一项新的临床期刊俱乐部实施的可行性及其与脊骨神经医学学生和受训人员循证实践的知识、态度和应用的关系:一项前后健康教育改进研究。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Pub Date : 2023-07-24 DOI:10.1186/s12998-023-00494-0
Melanie Häusler, Rahim Lalji, Léonie Hofstetter, Cesar A Hincapié
{"title":"一项新的临床期刊俱乐部实施的可行性及其与脊骨神经医学学生和受训人员循证实践的知识、态度和应用的关系:一项前后健康教育改进研究。","authors":"Melanie Häusler, Rahim Lalji, Léonie Hofstetter, Cesar A Hincapié","doi":"10.1186/s12998-023-00494-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the integration of best research evidence with clinical expertise and patients' values and preferences. Little is known about knowledge, attitudes, and application of EBP among chiropractic students and trainees. Our aims were to (1) examine the feasibility of implementing a new journal club format within a Swiss university chiropractic healthcare education setting, and (2) assess the associations between the new journal club implementation and EBP characteristics among chiropractic students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A before-and-after study was conducted through a newly implemented journal club with 5th and 6th year chiropractic students and postgraduate trainees between 1 and 2021 and 31 July 2021. The journal club was developed based on the \"community of practice\" and \"team-based learning\" conceptual frameworks. EBP knowledge, attitudes, personal application, and future use, were assessed with a validated questionnaire. We summarised participant characteristics using descriptive statistics, estimated before-and-after EBP total and subscale scores (i.e., knowledge, attitudes, personal application, and future use), and conducted an exploratory subgroup analysis based on journal club attendance (Group A: 3-5 sessions attended; Group B: ≤ 2 sessions attended).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 32 eligible students and trainees, 29 participants (mean age 26 years; 79% women) were enrolled: 25 (78%) responded to the pre- and 29 (91%) to the post-assessment surveys. Most (80%) were chiropractic students and 20% were postgraduate trainees. Group A consisted of 12 (41%) and Group B of 17 (59%) participants, respectively. We found reasonable feasibility for the new journal club format and our findings were compatible with no difference in before-and-after EBP scores (median EBP total score before: 72.6 [IQR, 63.7-77.4], and after: 73.4 [IQR, 61.3-78.2]). Exploratory subgroup analyses based on journal club attendance were consistent with our overall findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggests that the newly implemented journal club and embedding chiropractic educational research within the journal club were feasible and acceptable. Small before-and-after differences in the EBP subscale scores for knowledge, attitudes, personal application, and future use were observed in chiropractic students and postgraduate trainees. The small study size and short timeframe during a single semester limit potential inferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"31 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10367234/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of a new clinical journal club implementation and its association with knowledge, attitudes, and application of evidence-based practice among chiropractic students and trainees: a before-and-after healthcare education improvement study.\",\"authors\":\"Melanie Häusler, Rahim Lalji, Léonie Hofstetter, Cesar A Hincapié\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12998-023-00494-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the integration of best research evidence with clinical expertise and patients' values and preferences. Little is known about knowledge, attitudes, and application of EBP among chiropractic students and trainees. Our aims were to (1) examine the feasibility of implementing a new journal club format within a Swiss university chiropractic healthcare education setting, and (2) assess the associations between the new journal club implementation and EBP characteristics among chiropractic students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A before-and-after study was conducted through a newly implemented journal club with 5th and 6th year chiropractic students and postgraduate trainees between 1 and 2021 and 31 July 2021. The journal club was developed based on the \\\"community of practice\\\" and \\\"team-based learning\\\" conceptual frameworks. EBP knowledge, attitudes, personal application, and future use, were assessed with a validated questionnaire. We summarised participant characteristics using descriptive statistics, estimated before-and-after EBP total and subscale scores (i.e., knowledge, attitudes, personal application, and future use), and conducted an exploratory subgroup analysis based on journal club attendance (Group A: 3-5 sessions attended; Group B: ≤ 2 sessions attended).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 32 eligible students and trainees, 29 participants (mean age 26 years; 79% women) were enrolled: 25 (78%) responded to the pre- and 29 (91%) to the post-assessment surveys. Most (80%) were chiropractic students and 20% were postgraduate trainees. Group A consisted of 12 (41%) and Group B of 17 (59%) participants, respectively. We found reasonable feasibility for the new journal club format and our findings were compatible with no difference in before-and-after EBP scores (median EBP total score before: 72.6 [IQR, 63.7-77.4], and after: 73.4 [IQR, 61.3-78.2]). Exploratory subgroup analyses based on journal club attendance were consistent with our overall findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggests that the newly implemented journal club and embedding chiropractic educational research within the journal club were feasible and acceptable. Small before-and-after differences in the EBP subscale scores for knowledge, attitudes, personal application, and future use were observed in chiropractic students and postgraduate trainees. The small study size and short timeframe during a single semester limit potential inferences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10367234/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-023-00494-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-023-00494-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:循证实践是将最佳研究证据与临床专业知识以及患者的价值观和偏好相结合。脊医学生和受训人员对循证医学的知识、态度和应用知之甚少。我们的目的是(1)研究在瑞士大学脊骨医学保健教育环境中实施新的期刊俱乐部形式的可行性,以及(2)评估新期刊俱乐部的实施与脊骨医学学生的EBP特征之间的关系。方法:在2021年1月至2021年7月31日期间,通过一个新成立的期刊俱乐部,对5年级和6年级的脊骨神经医学学生以及研究生进行了前后研究。期刊俱乐部是在“实践社区”和“基于团队的学习”概念框架的基础上发展起来的。采用经验证的问卷对EBP的知识、态度、个人应用和未来使用进行评估。我们使用描述性统计数据总结了参与者的特征,估计了EBP前后的总分和分量表得分(即知识、态度、个人应用和未来使用),并根据期刊俱乐部的出席情况进行了探索性亚组分析(A组:参加3-5次会议;B组:参加≤2次会议)。结果:在32名符合条件的学生和受训人员中,29名参与者(平均年龄26岁;79%为女性)被录取:25人(78%)对评估前调查做出回应,29人(91%)对评估后调查做出回应。大多数(80%)是脊骨神经医学专业的学生,20%是研究生。A组由12名(41%)参与者组成,B组由17名(59%)参与者组成。我们发现新的期刊俱乐部形式是合理可行的,我们的研究结果与之前和之后的EBP得分没有差异(之前的EBP总分中位数:72.6[IQR,63.7-77.4],之后的:73.4[IQR,61.3-78.2])是一致的。基于期刊俱乐部出勤率的探索性亚组分析与我们的总体研究结果一致。结论:我们的研究表明,新成立的期刊俱乐部和将脊骨医学教育研究纳入期刊俱乐部是可行和可接受的。脊医学生和研究生在知识、态度、个人应用和未来使用方面的EBP分量表得分前后差异较小。一个学期的学习规模小,时间短,限制了潜在的推断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility of a new clinical journal club implementation and its association with knowledge, attitudes, and application of evidence-based practice among chiropractic students and trainees: a before-and-after healthcare education improvement study.

Background: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the integration of best research evidence with clinical expertise and patients' values and preferences. Little is known about knowledge, attitudes, and application of EBP among chiropractic students and trainees. Our aims were to (1) examine the feasibility of implementing a new journal club format within a Swiss university chiropractic healthcare education setting, and (2) assess the associations between the new journal club implementation and EBP characteristics among chiropractic students.

Methods: A before-and-after study was conducted through a newly implemented journal club with 5th and 6th year chiropractic students and postgraduate trainees between 1 and 2021 and 31 July 2021. The journal club was developed based on the "community of practice" and "team-based learning" conceptual frameworks. EBP knowledge, attitudes, personal application, and future use, were assessed with a validated questionnaire. We summarised participant characteristics using descriptive statistics, estimated before-and-after EBP total and subscale scores (i.e., knowledge, attitudes, personal application, and future use), and conducted an exploratory subgroup analysis based on journal club attendance (Group A: 3-5 sessions attended; Group B: ≤ 2 sessions attended).

Results: Among 32 eligible students and trainees, 29 participants (mean age 26 years; 79% women) were enrolled: 25 (78%) responded to the pre- and 29 (91%) to the post-assessment surveys. Most (80%) were chiropractic students and 20% were postgraduate trainees. Group A consisted of 12 (41%) and Group B of 17 (59%) participants, respectively. We found reasonable feasibility for the new journal club format and our findings were compatible with no difference in before-and-after EBP scores (median EBP total score before: 72.6 [IQR, 63.7-77.4], and after: 73.4 [IQR, 61.3-78.2]). Exploratory subgroup analyses based on journal club attendance were consistent with our overall findings.

Conclusion: Our study suggests that the newly implemented journal club and embedding chiropractic educational research within the journal club were feasible and acceptable. Small before-and-after differences in the EBP subscale scores for knowledge, attitudes, personal application, and future use were observed in chiropractic students and postgraduate trainees. The small study size and short timeframe during a single semester limit potential inferences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
48
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies publishes manuscripts on all aspects of evidence-based information that is clinically relevant to chiropractors, manual therapists and related health care professionals. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies is an open access journal that aims to provide chiropractors, manual therapists and related health professionals with clinically relevant, evidence-based information. Chiropractic and other manual therapies share a relatively broad diagnostic practice and treatment scope, emphasizing the structure and function of the body''s musculoskeletal framework (especially the spine). The practices of chiropractic and manual therapies are closely associated with treatments including manipulation, which is a key intervention. The range of services provided can also include massage, mobilisation, physical therapies, dry needling, lifestyle and dietary counselling, plus a variety of other associated therapeutic and rehabilitation approaches. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies continues to serve as a critical resource in this field, and as an open access publication, is more readily available to practitioners, researchers and clinicians worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Assessing research culture and capacity amongst faculty at a north American chiropractic institution: an explanatory mixed methods study. The association between students' confidence and ability to modulate spinal manipulation force-time characteristics of specific target forces: a cross-sectional study. Variability and repeatability of spinal manipulation force-time characteristics in thoracic spinal manipulation on a manikin. Applying an osteopathic intervention to improve mild to moderate mental health symptoms: a mixed-methods feasibility randomised trial. Societal costs of older adults with low back pain seeking chiropractic care: findings from the BACE-C cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1