EUS引导下盆腔脓肿引流的安全性和临床疗效。

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopic Ultrasound Pub Date : 2023-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-25 DOI:10.1097/eus.0000000000000020
Maher Al Khaldi, Alexander Ponomarev, Carole Richard, François Dagbert, Herawaty Sebajang, Frank Schwenter, Ramses Wassef, Éric De Broux, Richard Ratelle, Sarto C Paquin, Anand V Sahai, Rasmy Loungnarath
{"title":"EUS引导下盆腔脓肿引流的安全性和临床疗效。","authors":"Maher Al Khaldi,&nbsp;Alexander Ponomarev,&nbsp;Carole Richard,&nbsp;François Dagbert,&nbsp;Herawaty Sebajang,&nbsp;Frank Schwenter,&nbsp;Ramses Wassef,&nbsp;Éric De Broux,&nbsp;Richard Ratelle,&nbsp;Sarto C Paquin,&nbsp;Anand V Sahai,&nbsp;Rasmy Loungnarath","doi":"10.1097/eus.0000000000000020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>EUS is a potential alternative for the drainage of abscesses. The aim of this study was to determine if EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage is technically feasible, safe, and a valid option for abscess resolution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review from 2002 to 2020 at a single quaternary institution. EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage via the transrectal route was performed in all patients with or without drain/stent placement. Technical and clinical success of EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage was analyzed. Descriptive analyses and Fisher exact test were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty consecutive patients were included in the study (53.5% male; mean age, 53.8 ± 17.9 years). Pelvic abscesses occurred mainly postoperatively (33 cases; 60.0%) and from complicated diverticulitis (14 cases; 23.3%). Mean diameter was 6.5 ± 2.4 cm (80% unilocular). Drainage was performed with EUS-guided stent placement (double-pigtail plastic or lumen-apposing metal) in 74.5% of cases and with aspiration alone for the remainder. Technical success occurred in 58 cases (97%). Of those with long-term follow-up after EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage (<i>n</i> = 55; 91.7%), complete abscess resolution occurred in 72.7% of all cases. Recurrence occurred in 8 cases (14.5%) and persisted in 7 patients (12.5%), 7 of which were successfully retreated with EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage. Accounting for these successful reinterventions, the overall rate of abscess resolution was 85.5%. Abscess resolution rate improved with drain placement (83%). Accounting for 7 repeat EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainages, overall abscess resolution improved. Two deaths occurred (3.4%) because of sepsis from failed source control in patients who had previously failed medical, radiological, and surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage is technically feasible, safe, and an effective alternative to radiological or open surgical drainage. It also offers favorable clinical outcomes in different clinical situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11577,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","volume":"12 3","pages":"326-333"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ad/17/eusj-12-326.PMC10437202.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and clinical efficacy of EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage.\",\"authors\":\"Maher Al Khaldi,&nbsp;Alexander Ponomarev,&nbsp;Carole Richard,&nbsp;François Dagbert,&nbsp;Herawaty Sebajang,&nbsp;Frank Schwenter,&nbsp;Ramses Wassef,&nbsp;Éric De Broux,&nbsp;Richard Ratelle,&nbsp;Sarto C Paquin,&nbsp;Anand V Sahai,&nbsp;Rasmy Loungnarath\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/eus.0000000000000020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>EUS is a potential alternative for the drainage of abscesses. The aim of this study was to determine if EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage is technically feasible, safe, and a valid option for abscess resolution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review from 2002 to 2020 at a single quaternary institution. EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage via the transrectal route was performed in all patients with or without drain/stent placement. Technical and clinical success of EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage was analyzed. Descriptive analyses and Fisher exact test were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty consecutive patients were included in the study (53.5% male; mean age, 53.8 ± 17.9 years). Pelvic abscesses occurred mainly postoperatively (33 cases; 60.0%) and from complicated diverticulitis (14 cases; 23.3%). Mean diameter was 6.5 ± 2.4 cm (80% unilocular). Drainage was performed with EUS-guided stent placement (double-pigtail plastic or lumen-apposing metal) in 74.5% of cases and with aspiration alone for the remainder. Technical success occurred in 58 cases (97%). Of those with long-term follow-up after EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage (<i>n</i> = 55; 91.7%), complete abscess resolution occurred in 72.7% of all cases. Recurrence occurred in 8 cases (14.5%) and persisted in 7 patients (12.5%), 7 of which were successfully retreated with EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage. Accounting for these successful reinterventions, the overall rate of abscess resolution was 85.5%. Abscess resolution rate improved with drain placement (83%). Accounting for 7 repeat EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainages, overall abscess resolution improved. Two deaths occurred (3.4%) because of sepsis from failed source control in patients who had previously failed medical, radiological, and surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage is technically feasible, safe, and an effective alternative to radiological or open surgical drainage. It also offers favorable clinical outcomes in different clinical situations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopic Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"326-333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ad/17/eusj-12-326.PMC10437202.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopic Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/eus.0000000000000020\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/eus.0000000000000020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:EUS是脓肿引流的一种潜在替代方案。本研究的目的是确定EUS引导的盆腔脓肿引流在技术上是否可行、安全和有效。方法:我们对2002年至2020年的一所四级学院进行了回顾性研究。所有有或没有放置引流管/支架的患者均采用EUS引导下经直肠引流盆腔脓肿。分析了EUS引导下盆腔脓肿引流术的技术和临床成功率。进行描述性分析和Fisher精确检验。结果:60名连续患者被纳入研究(53.5%为男性;平均年龄53.8±17.9岁)。盆腔脓肿主要发生在术后(33例,60.0%)和并发憩室炎(14例,23.3%),平均直径6.5±2.4cm(80%为单眼)。74.5%的病例采用EUS引导的支架置入术(双尾纤塑料或管腔附着金属)进行引流,其余病例仅采用抽吸。技术成功58例(97%)。在EUS引导的盆腔脓肿引流术后进行长期随访的患者中(n=55;91.7%),72.7%的病例脓肿完全消退。复发8例(14.5%),持续7例(12.5%),其中7例在EUS引导下成功消退。考虑到这些成功的再干预,脓肿的总消退率为85.5%。脓肿的消退率随着引流管的放置而提高(83%)。考虑到7次重复EUS引导的盆腔脓肿引流,脓肿的总体解决方案得到改善。两例死亡(3.4%)是由于先前未通过医学、放射学和外科治疗的患者源控制失败而导致败血症。结论:EUS引导下盆腔脓肿引流在技术上可行、安全,是放射学或开放手术引流的有效替代方案。它还可以在不同的临床情况下提供良好的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety and clinical efficacy of EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage.

Background and objectives: EUS is a potential alternative for the drainage of abscesses. The aim of this study was to determine if EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage is technically feasible, safe, and a valid option for abscess resolution.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review from 2002 to 2020 at a single quaternary institution. EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage via the transrectal route was performed in all patients with or without drain/stent placement. Technical and clinical success of EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage was analyzed. Descriptive analyses and Fisher exact test were performed.

Results: Sixty consecutive patients were included in the study (53.5% male; mean age, 53.8 ± 17.9 years). Pelvic abscesses occurred mainly postoperatively (33 cases; 60.0%) and from complicated diverticulitis (14 cases; 23.3%). Mean diameter was 6.5 ± 2.4 cm (80% unilocular). Drainage was performed with EUS-guided stent placement (double-pigtail plastic or lumen-apposing metal) in 74.5% of cases and with aspiration alone for the remainder. Technical success occurred in 58 cases (97%). Of those with long-term follow-up after EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage (n = 55; 91.7%), complete abscess resolution occurred in 72.7% of all cases. Recurrence occurred in 8 cases (14.5%) and persisted in 7 patients (12.5%), 7 of which were successfully retreated with EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage. Accounting for these successful reinterventions, the overall rate of abscess resolution was 85.5%. Abscess resolution rate improved with drain placement (83%). Accounting for 7 repeat EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainages, overall abscess resolution improved. Two deaths occurred (3.4%) because of sepsis from failed source control in patients who had previously failed medical, radiological, and surgical treatment.

Conclusions: EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage is technically feasible, safe, and an effective alternative to radiological or open surgical drainage. It also offers favorable clinical outcomes in different clinical situations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopic Ultrasound
Endoscopic Ultrasound GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
144
期刊介绍: Endoscopic Ultrasound, a publication of Euro-EUS Scientific Committee, Asia-Pacific EUS Task Force and Latin American Chapter of EUS, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Quarterly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.eusjournal.com. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal does not charge for submission, processing or publication of manuscripts and even for color reproduction of photographs.
期刊最新文献
Consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic pseudocyst and walled-off necrosis from a Chinese multiple disciplinary team expert panel Computed tomography–based radial endobronchial ultrasound image simulation of peripheral pulmonary lesions using deep learning Comments and illustrations of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine contrast-enhanced ultrasound guidelines: Multiparametric imaging and EUS-guided sampling in rare pancreatic tumors. Benign mesenchymal pancreatic tumors A rare but interesting case of small intestinal tumor diagnosed by transrectal EUS-FNA (with video). Detective flow imaging versus contrast-enhanced EUS in solid pancreatic lesions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1