Covid-19对味觉的影响不受味觉-嗅觉混淆的影响:来自全球大型队列的综合化学感官家庭测试和在线调查的结果。

IF 2.8 4区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Chemical Senses Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1093/chemse/bjad020
Ha Nguyen, Javier Albayay, Richard Höchenberger, Surabhi Bhutani, Sanne Boesveldt, Niko A Busch, Ilja Croijmans, Keiland W Cooper, Jasper H B de Groot, Michael C Farruggia, Alexander W Fjaeldstad, John E Hayes, Thomas Hummel, Paule V Joseph, Tatiana K Laktionova, Thierry Thomas-Danguin, Maria G Veldhuizen, Vera V Voznessenskaya, Valentina Parma, M Yanina Pepino, Kathrin Ohla
{"title":"Covid-19对味觉的影响不受味觉-嗅觉混淆的影响:来自全球大型队列的综合化学感官家庭测试和在线调查的结果。","authors":"Ha Nguyen, Javier Albayay, Richard Höchenberger, Surabhi Bhutani, Sanne Boesveldt, Niko A Busch, Ilja Croijmans, Keiland W Cooper, Jasper H B de Groot, Michael C Farruggia, Alexander W Fjaeldstad, John E Hayes, Thomas Hummel, Paule V Joseph, Tatiana K Laktionova, Thierry Thomas-Danguin, Maria G Veldhuizen, Vera V Voznessenskaya, Valentina Parma, M Yanina Pepino, Kathrin Ohla","doi":"10.1093/chemse/bjad020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People often confuse smell loss with taste loss, so it is unclear how much gustatory function is reduced in patients self-reporting taste loss. Our pre-registered cross-sectional study design included an online survey in 12 languages with instructions for self-administering chemosensory tests with 10 household items. Between June 2020 and March 2021, 10,953 individuals participated. Of these, 5,225 self-reported a respiratory illness and were grouped based on their reported COVID test results: COVID-positive (COVID+, N = 3,356), COVID-negative (COVID-, N = 602), and COVID unknown for those waiting for a test result (COVID?, N = 1,267). The participants who reported no respiratory illness were grouped by symptoms: sudden smell/taste changes (STC, N = 4,445), other symptoms excluding smell or taste changes (OthS, N = 832), and no symptoms (NoS, N = 416). Taste, smell, and oral irritation intensities and self-assessed abilities were rated on visual analog scales. Compared to the NoS group, COVID+ was associated with a 21% reduction in taste (95% confidence interval (CI): 15-28%), 47% in smell (95% CI: 37-56%), and 17% in oral irritation (95% CI: 10-25%) intensity. There were medium to strong correlations between perceived intensities and self-reported abilities (r = 0.84 for smell, r = 0.68 for taste, and r = 0.37 for oral irritation). Our study demonstrates that COVID-19-positive individuals report taste dysfunction when self-tested with stimuli that have little to none olfactory components. Assessing the smell and taste intensity of household items is a promising, cost-effective screening tool that complements self-reports and may help to disentangle taste loss from smell loss. However, it does not replace standardized validated psychophysical tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":9771,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Senses","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10396355/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Covid-19 affects taste independent of taste-smell confusions: results from a combined chemosensory home test and online survey from a large global cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Ha Nguyen, Javier Albayay, Richard Höchenberger, Surabhi Bhutani, Sanne Boesveldt, Niko A Busch, Ilja Croijmans, Keiland W Cooper, Jasper H B de Groot, Michael C Farruggia, Alexander W Fjaeldstad, John E Hayes, Thomas Hummel, Paule V Joseph, Tatiana K Laktionova, Thierry Thomas-Danguin, Maria G Veldhuizen, Vera V Voznessenskaya, Valentina Parma, M Yanina Pepino, Kathrin Ohla\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/chemse/bjad020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>People often confuse smell loss with taste loss, so it is unclear how much gustatory function is reduced in patients self-reporting taste loss. Our pre-registered cross-sectional study design included an online survey in 12 languages with instructions for self-administering chemosensory tests with 10 household items. Between June 2020 and March 2021, 10,953 individuals participated. Of these, 5,225 self-reported a respiratory illness and were grouped based on their reported COVID test results: COVID-positive (COVID+, N = 3,356), COVID-negative (COVID-, N = 602), and COVID unknown for those waiting for a test result (COVID?, N = 1,267). The participants who reported no respiratory illness were grouped by symptoms: sudden smell/taste changes (STC, N = 4,445), other symptoms excluding smell or taste changes (OthS, N = 832), and no symptoms (NoS, N = 416). Taste, smell, and oral irritation intensities and self-assessed abilities were rated on visual analog scales. Compared to the NoS group, COVID+ was associated with a 21% reduction in taste (95% confidence interval (CI): 15-28%), 47% in smell (95% CI: 37-56%), and 17% in oral irritation (95% CI: 10-25%) intensity. There were medium to strong correlations between perceived intensities and self-reported abilities (r = 0.84 for smell, r = 0.68 for taste, and r = 0.37 for oral irritation). Our study demonstrates that COVID-19-positive individuals report taste dysfunction when self-tested with stimuli that have little to none olfactory components. Assessing the smell and taste intensity of household items is a promising, cost-effective screening tool that complements self-reports and may help to disentangle taste loss from smell loss. However, it does not replace standardized validated psychophysical tests.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical Senses\",\"volume\":\"48 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10396355/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical Senses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjad020\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Senses","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjad020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们经常将嗅觉丧失与味觉丧失混为一谈,因此目前还不清楚自述味觉丧失的患者的味觉功能究竟降低了多少。我们预先登记的横断面研究设计包括一项 12 种语言的在线调查,并附有使用 10 种家用物品进行化学感觉测试的自我管理说明。2020 年 6 月至 2021 年 3 月期间,共有 10953 人参与了这项研究。其中,5225 人自我报告患有呼吸道疾病,并根据报告的 COVID 测试结果进行分组:COVID阳性(COVID+,人数=3356),COVID阴性(COVID-,人数=602),等待检测结果的COVID未知(COVID?)对未报告呼吸道疾病的参与者按症状分组:气味/味道突然改变(STC,N = 4,445)、不包括气味或味道改变的其他症状(OthS,N = 832)和无症状(NoS,N = 416)。味觉、嗅觉和口腔刺激强度以及自我评估能力采用视觉模拟量表进行评分。与无症状组相比,COVID+ 可使味觉强度降低 21%(95% 置信区间 (CI):15-28%),嗅觉强度降低 47%(95% 置信区间 (CI):37-56%),口腔刺激强度降低 17%(95% 置信区间 (CI):10-25%)。感知强度与自我报告能力之间存在中等到较强的相关性(嗅觉相关性为 0.84,味觉相关性为 0.68,口腔刺激相关性为 0.37)。我们的研究表明,COVID-19 阳性者在使用几乎没有嗅觉成分的刺激物进行自我测试时,会出现味觉功能障碍。对家居用品的气味和味道强度进行评估是一种很有前景、经济有效的筛查工具,它是对自我报告的补充,可能有助于将味觉丧失与嗅觉丧失区分开来。然而,它并不能取代经过验证的标准化心理物理测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Covid-19 affects taste independent of taste-smell confusions: results from a combined chemosensory home test and online survey from a large global cohort.

People often confuse smell loss with taste loss, so it is unclear how much gustatory function is reduced in patients self-reporting taste loss. Our pre-registered cross-sectional study design included an online survey in 12 languages with instructions for self-administering chemosensory tests with 10 household items. Between June 2020 and March 2021, 10,953 individuals participated. Of these, 5,225 self-reported a respiratory illness and were grouped based on their reported COVID test results: COVID-positive (COVID+, N = 3,356), COVID-negative (COVID-, N = 602), and COVID unknown for those waiting for a test result (COVID?, N = 1,267). The participants who reported no respiratory illness were grouped by symptoms: sudden smell/taste changes (STC, N = 4,445), other symptoms excluding smell or taste changes (OthS, N = 832), and no symptoms (NoS, N = 416). Taste, smell, and oral irritation intensities and self-assessed abilities were rated on visual analog scales. Compared to the NoS group, COVID+ was associated with a 21% reduction in taste (95% confidence interval (CI): 15-28%), 47% in smell (95% CI: 37-56%), and 17% in oral irritation (95% CI: 10-25%) intensity. There were medium to strong correlations between perceived intensities and self-reported abilities (r = 0.84 for smell, r = 0.68 for taste, and r = 0.37 for oral irritation). Our study demonstrates that COVID-19-positive individuals report taste dysfunction when self-tested with stimuli that have little to none olfactory components. Assessing the smell and taste intensity of household items is a promising, cost-effective screening tool that complements self-reports and may help to disentangle taste loss from smell loss. However, it does not replace standardized validated psychophysical tests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical Senses
Chemical Senses 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
25
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Senses publishes original research and review papers on all aspects of chemoreception in both humans and animals. An important part of the journal''s coverage is devoted to techniques and the development and application of new methods for investigating chemoreception and chemosensory structures.
期刊最新文献
A receptor-based assay to study the sweet and bitter tastes of sweeteners and binary sweet blends: The SWEET Project. Late olfactory bulb involvement in COVID19. Monorhinal and Birhinal Odor Processing in Humans: an fMRI investigation. Methodologies for smellwalks and scentwalks-a critical review. Emotional self-body odors do not influence the access to visual awareness by emotional faces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1