首页 > 最新文献

Journal of renal care最新文献

英文 中文
Advance Care Planning Interventions for Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review 成人慢性肾病的预先护理计划干预:一项系统综述。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Pub Date : 2026-01-25 DOI: 10.1111/jorc.70046
Juthamas Tiansaard, Melissa J. Bloomer, Louise Purtell, Ann Bonner

Background

Advance care planning enables adults to express their goals and preferences for future care. Advance care planning has been widely recognised in oncology and palliative care for decades, but its use in kidney care is variable.

Objective

To examine interventions that promote advance care planning among adults with chronic kidney disease, including those receiving kidney replacement therapy.

Design

Systematic review.

Method

A comprehensive search was conducted in six databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Embase. Studies published from databases inception to September 2024 were included. Two independent reviewers identified studies for full-text review and data extraction. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024589958).

Results

Twenty-seven studies were included: 22 were quantitative (10 randomised and 12 non-randomised), three were qualitative, and two were mixed-methods designs. Most studies were conducted in the United States of America. Five main strategies to promote advance care planning uptake and improve outcomes were educating and training kidney healthcare professionals; implementing advance care planning conversations; providing educational resources; offering peer facilitators; and integrating palliative care teams. The synthesis of qualitative findings indicated that advance care planning discussions instilled hopefulness about the future and did not induce anxiety.

Conclusion

Advance care planning conversations combined with educational resources and peer support facilitators are likely to improve rates of advance care planning completions in this population, although further evidence is needed. Kidney healthcare professionals should be trained to initiate these conversations with all patients.

背景:提前护理计划使成年人能够表达他们对未来护理的目标和偏好。几十年来,提前护理计划在肿瘤学和姑息治疗中得到广泛认可,但其在肾脏护理中的应用是可变的。目的:探讨促进成人慢性肾病患者(包括接受肾脏替代治疗的患者)提前护理计划的干预措施。设计:系统回顾。方法:综合检索PubMed、MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Scopus、Embase 6个数据库。纳入了从数据库建立到2024年9月发表的研究。两名独立审稿人确定了研究的全文审查和数据提取。使用混合方法评估工具评估方法学质量。该审查方案已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024589958)。结果:纳入27项研究:22项为定量研究(10项随机,12项非随机),3项为定性研究,2项为混合方法设计。大多数研究是在美国进行的。促进提前护理计划吸收和改善结果的五个主要策略是教育和培训肾脏保健专业人员;实施预先护理计划对话;提供教育资源;提供同伴协助;整合姑息治疗团队。综合定性研究结果表明,预先护理计划的讨论灌输了对未来的希望,并没有引起焦虑。结论:预先护理计划对话结合教育资源和同伴支持促进者可能提高该人群的预先护理计划完成率,尽管还需要进一步的证据。肾脏保健专业人员应该接受培训,与所有患者进行这些对话。
{"title":"Advance Care Planning Interventions for Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review","authors":"Juthamas Tiansaard,&nbsp;Melissa J. Bloomer,&nbsp;Louise Purtell,&nbsp;Ann Bonner","doi":"10.1111/jorc.70046","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jorc.70046","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Advance care planning enables adults to express their goals and preferences for future care. Advance care planning has been widely recognised in oncology and palliative care for decades, but its use in kidney care is variable.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To examine interventions that promote advance care planning among adults with chronic kidney disease, including those receiving kidney replacement therapy.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Design</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Systematic review.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A comprehensive search was conducted in six databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Embase. Studies published from databases inception to September 2024 were included. Two independent reviewers identified studies for full-text review and data extraction. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024589958).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Twenty-seven studies were included: 22 were quantitative (10 randomised and 12 non-randomised), three were qualitative, and two were mixed-methods designs. Most studies were conducted in the United States of America. Five main strategies to promote advance care planning uptake and improve outcomes were educating and training kidney healthcare professionals; implementing advance care planning conversations; providing educational resources; offering peer facilitators; and integrating palliative care teams. The synthesis of qualitative findings indicated that advance care planning discussions instilled hopefulness about the future and did not induce anxiety.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Advance care planning conversations combined with educational resources and peer support facilitators are likely to improve rates of advance care planning completions in this population, although further evidence is needed. Kidney healthcare professionals should be trained to initiate these conversations with all patients.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of renal care","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12833587/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146046757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preserving Residual Kidney Function in Haemodialysis: Current Practices, Challenges, and Perspectives From Renal Clinicians 血液透析中保留残余肾功能:目前的实践、挑战和肾脏临床医生的观点。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Pub Date : 2026-01-23 DOI: 10.1111/jorc.70045
Lijun Zhong, Ulrich Steinwandel, Hugh Davies, Sara Bayes, Jagadish Jamboti, Hemant Kulkarni, Doris Chan
<div> <section> <h3> Background</h3> <p>Residual kidney function in patients receiving haemodialysis is associated with improved survival, reduced cardiovascular risk and better quality of life. Yet, clinical guidelines on its preservation are limited, and local practices remain unclear.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Objectives</h3> <p>To explore current practices, perceptions and challenges related to residual kidney function preservation among renal clinicians.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Design</h3> <p>Descriptive cross-sectional survey.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Participants</h3> <p>Renal physicians and nurses working in hospital-based haemodialysis units across Western Australia.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Measurements</h3> <p>Role-specific questionnaires were administered to renal physicians and nurses.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>Eighty-four completed responses were received (physicians <i>n</i> = 25; nurses <i>n</i> = 59). Over half of physicians (56%, <i>n</i> = 14) reported residual kidney function was present in more than half of patients at haemodialysis initiation, while most nurses (64%, <i>n</i> = 30) indicated it was often or always present. Assessment of this function was reported by 64% of physicians (<i>n</i> = 16) and 61% of nurses (<i>n</i> = 36), predominantly via patient self-reported urine output (physician 100%, <i>n</i> = 16; nurses 86%, <i>n</i> = 31). Most physicians (76%, <i>n</i> = 19) and nearly all nurses (90%, <i>n</i> = 53) believed preservation could improve patient outcomes. Key reported challenges included lack of consensus on optimal approaches (physicians 74%, <i>n</i> = 17; nurses 54%, <i>n</i> = 29), absence of clinical guidelines (nurses 61%, <i>n</i> = 33), difficulty in accurate assessment (physicians 65%, <i>n</i> = 15; nurses 52%, <i>n</i> = 28), and limited patient awareness (physician 57%, <i>n</i> = 13). Nurses identified staff education (83% <i>n</i> = 49) and practice guidelines (81%, <i>n</i> = 48) as key enablers to enhancing preservation efforts.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Conclusions</h3> <p>While the clinical value of residual kidney function is widely recognised, its preservation in haemodialysis remains constrained by the lack of clinical consensus and guideline
背景:接受血液透析患者的残余肾功能与提高生存率、降低心血管风险和改善生活质量相关。然而,关于其保存的临床指南是有限的,而且当地的实践仍然不清楚。目的:探讨当前肾脏临床医生在残肾功能保存方面的实践、认知和挑战。设计:描述性横断面调查。参与者:在西澳大利亚州医院血液透析单位工作的肾脏医生和护士。测量方法:对肾脏内科医生和护士进行角色特定的问卷调查。结果:共收到完整问卷84份(医生25份,护士59份)。超过一半的医生(56%,n = 14)报告在血液透析开始时,超过一半的患者存在残余肾功能,而大多数护士(64%,n = 30)表示经常或总是存在残余肾功能。64%的医生(n = 16)和61%的护士(n = 36)报告了该功能的评估,主要是通过患者自我报告的尿量(医生100%,n = 16;护士86%,n = 31)。大多数医生(76%,n = 19)和几乎所有护士(90%,n = 53)认为保存可以改善患者的预后。报告的主要挑战包括对最佳方法缺乏共识(医生74%,n = 17;护士54%,n = 29),缺乏临床指南(护士61%,n = 33),难以准确评估(医生65%,n = 15;护士52%,n = 28),以及患者意识有限(医生57%,n = 13)。护士认为员工教育(83%,n = 49)和实践指南(81%,n = 48)是加强保护工作的关键推动因素。结论:虽然残留肾功能的临床价值得到广泛认可,但由于缺乏临床共识和指南,以及患者和临床医生的认识有限,其在血液透析中的保存仍然受到限制。明确的指导方针和有针对性的教育对于将保存实践纳入常规血液透析护理至关重要。
{"title":"Preserving Residual Kidney Function in Haemodialysis: Current Practices, Challenges, and Perspectives From Renal Clinicians","authors":"Lijun Zhong,&nbsp;Ulrich Steinwandel,&nbsp;Hugh Davies,&nbsp;Sara Bayes,&nbsp;Jagadish Jamboti,&nbsp;Hemant Kulkarni,&nbsp;Doris Chan","doi":"10.1111/jorc.70045","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jorc.70045","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Background&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Residual kidney function in patients receiving haemodialysis is associated with improved survival, reduced cardiovascular risk and better quality of life. Yet, clinical guidelines on its preservation are limited, and local practices remain unclear.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Objectives&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;To explore current practices, perceptions and challenges related to residual kidney function preservation among renal clinicians.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Design&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Descriptive cross-sectional survey.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Participants&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Renal physicians and nurses working in hospital-based haemodialysis units across Western Australia.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Measurements&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Role-specific questionnaires were administered to renal physicians and nurses.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Eighty-four completed responses were received (physicians &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 25; nurses &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 59). Over half of physicians (56%, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 14) reported residual kidney function was present in more than half of patients at haemodialysis initiation, while most nurses (64%, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 30) indicated it was often or always present. Assessment of this function was reported by 64% of physicians (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 16) and 61% of nurses (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 36), predominantly via patient self-reported urine output (physician 100%, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 16; nurses 86%, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 31). Most physicians (76%, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 19) and nearly all nurses (90%, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 53) believed preservation could improve patient outcomes. Key reported challenges included lack of consensus on optimal approaches (physicians 74%, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 17; nurses 54%, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 29), absence of clinical guidelines (nurses 61%, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 33), difficulty in accurate assessment (physicians 65%, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 15; nurses 52%, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 28), and limited patient awareness (physician 57%, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 13). Nurses identified staff education (83% &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 49) and practice guidelines (81%, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 48) as key enablers to enhancing preservation efforts.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;While the clinical value of residual kidney function is widely recognised, its preservation in haemodialysis remains constrained by the lack of clinical consensus and guideline","PeriodicalId":16947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of renal care","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12828637/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146030158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Barriers and Facilitators to Haemodialysis Care in Indonesia: Perspectives of Dialysis Nurses 印度尼西亚血液透析护理的障碍和促进因素:透析护士的观点。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1111/jorc.70044
Fitri Mailani, Emil Huriani, Hema Malini, Setiawan Setiawan, Anisa Rahma Yuni

Background

Nurses play a crucial role in haemodialysis care, yet they often face complex responsibilities, heavy workloads, and emotional strain. Despite their central role, limited evidence exists regarding the barriers and facilitators that influence their experiences, particularly within Indonesia's public hospital settings.

Objective

This study aimed to explore the facilitators and barriers encountered by nursing professionals in delivering haemodialysis care in Indonesia.

Design

A descriptive qualitative design was employed.

Participants

Sixteen dialysis nurses were recruited through purposive sampling from three tertiary government hospitals in Indonesia.

Methods

Data were collected through in-depth interviews and analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis approach.

Findings

Three overarching themes emerged as facilitators: team collegiality, adequate equipment and clinical resources, and respect and remuneration, encompassing eight sub-themes. Four major themes were identified as barriers: limited specialised equipment; staffing constraints; patient barriers such as travel cost, cultural beliefs; and adherence to treatment and educational barriers, comprising ten sub-themes.

Conclusion

This study highlights the dual nature of facilitators and barriers influencing nursing practice in haemodialysis units. Understanding these factors is crucial for developing effective strategies to enhance workforce capacity, optimise resource allocation, and foster supportive work environments. Ultimately, addressing these barriers may improve both nurses' professional well-being and the quality of care provided to patients undergoing haemodialysis in Indonesia.

背景:护士在血液透析护理中发挥着至关重要的作用,但他们往往面临复杂的责任,繁重的工作量和情绪紧张。尽管她们发挥着核心作用,但关于影响她们经历的障碍和促进因素的证据有限,特别是在印度尼西亚的公立医院环境中。目的:本研究旨在探讨护理专业人员在印度尼西亚提供血液透析护理时遇到的便利条件和障碍。设计:采用描述性定性设计。参与者:通过有目的抽样从印度尼西亚的三所三级政府医院招募了16名透析护士。方法:采用深度访谈法收集数据,采用Braun和Clarke的主题分析法进行分析。研究发现:三个主要的主题作为促进因素出现:团队合作、充足的设备和临床资源、尊重和报酬,包括八个子主题。四个主要主题被确定为障碍:专业设备有限;人力资源约束;患者障碍如差旅费用、文化信仰;坚持治疗和教育障碍,包括十个分主题。结论:本研究突出了影响血液透析单位护理实践的促进因素和障碍的双重性质。了解这些因素对于制定有效战略以提高劳动力能力、优化资源分配和培育支持性工作环境至关重要。最终,解决这些障碍可能会改善护士的专业福祉和为印度尼西亚接受血液透析的患者提供的护理质量。
{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators to Haemodialysis Care in Indonesia: Perspectives of Dialysis Nurses","authors":"Fitri Mailani,&nbsp;Emil Huriani,&nbsp;Hema Malini,&nbsp;Setiawan Setiawan,&nbsp;Anisa Rahma Yuni","doi":"10.1111/jorc.70044","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jorc.70044","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Nurses play a crucial role in haemodialysis care, yet they often face complex responsibilities, heavy workloads, and emotional strain. Despite their central role, limited evidence exists regarding the barriers and facilitators that influence their experiences, particularly within Indonesia's public hospital settings.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study aimed to explore the facilitators and barriers encountered by nursing professionals in delivering haemodialysis care in Indonesia.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Design</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A descriptive qualitative design was employed.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Participants</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Sixteen dialysis nurses were recruited through purposive sampling from three tertiary government hospitals in Indonesia.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Data were collected through in-depth interviews and analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis approach.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Three overarching themes emerged as facilitators: team collegiality, adequate equipment and clinical resources, and respect and remuneration, encompassing eight sub-themes. Four major themes were identified as barriers: limited specialised equipment; staffing constraints; patient barriers such as travel cost, cultural beliefs; and adherence to treatment and educational barriers, comprising ten sub-themes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study highlights the dual nature of facilitators and barriers influencing nursing practice in haemodialysis units. Understanding these factors is crucial for developing effective strategies to enhance workforce capacity, optimise resource allocation, and foster supportive work environments. Ultimately, addressing these barriers may improve both nurses' professional well-being and the quality of care provided to patients undergoing haemodialysis in Indonesia.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of renal care","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145989786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of Benson's Relaxation on Physical, Psychological, and Quality of Life Outcomes in Adults Receiving Hemodialysis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Benson放松对接受血液透析的成人生理、心理和生活质量的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1111/jorc.70043
Şefika Tuğba Yangöz, Zeynep Karakuş, Zeynep Özer
<div> <section> <h3> Background</h3> <p>Adults receiving hemodialysis experience many problems. Benson's relaxation technique has been used to manage these problems, but evidence of its effectiveness is limited.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Objectives</h3> <p>To assess Benson's relaxation effects on physical, psychological outcomes, and quality of life in adults receiving hemodialysis.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Design</h3> <p>Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022379551).</p> </section> <section> <h3> Participants</h3> <p>Adults receiving hemodialysis.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Measurements</h3> <p>Eleven databases were searched through January 18, 2024, and updated January 10, 2025. Eligible RCTs involved adults on hemodialysis for at least 3 months, comparing Benson's relaxation with routine care or other interventions. Primary outcomes included physical measures, quality of life, and psychological outcomes; secondary outcomes were narratively reported. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB 2.0, and evidence certainty with GRADE. Random-effects meta-analysis and sensitivity analyses used Comprehensive Meta-Analysis v3.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>Fourteen trials with 1,104 participants provided low-certainty evidence for small effects on serum phosphate (Hedges' <i>g</i> = 0.39, <i>p</i> = 0.010) and large effects on pain (Hedges' <i>g</i> = 1.21, <i>p</i> = 0.010). Very-low-certainty evidence found moderate effects on quality of life (Hedges' <i>g</i> = 0.65, <i>p</i> = 0.010) and large effects on stress (Hedges' <i>g</i> = 1.58, <i>p</i> = 0.017). High-certainty evidence showed small effects on anxiety (Hedges' <i>g</i> = 0.45, <i>p</i> = 0.001). No significant effects were observed for serum calcium or depression symptoms. Sensitivity analyses showed variable robustness. Secondary outcomes were reported narratively.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Conclusions</h3> <p>Overall, current evidence supports cautious clinical interpretation and highlights the need for further rigorous, adequately powered randomized controlled trials.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Study Registration</h3> <p>This study is registered in PROSPERO (Registration Number: CRD42022379551, registered on December 8, 2022).</p> </section>
背景:接受血液透析的成年人会遇到许多问题。本森的放松技术已被用于处理这些问题,但其有效性的证据有限。目的:评估Benson放松对接受血液透析的成人的生理、心理结果和生活质量的影响。设计:系统评价和荟萃分析在PROSPERO注册的随机对照试验(CRD42022379551)。参与者:接受血液透析的成年人。测量:在2024年1月18日之前搜索了11个数据库,并于2025年1月10日更新。符合条件的随机对照试验包括接受血液透析至少3个月的成年人,将Benson放松疗法与常规护理或其他干预措施进行比较。主要结局包括身体测量、生活质量和心理结局;次要结果叙述性报道。用Cochrane RoB 2.0评估偏倚风险,用GRADE评估证据确定性。随机效应荟萃分析和敏感性分析采用综合荟萃分析v3。结果:涉及1104名受试者的14项试验提供了低确定性证据,证明对血清磷酸盐的影响很小(Hedges' g = 0.39, p = 0.010),对疼痛的影响很大(Hedges' g = 1.21, p = 0.010)。非常低确定性的证据发现,对生活质量的影响中等(Hedges的g = 0.65, p = 0.010),对压力的影响很大(Hedges的g = 1.58, p = 0.017)。高确定性证据显示对焦虑的影响很小(Hedges的g = 0.45, p = 0.001)。血清钙或抑郁症状未见明显影响。敏感性分析显示了可变稳健性。次要结果以叙述方式报道。结论:总的来说,目前的证据支持谨慎的临床解释,并强调需要进一步严格、充分有力的随机对照试验。研究注册:本研究在PROSPERO注册(注册号:CRD42022379551,于2022年12月8日注册)。
{"title":"Effect of Benson's Relaxation on Physical, Psychological, and Quality of Life Outcomes in Adults Receiving Hemodialysis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Şefika Tuğba Yangöz,&nbsp;Zeynep Karakuş,&nbsp;Zeynep Özer","doi":"10.1111/jorc.70043","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jorc.70043","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Background&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Adults receiving hemodialysis experience many problems. Benson's relaxation technique has been used to manage these problems, but evidence of its effectiveness is limited.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Objectives&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;To assess Benson's relaxation effects on physical, psychological outcomes, and quality of life in adults receiving hemodialysis.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Design&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022379551).&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Participants&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Adults receiving hemodialysis.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Measurements&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Eleven databases were searched through January 18, 2024, and updated January 10, 2025. Eligible RCTs involved adults on hemodialysis for at least 3 months, comparing Benson's relaxation with routine care or other interventions. Primary outcomes included physical measures, quality of life, and psychological outcomes; secondary outcomes were narratively reported. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB 2.0, and evidence certainty with GRADE. Random-effects meta-analysis and sensitivity analyses used Comprehensive Meta-Analysis v3.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Fourteen trials with 1,104 participants provided low-certainty evidence for small effects on serum phosphate (Hedges' &lt;i&gt;g&lt;/i&gt; = 0.39, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.010) and large effects on pain (Hedges' &lt;i&gt;g&lt;/i&gt; = 1.21, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.010). Very-low-certainty evidence found moderate effects on quality of life (Hedges' &lt;i&gt;g&lt;/i&gt; = 0.65, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.010) and large effects on stress (Hedges' &lt;i&gt;g&lt;/i&gt; = 1.58, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.017). High-certainty evidence showed small effects on anxiety (Hedges' &lt;i&gt;g&lt;/i&gt; = 0.45, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.001). No significant effects were observed for serum calcium or depression symptoms. Sensitivity analyses showed variable robustness. Secondary outcomes were reported narratively.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Overall, current evidence supports cautious clinical interpretation and highlights the need for further rigorous, adequately powered randomized controlled trials.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Study Registration&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This study is registered in PROSPERO (Registration Number: CRD42022379551, registered on December 8, 2022).&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 ","PeriodicalId":16947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of renal care","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145971075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Issue Information: Journal of Renal Care 1/2026 期刊信息:Journal of Renal Care 1/2026
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-30 DOI: 10.1111/jorc.70042
{"title":"Issue Information: Journal of Renal Care 1/2026","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/jorc.70042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jorc.70042","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of renal care","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jorc.70042","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145891563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Association Between Fear of Falling and Physical Activity in Haemodialysis Patients 血液透析患者对跌倒的恐惧与身体活动的关系
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-30 DOI: 10.1111/jorc.70041
Sevda Tüzün Özdemir, Asiye Akyol, Şengül Özdemir, Ahmet Aykut Sifil

Background

Fear of falling is a common concern among patients undergoing haemodialysis, leading to decreased physical activity, increased dependency, and reduced quality of life. Despite its relevance, the impact of this fear on physical activity in this population remains underexplored.

Objective

To examine the association between fear of falling and physical activity levels in patients receiving haemodialysis.

Design

A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted between 20 October and 20 November 2023, at a private dialysis center in Turkey.

Participants

The study included 103 haemodialysis patients aged 18 years or older who were literate, fluent in Turkish, and voluntarily agreed to participate. The sample size was calculated using G*Power software, and post hoc analysis showed the study had 94% power.

Measurements

Data were collected using the Patient Information Form, the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF). Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed, including Mann–Whitney U, Kruskal–Wallis H, and Spearman's correlation tests.

Results

The mean age of participants was 65.1 ± 13.5 years. A history of falling was reported by 43.7%, and 67% reported fear of falling. A moderate positive correlation was found between fall history and FES-I scores (r = 0.369, p < 0.01), while a moderate negative correlation was observed between FES-I and IPAQ-SF scores (r = −0.491, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Fear of falling negatively affects physical activity in haemodialysis patients. Interventions aimed at reducing fall-related fear and enhancing psychological support may promote more active lifestyles and improve overall well-being in this population.

背景:害怕跌倒是接受血液透析的患者普遍担心的问题,导致身体活动减少,依赖性增加,生活质量下降。尽管存在相关性,但这种恐惧对这一人群身体活动的影响仍未得到充分探讨。目的:探讨血液透析患者对跌倒的恐惧与身体活动水平的关系。设计:在2023年10月20日至11月20日期间,在土耳其的一家私人透析中心进行了一项描述性横断面研究。参与者:该研究包括103名18岁或以上的血液透析患者,他们识字,土耳其语流利,并自愿同意参加。使用G*Power软件计算样本量,事后分析显示该研究的有效性为94%。测量方法:使用患者信息表、国际跌倒功效量表(FES-I)和国际体育活动问卷-短表(IPAQ-SF)收集数据。进行了描述性和推断性分析,包括Mann-Whitney U、Kruskal-Wallis H和Spearman相关检验。结果:参与者平均年龄为65.1±13.5岁。有跌倒史的占43.7%,有跌倒恐惧的占67%。跌倒史与FES-I评分呈中度正相关(r = 0.369, p)。结论:对跌倒的恐惧对血液透析患者的体力活动有负面影响。旨在减少与跌倒有关的恐惧和加强心理支持的干预措施可能会促进更积极的生活方式,并改善这一人群的整体健康状况。
{"title":"The Association Between Fear of Falling and Physical Activity in Haemodialysis Patients","authors":"Sevda Tüzün Özdemir,&nbsp;Asiye Akyol,&nbsp;Şengül Özdemir,&nbsp;Ahmet Aykut Sifil","doi":"10.1111/jorc.70041","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jorc.70041","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Fear of falling is a common concern among patients undergoing haemodialysis, leading to decreased physical activity, increased dependency, and reduced quality of life. Despite its relevance, the impact of this fear on physical activity in this population remains underexplored.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To examine the association between fear of falling and physical activity levels in patients receiving haemodialysis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Design</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted between 20 October and 20 November 2023, at a private dialysis center in Turkey.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Participants</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The study included 103 haemodialysis patients aged 18 years or older who were literate, fluent in Turkish, and voluntarily agreed to participate. The sample size was calculated using G*Power software, and post hoc analysis showed the study had 94% power.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Measurements</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Data were collected using the Patient Information Form, the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF). Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed, including Mann–Whitney <i>U</i>, Kruskal–Wallis <i>H</i>, and Spearman's correlation tests.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The mean age of participants was 65.1 ± 13.5 years. A history of falling was reported by 43.7%, and 67% reported fear of falling. A moderate positive correlation was found between fall history and FES-I scores (<i>r</i> = 0.369, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), while a moderate negative correlation was observed between FES-I and IPAQ-SF scores (<i>r</i> = −0.491, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Fear of falling negatively affects physical activity in haemodialysis patients. Interventions aimed at reducing fall-related fear and enhancing psychological support may promote more active lifestyles and improve overall well-being in this population.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of renal care","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145856637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Global Prevalence and Risk Factors of Constipation Among Patients Receiving Haemodialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 血液透析患者便秘的全球患病率和危险因素:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-22 DOI: 10.1111/jorc.70040
Nga Thi Thuy Nguyen, Nuzul Sri Hertanti, Yeu-Hui Chuang

Background

Constipation significantly affects the quality of life and health outcomes of patients undergoing haemodialysis. Despite its common occurrence in this population, there is a lack of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the prevalence of constipation among patients receiving haemodialysis.

Objectives

To determine the global prevalence and risk factors of constipation among patients receiving haemodialysis.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines.

Participants

Adult patients undergoing haemodialysis.

Methods

A comprehensive search strategy was conducted across PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Medline to identify relevant articles. A random-effects model was used with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity, meta-regression, moderators, and publication bias were also analysed. The methodological quality was assessed according to Hoy's guidelines and the Risk of Bias tool 2.0. Risk factors were determined based on odds ratios, along with 95% confidence intervals or p-values.

Results

Twenty-two studies involving 4963 patients receiving haemodialysis were included. The pooled prevalence of constipation among patients with haemodialysis was 42.2%. The Asian region reported a significantly higher proportion of constipation than other regions. No publication bias was identified using Egger's test. The Rome criteria were mostly used among the included studies. Significant risk factors for constipation were diabetes and low levels of physical activity.

Conclusion

Constipation is prevalent among patients with haemodialysis, affecting nearly half of this population, particularly in Asia. The Rome criteria were the predominant method used for diagnosing constipation. Diabetes and limited physical activity were significant risk factors for constipation. The findings emphasise the importance of healthcare professionals conducting regular screening and designing tailored interventions to effectively manage constipation in this population.

背景:便秘显著影响血液透析患者的生活质量和健康结局。尽管便秘在这一人群中很常见,但缺乏对血液透析患者中便秘患病率的系统综述和荟萃分析。目的:了解血液透析患者便秘的全球患病率及危险因素。设计:遵循PRISMA指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。参与者:接受血液透析的成年患者。方法:在PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science和Medline上进行综合搜索策略,以确定相关文章。采用随机效应模型,置信区间为95%。异质性、元回归、调节因子和发表偏倚也进行了分析。方法学质量根据Hoy指南和风险偏倚工具2.0进行评估。根据比值比、95%置信区间或p值确定危险因素。结果:纳入22项研究,涉及4963例接受血液透析的患者。血液透析患者中便秘的总患病率为42.2%。亚洲地区报告的便秘比例明显高于其他地区。Egger检验未发现发表偏倚。纳入的研究大多采用Rome标准。便秘的重要危险因素是糖尿病和低水平的体育活动。结论:便秘在血液透析患者中很普遍,影响了近一半的患者,特别是在亚洲。罗马标准是诊断便秘的主要方法。糖尿病和有限的体力活动是便秘的重要危险因素。研究结果强调了卫生保健专业人员进行定期筛查和设计量身定制的干预措施以有效管理这一人群便秘的重要性。
{"title":"Global Prevalence and Risk Factors of Constipation Among Patients Receiving Haemodialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Nga Thi Thuy Nguyen,&nbsp;Nuzul Sri Hertanti,&nbsp;Yeu-Hui Chuang","doi":"10.1111/jorc.70040","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jorc.70040","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Constipation significantly affects the quality of life and health outcomes of patients undergoing haemodialysis. Despite its common occurrence in this population, there is a lack of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the prevalence of constipation among patients receiving haemodialysis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To determine the global prevalence and risk factors of constipation among patients receiving haemodialysis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Design</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Participants</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Adult patients undergoing haemodialysis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A comprehensive search strategy was conducted across PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Medline to identify relevant articles. A random-effects model was used with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity, meta-regression, moderators, and publication bias were also analysed. The methodological quality was assessed according to Hoy's guidelines and the Risk of Bias tool 2.0. Risk factors were determined based on odds ratios, along with 95% confidence intervals or <i>p</i>-values.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Twenty-two studies involving 4963 patients receiving haemodialysis were included. The pooled prevalence of constipation among patients with haemodialysis was 42.2%. The Asian region reported a significantly higher proportion of constipation than other regions. No publication bias was identified using Egger's test. The Rome criteria were mostly used among the included studies. Significant risk factors for constipation were diabetes and low levels of physical activity.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Constipation is prevalent among patients with haemodialysis, affecting nearly half of this population, particularly in Asia. The Rome criteria were the predominant method used for diagnosing constipation. Diabetes and limited physical activity were significant risk factors for constipation. The findings emphasise the importance of healthcare professionals conducting regular screening and designing tailored interventions to effectively manage constipation in this population.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of renal care","volume":"51 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145804731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lifestyle Interventions, Markers of Metabolic Syndrome and Quality of Life in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 肾移植受者生活方式干预、代谢综合征标志物和生活质量:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI: 10.1111/jorc.70038
Ashley Darvell, Annaliese Pretty, Kelly Lambert, Elizabeth P. Neale

Background

Kidney transplantation reduces mortality in patients with kidney failure; however, recipients often experience post-transplant complications, such as weight gain, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and new-onset diabetes mellitus.

Objectives

To examine the impact of lifestyle interventions (diet, exercise and behavioural) on markers of metabolic syndrome and quality of life (QoL) in kidney transplant recipients.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials assessing the effect of lifestyle interventions on metabolic outcomes (body weight, lipid levels, HbA1c, fasting glucose, blood pressure, albuminuria, proteinuria and C-reactive protein), and QoL in kidney transplant recipients. A systematic search until 27 June 2025 was conducted. Data were synthesised using random-effects meta-analyses, and QoL data were synthesised using a narrative synthesis approach.

Results

A total of 35 studies were included: 13 (37%) of which were exercise interventions, 11 (31%) diet, 2 (6%) behavioural and 9 (26%) were multi-component interventions. Lifestyle intervention resulted in significant reductions in body fat (weighted mean difference: −1.190 kg [95% CI: −2.088 to −0.291]) and significant increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (0.094 mmol/L [95% CI: 0.013, 0.175]), with no other significant changes found. Narrative synthesis found improvements in QoL following lifestyle intervention. Certainty of the body of evidence (assessed using GRADE) ranged from moderate to very low.

Conclusion

Lifestyle intervention was found to lead to improvements in body fat (kg), HDL cholesterol and QoL. While these findings suggest some potential benefits of lifestyle intervention, additional research is needed across a range of lifestyle interventions.

背景:肾移植可降低肾衰竭患者的死亡率;然而,受者经常会出现移植后并发症,如体重增加、高血压、血脂异常和新发糖尿病。目的:探讨生活方式干预(饮食、运动和行为)对肾移植受者代谢综合征标志物和生活质量(QoL)的影响。设计:系统回顾和荟萃分析。方法:符合条件的研究是随机对照试验,评估生活方式干预对肾移植受者代谢结局(体重、脂质水平、糖化血红蛋白、空腹血糖、血压、蛋白尿、蛋白尿和c反应蛋白)和生活质量的影响。在2025年6月27日之前进行了系统搜索。数据采用随机效应荟萃分析综合,生活质量数据采用叙事综合方法综合。结果:共纳入35项研究,其中运动干预13项(37%),饮食干预11项(31%),行为干预2项(6%),多组分干预9项(26%)。生活方式干预导致体脂显著降低(加权平均差:-1.190 kg [95% CI: -2.088至-0.291]),高密度脂蛋白胆固醇显著升高(0.094 mmol/L [95% CI: 0.013, 0.175]),未发现其他显著变化。叙事综合发现生活方式干预后生活质量有所改善。证据体的确定性(使用GRADE评估)范围从中等到极低。结论:生活方式干预可改善体脂(kg)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和生活质量。虽然这些发现表明生活方式干预有一些潜在的好处,但需要对一系列生活方式干预进行进一步的研究。
{"title":"Lifestyle Interventions, Markers of Metabolic Syndrome and Quality of Life in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Ashley Darvell,&nbsp;Annaliese Pretty,&nbsp;Kelly Lambert,&nbsp;Elizabeth P. Neale","doi":"10.1111/jorc.70038","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jorc.70038","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Kidney transplantation reduces mortality in patients with kidney failure; however, recipients often experience post-transplant complications, such as weight gain, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and new-onset diabetes mellitus.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To examine the impact of lifestyle interventions (diet, exercise and behavioural) on markers of metabolic syndrome and quality of life (QoL) in kidney transplant recipients.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Design</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials assessing the effect of lifestyle interventions on metabolic outcomes (body weight, lipid levels, HbA1c, fasting glucose, blood pressure, albuminuria, proteinuria and C-reactive protein), and QoL in kidney transplant recipients. A systematic search until 27 June 2025 was conducted. Data were synthesised using random-effects meta-analyses, and QoL data were synthesised using a narrative synthesis approach.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A total of 35 studies were included: 13 (37%) of which were exercise interventions, 11 (31%) diet, 2 (6%) behavioural and 9 (26%) were multi-component interventions. Lifestyle intervention resulted in significant reductions in body fat (weighted mean difference: −1.190 kg [95% CI: −2.088 to −0.291]) and significant increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (0.094 mmol/L [95% CI: 0.013, 0.175]), with no other significant changes found. Narrative synthesis found improvements in QoL following lifestyle intervention. Certainty of the body of evidence (assessed using GRADE) ranged from moderate to very low.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Lifestyle intervention was found to lead to improvements in body fat (kg), HDL cholesterol and QoL. While these findings suggest some potential benefits of lifestyle intervention, additional research is needed across a range of lifestyle interventions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of renal care","volume":"51 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145768526","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Vaccination Uptake and Patient Perceptions Among Haemodialysis Patients: Insights From a Cross-Sectional Study 血液透析患者的疫苗接种和患者认知:来自横断面研究的见解。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI: 10.1111/jorc.70039
Eirini Potamianou, Ioanna Dimitriadou, Maria Saridi, Aikaterini Toska, Evangelos C. Fradelos, Paraskevi Theofilou, Dimitrios Papagiannis

Background

Haemodialysis patients face an elevated risk of infectious diseases due to immunosuppression and frequent exposure to healthcare settings. Vaccination is a critical preventive strategy for this population; however, coverage remains inconsistent across different vaccines.

Objective

To evaluate vaccine coverage and perceptions among patients undergoing haemodialysis in Greece and identify factors influencing uptake.

Design

This was a cross-sectional study employing a structured, interviewer-administered questionnaire.

Participants

The study included 201 adult patients undergoing maintenance haemodialysis at selected dialysis centres in Greece.

Measurements

Data collected included demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and self-reported vaccination status for influenza, pneumococcal, meningococcal B, and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccines. Attitudes toward vaccination were assessed using Likert scale items. Statistical analyses involved linear regression, ANOVA, and Pearson's correlation tests.

Results

Vaccination rates were highest for influenza (88.6%) and pneumococcal vaccines (85.1%), while coverage for meningococcal B (25.4%) and Hib (16.9%) was low. Key barriers to vaccination included a perceived low risk of infection, lack of physician recommendations, and inadequate awareness. Age and higher educational attainment were significantly associated with greater vaccine uptake (p < 0.05). A weak but statistically significant correlation (r = .163–0.341) was observed between positive perceptions of vaccines and actual vaccination behaviour.

Conclusion

Although the uptake of some vaccines was high, the coverage of others remained suboptimal. Addressing knowledge gaps and increasing physician-driven recommendations may improve vaccine acceptance among the haemodialysis population.

背景:血液透析患者由于免疫抑制和频繁暴露于医疗机构而面临传染病风险升高。疫苗接种是这一人群的重要预防策略;然而,不同疫苗的覆盖率仍然不一致。目的:评估希腊血液透析患者的疫苗覆盖率和认知,并确定影响接种的因素。设计:这是一项横断面研究,采用结构化的访谈问卷。参与者:该研究包括201名在希腊选定的透析中心接受维持性血液透析的成年患者。测量:收集的数据包括人口统计学特征、合并症和自我报告的流感、肺炎球菌、脑膜炎球菌B和B型流感嗜血杆菌(Hib)疫苗接种情况。使用李克特量表项目评估对疫苗接种的态度。统计分析包括线性回归、方差分析和Pearson相关检验。结果:流感疫苗接种率最高(88.6%),肺炎球菌疫苗接种率最高(85.1%),乙型脑膜炎球菌疫苗接种率较低(25.4%),Hib疫苗接种率较低(16.9%)。接种疫苗的主要障碍包括认为感染风险低、缺乏医生建议和认识不足。年龄和较高的受教育程度与较高的疫苗接种率显著相关(p结论:尽管某些疫苗的接种率很高,但其他疫苗的覆盖率仍不理想。解决知识差距和增加医生驱动的建议可能会提高血液透析人群对疫苗的接受程度。
{"title":"Vaccination Uptake and Patient Perceptions Among Haemodialysis Patients: Insights From a Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Eirini Potamianou,&nbsp;Ioanna Dimitriadou,&nbsp;Maria Saridi,&nbsp;Aikaterini Toska,&nbsp;Evangelos C. Fradelos,&nbsp;Paraskevi Theofilou,&nbsp;Dimitrios Papagiannis","doi":"10.1111/jorc.70039","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jorc.70039","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Haemodialysis patients face an elevated risk of infectious diseases due to immunosuppression and frequent exposure to healthcare settings. Vaccination is a critical preventive strategy for this population; however, coverage remains inconsistent across different vaccines.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To evaluate vaccine coverage and perceptions among patients undergoing haemodialysis in Greece and identify factors influencing uptake.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Design</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This was a cross-sectional study employing a structured, interviewer-administered questionnaire.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Participants</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The study included 201 adult patients undergoing maintenance haemodialysis at selected dialysis centres in Greece.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Measurements</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Data collected included demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and self-reported vaccination status for influenza, pneumococcal, meningococcal B, and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccines. Attitudes toward vaccination were assessed using Likert scale items. Statistical analyses involved linear regression, ANOVA, and Pearson's correlation tests.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Vaccination rates were highest for influenza (88.6%) and pneumococcal vaccines (85.1%), while coverage for meningococcal B (25.4%) and Hib (16.9%) was low. Key barriers to vaccination included a perceived low risk of infection, lack of physician recommendations, and inadequate awareness. Age and higher educational attainment were significantly associated with greater vaccine uptake (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). A weak but statistically significant correlation (<i>r</i> = .163–0.341) was observed between positive perceptions of vaccines and actual vaccination behaviour.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Although the uptake of some vaccines was high, the coverage of others remained suboptimal. Addressing knowledge gaps and increasing physician-driven recommendations may improve vaccine acceptance among the haemodialysis population.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of renal care","volume":"51 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12710131/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145768437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Investigating Perceptions of Quality Nephrology Nurse Training 对优质肾脏病护士培训的认知调查。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-11 DOI: 10.1111/jorc.70037
Kathy Hill, Anne Britton, Dana Cotton

Background

Nephrology nursing shortages are becoming a critical problem in South Australian renal units due to increasing caseloads and high levels of attrition.

Purpose

We sought to explore this issue from the perspective of renal unit nurse managers, nephrology nurse educators, and nursing staff working within haemodialysis units, home therapies and a renal ward.

Methods

A qualitative approach was taken through individual interviews and several focus groups to allow an open exploration of the current workforce challenges and the aspects of nephrology nurse training that needed to be improved.

Participants

Thirty-three nephrology nurses drawn from four health services participated in a face-to-face interview or a focus group with several others.

Results

Staff shortages are described as chronic, and the problem starts with the undergraduate training programme and limited clinical exposure. This is compounded by employment of nurses with no post graduate qualification and limited desire to study for one. Nephrology nursing is now a buyers’ market with staff attracted to units with no night shift and the simplicity of haemodialysis therapies. This is creating technicians not knowledgeable renal nurses.

Conclusion

To address staff shortages renal units need to consider the reintroduction of clinical rotations and incentives to complete post graduate training.

背景:肾脏病护理短缺正在成为一个关键问题,在南澳大利亚肾单位由于增加的病例负荷和高水平的损耗率。目的:我们试图从肾科护士管理人员、肾脏病护士教育工作者和血液透析病房、家庭治疗和肾科病房的护理人员的角度探讨这一问题。方法:通过个人访谈和几个焦点小组,采用定性方法,对当前的劳动力挑战和需要改进的肾脏病护士培训方面进行开放探索。参与者:从四个卫生服务机构抽取的33名肾病科护士参加了面对面访谈或与其他几个人的焦点小组。结果:人员短缺被描述为慢性的,问题始于本科培训计划和有限的临床暴露。这种情况由于雇用没有研究生资格的护士和有限的学习意愿而变得更加复杂。肾脏护理现在是一个买方市场,工作人员被没有夜班和血液透析治疗简单的单位所吸引。这造就了技术人员,而不是知识渊博的肾脏护士。结论:为了解决人员短缺的问题,肾脏单位需要考虑重新引入临床轮转和激励完成研究生培训。
{"title":"Investigating Perceptions of Quality Nephrology Nurse Training","authors":"Kathy Hill,&nbsp;Anne Britton,&nbsp;Dana Cotton","doi":"10.1111/jorc.70037","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jorc.70037","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Nephrology nursing shortages are becoming a critical problem in South Australian renal units due to increasing caseloads and high levels of attrition.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We sought to explore this issue from the perspective of renal unit nurse managers, nephrology nurse educators, and nursing staff working within haemodialysis units, home therapies and a renal ward.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A qualitative approach was taken through individual interviews and several focus groups to allow an open exploration of the current workforce challenges and the aspects of nephrology nurse training that needed to be improved.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Participants</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Thirty-three nephrology nurses drawn from four health services participated in a face-to-face interview or a focus group with several others.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Staff shortages are described as chronic, and the problem starts with the undergraduate training programme and limited clinical exposure. This is compounded by employment of nurses with no post graduate qualification and limited desire to study for one. Nephrology nursing is now a buyers’ market with staff attracted to units with no night shift and the simplicity of haemodialysis therapies. This is creating technicians not knowledgeable renal nurses.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To address staff shortages renal units need to consider the reintroduction of clinical rotations and incentives to complete post graduate training.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of renal care","volume":"51 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145724066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of renal care
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1