Medi-Cal“以出生为中心的结果研究参与(B-CORE)”项目:降低孕产妇死亡率和严重孕产妇发病率的社区建议

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Womens Health Issues Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2023.03.012
Priya Batra MD, MS, FACOG , Gabriela Alvarado MD, MSc, MA, MPhil , Chloe E. Bird PhD, FAAAS, FAAHB
{"title":"Medi-Cal“以出生为中心的结果研究参与(B-CORE)”项目:降低孕产妇死亡率和严重孕产妇发病率的社区建议","authors":"Priya Batra MD, MS, FACOG ,&nbsp;Gabriela Alvarado MD, MSc, MA, MPhil ,&nbsp;Chloe E. Bird PhD, FAAAS, FAAHB","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Through applied research and health care quality improvement<span>, California has achieved a maternal mortality (MM) rate significantly lower than that measured nationally. However, Medicaid (Medi-Cal)-insured births in the state continue to experience disproportionate shares of MM and severe </span></span>maternal morbidity (SMM), which often precedes death. Failure to engage the Medi-Cal community in this work may impede efforts to increase equity.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This community engagement project used deliberative democracy<span><span> methods to engage stakeholders with lived experience in California's Medi-Cal </span>perinatal care system to generate an actionable and specific agenda of recommendations to decrease MM and SMM in the Medi-Cal population.</span></p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>A total of 37 Medi-Cal stakeholders—representing birthing people, providers, health plan administrators, and advocates—participated in longitudinal co-learning sessions on the topics of MM/SMM in Medi-Cal. Most of these stakeholders (75.7%) then participated in deliberation sessions. Deliberation recommendations fell into five distinct categories: Medi-Cal perinatal covered benefits, data collection and dissemination, patient experience and its link to care quality, Medi-Cal reimbursement rates, and accountability with respect to racism in perinatal care. Stakeholders identified the Medi-Cal system actors best positioned to implement specific recommendations to directly impact MM/SMM.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This project demonstrates the feasibility and success of using deliberative democracy methods to generate local and community-generated solutions to critical problems in health equity. Active and engaged stakeholders were keen to identify both immediate actions and long-term research and quality improvement paradigm shifts to support birth equity in Medi-Cal.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":"33 5","pages":"Pages 474-480"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The “Birth-Centered Outcomes Research Engagement (B-CORE) in Medi-Cal” Project: Community-Generated Recommendations to Decrease Maternal Mortality and Severe Maternal Morbidity\",\"authors\":\"Priya Batra MD, MS, FACOG ,&nbsp;Gabriela Alvarado MD, MSc, MA, MPhil ,&nbsp;Chloe E. Bird PhD, FAAAS, FAAHB\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.whi.2023.03.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Through applied research and health care quality improvement<span>, California has achieved a maternal mortality (MM) rate significantly lower than that measured nationally. However, Medicaid (Medi-Cal)-insured births in the state continue to experience disproportionate shares of MM and severe </span></span>maternal morbidity (SMM), which often precedes death. Failure to engage the Medi-Cal community in this work may impede efforts to increase equity.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This community engagement project used deliberative democracy<span><span> methods to engage stakeholders with lived experience in California's Medi-Cal </span>perinatal care system to generate an actionable and specific agenda of recommendations to decrease MM and SMM in the Medi-Cal population.</span></p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>A total of 37 Medi-Cal stakeholders—representing birthing people, providers, health plan administrators, and advocates—participated in longitudinal co-learning sessions on the topics of MM/SMM in Medi-Cal. Most of these stakeholders (75.7%) then participated in deliberation sessions. Deliberation recommendations fell into five distinct categories: Medi-Cal perinatal covered benefits, data collection and dissemination, patient experience and its link to care quality, Medi-Cal reimbursement rates, and accountability with respect to racism in perinatal care. Stakeholders identified the Medi-Cal system actors best positioned to implement specific recommendations to directly impact MM/SMM.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This project demonstrates the feasibility and success of using deliberative democracy methods to generate local and community-generated solutions to critical problems in health equity. Active and engaged stakeholders were keen to identify both immediate actions and long-term research and quality improvement paradigm shifts to support birth equity in Medi-Cal.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Womens Health Issues\",\"volume\":\"33 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 474-480\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Womens Health Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386723000804\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health Issues","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386723000804","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景通过应用研究和医疗保健质量的提高,加利福尼亚州的孕产妇死亡率显著低于全国水平。然而,该州的医疗补助(Medi-Cal)保险分娩继续经历不成比例的MM和严重孕产妇发病率(SMM),这通常发生在死亡之前。未能让Medi-Cal社区参与这项工作可能会阻碍提高公平性的努力。方法该社区参与项目使用协商民主方法,让在加州Medi-Cal围产期护理系统有生活经验的利益相关者参与进来,以制定一个可操作的具体建议议程,减少Medi-Cal人群中的MM和SMM。发现共有37名Medi-Cal利益相关者——代表出生者、提供者、健康计划管理员和倡导者——参加了Medi-Cal关于MM/SMM主题的纵向共同学习会议。这些利益相关者中的大多数(75.7%)随后参加了审议会议。审议建议分为五类:Medi-Cal围产期保险福利、数据收集和传播、患者体验及其与护理质量的联系、Medi-Cal报销率以及对围产期护理中种族主义的问责。利益相关者确定了Medi-Cal系统最适合实施具体建议以直接影响MM/SMM的参与者。结论该项目证明了使用协商民主方法为卫生公平的关键问题制定地方和社区解决方案的可行性和成功性。积极参与的利益相关者热衷于确定立即行动和长期研究以及质量改进范式的转变,以支持Medi-Cal的出生公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The “Birth-Centered Outcomes Research Engagement (B-CORE) in Medi-Cal” Project: Community-Generated Recommendations to Decrease Maternal Mortality and Severe Maternal Morbidity

Background

Through applied research and health care quality improvement, California has achieved a maternal mortality (MM) rate significantly lower than that measured nationally. However, Medicaid (Medi-Cal)-insured births in the state continue to experience disproportionate shares of MM and severe maternal morbidity (SMM), which often precedes death. Failure to engage the Medi-Cal community in this work may impede efforts to increase equity.

Methods

This community engagement project used deliberative democracy methods to engage stakeholders with lived experience in California's Medi-Cal perinatal care system to generate an actionable and specific agenda of recommendations to decrease MM and SMM in the Medi-Cal population.

Findings

A total of 37 Medi-Cal stakeholders—representing birthing people, providers, health plan administrators, and advocates—participated in longitudinal co-learning sessions on the topics of MM/SMM in Medi-Cal. Most of these stakeholders (75.7%) then participated in deliberation sessions. Deliberation recommendations fell into five distinct categories: Medi-Cal perinatal covered benefits, data collection and dissemination, patient experience and its link to care quality, Medi-Cal reimbursement rates, and accountability with respect to racism in perinatal care. Stakeholders identified the Medi-Cal system actors best positioned to implement specific recommendations to directly impact MM/SMM.

Conclusions

This project demonstrates the feasibility and success of using deliberative democracy methods to generate local and community-generated solutions to critical problems in health equity. Active and engaged stakeholders were keen to identify both immediate actions and long-term research and quality improvement paradigm shifts to support birth equity in Medi-Cal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Health Issues (WHI) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal that publishes research and review manuscripts related to women"s health care and policy. As the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women"s Health, it is dedicated to improving the health and health care of all women throughout the lifespan and in diverse communities. The journal seeks to inform health services researchers, health care and public health professionals, social scientists, policymakers, and others concerned with women"s health.
期刊最新文献
Community-dwelling Black Women's Experiences With Urinary Incontinence: A Qualitative Study. "Neither Side Really Knows… What an Abortion Is Like": A Qualitative Analysis of Medical Students' Experiences With Second-Trimester Procedural Abortions. A Mixed Methods Longitudinal Investigation of Maternal Depression Across the Perinatal Period Among Mothers Who Gave Birth During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Exploring Consumer Preferences for Pharmacy Provision of Mifepristone in the Human-centered Design Discovery Phase. "Women's Lives Are on the Line, and Our Hands Are Tied": How Television Is Reckoning With a Post-Dobbs America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1