在雄性小鼠中,饮食诱导的类似暴饮的饮食会削弱对急性尼索西汀的听觉惊吓反应。

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioural Pharmacology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-15 DOI:10.1097/FBP.0000000000000748
Lori L Scarpa, Nicholas T Bello
{"title":"在雄性小鼠中,饮食诱导的类似暴饮的饮食会削弱对急性尼索西汀的听觉惊吓反应。","authors":"Lori L Scarpa,&nbsp;Nicholas T Bello","doi":"10.1097/FBP.0000000000000748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sensorimotor gating disruptions have been noted in several psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders. However, the involvement of sensorimotor gating processes in eating disorders has not been well characterized. Our objective was to examine the sensorimotor gating of the acoustic startle response following dietary-induced binge eating and high-fat diet (HFD) induced weight gain in male C57B/6J mice. Acute administration of the norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, nisoxetine (0.5 and 5 mg/kg), and a dopamine reuptake inhibitor, GBR 12783 (1.6 and 16 mg/kg), were either given alone or in combination to assess norepinephrine and dopamine alterations, respectively. Male mice with repeated bouts of calorie restriction (Restrict) and with limited access to a sweetened fat food (Binge) demonstrated an escalation of intake over 2.5 weeks under standard chow conditions. Restrict Binge (RB) mice had a reduced startle response to the startle pulse (110 dB) compared with the Naive control group at 5 mg/kg nisoxetine. There was an overall effect of nisoxetine (0.5 and 5 mg/kg) to increase percent inhibition at pre-pulse (74 dB), %PP74. Under HFD conditions, the RB group did not demonstrate a binge-like eating phenotype. The RB group on HFD had a higher response to 74 dB with nisoxetine (5.0 mg/kg) compared with a combinational dose of nisoxetine (5.0 mg/kg) and GBR 12783 (1.6 mg/kg). These findings suggest that dietary conditions that promote binge-like eating can influence the central noradrenergic and dopaminergic controls of the acoustic startle response and potentially influence sensorimotor gating.</p>","PeriodicalId":8832,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10528891/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dietary-induced binge-like eating impairs acoustic startle responses to acute nisoxetine in male mice.\",\"authors\":\"Lori L Scarpa,&nbsp;Nicholas T Bello\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/FBP.0000000000000748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sensorimotor gating disruptions have been noted in several psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders. However, the involvement of sensorimotor gating processes in eating disorders has not been well characterized. Our objective was to examine the sensorimotor gating of the acoustic startle response following dietary-induced binge eating and high-fat diet (HFD) induced weight gain in male C57B/6J mice. Acute administration of the norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, nisoxetine (0.5 and 5 mg/kg), and a dopamine reuptake inhibitor, GBR 12783 (1.6 and 16 mg/kg), were either given alone or in combination to assess norepinephrine and dopamine alterations, respectively. Male mice with repeated bouts of calorie restriction (Restrict) and with limited access to a sweetened fat food (Binge) demonstrated an escalation of intake over 2.5 weeks under standard chow conditions. Restrict Binge (RB) mice had a reduced startle response to the startle pulse (110 dB) compared with the Naive control group at 5 mg/kg nisoxetine. There was an overall effect of nisoxetine (0.5 and 5 mg/kg) to increase percent inhibition at pre-pulse (74 dB), %PP74. Under HFD conditions, the RB group did not demonstrate a binge-like eating phenotype. The RB group on HFD had a higher response to 74 dB with nisoxetine (5.0 mg/kg) compared with a combinational dose of nisoxetine (5.0 mg/kg) and GBR 12783 (1.6 mg/kg). These findings suggest that dietary conditions that promote binge-like eating can influence the central noradrenergic and dopaminergic controls of the acoustic startle response and potentially influence sensorimotor gating.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioural Pharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10528891/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioural Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0000000000000748\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0000000000000748","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

感觉运动门控中断已在几种精神病和神经退行性疾病中被注意到。然而,感觉运动门控过程在饮食失调中的参与尚未得到很好的表征。我们的目的是研究雄性C57B/6J小鼠在饮食诱导的暴饮和高脂肪饮食(HFD)诱导的体重增加后听觉惊吓反应的感觉运动门控。急性给药去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂尼西汀(0.5和5 mg/kg)和多巴胺再摄取抑制剂GBR 12783(1.6和16 mg/kg),分别单独或联合给药以评估去甲肾上腺素和多巴胺的变化。在标准饮食条件下,反复摄入热量限制(Restrict)和有限摄入加糖脂肪食物(Binge)的雄性小鼠在2.5周内的摄入量增加。Restrict Binge(RB)小鼠对惊吓脉冲的惊吓反应降低(110 dB)与Naive对照组相比 mg/kg的尼索汀。尼索西汀的总体疗效(0.5和5 mg/kg),以增加预脉冲时的抑制百分比(74 dB)、%PP74。在HFD条件下,RB组没有表现出类似暴饮的饮食表型。接受HFD治疗的RB组对74 用尼索汀(5.0 mg/kg)与联合剂量的尼西汀(5.0 mg/kg)和GBR 12783(1.6 mg/kg)。这些发现表明,促进类似暴饮的饮食条件可以影响听觉惊吓反应的中枢去甲肾上腺素能和多巴胺能控制,并可能影响感觉运动门控。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dietary-induced binge-like eating impairs acoustic startle responses to acute nisoxetine in male mice.

Sensorimotor gating disruptions have been noted in several psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders. However, the involvement of sensorimotor gating processes in eating disorders has not been well characterized. Our objective was to examine the sensorimotor gating of the acoustic startle response following dietary-induced binge eating and high-fat diet (HFD) induced weight gain in male C57B/6J mice. Acute administration of the norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, nisoxetine (0.5 and 5 mg/kg), and a dopamine reuptake inhibitor, GBR 12783 (1.6 and 16 mg/kg), were either given alone or in combination to assess norepinephrine and dopamine alterations, respectively. Male mice with repeated bouts of calorie restriction (Restrict) and with limited access to a sweetened fat food (Binge) demonstrated an escalation of intake over 2.5 weeks under standard chow conditions. Restrict Binge (RB) mice had a reduced startle response to the startle pulse (110 dB) compared with the Naive control group at 5 mg/kg nisoxetine. There was an overall effect of nisoxetine (0.5 and 5 mg/kg) to increase percent inhibition at pre-pulse (74 dB), %PP74. Under HFD conditions, the RB group did not demonstrate a binge-like eating phenotype. The RB group on HFD had a higher response to 74 dB with nisoxetine (5.0 mg/kg) compared with a combinational dose of nisoxetine (5.0 mg/kg) and GBR 12783 (1.6 mg/kg). These findings suggest that dietary conditions that promote binge-like eating can influence the central noradrenergic and dopaminergic controls of the acoustic startle response and potentially influence sensorimotor gating.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Pharmacology
Behavioural Pharmacology 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioural Pharmacology accepts original full and short research reports in diverse areas ranging from ethopharmacology to the pharmacology of schedule-controlled operant behaviour, provided that their primary focus is behavioural. Suitable topics include drug, chemical and hormonal effects on behaviour, the neurochemical mechanisms under-lying behaviour, and behavioural methods for the study of drug action. Both animal and human studies are welcome; however, studies reporting neurochemical data should have a predominantly behavioural focus, and human studies should not consist exclusively of clinical trials or case reports. Preference is given to studies that demonstrate and develop the potential of behavioural methods, and to papers reporting findings of direct relevance to clinical problems. Papers making a significant theoretical contribution are particularly welcome and, where possible and merited, space is made available for authors to explore fully the theoretical implications of their findings. Reviews of an area of the literature or at an appropriate stage in the development of an author’s own work are welcome. Commentaries in areas of current interest are also considered for publication, as are Reviews and Commentaries in areas outside behavioural pharmacology, but of importance and interest to behavioural pharmacologists. Behavioural Pharmacology publishes frequent Special Issues on current hot topics. The editors welcome correspondence about whether a paper in preparation might be suitable for inclusion in a Special Issue.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of potential punishing effects of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM) in rhesus monkeys responding under a choice procedure. Ultra-low doses of methamphetamine suppress 5-hydroxytryptophan-induced head-twitch response in mice during aging. Effects of prenatal cocaine exposure on estrous cycle, and behavior and expression of estrogen receptor alpha and oxytocin during estrus and diestrus in mice offspring. Omeprazole affects the expression of serotonin-1A in the brain regions and alleviates anxiety in rat model of immobilization-induced stress. Role of l -arginine/nitric oxide/cyclic GMP/K ATP channel signaling pathway and opioid receptors in the antinociceptive effect of rutin in mice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1