降钙素原和c反应蛋白:吻合口瘘早期诊断的标志物。

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Cirugia Y Cirujanos Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.24875/CIRU.22000116
Isadora G Maldonado-Hernández, Eduardo Vega-Chavarría, Yamir A Nacud-Bezies, Hid F Cordero-Franco, Gerardo C Palacios-Saucedo
{"title":"降钙素原和c反应蛋白:吻合口瘘早期诊断的标志物。","authors":"Isadora G Maldonado-Hernández,&nbsp;Eduardo Vega-Chavarría,&nbsp;Yamir A Nacud-Bezies,&nbsp;Hid F Cordero-Franco,&nbsp;Gerardo C Palacios-Saucedo","doi":"10.24875/CIRU.22000116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the efficacy of serum procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in the early diagnosis of anastomotic leak (AL) in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Diagnostic test in a tertiary care hospital. Patients who did not have preoperative measurements of PCT and CRP were excluded. Those with postoperative infection not related to AL were eliminated. The diagnostic efficacy measures were sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine patients were analyzed; six had AL (15.4%). PCT and CRP increased on the second postoperative day, only in patients with AL. The cut-off points at the second postoperative day were 1.55 ng/mL for PCT and 11.25 mg/L for CRP. The most efficacious test was PCR at second postoperative day (AUROC: 1.00; Sn: 100%; Sp: 96.7%; PPV: 85.7%; NPV: 100%; LR+: 33.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CRP at second postoperative day was the most effective test in the early diagnosis of AL in patients undergoing colorectal surgery, with a cut-off point lower than that reported in the international literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":50990,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia Y Cirujanos","volume":"91 4","pages":"542-549"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein: markers in the early diagnosis of anastomotic leak.\",\"authors\":\"Isadora G Maldonado-Hernández,&nbsp;Eduardo Vega-Chavarría,&nbsp;Yamir A Nacud-Bezies,&nbsp;Hid F Cordero-Franco,&nbsp;Gerardo C Palacios-Saucedo\",\"doi\":\"10.24875/CIRU.22000116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the efficacy of serum procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in the early diagnosis of anastomotic leak (AL) in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Diagnostic test in a tertiary care hospital. Patients who did not have preoperative measurements of PCT and CRP were excluded. Those with postoperative infection not related to AL were eliminated. The diagnostic efficacy measures were sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine patients were analyzed; six had AL (15.4%). PCT and CRP increased on the second postoperative day, only in patients with AL. The cut-off points at the second postoperative day were 1.55 ng/mL for PCT and 11.25 mg/L for CRP. The most efficacious test was PCR at second postoperative day (AUROC: 1.00; Sn: 100%; Sp: 96.7%; PPV: 85.7%; NPV: 100%; LR+: 33.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CRP at second postoperative day was the most effective test in the early diagnosis of AL in patients undergoing colorectal surgery, with a cut-off point lower than that reported in the international literature.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cirugia Y Cirujanos\",\"volume\":\"91 4\",\"pages\":\"542-549\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cirugia Y Cirujanos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.22000116\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia Y Cirujanos","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.22000116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨血清降钙素原(PCT)和c反应蛋白(CRP)在结直肠手术患者吻合口漏(AL)早期诊断中的价值。方法:在三级医院进行诊断试验。术前未检测PCT和CRP的患者被排除在外。排除与AL无关的术后感染。诊断效能指标为敏感性(Sn)、特异性(Sp)、阳性(PPV)和阴性(NPV)预测值、阳性(LR+)和阴性(LR-)似然比、受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)。结果:分析39例患者;AL 6例(15.4%)。术后第2天PCT和CRP升高,仅AL患者升高。术后第2天PCT和CRP的临界值分别为1.55 ng/mL和11.25 mg/L。术后第2天PCR检测最有效(AUROC: 1.00;Sn: 100%;Sp: 96.7%;PPV: 85.7%;净现值:100%;LR +: 33.0)。结论:术后第2天CRP是早期诊断结直肠手术患者AL最有效的检测指标,其临界值低于国际文献报道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein: markers in the early diagnosis of anastomotic leak.

Objective: To determine the efficacy of serum procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in the early diagnosis of anastomotic leak (AL) in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Method: Diagnostic test in a tertiary care hospital. Patients who did not have preoperative measurements of PCT and CRP were excluded. Those with postoperative infection not related to AL were eliminated. The diagnostic efficacy measures were sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

Results: Thirty-nine patients were analyzed; six had AL (15.4%). PCT and CRP increased on the second postoperative day, only in patients with AL. The cut-off points at the second postoperative day were 1.55 ng/mL for PCT and 11.25 mg/L for CRP. The most efficacious test was PCR at second postoperative day (AUROC: 1.00; Sn: 100%; Sp: 96.7%; PPV: 85.7%; NPV: 100%; LR+: 33.0).

Conclusions: CRP at second postoperative day was the most effective test in the early diagnosis of AL in patients undergoing colorectal surgery, with a cut-off point lower than that reported in the international literature.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cirugia Y Cirujanos
Cirugia Y Cirujanos 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
207
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cirugía y Cirujanoses exponente del desarrollo académico, científico, médico, quirúrgico y tecnológico en materia de salud en México y en el ámbito internacional. Es una revista bimestral, open access, revisada por pares, que publica en español y en inglés (traducido sin coste para los autores) artículos científicos originales, casos clínicos, artículos de revisión de interés general y cartas al editor. Los artículos se seleccionan y publican siguiendo un riguroso análisis, de acuerdo con los estándares internacionalmente aceptados. Sus espacios están abiertos a los académicos, así como a todo miembro de la comunidad médica que manifieste interés por utilizar este foro para publicar sus trabajos.
期刊最新文献
Clinical outcomes and radiological assessment of vascular anatomy in patients who underwent D3 left hemicolectomy. A model to determine factors influencing intraoperative complications in sleeve gastrectomy. [Extremity soft tissue sarcoma: does surgical margin impact survival?] Relación preoperatoria de neutrófilos a proteína C reactiva como predictor de complicaciones posoperatorias del cáncer de pancreas ¿La vía de señalización de sonic hedgehog desempeña un papel en el mecanismo antirreflujo de la vejiga en los niños?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1