接种抗COVID-19疫苗后育龄妇女月经周期的改变一项调查对419名意大利妇女的生活质量和性功能进行了评价。

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Minerva obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI:10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05347-2
Melania Loggia, Anna DI Pinto, Claudia Morgani, Giorgia Cardella, Alessia Contadini, Pier L Palazzetti, Francesca Macrì, Paolo R Moro, Vincenzo Spina, Andrea Morciano, Herbert C Valensise, Michele C Schiavi
{"title":"接种抗COVID-19疫苗后育龄妇女月经周期的改变一项调查对419名意大利妇女的生活质量和性功能进行了评价。","authors":"Melania Loggia,&nbsp;Anna DI Pinto,&nbsp;Claudia Morgani,&nbsp;Giorgia Cardella,&nbsp;Alessia Contadini,&nbsp;Pier L Palazzetti,&nbsp;Francesca Macrì,&nbsp;Paolo R Moro,&nbsp;Vincenzo Spina,&nbsp;Andrea Morciano,&nbsp;Herbert C Valensise,&nbsp;Michele C Schiavi","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05347-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacovigilance agencies did not collect data regarding menstrual changes after COVID-19 vaccination even if many women experienced it. Our aim was to evaluate whether COVID-19 vaccination is associated with secondary changes in menstrual cycle and to assess both quality of life (QoL) and sexual function (SF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective analysis referred to our Department from January 2021 to December 2021. The study cohort responded to same questionnaires before the second dose of vaccination (referring to previous 3 months) and 3 months after that (referring to three menstrual cycles after full-dose vaccination). The surveys administered were FSFI, FSDS, SF-36, MEDI-Q and the VAS-scale for dysmenorrhea.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four-hundred-nineteen vaccinated women were included in the study. The survey did not show a significant change in menstrual cycle length before and after COVID-19 vaccine (5.88±3.67 vs. 4.97±2.89, P=0.21); the interval between periods was significantly higher after a full-cycle vaccination (28.32±7.34 vs. 32.38±7.45, P<0.02); 32 patients (7.6%) developed amenorrhea after the second dose; VAS Scale did not change significantly (median range 3 (3-5) vs. 4 (3-6), P=0.20). MEDI-Q did not show significant variations before and after the vaccination (43.21±11.65 vs. 40.28±9.88, P=0.35). QoL and SF did not change significantly (FSFI median 27 [24-29] vs. 28 [25-30], P=0.12, FSDS median 9 [5-11] vs. 8 [4-12], P=0.22), SF-36 median 81 [70-85] vs. 82 [72-86], P=0.43).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>COVID-19 vaccination is associated with a significant change in intervals between menstrual cycles without other alterations in menstrual characteristics, in QoL or SF.</p>","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Menstrual cycle alterations in reproductive age women after anti COVID-19 vaccination. A survey in 419 Italian women and quality of life and sexual function evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Melania Loggia,&nbsp;Anna DI Pinto,&nbsp;Claudia Morgani,&nbsp;Giorgia Cardella,&nbsp;Alessia Contadini,&nbsp;Pier L Palazzetti,&nbsp;Francesca Macrì,&nbsp;Paolo R Moro,&nbsp;Vincenzo Spina,&nbsp;Andrea Morciano,&nbsp;Herbert C Valensise,&nbsp;Michele C Schiavi\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05347-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacovigilance agencies did not collect data regarding menstrual changes after COVID-19 vaccination even if many women experienced it. Our aim was to evaluate whether COVID-19 vaccination is associated with secondary changes in menstrual cycle and to assess both quality of life (QoL) and sexual function (SF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective analysis referred to our Department from January 2021 to December 2021. The study cohort responded to same questionnaires before the second dose of vaccination (referring to previous 3 months) and 3 months after that (referring to three menstrual cycles after full-dose vaccination). The surveys administered were FSFI, FSDS, SF-36, MEDI-Q and the VAS-scale for dysmenorrhea.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four-hundred-nineteen vaccinated women were included in the study. The survey did not show a significant change in menstrual cycle length before and after COVID-19 vaccine (5.88±3.67 vs. 4.97±2.89, P=0.21); the interval between periods was significantly higher after a full-cycle vaccination (28.32±7.34 vs. 32.38±7.45, P<0.02); 32 patients (7.6%) developed amenorrhea after the second dose; VAS Scale did not change significantly (median range 3 (3-5) vs. 4 (3-6), P=0.20). MEDI-Q did not show significant variations before and after the vaccination (43.21±11.65 vs. 40.28±9.88, P=0.35). QoL and SF did not change significantly (FSFI median 27 [24-29] vs. 28 [25-30], P=0.12, FSDS median 9 [5-11] vs. 8 [4-12], P=0.22), SF-36 median 81 [70-85] vs. 82 [72-86], P=0.43).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>COVID-19 vaccination is associated with a significant change in intervals between menstrual cycles without other alterations in menstrual characteristics, in QoL or SF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05347-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05347-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:药物警戒机构没有收集关于COVID-19疫苗接种后月经变化的数据,即使许多妇女都经历了这种变化。我们的目的是评估COVID-19疫苗接种是否与月经周期的继发性改变有关,并评估生活质量(QoL)和性功能(SF)。方法:本研究是对我科2021年1月至2021年12月的回顾性分析。研究队列在第二次接种前(参照前3个月)和接种后3个月(参照全剂量接种后的3个月经周期)回答相同的问卷。采用FSFI、FSDS、SF-36、medium - q和痛经vas量表进行调查。结果:研究中包括了419名接种疫苗的妇女。调查显示,接种新冠病毒疫苗前后月经周期长度无显著变化(5.88±3.67∶4.97±2.89,P=0.21);全周期疫苗接种后月经间隔时间明显增加(28.32±7.34 vs. 32.38±7.45)。结论:COVID-19疫苗接种与月经周期间隔时间显著改变相关,而月经特征、生活质量或SF没有其他改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Menstrual cycle alterations in reproductive age women after anti COVID-19 vaccination. A survey in 419 Italian women and quality of life and sexual function evaluation.

Background: Pharmacovigilance agencies did not collect data regarding menstrual changes after COVID-19 vaccination even if many women experienced it. Our aim was to evaluate whether COVID-19 vaccination is associated with secondary changes in menstrual cycle and to assess both quality of life (QoL) and sexual function (SF).

Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis referred to our Department from January 2021 to December 2021. The study cohort responded to same questionnaires before the second dose of vaccination (referring to previous 3 months) and 3 months after that (referring to three menstrual cycles after full-dose vaccination). The surveys administered were FSFI, FSDS, SF-36, MEDI-Q and the VAS-scale for dysmenorrhea.

Results: Four-hundred-nineteen vaccinated women were included in the study. The survey did not show a significant change in menstrual cycle length before and after COVID-19 vaccine (5.88±3.67 vs. 4.97±2.89, P=0.21); the interval between periods was significantly higher after a full-cycle vaccination (28.32±7.34 vs. 32.38±7.45, P<0.02); 32 patients (7.6%) developed amenorrhea after the second dose; VAS Scale did not change significantly (median range 3 (3-5) vs. 4 (3-6), P=0.20). MEDI-Q did not show significant variations before and after the vaccination (43.21±11.65 vs. 40.28±9.88, P=0.35). QoL and SF did not change significantly (FSFI median 27 [24-29] vs. 28 [25-30], P=0.12, FSDS median 9 [5-11] vs. 8 [4-12], P=0.22), SF-36 median 81 [70-85] vs. 82 [72-86], P=0.43).

Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccination is associated with a significant change in intervals between menstrual cycles without other alterations in menstrual characteristics, in QoL or SF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
191
期刊最新文献
Use of the Knutson's paste for the treatment of perineal wound dehiscence after vaginal delivery: a single-center clinical experience. Endometriosis and risk factors in pregnancy, labor and delivery: a case-control study. Recipients' age, fresh embryo and blastocyst-stage embryo transfer as favorable factors in a transnational oocyte donation program. The role of colposcopy in HPV vaccination era. The predictive role of uterocervical angle in labor outcomes: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1