毒理学病理学论坛:关于在偏远地区进行非临床毒性研究的良好实验室规范组织病理学评估的意见。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Toxicologic Pathology Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1177/01926233231168133
Renee R Hukkanen, Michelle Trapani, Tana Derringer, Victoria Laast, Zbigniew W Wojcinski, Rosa Anna Manno, Matthias Rinke, Eric van Esch, Alys E Bradley, Patrizia Cristofori, Roger Alison, Barb Munch
{"title":"毒理学病理学论坛:关于在偏远地区进行非临床毒性研究的良好实验室规范组织病理学评估的意见。","authors":"Renee R Hukkanen,&nbsp;Michelle Trapani,&nbsp;Tana Derringer,&nbsp;Victoria Laast,&nbsp;Zbigniew W Wojcinski,&nbsp;Rosa Anna Manno,&nbsp;Matthias Rinke,&nbsp;Eric van Esch,&nbsp;Alys E Bradley,&nbsp;Patrizia Cristofori,&nbsp;Roger Alison,&nbsp;Barb Munch","doi":"10.1177/01926233231168133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Toxicologic/veterinary pathologists are working remotely from Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) test facilities (TFs) in increasing numbers, most commonly in home-office settings. A study pathologist (SP) generating data on GLP-compliant nonclinical studies must be keenly aware of applicable national GLP regulations and comply with TF and protocol requirements. This Toxicological Pathology Forum Opinion Piece will summarize primary areas of emphasis for the SP generating GLP data using glass slides. Peer review and digital review of whole slide images are out of scope for this opinion piece. Key GLP considerations for primary pathology on glass slides are discussed with respect to SP location and employment status, including pathologist qualifications, specimen management, facilities, equipment, archive, and quality assurance. Notable differences between national GLP regulations of the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, France, Ireland, Switzerland, Italy, and Israel are presented. With the understanding that each combination of location and employment is unique, the authors provide a general overview of considerations for successful remote GLP work.</p>","PeriodicalId":23113,"journal":{"name":"Toxicologic Pathology","volume":"51 3","pages":"148-152"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toxicologic Pathology Forum: Opinion on Performing Good Laboratory Practice Histopathology Evaluation for Nonclinical Toxicity Studies in a Remote Location.\",\"authors\":\"Renee R Hukkanen,&nbsp;Michelle Trapani,&nbsp;Tana Derringer,&nbsp;Victoria Laast,&nbsp;Zbigniew W Wojcinski,&nbsp;Rosa Anna Manno,&nbsp;Matthias Rinke,&nbsp;Eric van Esch,&nbsp;Alys E Bradley,&nbsp;Patrizia Cristofori,&nbsp;Roger Alison,&nbsp;Barb Munch\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01926233231168133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Toxicologic/veterinary pathologists are working remotely from Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) test facilities (TFs) in increasing numbers, most commonly in home-office settings. A study pathologist (SP) generating data on GLP-compliant nonclinical studies must be keenly aware of applicable national GLP regulations and comply with TF and protocol requirements. This Toxicological Pathology Forum Opinion Piece will summarize primary areas of emphasis for the SP generating GLP data using glass slides. Peer review and digital review of whole slide images are out of scope for this opinion piece. Key GLP considerations for primary pathology on glass slides are discussed with respect to SP location and employment status, including pathologist qualifications, specimen management, facilities, equipment, archive, and quality assurance. Notable differences between national GLP regulations of the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, France, Ireland, Switzerland, Italy, and Israel are presented. With the understanding that each combination of location and employment is unique, the authors provide a general overview of considerations for successful remote GLP work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicologic Pathology\",\"volume\":\"51 3\",\"pages\":\"148-152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicologic Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01926233231168133\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicologic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01926233231168133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的毒理学/兽医病理学家正在从良好实验室规范(GLP)测试设施(tf)远程工作,最常见的是在家庭办公室环境中。生成符合GLP的非临床研究数据的研究病理学家(SP)必须敏锐地意识到适用的国家GLP法规,并遵守TF和协议要求。这篇毒理学病理学论坛观点文章将总结SP使用玻片生成GLP数据的主要重点领域。同行评审和整个幻灯片图像的数字评审不在本文讨论的范围之内。主要GLP考虑的玻璃片上的原发病理方面的SP位置和就业状况进行了讨论,包括病理学家资格,标本管理,设施,设备,档案和质量保证。介绍了美国、英国、德国、荷兰、法国、爱尔兰、瑞士、意大利和以色列国家GLP法规之间的显著差异。了解到位置和就业的每个组合都是独特的,作者提供了成功远程GLP工作的总体概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Toxicologic Pathology Forum: Opinion on Performing Good Laboratory Practice Histopathology Evaluation for Nonclinical Toxicity Studies in a Remote Location.

Toxicologic/veterinary pathologists are working remotely from Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) test facilities (TFs) in increasing numbers, most commonly in home-office settings. A study pathologist (SP) generating data on GLP-compliant nonclinical studies must be keenly aware of applicable national GLP regulations and comply with TF and protocol requirements. This Toxicological Pathology Forum Opinion Piece will summarize primary areas of emphasis for the SP generating GLP data using glass slides. Peer review and digital review of whole slide images are out of scope for this opinion piece. Key GLP considerations for primary pathology on glass slides are discussed with respect to SP location and employment status, including pathologist qualifications, specimen management, facilities, equipment, archive, and quality assurance. Notable differences between national GLP regulations of the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, France, Ireland, Switzerland, Italy, and Israel are presented. With the understanding that each combination of location and employment is unique, the authors provide a general overview of considerations for successful remote GLP work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxicologic Pathology
Toxicologic Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Toxicologic Pathology is dedicated to the promotion of human, animal, and environmental health through the dissemination of knowledge, techniques, and guidelines to enhance the understanding and practice of toxicologic pathology. Toxicologic Pathology, the official journal of the Society of Toxicologic Pathology, will publish Original Research Articles, Symposium Articles, Review Articles, Meeting Reports, New Techniques, and Position Papers that are relevant to toxicologic pathology.
期刊最新文献
Systemic Toxicity of Recombinant Adeno-Associated Virus Gene Therapy Vectors. Session 4: mRNA and Self-Amplifying RNA (saRNA): Opportunities for Disease Prevention and Therapy. Opinion on the Importance of Sharing Toxicologic Pathology Data for Educational and/or Scientific Purposes. Historical Control Background Incidence of Spontaneous Nonneoplastic Lesions of Sprague Dawley Rats in 104-Week Carcinogenicity Studies. Exogenous Growth Hormone Exacerbates Post-Irradiation Atherosclerosis in Susceptible Epicardial Coronary Arteries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1