社会工作中的护理标准:伦理和风险管理启示。

IF 2.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK Social work Pub Date : 2023-09-14 DOI:10.1093/sw/swad023
Frederic G Reamer
{"title":"社会工作中的护理标准:伦理和风险管理启示。","authors":"Frederic G Reamer","doi":"10.1093/sw/swad023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social workers are sometimes named as defendants in malpractice lawsuits. These lawsuits allege negligence, specifically that social work defendants owed a duty to the plaintiff, breached this duty, and the defendant's actions caused harm. Plaintiffs in litigation cases typically allege that social workers violated or failed to meet prevailing standards of care in the profession. It is essential that social workers understand the legal concept of standard of care and its implications for professional practice. This article reviews the concept of standard of care; discusses the ways in which social work ethics standards, federal and state laws, national practice standards, expert witness testimony, and professional literature determine the standard of care; and presents practical steps social workers can take to comply with prevailing standards of care, protect clients, and protect themselves. The author focuses especially on complex cases where social workers may not agree on relevant standards of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":21875,"journal":{"name":"Social work","volume":"68 4","pages":"277-285"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standards of Care in Social Work: Ethical and Risk Management Implications.\",\"authors\":\"Frederic G Reamer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/sw/swad023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Social workers are sometimes named as defendants in malpractice lawsuits. These lawsuits allege negligence, specifically that social work defendants owed a duty to the plaintiff, breached this duty, and the defendant's actions caused harm. Plaintiffs in litigation cases typically allege that social workers violated or failed to meet prevailing standards of care in the profession. It is essential that social workers understand the legal concept of standard of care and its implications for professional practice. This article reviews the concept of standard of care; discusses the ways in which social work ethics standards, federal and state laws, national practice standards, expert witness testimony, and professional literature determine the standard of care; and presents practical steps social workers can take to comply with prevailing standards of care, protect clients, and protect themselves. The author focuses especially on complex cases where social workers may not agree on relevant standards of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social work\",\"volume\":\"68 4\",\"pages\":\"277-285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swad023\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swad023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会工作者有时被列为渎职诉讼的被告。这些诉讼指控疏忽,特别是社会工作被告对原告负有义务,违反了这一义务,被告的行为造成了伤害。诉讼案件中的原告通常指控社会工作者违反或未能达到该行业的现行护理标准。社会工作者必须了解护理标准的法律概念及其对专业实践的影响。本文回顾了护理标准的概念;讨论了社会工作道德标准、联邦和州法律、国家实践标准、专家证人证词和专业文献决定护理标准的方式;并提出了社会工作者可以采取的实际步骤,以遵守现行的护理标准,保护客户和保护自己。作者特别关注社会工作者可能不同意相关护理标准的复杂情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Standards of Care in Social Work: Ethical and Risk Management Implications.

Social workers are sometimes named as defendants in malpractice lawsuits. These lawsuits allege negligence, specifically that social work defendants owed a duty to the plaintiff, breached this duty, and the defendant's actions caused harm. Plaintiffs in litigation cases typically allege that social workers violated or failed to meet prevailing standards of care in the profession. It is essential that social workers understand the legal concept of standard of care and its implications for professional practice. This article reviews the concept of standard of care; discusses the ways in which social work ethics standards, federal and state laws, national practice standards, expert witness testimony, and professional literature determine the standard of care; and presents practical steps social workers can take to comply with prevailing standards of care, protect clients, and protect themselves. The author focuses especially on complex cases where social workers may not agree on relevant standards of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social work
Social work SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Professional Self-Care in Social Work Practice: A New Conceptual Framework. Preventing Firearm Injuries and Deaths among Clients: An Action Plan Model for Social Workers. Social Work, Harm Reduction, and Substance Use: Progress, Policy, and Perseverance. How Academic Social Workers Negotiate Their Direct Practice Skills and Qualitative Research Techniques. Regional Differences in Job Satisfaction among Chinese Social Workers: The Mediating Effect of Attitudinal Professionalism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1