接种抗COVID-19疫苗后育龄妇女月经周期的改变一项调查对419名意大利妇女的生活质量和性功能进行了评价。

IF 1 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Minerva obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-15 DOI:10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05347-2
Melania Loggia, Anna DI Pinto, Claudia Morgani, Giorgia Cardella, Alessia Contadini, Pier L Palazzetti, Francesca Macrì, Paolo R Moro, Vincenzo Spina, Andrea Morciano, Herbert C Valensise, Michele C Schiavi
{"title":"接种抗COVID-19疫苗后育龄妇女月经周期的改变一项调查对419名意大利妇女的生活质量和性功能进行了评价。","authors":"Melania Loggia, Anna DI Pinto, Claudia Morgani, Giorgia Cardella, Alessia Contadini, Pier L Palazzetti, Francesca Macrì, Paolo R Moro, Vincenzo Spina, Andrea Morciano, Herbert C Valensise, Michele C Schiavi","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05347-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacovigilance agencies did not collect data regarding menstrual changes after COVID-19 vaccination even if many women experienced it. Our aim was to evaluate whether COVID-19 vaccination is associated with secondary changes in menstrual cycle and to assess both quality of life (QoL) and sexual function (SF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective analysis referred to our Department from January 2021 to December 2021. The study cohort responded to same questionnaires before the second dose of vaccination (referring to previous 3 months) and 3 months after that (referring to three menstrual cycles after full-dose vaccination). The surveys administered were FSFI, FSDS, SF-36, MEDI-Q and the VAS-scale for dysmenorrhea.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four-hundred-nineteen vaccinated women were included in the study. The survey did not show a significant change in menstrual cycle length before and after COVID-19 vaccine (5.88±3.67 vs. 4.97±2.89, P=0.21); the interval between periods was significantly higher after a full-cycle vaccination (28.32±7.34 vs. 32.38±7.45, P<0.02); 32 patients (7.6%) developed amenorrhea after the second dose; VAS Scale did not change significantly (median range 3 (3-5) vs. 4 (3-6), P=0.20). MEDI-Q did not show significant variations before and after the vaccination (43.21±11.65 vs. 40.28±9.88, P=0.35). QoL and SF did not change significantly (FSFI median 27 [24-29] vs. 28 [25-30], P=0.12, FSDS median 9 [5-11] vs. 8 [4-12], P=0.22), SF-36 median 81 [70-85] vs. 82 [72-86], P=0.43).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>COVID-19 vaccination is associated with a significant change in intervals between menstrual cycles without other alterations in menstrual characteristics, in QoL or SF.</p>","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"516-521"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Menstrual cycle alterations in reproductive age women after anti COVID-19 vaccination. A survey in 419 Italian women and quality of life and sexual function evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Melania Loggia, Anna DI Pinto, Claudia Morgani, Giorgia Cardella, Alessia Contadini, Pier L Palazzetti, Francesca Macrì, Paolo R Moro, Vincenzo Spina, Andrea Morciano, Herbert C Valensise, Michele C Schiavi\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05347-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacovigilance agencies did not collect data regarding menstrual changes after COVID-19 vaccination even if many women experienced it. Our aim was to evaluate whether COVID-19 vaccination is associated with secondary changes in menstrual cycle and to assess both quality of life (QoL) and sexual function (SF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective analysis referred to our Department from January 2021 to December 2021. The study cohort responded to same questionnaires before the second dose of vaccination (referring to previous 3 months) and 3 months after that (referring to three menstrual cycles after full-dose vaccination). The surveys administered were FSFI, FSDS, SF-36, MEDI-Q and the VAS-scale for dysmenorrhea.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four-hundred-nineteen vaccinated women were included in the study. The survey did not show a significant change in menstrual cycle length before and after COVID-19 vaccine (5.88±3.67 vs. 4.97±2.89, P=0.21); the interval between periods was significantly higher after a full-cycle vaccination (28.32±7.34 vs. 32.38±7.45, P<0.02); 32 patients (7.6%) developed amenorrhea after the second dose; VAS Scale did not change significantly (median range 3 (3-5) vs. 4 (3-6), P=0.20). MEDI-Q did not show significant variations before and after the vaccination (43.21±11.65 vs. 40.28±9.88, P=0.35). QoL and SF did not change significantly (FSFI median 27 [24-29] vs. 28 [25-30], P=0.12, FSDS median 9 [5-11] vs. 8 [4-12], P=0.22), SF-36 median 81 [70-85] vs. 82 [72-86], P=0.43).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>COVID-19 vaccination is associated with a significant change in intervals between menstrual cycles without other alterations in menstrual characteristics, in QoL or SF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"516-521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05347-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05347-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:药物警戒机构没有收集关于COVID-19疫苗接种后月经变化的数据,即使许多妇女都经历了这种变化。我们的目的是评估COVID-19疫苗接种是否与月经周期的继发性改变有关,并评估生活质量(QoL)和性功能(SF)。方法:本研究是对我科2021年1月至2021年12月的回顾性分析。研究队列在第二次接种前(参照前3个月)和接种后3个月(参照全剂量接种后的3个月经周期)回答相同的问卷。采用FSFI、FSDS、SF-36、medium - q和痛经vas量表进行调查。结果:研究中包括了419名接种疫苗的妇女。调查显示,接种新冠病毒疫苗前后月经周期长度无显著变化(5.88±3.67∶4.97±2.89,P=0.21);全周期疫苗接种后月经间隔时间明显增加(28.32±7.34 vs. 32.38±7.45)。结论:COVID-19疫苗接种与月经周期间隔时间显著改变相关,而月经特征、生活质量或SF没有其他改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Menstrual cycle alterations in reproductive age women after anti COVID-19 vaccination. A survey in 419 Italian women and quality of life and sexual function evaluation.

Background: Pharmacovigilance agencies did not collect data regarding menstrual changes after COVID-19 vaccination even if many women experienced it. Our aim was to evaluate whether COVID-19 vaccination is associated with secondary changes in menstrual cycle and to assess both quality of life (QoL) and sexual function (SF).

Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis referred to our Department from January 2021 to December 2021. The study cohort responded to same questionnaires before the second dose of vaccination (referring to previous 3 months) and 3 months after that (referring to three menstrual cycles after full-dose vaccination). The surveys administered were FSFI, FSDS, SF-36, MEDI-Q and the VAS-scale for dysmenorrhea.

Results: Four-hundred-nineteen vaccinated women were included in the study. The survey did not show a significant change in menstrual cycle length before and after COVID-19 vaccine (5.88±3.67 vs. 4.97±2.89, P=0.21); the interval between periods was significantly higher after a full-cycle vaccination (28.32±7.34 vs. 32.38±7.45, P<0.02); 32 patients (7.6%) developed amenorrhea after the second dose; VAS Scale did not change significantly (median range 3 (3-5) vs. 4 (3-6), P=0.20). MEDI-Q did not show significant variations before and after the vaccination (43.21±11.65 vs. 40.28±9.88, P=0.35). QoL and SF did not change significantly (FSFI median 27 [24-29] vs. 28 [25-30], P=0.12, FSDS median 9 [5-11] vs. 8 [4-12], P=0.22), SF-36 median 81 [70-85] vs. 82 [72-86], P=0.43).

Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccination is associated with a significant change in intervals between menstrual cycles without other alterations in menstrual characteristics, in QoL or SF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
191
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound signs of adenomyosis in pregnancy and counselling related to infertility and obstetric outcomes. Impact of low and late fertility on gestational diabetes mellitus and macrosomia. The association of gestational weight gain with carotid intima-media thickness in correlation with pregnancy outcome and placental assessment: a prospective study. Blastocyst implantation assay: towards the development of a new in vitro model for studying woman-specific blastocyst implantation. Myofascial pelvic floor dysfunction as a hidden contributor to urinary symptoms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1