross-cultural adaptation and validation processes were conducted. Subsequently, 80 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing active brace treatment were included from 4 scoliosis centers to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the BrQ. The questionnaire's floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were assessed. Concurrent validity was evaluated by comparing the BrQ with the revised Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire (SRS-22r) scores.

Results: The mean total BrQ score was 75.9 (standard deviation [SD] 11.3) and the mean domain scores varied between 3.4 (SD 0.9) and 4.2 (SD 0.7) for the domains "vitality" and "bodily pain," respectively. There were no floor and ceiling effects for the total BrQ score. The BrQ showed satisfactory internal consistency in most subdomains with a Cronbach's α ranging between 0.35 for the domain "general health perception" and 0.89 for the domain "self-esteem and aesthetics." Excellent test-retest reproducibility was observed for the total BrQ score (ICC 0.91), and the BrQ was successfully validated against the SRS-22r.

Conclusion: The translated and culturally adapted Dutch version of the BrQ is a valid and reliable HRQOL instrument for AIS patients undergoing brace treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Orthopaedica
Acta Orthopaedica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.
期刊最新文献
Acute treatment of elderly patients with acetabular fractures by open reduction, internal fixation, and total hip arthroplasty: a 1-10-year follow-up of 48 patients. Incidence and risk factors of adverse events after distal radius fracture fixation with volar locking plates: retrospective analysis of 2,790 cases. The completeness of national hip and knee replacement registers. Can KOOS-PS be replaced with a simple anchor question in patients after total knee arthroplasty?: an agreement study of 2,478 primary surgeries. Erratum: Regional variation in low-value musculoskeletal surgery: a nationwide study from the Finnish Care Register.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1