不含 HEMA 的一步法自粘粘合剂在非龋齿性宫颈病变中的 14 年临床表现。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Adhesive Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-07-12 DOI:10.3290/j.jad.b4208859
Marleen Peumans, Ellen Van de Maele, Jan de Munck, Kirsten van Landuyt, Bart Van Meerbeek
{"title":"不含 HEMA 的一步法自粘粘合剂在非龋齿性宫颈病变中的 14 年临床表现。","authors":"Marleen Peumans, Ellen Van de Maele, Jan de Munck, Kirsten van Landuyt, Bart Van Meerbeek","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.b4208859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the 14-year clinical performance of a HEMA-free 1-step self-etch adhesive (1SEa) compared with that of a 3-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (3E&Ra).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>267 non-carious cervical lesions in 52 patients were restored with the microhybrid composite Gradia Direct (GC), bonded in random order either with the HEMA-free 1SEa G-Bond (GB; GC) or the 3E&Ra Optibond FL (OFL; Kerr), which is considered the gold-standard E&Ra (control). The restorations were followed over 14 years for retention, marginal adaptation and discoloration, and caries occurrence. Statistical analysis involved a logistic regression model with generalized estimating equations (2-way GEE model).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patient recall rate at 14 years was 63%. In total, 79 restorations (39 GB, 40 OFL) failed because of retention loss (GB: 19.4%, OFL: 19.6%), severe marginal defects, discoloration and/or caries (GB: 21.7%; OFL: 22.5%). The overall clinical success rate was 58.9% and 57.9% for GB and OFL, respectively. The number of restorations with an unacceptable marginal defect (GB: 14.5%; OFL: 19.2%) and deep marginal discoloration (GB: 18.2%; OFL: 13.2%) increased during the last 5 years. No significant difference in overall clinical performance was recorded between the two adhesives (p > 0.05). Changes in the medical health of some patients and recurrence of abrasion/erosion/abfraction increased the failure rate and retention rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After 14 years, restorations bonded with the HEMA-free 1SEa performed as well as those bonded with the 3E&Ra gold standard. Unacceptable marginal deterioration was the main reason for failure, followed by loss of retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":55604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adhesive Dentistry","volume":"25 1","pages":"147-158"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fourteen-year Clinical Performance of a HEMA-free One-step Self-etch Adhesive in Non-carious Cervical Lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Marleen Peumans, Ellen Van de Maele, Jan de Munck, Kirsten van Landuyt, Bart Van Meerbeek\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.jad.b4208859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the 14-year clinical performance of a HEMA-free 1-step self-etch adhesive (1SEa) compared with that of a 3-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (3E&Ra).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>267 non-carious cervical lesions in 52 patients were restored with the microhybrid composite Gradia Direct (GC), bonded in random order either with the HEMA-free 1SEa G-Bond (GB; GC) or the 3E&Ra Optibond FL (OFL; Kerr), which is considered the gold-standard E&Ra (control). The restorations were followed over 14 years for retention, marginal adaptation and discoloration, and caries occurrence. Statistical analysis involved a logistic regression model with generalized estimating equations (2-way GEE model).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patient recall rate at 14 years was 63%. In total, 79 restorations (39 GB, 40 OFL) failed because of retention loss (GB: 19.4%, OFL: 19.6%), severe marginal defects, discoloration and/or caries (GB: 21.7%; OFL: 22.5%). The overall clinical success rate was 58.9% and 57.9% for GB and OFL, respectively. The number of restorations with an unacceptable marginal defect (GB: 14.5%; OFL: 19.2%) and deep marginal discoloration (GB: 18.2%; OFL: 13.2%) increased during the last 5 years. No significant difference in overall clinical performance was recorded between the two adhesives (p > 0.05). Changes in the medical health of some patients and recurrence of abrasion/erosion/abfraction increased the failure rate and retention rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After 14 years, restorations bonded with the HEMA-free 1SEa performed as well as those bonded with the 3E&Ra gold standard. Unacceptable marginal deterioration was the main reason for failure, followed by loss of retention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Adhesive Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"147-158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Adhesive Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b4208859\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adhesive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b4208859","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本随机对照试验旨在评估不含 HEMA 的 1 步自酸蚀粘合剂 (1SEa) 与 3 步酸蚀加冲洗粘合剂 (3E&Ra) 14 年的临床表现。材料和方法:对 52 名患者的 267 个非龋性颈椎病灶使用微杂化复合材料 Gradia Direct (GC) 进行修复,并随机使用不含 HEMA 的 1SEa G-Bond (GB; GC) 或 3E&Ra Optibond FL (OFL; Kerr) 进行粘接,后者被认为是黄金标准的 E&Ra(对照组)。对这些修复体进行了长达 14 年的跟踪观察,以了解其固位情况、边缘适应性和变色情况以及龋齿发生情况。统计分析采用了带广义估计方程的逻辑回归模型(双向 GEE 模型):结果:14 年的患者召回率为 63%。共有79颗修复体(39颗GB修复体,40颗OFL修复体)因固位丧失(GB修复体:19.4%;OFL修复体:19.6%)、严重边缘缺损、变色和/或龋坏(GB修复体:21.7%;OFL修复体:22.5%)而失败。GB和OFL的总体临床成功率分别为58.9%和57.9%。在过去的 5 年中,边缘缺损不可接受(GB:14.5%;OFL:19.2%)和边缘深变色(GB:18.2%;OFL:13.2%)的修复体数量有所增加。两种粘合剂的总体临床表现无明显差异(P > 0.05)。一些患者的健康状况发生了变化,磨蚀/腐蚀/折损的复发增加了失败率和保留率:14年后,使用不含 HEMA 的 1SEa 粘接的修复体与使用 3E&Ra 金标准粘接的修复体性能相当。无法接受的边缘恶化是失败的主要原因,其次是固位丧失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fourteen-year Clinical Performance of a HEMA-free One-step Self-etch Adhesive in Non-carious Cervical Lesions.

Purpose: This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the 14-year clinical performance of a HEMA-free 1-step self-etch adhesive (1SEa) compared with that of a 3-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (3E&Ra).

Materials and methods: 267 non-carious cervical lesions in 52 patients were restored with the microhybrid composite Gradia Direct (GC), bonded in random order either with the HEMA-free 1SEa G-Bond (GB; GC) or the 3E&Ra Optibond FL (OFL; Kerr), which is considered the gold-standard E&Ra (control). The restorations were followed over 14 years for retention, marginal adaptation and discoloration, and caries occurrence. Statistical analysis involved a logistic regression model with generalized estimating equations (2-way GEE model).

Results: The patient recall rate at 14 years was 63%. In total, 79 restorations (39 GB, 40 OFL) failed because of retention loss (GB: 19.4%, OFL: 19.6%), severe marginal defects, discoloration and/or caries (GB: 21.7%; OFL: 22.5%). The overall clinical success rate was 58.9% and 57.9% for GB and OFL, respectively. The number of restorations with an unacceptable marginal defect (GB: 14.5%; OFL: 19.2%) and deep marginal discoloration (GB: 18.2%; OFL: 13.2%) increased during the last 5 years. No significant difference in overall clinical performance was recorded between the two adhesives (p > 0.05). Changes in the medical health of some patients and recurrence of abrasion/erosion/abfraction increased the failure rate and retention rate.

Conclusion: After 14 years, restorations bonded with the HEMA-free 1SEa performed as well as those bonded with the 3E&Ra gold standard. Unacceptable marginal deterioration was the main reason for failure, followed by loss of retention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: New materials and applications for adhesion are profoundly changing the way dentistry is delivered. Bonding techniques, which have long been restricted to the tooth hard tissues, enamel, and dentin, have obvious applications in operative and preventive dentistry, as well as in esthetic and pediatric dentistry, prosthodontics, and orthodontics. The current development of adhesive techniques for soft tissues and slow-releasing agents will expand applications to include periodontics and oral surgery. Scientifically sound, peer-reviewed articles explore the latest innovations in these emerging fields.
期刊最新文献
Preheated Composite as an Alternative for Bonding Feldspathic and Hybrid Ceramics: A Microshear Bond Strength Study. Fourteen-year Clinical Performance of a HEMA-free One-step Self-etch Adhesive in Non-carious Cervical Lesions. Three-year Clinical Performance of a Universal Adhesive in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions. Effects of Surface Treatment and Thermocycling on the Shear Bond Strength of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic. Effect of Carbodiimide (EDC) on the Bond Strength Longevity of Epoxy Resin-based Endodontic Sealer to Root Dentin: An In-Vitro Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1