S C Chivers, T Vasavan, M Nandi, B R Hayes-Gill, I A Jayawardane, J M Simpson, C Williamson, W P Fifer, M Lucchini
{"title":"利用计算机化算法测量胎儿心电图的心脏时间间隔:一项回顾性观察研究。","authors":"S C Chivers, T Vasavan, M Nandi, B R Hayes-Gill, I A Jayawardane, J M Simpson, C Williamson, W P Fifer, M Lucchini","doi":"10.1177/20480040221096209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Establish whether the reliable measurement of cardiac time intervals of the fetal ECG can be automated and to address whether this approach could be used to investigate large datasets.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Teaching hospitals in London UK, Nottingham UK and New York USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Singleton pregnancies with no known fetal abnormality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Archived fetal ECG's performed using the MonicaAN24 monitor. A single ECG (PQRST) complex was generated from 5000 signal-averaged beats and electrical cardiac time intervals measured in an automated way and manually.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Validation of a newly developed algorithm to measure the cardiac time intervals of the fetal ECG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>188/236 (79.7%) subjects with fECGs of suitable signal:noise ratio were included for analysis comparing manual with automated measurement. PR interval was measured in 173/188 (92%), QRS complex in 170/188 (90%) and QT interval in 123/188 (65.4%). PR interval was 107.6 (12.07) ms [mean(SD)] manual vs 109.11 (14.7) ms algorithm. QRS duration was 54.72(6.35) ms manual vs 58.34(5.73) ms algorithm. QT-interval was 268.93 (21.59) ms manual vs 261.63 (36.16) ms algorithm. QTc was 407.5(32.71) ms manual vs 396.4 (54.78) ms algorithm. The QRS-duration increased with gestational age in both manual and algorithm measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Accurate measurement of fetal ECG cardiac time intervals can be automated with potential application to interpretation of larger datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":30457,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","volume":"11 ","pages":"20480040221096209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/51/3e/10.1177_20480040221096209.PMC9102181.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement of the cardiac time intervals of the fetal ECG utilising a computerised algorithm: A retrospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"S C Chivers, T Vasavan, M Nandi, B R Hayes-Gill, I A Jayawardane, J M Simpson, C Williamson, W P Fifer, M Lucchini\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20480040221096209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Establish whether the reliable measurement of cardiac time intervals of the fetal ECG can be automated and to address whether this approach could be used to investigate large datasets.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Teaching hospitals in London UK, Nottingham UK and New York USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Singleton pregnancies with no known fetal abnormality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Archived fetal ECG's performed using the MonicaAN24 monitor. A single ECG (PQRST) complex was generated from 5000 signal-averaged beats and electrical cardiac time intervals measured in an automated way and manually.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Validation of a newly developed algorithm to measure the cardiac time intervals of the fetal ECG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>188/236 (79.7%) subjects with fECGs of suitable signal:noise ratio were included for analysis comparing manual with automated measurement. PR interval was measured in 173/188 (92%), QRS complex in 170/188 (90%) and QT interval in 123/188 (65.4%). PR interval was 107.6 (12.07) ms [mean(SD)] manual vs 109.11 (14.7) ms algorithm. QRS duration was 54.72(6.35) ms manual vs 58.34(5.73) ms algorithm. QT-interval was 268.93 (21.59) ms manual vs 261.63 (36.16) ms algorithm. QTc was 407.5(32.71) ms manual vs 396.4 (54.78) ms algorithm. The QRS-duration increased with gestational age in both manual and algorithm measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Accurate measurement of fetal ECG cardiac time intervals can be automated with potential application to interpretation of larger datasets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"20480040221096209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/51/3e/10.1177_20480040221096209.PMC9102181.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20480040221096209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20480040221096209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Measurement of the cardiac time intervals of the fetal ECG utilising a computerised algorithm: A retrospective observational study.
Objective: Establish whether the reliable measurement of cardiac time intervals of the fetal ECG can be automated and to address whether this approach could be used to investigate large datasets.
Design: Retrospective observational study.
Setting: Teaching hospitals in London UK, Nottingham UK and New York USA.
Participants: Singleton pregnancies with no known fetal abnormality.
Methods: Archived fetal ECG's performed using the MonicaAN24 monitor. A single ECG (PQRST) complex was generated from 5000 signal-averaged beats and electrical cardiac time intervals measured in an automated way and manually.
Main outcome measure: Validation of a newly developed algorithm to measure the cardiac time intervals of the fetal ECG.
Results: 188/236 (79.7%) subjects with fECGs of suitable signal:noise ratio were included for analysis comparing manual with automated measurement. PR interval was measured in 173/188 (92%), QRS complex in 170/188 (90%) and QT interval in 123/188 (65.4%). PR interval was 107.6 (12.07) ms [mean(SD)] manual vs 109.11 (14.7) ms algorithm. QRS duration was 54.72(6.35) ms manual vs 58.34(5.73) ms algorithm. QT-interval was 268.93 (21.59) ms manual vs 261.63 (36.16) ms algorithm. QTc was 407.5(32.71) ms manual vs 396.4 (54.78) ms algorithm. The QRS-duration increased with gestational age in both manual and algorithm measurements.
Conclusion: Accurate measurement of fetal ECG cardiac time intervals can be automated with potential application to interpretation of larger datasets.