Diane E Mack, Daniel Anzovino, Malcolm Sanderson, Raffy Dotan, Bareket Falk
{"title":"青少年肌肉强化干预的不良事件报告:一项系统综述。","authors":"Diane E Mack, Daniel Anzovino, Malcolm Sanderson, Raffy Dotan, Bareket Falk","doi":"10.1123/pes.2021-0145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clear definition, identification, and reporting of adverse event (AE) monitoring during training interventions are essential for decision making regarding the safety of training and testing in youths.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To document the extent to which AEs, resulting from intervention studies targeting muscle strengthening training (MST) in youth, are reported by researchers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases (CINAHL, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science) were searched for English peer-reviewed articles published before April 2018. Inclusion criteria were: (1) average age <16 years, (2) use of MST, (3) statement(s) linked to the presence/absence of AEs, and (4) randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental designs. Risk of reporting bias for AEs followed recommendations by the Cochrane Collaboration group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and ninety-one full-text articles were screened. One hundred and thirty met all MST criteria, out of which only 44 (33.8%; n = 1278, age = 12.1 [1.1] y) included a statement as to the presence/absence of adverse events. The 86 other studies (66.2%) included no such statement. Of the reporting 44 studies, 18 (40.1%) indicated one or more adverse events. Of the 93 reported adverse events, 55 (59.1%) were linked to training or testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most MST studies in youth do not report presence/absence of adverse events, and when reported, adverse events are not well defined.</p>","PeriodicalId":49712,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Exercise Science","volume":"35 3","pages":"127-143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reporting of Adverse Events in Muscle Strengthening Interventions in Youth: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Diane E Mack, Daniel Anzovino, Malcolm Sanderson, Raffy Dotan, Bareket Falk\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/pes.2021-0145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Clear definition, identification, and reporting of adverse event (AE) monitoring during training interventions are essential for decision making regarding the safety of training and testing in youths.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To document the extent to which AEs, resulting from intervention studies targeting muscle strengthening training (MST) in youth, are reported by researchers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases (CINAHL, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science) were searched for English peer-reviewed articles published before April 2018. Inclusion criteria were: (1) average age <16 years, (2) use of MST, (3) statement(s) linked to the presence/absence of AEs, and (4) randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental designs. Risk of reporting bias for AEs followed recommendations by the Cochrane Collaboration group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and ninety-one full-text articles were screened. One hundred and thirty met all MST criteria, out of which only 44 (33.8%; n = 1278, age = 12.1 [1.1] y) included a statement as to the presence/absence of adverse events. The 86 other studies (66.2%) included no such statement. Of the reporting 44 studies, 18 (40.1%) indicated one or more adverse events. Of the 93 reported adverse events, 55 (59.1%) were linked to training or testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most MST studies in youth do not report presence/absence of adverse events, and when reported, adverse events are not well defined.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49712,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Exercise Science\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"127-143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Exercise Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2021-0145\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Exercise Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2021-0145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在培训干预期间,对不良事件(AE)监测的明确定义、识别和报告对于青少年培训和检测的安全性决策至关重要。目的:研究人员报道了针对青少年肌肉强化训练(MST)的干预研究导致的ae的程度。方法:检索2018年4月前发表的英文同行评议文章的电子数据库(CINAHL、PubMed、SPORTDiscus和Web of Science)。纳入标准为:(1)平均年龄。结果:筛选了191篇全文文章。130家企业符合全部MST标准,其中只有44家(33.8%;N = 1278,年龄= 12.1 [1.1]y)包括关于是否存在不良事件的陈述。其他86项研究(66.2%)未包含此类声明。在报告的44项研究中,18项(40.1%)指出了一个或多个不良事件。在93例报告的不良事件中,55例(59.1%)与培训或检测有关。结论:大多数青少年MST研究没有报告不良事件的存在/不存在,即使报告了,不良事件也没有很好的定义。
Reporting of Adverse Events in Muscle Strengthening Interventions in Youth: A Systematic Review.
Clear definition, identification, and reporting of adverse event (AE) monitoring during training interventions are essential for decision making regarding the safety of training and testing in youths.
Purpose: To document the extent to which AEs, resulting from intervention studies targeting muscle strengthening training (MST) in youth, are reported by researchers.
Methods: Electronic databases (CINAHL, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science) were searched for English peer-reviewed articles published before April 2018. Inclusion criteria were: (1) average age <16 years, (2) use of MST, (3) statement(s) linked to the presence/absence of AEs, and (4) randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental designs. Risk of reporting bias for AEs followed recommendations by the Cochrane Collaboration group.
Results: One hundred and ninety-one full-text articles were screened. One hundred and thirty met all MST criteria, out of which only 44 (33.8%; n = 1278, age = 12.1 [1.1] y) included a statement as to the presence/absence of adverse events. The 86 other studies (66.2%) included no such statement. Of the reporting 44 studies, 18 (40.1%) indicated one or more adverse events. Of the 93 reported adverse events, 55 (59.1%) were linked to training or testing.
Conclusions: Most MST studies in youth do not report presence/absence of adverse events, and when reported, adverse events are not well defined.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Exercise Science is a journal committed to enriching the scientific knowledge of exercise during childhood and adolescence. To this end it publishes information that contributes to an understanding of (a) the unique aspects of the physiologic, physical, biochemical, and psychologic responses of children to exercise, (b) the role of exercise in the treatment of pediatric chronic diseases, (c) the importance of physical activity in the prevention of illness and preservation of wellness, and (d) the means by which participation in sports may be made safer and more enjoyable for children and youth. Consideration will be given for publication of work by various methodologies consistent with the scientific approach.
Besides original research, the journal includes review articles, abstracts from other journals, book reviews, and editorial comments. Pediatric Exercise Science encourages the expression of conflicting opinions regarding children and exercise by providing a forum for alternative viewpoints. At the same time it serves as a means of accumulating a base of research information that will allow application of experimental data to clinical practice. The scientific disciplines contributing to this body of knowledge are diverse. Therefore it is the purpose of this journal to provide a common focus for disseminating advances in the science of exercise during childhood. In doing so, the journal allows the opportunity for cross-fertilization of ideas between disciplines that will potentiate the growth of knowledge in this field. Pediatric Exercise Science seeks to stimulate new ideas regarding exercise in children and to increase the awareness of scientists, health care providers, and physical educators of the importance of exercise during childhood.