David McIntyre MN, NP, Ann Bonner PhD, RN, Amanda McGuire PhD, RN
{"title":"McIntyre审计工具测量血液透析护士敏感指标的验证","authors":"David McIntyre MN, NP, Ann Bonner PhD, RN, Amanda McGuire PhD, RN","doi":"10.1111/jorc.12441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Nurse sensitive indicators measure the quality of nursing care. Although there are some haemodialysis nurse sensitive indicators, there are currently no validated audit tools available to measure the indicators.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To test the validity of the McIntyre Audit Tool.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>This study used a descriptive observation design conducted over two phases to assess face and content validity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>An expert panel of haemodialysis nurses (<i>n</i> = 13).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Face validity (phase 1) involved 13 nurses in two focus groups who reviewed the audit tool with qualitative data generated analysed to identify common themes. Phase 2 used a modified version of the audit tool to test for content validity for each item and then scale level content validity was calculated by combining all item scores.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Measurements</h3>\n \n <p>Ten nurses rated 26 indicators in the audit tool using a 4-point Likert scale to assess each item for clarity, relevance, appropriateness, and ambiguity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All 26-haemodialysis nurse sensitive indicators achieved item content validity indices ranging from 0.825 to 1.00 with a scale content validity index average of 0.910. However, based on feedback from phase 2, 6 outcome indicators were removed from the audit tool to reduce staff burden and assist with ease of use. The final audit tool had an excellent average scale content validity index of 0.924.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The McIntyre Audit Tool to measure 20 haemodialysis nurse sensitive indicators has been validated. It now requires feasibility and reliability testing before auditing the quality of haemodialysis nursing care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of renal care","volume":"49 3","pages":"191-197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jorc.12441","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the McIntyre Audit Tool to measure haemodialysis nurse sensitive indicators\",\"authors\":\"David McIntyre MN, NP, Ann Bonner PhD, RN, Amanda McGuire PhD, RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jorc.12441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Nurse sensitive indicators measure the quality of nursing care. Although there are some haemodialysis nurse sensitive indicators, there are currently no validated audit tools available to measure the indicators.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To test the validity of the McIntyre Audit Tool.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study used a descriptive observation design conducted over two phases to assess face and content validity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Participants</h3>\\n \\n <p>An expert panel of haemodialysis nurses (<i>n</i> = 13).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Face validity (phase 1) involved 13 nurses in two focus groups who reviewed the audit tool with qualitative data generated analysed to identify common themes. Phase 2 used a modified version of the audit tool to test for content validity for each item and then scale level content validity was calculated by combining all item scores.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Measurements</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ten nurses rated 26 indicators in the audit tool using a 4-point Likert scale to assess each item for clarity, relevance, appropriateness, and ambiguity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>All 26-haemodialysis nurse sensitive indicators achieved item content validity indices ranging from 0.825 to 1.00 with a scale content validity index average of 0.910. However, based on feedback from phase 2, 6 outcome indicators were removed from the audit tool to reduce staff burden and assist with ease of use. The final audit tool had an excellent average scale content validity index of 0.924.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The McIntyre Audit Tool to measure 20 haemodialysis nurse sensitive indicators has been validated. It now requires feasibility and reliability testing before auditing the quality of haemodialysis nursing care.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of renal care\",\"volume\":\"49 3\",\"pages\":\"191-197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jorc.12441\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of renal care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jorc.12441\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of renal care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jorc.12441","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of the McIntyre Audit Tool to measure haemodialysis nurse sensitive indicators
Background
Nurse sensitive indicators measure the quality of nursing care. Although there are some haemodialysis nurse sensitive indicators, there are currently no validated audit tools available to measure the indicators.
Objectives
To test the validity of the McIntyre Audit Tool.
Design
This study used a descriptive observation design conducted over two phases to assess face and content validity.
Participants
An expert panel of haemodialysis nurses (n = 13).
Methods
Face validity (phase 1) involved 13 nurses in two focus groups who reviewed the audit tool with qualitative data generated analysed to identify common themes. Phase 2 used a modified version of the audit tool to test for content validity for each item and then scale level content validity was calculated by combining all item scores.
Measurements
Ten nurses rated 26 indicators in the audit tool using a 4-point Likert scale to assess each item for clarity, relevance, appropriateness, and ambiguity.
Results
All 26-haemodialysis nurse sensitive indicators achieved item content validity indices ranging from 0.825 to 1.00 with a scale content validity index average of 0.910. However, based on feedback from phase 2, 6 outcome indicators were removed from the audit tool to reduce staff burden and assist with ease of use. The final audit tool had an excellent average scale content validity index of 0.924.
Conclusions
The McIntyre Audit Tool to measure 20 haemodialysis nurse sensitive indicators has been validated. It now requires feasibility and reliability testing before auditing the quality of haemodialysis nursing care.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Renal Care (JORC), formally EDTNA/ERCA Journal, is the official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Nursing Association/European Renal Care Association (EDTNA/ERCA).
The Journal of Renal Care is an international peer-reviewed journal for the multi-professional health care team caring for people with kidney disease and those who research this specialised area of health care. Kidney disease is a chronic illness with four basic treatments: haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis conservative management and transplantation, which includes emptive transplantation, living donor & cadavaric transplantation. The continuous world-wide increase of people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) means that research and shared knowledge into the causes and treatment is vital to delay the progression of CKD and to improve treatments and the care given.
The Journal of Renal Care is an important journal for all health-care professionals working in this and associated conditions, such as diabetes and cardio-vascular disease amongst others. It covers the trajectory of the disease from the first diagnosis to palliative care and includes acute renal injury. The Journal of Renal Care accepts that kidney disease affects not only the patients but also their families and significant others and provides a forum for both the psycho-social and physiological aspects of the disease.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
