精神障碍学生的支持性教育:2009年至2021年有效性研究的系统回顾

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1037/prj0000528
Jacomijn Hofstra, Jorien van der Velde, Marianne Farkas, Lies Korevaar, Svenja Büttner
{"title":"精神障碍学生的支持性教育:2009年至2021年有效性研究的系统回顾","authors":"Jacomijn Hofstra,&nbsp;Jorien van der Velde,&nbsp;Marianne Farkas,&nbsp;Lies Korevaar,&nbsp;Svenja Büttner","doi":"10.1037/prj0000528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>For more than a decade, an increase in psychiatric disabilities has been reported worldwide among students in postsecondary education. Supported Education (SEd) interventions support students with psychiatric disabilities to return to or remain in education. As not much is known about the effectiveness of SEd, we conducted a systematic review of the research on the effects of SEd on educational functioning, including study success and student satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The EBSCOhost Complete browser (e.g., ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO, SocINDEX) was used to search for peer-reviewed studies representing effectiveness data on SEd published in English or Dutch/Flemish between 2009 and 2021. The quality of the research was assessed for all studies included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total number of seven studies were eligible. The results indicated a positive impact of SEd on the educational functioning (e.g., educational attainment, grade point average, comfort with the student role) of students with psychiatric disabilities. In addition, effects on time spent on educational activities, interpersonal skills, and sustained attention/vigilance were found. The quality of the studies appeared to be moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for practice: </strong>The limited available evidence suggests the added value of SEd interventions for the educational functioning of students with psychiatric disabilities. Reviewing the effectiveness of SEd was difficult due to differences in the SEd interventions used, the generally small research populations, and differing research designs. To improve the quality of research on this subject, future studies should overcome the identified shortcomings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47875,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","volume":"46 3","pages":"173-184"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supported education for students with psychiatric disabilities: A systematic review of effectiveness studies from 2009 to 2021.\",\"authors\":\"Jacomijn Hofstra,&nbsp;Jorien van der Velde,&nbsp;Marianne Farkas,&nbsp;Lies Korevaar,&nbsp;Svenja Büttner\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/prj0000528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>For more than a decade, an increase in psychiatric disabilities has been reported worldwide among students in postsecondary education. Supported Education (SEd) interventions support students with psychiatric disabilities to return to or remain in education. As not much is known about the effectiveness of SEd, we conducted a systematic review of the research on the effects of SEd on educational functioning, including study success and student satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The EBSCOhost Complete browser (e.g., ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO, SocINDEX) was used to search for peer-reviewed studies representing effectiveness data on SEd published in English or Dutch/Flemish between 2009 and 2021. The quality of the research was assessed for all studies included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total number of seven studies were eligible. The results indicated a positive impact of SEd on the educational functioning (e.g., educational attainment, grade point average, comfort with the student role) of students with psychiatric disabilities. In addition, effects on time spent on educational activities, interpersonal skills, and sustained attention/vigilance were found. The quality of the studies appeared to be moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for practice: </strong>The limited available evidence suggests the added value of SEd interventions for the educational functioning of students with psychiatric disabilities. Reviewing the effectiveness of SEd was difficult due to differences in the SEd interventions used, the generally small research populations, and differing research designs. To improve the quality of research on this subject, future studies should overcome the identified shortcomings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal\",\"volume\":\"46 3\",\"pages\":\"173-184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000528\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000528","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:十多年来,据报道,世界范围内接受高等教育的学生中精神残疾的人数有所增加。支持教育(SEd)干预措施支持有精神障碍的学生重返或继续接受教育。由于对SEd的有效性知之甚少,我们对SEd对教育功能(包括学习成功和学生满意度)的影响的研究进行了系统的回顾。方法:使用EBSCOhost完整浏览器(如ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO, SocINDEX)检索2009年至2021年间以英语或荷兰语/佛兰德语发表的具有SEd有效性数据的同行评审研究。对纳入的所有研究的研究质量进行了评估。结果:共有7项研究符合条件。结果表明,SEd对精神障碍学生的教育功能(如教育程度、平均成绩、对学生角色的舒适度)有积极影响。此外,还发现了在教育活动上花费的时间、人际交往能力和持续的注意力/警惕性方面的影响。研究的质量一般。结论和实践意义:有限的现有证据表明,SEd干预对精神障碍学生的教育功能有附加价值。由于使用的SEd干预措施存在差异,研究人群通常较小,研究设计不同,因此很难评估SEd的有效性。为了提高这一课题的研究质量,未来的研究应克服已发现的不足。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Supported education for students with psychiatric disabilities: A systematic review of effectiveness studies from 2009 to 2021.

Objective: For more than a decade, an increase in psychiatric disabilities has been reported worldwide among students in postsecondary education. Supported Education (SEd) interventions support students with psychiatric disabilities to return to or remain in education. As not much is known about the effectiveness of SEd, we conducted a systematic review of the research on the effects of SEd on educational functioning, including study success and student satisfaction.

Method: The EBSCOhost Complete browser (e.g., ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO, SocINDEX) was used to search for peer-reviewed studies representing effectiveness data on SEd published in English or Dutch/Flemish between 2009 and 2021. The quality of the research was assessed for all studies included.

Results: A total number of seven studies were eligible. The results indicated a positive impact of SEd on the educational functioning (e.g., educational attainment, grade point average, comfort with the student role) of students with psychiatric disabilities. In addition, effects on time spent on educational activities, interpersonal skills, and sustained attention/vigilance were found. The quality of the studies appeared to be moderate.

Conclusions and implications for practice: The limited available evidence suggests the added value of SEd interventions for the educational functioning of students with psychiatric disabilities. Reviewing the effectiveness of SEd was difficult due to differences in the SEd interventions used, the generally small research populations, and differing research designs. To improve the quality of research on this subject, future studies should overcome the identified shortcomings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal is sponsored by the Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, at Boston University"s Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences and by the US Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association (USPRA) . The mission of the Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal is to promote the development of new knowledge related to psychiatric rehabilitation and recovery of persons with serious mental illnesses.
期刊最新文献
Perceived impacts of internalized stigma in individuals with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Prevalence of chronic physical conditions and physical multimorbidity among young adults with serious mental health conditions. The impact of life story work during peer worker training: Identity reconstruction, social connection, and recovery. The relationship between personal recovery, clinical symptoms, and psychosocial functioning over time among service users with psychosis. Using exit surveys to elicit turnover reasons among behavioral health employees for organizational interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1