开发和评估数据驱动的互动研讨会,以促进门诊肿瘤医疗环境中的沟通和团队合作。

Cancer care research online Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-24 DOI:10.1097/cr9.0000000000000043
Amanda C Blok, Deena Kelly Costa, Nathan C Wright, Milisa Manojlovich, Christopher R Friese
{"title":"开发和评估数据驱动的互动研讨会,以促进门诊肿瘤医疗环境中的沟通和团队合作。","authors":"Amanda C Blok, Deena Kelly Costa, Nathan C Wright, Milisa Manojlovich, Christopher R Friese","doi":"10.1097/cr9.0000000000000043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While adverse events and toxicities related to cancer drug therapy in the ambulatory oncology setting are common and often rooted in communication challenges, few studies have examined the problems of communication or tested tools to improve communication in this unique, high-risk setting.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual interdisciplinary communication Workshop designed to strengthen communication across ambulatory oncology teams members.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surveys of patients and clinicians in one ambulatory oncology clinic were analyzed and informed the communication intervention: an interdisciplinary virtual Workshop. Workshop evaluation included an implementation survey measure and a structured debrief with Workshop attendees.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>87 patients and 56 clinicians participated in pre-workshop surveys that revealed patient satisfaction with timely care and information, yet a range of rating communication experiences with the clinical team, and clinicians perceiving a high amount of organizational safety, yet rated discussion of alternatives to normal work processes low. Survey results guided reflection and discussion within the Workshop. Six clinicians participated in the interactive Workshop. Feasibility and acceptability of the virtual Workshop were supported by formative and summative data, along with suggestions for improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The patient and clinician surveys coupled with an interactive virtual Workshop were feasible and acceptable.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>The Workshop identified opportunities for individual- and system-level improvements in clinical team communication. This promising strategy requires replication in larger, diverse practice samples.</p><p><strong>Foundational: </strong>Clinicians accepted an interactive workshop that incorporated clinic-specific data and communication strategies. The program is feasible and acceptable in ambulatory oncology settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":72506,"journal":{"name":"Cancer care research online","volume":"3 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Evaluation of a Data-Driven, Interactive Workshop to Facilitate Communication and Teamwork in Ambulatory Medical Oncology Settings.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda C Blok, Deena Kelly Costa, Nathan C Wright, Milisa Manojlovich, Christopher R Friese\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/cr9.0000000000000043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While adverse events and toxicities related to cancer drug therapy in the ambulatory oncology setting are common and often rooted in communication challenges, few studies have examined the problems of communication or tested tools to improve communication in this unique, high-risk setting.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual interdisciplinary communication Workshop designed to strengthen communication across ambulatory oncology teams members.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surveys of patients and clinicians in one ambulatory oncology clinic were analyzed and informed the communication intervention: an interdisciplinary virtual Workshop. Workshop evaluation included an implementation survey measure and a structured debrief with Workshop attendees.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>87 patients and 56 clinicians participated in pre-workshop surveys that revealed patient satisfaction with timely care and information, yet a range of rating communication experiences with the clinical team, and clinicians perceiving a high amount of organizational safety, yet rated discussion of alternatives to normal work processes low. Survey results guided reflection and discussion within the Workshop. Six clinicians participated in the interactive Workshop. Feasibility and acceptability of the virtual Workshop were supported by formative and summative data, along with suggestions for improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The patient and clinician surveys coupled with an interactive virtual Workshop were feasible and acceptable.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>The Workshop identified opportunities for individual- and system-level improvements in clinical team communication. This promising strategy requires replication in larger, diverse practice samples.</p><p><strong>Foundational: </strong>Clinicians accepted an interactive workshop that incorporated clinic-specific data and communication strategies. The program is feasible and acceptable in ambulatory oncology settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer care research online\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501213/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer care research online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/cr9.0000000000000043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer care research online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/cr9.0000000000000043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然在流动肿瘤学环境中,与癌症药物治疗相关的不良事件和毒性很常见,并且通常源于沟通挑战,但很少有研究探讨沟通问题或测试工具来改善这种独特、高风险环境中的沟通。目的:确定虚拟跨学科沟通研讨会的可行性和可接受性,该研讨会旨在加强门诊肿瘤学团队成员之间的沟通。方法:分析一家门诊肿瘤诊所的患者和临床医生的调查,并告知沟通干预:一个跨学科的虚拟研讨会。研讨会评估包括一项实施情况调查措施和与研讨会与会者的结构化汇报。结果:87名患者和56名临床医生参加了研讨会前调查,调查显示患者对及时护理和信息的满意度,但对与临床团队的沟通经验进行了一系列评分,临床医生认为组织安全性很高,但对正常工作流程替代方案的讨论评分较低。调查结果指导了讲习班内的反思和讨论。六名临床医生参加了互动讲习班。形成性和总结性数据以及改进建议支持了虚拟研讨会的可行性和可接受性。结论:患者和临床医生的调查与互动虚拟研讨会相结合是可行和可接受的。对实践的影响:研讨会确定了在临床团队沟通中个人和系统层面改进的机会。这种有前景的策略需要在更大、多样化的实践样本中进行复制。基础:临床医生接受了一个互动研讨会,其中包括诊所特定的数据和沟通策略。该方案在门诊肿瘤学环境中是可行和可接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and Evaluation of a Data-Driven, Interactive Workshop to Facilitate Communication and Teamwork in Ambulatory Medical Oncology Settings.

Background: While adverse events and toxicities related to cancer drug therapy in the ambulatory oncology setting are common and often rooted in communication challenges, few studies have examined the problems of communication or tested tools to improve communication in this unique, high-risk setting.

Objective: To determine the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual interdisciplinary communication Workshop designed to strengthen communication across ambulatory oncology teams members.

Methods: Surveys of patients and clinicians in one ambulatory oncology clinic were analyzed and informed the communication intervention: an interdisciplinary virtual Workshop. Workshop evaluation included an implementation survey measure and a structured debrief with Workshop attendees.

Results: 87 patients and 56 clinicians participated in pre-workshop surveys that revealed patient satisfaction with timely care and information, yet a range of rating communication experiences with the clinical team, and clinicians perceiving a high amount of organizational safety, yet rated discussion of alternatives to normal work processes low. Survey results guided reflection and discussion within the Workshop. Six clinicians participated in the interactive Workshop. Feasibility and acceptability of the virtual Workshop were supported by formative and summative data, along with suggestions for improvement.

Conclusions: The patient and clinician surveys coupled with an interactive virtual Workshop were feasible and acceptable.

Implications for practice: The Workshop identified opportunities for individual- and system-level improvements in clinical team communication. This promising strategy requires replication in larger, diverse practice samples.

Foundational: Clinicians accepted an interactive workshop that incorporated clinic-specific data and communication strategies. The program is feasible and acceptable in ambulatory oncology settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nutritional Status, Eating Behaviors, and Gastrointestinal Symptom Cluster Among Children Receiving Cancer Chemotherapy in Thailand: A Descriptive Study Electricity Availability and Relevance for Oncology Nursing Coping in Women With Breast Cancer Awaiting a Surgical Intervention: A Cross-Sectional Study Mobility Is Medicine, Too: Creating a Culture of Mobility Amongst Hospitalized Patients With Cancer to Improve Patient Outcomes Long-term Cancer Survivorship: A Family Affair
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1