不同人群中儿科和产前外显子组测序的诊断率。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY NPJ Genomic Medicine Pub Date : 2023-05-26 DOI:10.1038/s41525-023-00353-0
Anne Slavotinek, Shannon Rego, Nuriye Sahin-Hodoglugil, Mark Kvale, Billie Lianoglou, Tiffany Yip, Hannah Hoban, Simon Outram, Beatrice Anguiano, Flavia Chen, Jeremy Michelson, Roberta M Cilio, Cynthia Curry, Renata C Gallagher, Marisa Gardner, Rachel Kuperman, Bryce Mendelsohn, Elliott Sherr, Joseph Shieh, Jonathan Strober, Allison Tam, Jessica Tenney, William Weiss, Amy Whittle, Garrett Chin, Amanda Faubel, Hannah Prasad, Yusuph Mavura, Jessica Van Ziffle, W Patrick Devine, Ugur Hodoglugil, Pierre-Marie Martin, Teresa N Sparks, Barbara Koenig, Sara Ackerman, Neil Risch, Pui-Yan Kwok, Mary E Norton
{"title":"不同人群中儿科和产前外显子组测序的诊断率。","authors":"Anne Slavotinek, Shannon Rego, Nuriye Sahin-Hodoglugil, Mark Kvale, Billie Lianoglou, Tiffany Yip, Hannah Hoban, Simon Outram, Beatrice Anguiano, Flavia Chen, Jeremy Michelson, Roberta M Cilio, Cynthia Curry, Renata C Gallagher, Marisa Gardner, Rachel Kuperman, Bryce Mendelsohn, Elliott Sherr, Joseph Shieh, Jonathan Strober, Allison Tam, Jessica Tenney, William Weiss, Amy Whittle, Garrett Chin, Amanda Faubel, Hannah Prasad, Yusuph Mavura, Jessica Van Ziffle, W Patrick Devine, Ugur Hodoglugil, Pierre-Marie Martin, Teresa N Sparks, Barbara Koenig, Sara Ackerman, Neil Risch, Pui-Yan Kwok, Mary E Norton","doi":"10.1038/s41525-023-00353-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) has primarily been evaluated in individuals of European ancestry, with less focus on underrepresented minority (URM) and underserved (US) patients. We evaluated the diagnostic yield of ES in a cohort of predominantly US and URM pediatric and prenatal patients suspected to have a genetic disorder. Eligible pediatric patients had multiple congenital anomalies and/or neurocognitive disabilities and prenatal patients had one or more structural anomalies, disorders of fetal growth, or fetal effusions. URM and US patients were prioritized for enrollment and underwent ES at a single academic center. We identified definitive positive or probable positive results in 201/845 (23.8%) patients, with a significantly higher diagnostic rate in pediatric (26.7%) compared to prenatal patients (19.0%) (P = 0.01). For both pediatric and prenatal patients, the diagnostic yield and frequency of inconclusive findings did not differ significantly between URM and non-URM patients or between patients with US status and those without US status. Our results demonstrate a similar diagnostic yield of ES between prenatal and pediatric URM/US patients and non-URM/US patients for positive and inconclusive results. These data support the use of ES to identify clinically relevant variants in patients from diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19273,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Genomic Medicine","volume":"8 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220040/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic yield of pediatric and prenatal exome sequencing in a diverse population.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Slavotinek, Shannon Rego, Nuriye Sahin-Hodoglugil, Mark Kvale, Billie Lianoglou, Tiffany Yip, Hannah Hoban, Simon Outram, Beatrice Anguiano, Flavia Chen, Jeremy Michelson, Roberta M Cilio, Cynthia Curry, Renata C Gallagher, Marisa Gardner, Rachel Kuperman, Bryce Mendelsohn, Elliott Sherr, Joseph Shieh, Jonathan Strober, Allison Tam, Jessica Tenney, William Weiss, Amy Whittle, Garrett Chin, Amanda Faubel, Hannah Prasad, Yusuph Mavura, Jessica Van Ziffle, W Patrick Devine, Ugur Hodoglugil, Pierre-Marie Martin, Teresa N Sparks, Barbara Koenig, Sara Ackerman, Neil Risch, Pui-Yan Kwok, Mary E Norton\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41525-023-00353-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) has primarily been evaluated in individuals of European ancestry, with less focus on underrepresented minority (URM) and underserved (US) patients. We evaluated the diagnostic yield of ES in a cohort of predominantly US and URM pediatric and prenatal patients suspected to have a genetic disorder. Eligible pediatric patients had multiple congenital anomalies and/or neurocognitive disabilities and prenatal patients had one or more structural anomalies, disorders of fetal growth, or fetal effusions. URM and US patients were prioritized for enrollment and underwent ES at a single academic center. We identified definitive positive or probable positive results in 201/845 (23.8%) patients, with a significantly higher diagnostic rate in pediatric (26.7%) compared to prenatal patients (19.0%) (P = 0.01). For both pediatric and prenatal patients, the diagnostic yield and frequency of inconclusive findings did not differ significantly between URM and non-URM patients or between patients with US status and those without US status. Our results demonstrate a similar diagnostic yield of ES between prenatal and pediatric URM/US patients and non-URM/US patients for positive and inconclusive results. These data support the use of ES to identify clinically relevant variants in patients from diverse populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Genomic Medicine\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220040/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Genomic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41525-023-00353-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Genomic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41525-023-00353-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

外显子组测序(ES)的诊断率主要在欧洲血统的个体中进行评估,较少关注代表性不足的少数民族(URM)和服务不足的(US)患者。我们在一个主要由美国和URM儿童和产前疑似遗传病患者组成的队列中评估了ES的诊断率。符合条件的儿科患者有多个先天性异常和/或神经认知障碍,产前患者有一个或多个结构异常、胎儿生长障碍或胎儿积液。URM和US患者被优先纳入,并在一个学术中心接受ES。我们在201/845例(23.8%)患者中确定了明确的阳性或可能的阳性结果,与产前患者(19.0%)相比,儿科患者(26.7%)的诊断率显著更高(P = 0.01)。对于儿科和产前患者,URM和非URM患者之间,或者有US状态的患者和没有US状态的病人之间,诊断结果和不确定结果的频率没有显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,对于阳性和不确定的结果,产前和儿科URM/US患者与非URM/US病例之间的ES诊断率相似。这些数据支持使用ES来识别不同人群患者的临床相关变异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic yield of pediatric and prenatal exome sequencing in a diverse population.

The diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) has primarily been evaluated in individuals of European ancestry, with less focus on underrepresented minority (URM) and underserved (US) patients. We evaluated the diagnostic yield of ES in a cohort of predominantly US and URM pediatric and prenatal patients suspected to have a genetic disorder. Eligible pediatric patients had multiple congenital anomalies and/or neurocognitive disabilities and prenatal patients had one or more structural anomalies, disorders of fetal growth, or fetal effusions. URM and US patients were prioritized for enrollment and underwent ES at a single academic center. We identified definitive positive or probable positive results in 201/845 (23.8%) patients, with a significantly higher diagnostic rate in pediatric (26.7%) compared to prenatal patients (19.0%) (P = 0.01). For both pediatric and prenatal patients, the diagnostic yield and frequency of inconclusive findings did not differ significantly between URM and non-URM patients or between patients with US status and those without US status. Our results demonstrate a similar diagnostic yield of ES between prenatal and pediatric URM/US patients and non-URM/US patients for positive and inconclusive results. These data support the use of ES to identify clinically relevant variants in patients from diverse populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Genomic Medicine
NPJ Genomic Medicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
67
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Genomic Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing the most important scientific advances in all aspects of genomics and its application in the practice of medicine. The journal defines genomic medicine as "diagnosis, prognosis, prevention and/or treatment of disease and disorders of the mind and body, using approaches informed or enabled by knowledge of the genome and the molecules it encodes." Relevant and high-impact papers that encompass studies of individuals, families, or populations are considered for publication. An emphasis will include coupling detailed phenotype and genome sequencing information, both enabled by new technologies and informatics, to delineate the underlying aetiology of disease. Clinical recommendations and/or guidelines of how that data should be used in the clinical management of those patients in the study, and others, are also encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Common protein-altering variant in GFAP is associated with white matter lesions in the older Japanese population. Benchmarking nanopore sequencing and rapid genomics feasibility: validation at a quaternary hospital in New Zealand. Coding and non-coding variants in the ciliopathy gene CFAP410 cause early-onset non-syndromic retinal degeneration. Biallelic loss-of-function variants in GON4L cause microcephaly and brain structure abnormalities. Genomic variations associated with risk and protection against vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in pediatric cancer patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1