哥伦比亚一个地方性城市伊蚊传播疾病风险和预防措施的社会建设。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Rural and remote health Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.22605/RRH7695
Claudia Margarita Cortés García, Claudia Milena Hormiga Sánchez, Johan Sebastián Ariza Abril, Yaneth Stefania Becerra Fajardo
{"title":"哥伦比亚一个地方性城市伊蚊传播疾病风险和预防措施的社会建设。","authors":"Claudia Margarita Cortés García,&nbsp;Claudia Milena Hormiga Sánchez,&nbsp;Johan Sebastián Ariza Abril,&nbsp;Yaneth Stefania Becerra Fajardo","doi":"10.22605/RRH7695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This article analyzes risk discourses around dengue, zika and chikungunya constructed by lay people, community leaders and disease control experts from the fields of medical anthropology, medical sociology, and public health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative ethnographic study was conducted in a municipality in Colombia (December 2016 and January 2018) with semistructured and open-ended interviews, informal dialogues, and fieldwork journal observations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study found a mismatch in risk discourse about vector-borne diseases among health officials, lay people, and community leaders. These discourses are linked to the sociocultural contexts in which people live, and offer particular ways of giving meaning and acting in the face of disease prevention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings show a multisituated risk that refers to the inside and outside of homes; and the prevention practices mentioned by different actors, in which a continuity of tensions between lay people, leaders and government officials can be observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social construction of risk and prevention practices related to Aedes mosquito-borne disease in an endemic municipality in Colombia.\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Margarita Cortés García,&nbsp;Claudia Milena Hormiga Sánchez,&nbsp;Johan Sebastián Ariza Abril,&nbsp;Yaneth Stefania Becerra Fajardo\",\"doi\":\"10.22605/RRH7695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This article analyzes risk discourses around dengue, zika and chikungunya constructed by lay people, community leaders and disease control experts from the fields of medical anthropology, medical sociology, and public health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative ethnographic study was conducted in a municipality in Colombia (December 2016 and January 2018) with semistructured and open-ended interviews, informal dialogues, and fieldwork journal observations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study found a mismatch in risk discourse about vector-borne diseases among health officials, lay people, and community leaders. These discourses are linked to the sociocultural contexts in which people live, and offer particular ways of giving meaning and acting in the face of disease prevention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings show a multisituated risk that refers to the inside and outside of homes; and the prevention practices mentioned by different actors, in which a continuity of tensions between lay people, leaders and government officials can be observed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rural and remote health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rural and remote health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH7695\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural and remote health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH7695","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:本文分析了由医学人类学、医学社会学和公共卫生领域的外行、社区领袖和疾病控制专家围绕登革热、寨卡和基孔肯雅热构建的风险话语。方法:在哥伦比亚的一个城市(2016年12月和2018年1月)进行了一项定性民族志研究,采用半结构化和开放式访谈、非正式对话和实地调查期刊观察。结果:本研究发现在卫生官员、非专业人员和社区领导人之间关于媒介传播疾病的风险话语不匹配。这些话语与人们生活的社会文化背景有关,并提供了在面对疾病预防时赋予意义和采取行动的特殊方式。结论:研究结果表明存在多地点风险,包括室内和室外;以及不同行为者提到的预防措施,其中可以观察到外行人,领导人和政府官员之间持续的紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social construction of risk and prevention practices related to Aedes mosquito-borne disease in an endemic municipality in Colombia.

Introduction: This article analyzes risk discourses around dengue, zika and chikungunya constructed by lay people, community leaders and disease control experts from the fields of medical anthropology, medical sociology, and public health.

Methods: A qualitative ethnographic study was conducted in a municipality in Colombia (December 2016 and January 2018) with semistructured and open-ended interviews, informal dialogues, and fieldwork journal observations.

Results: This study found a mismatch in risk discourse about vector-borne diseases among health officials, lay people, and community leaders. These discourses are linked to the sociocultural contexts in which people live, and offer particular ways of giving meaning and acting in the face of disease prevention.

Conclusion: The findings show a multisituated risk that refers to the inside and outside of homes; and the prevention practices mentioned by different actors, in which a continuity of tensions between lay people, leaders and government officials can be observed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rural and remote health
Rural and remote health Rural Health-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
145
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rural and Remote Health is a not-for-profit, online-only, peer-reviewed academic publication. It aims to further rural and remote health education, research and practice. The primary purpose of the Journal is to publish and so provide an international knowledge-base of peer-reviewed material from rural health practitioners (medical, nursing and allied health professionals and health workers), educators, researchers and policy makers.
期刊最新文献
Factors associated with early-career GPs' retention as independent specialists in former training practices. Online SMART Recovery mutual-help groups: a comparison of the characteristics and experiences of men living in rural and urban regions of Australia. Promoting women's wellbeing through the Niska (Goose) Harvesting Program in subarctic Ontario, Canada. Towards the new primary care reform in Greece: a focus on patients' expectations, views and perceptions from rural healthcare centres. What do nurses practising in rural, remote and isolated locations consider important for attraction and retention? A scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1