结合回归树和面板回归,探索和测试补充管理措施对临时通知的择期手术取消率的影响。

IF 1.2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Systems Pub Date : 2019-04-19 DOI:10.1080/20476965.2019.1596338
Reza Salehnejad, Manhal Ali, Nathan Proudlove
{"title":"结合回归树和面板回归,探索和测试补充管理措施对临时通知的择期手术取消率的影响。","authors":"Reza Salehnejad, Manhal Ali, Nathan Proudlove","doi":"10.1080/20476965.2019.1596338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Variation in the performance of providers across healthcare systems is pervasive. It is recognised as both a major concern and an opportunity for learning and improvement. Variation between providers is broadly considered to be due to management practices and contextual factors such as catchment-area demographics. However, there is little understanding of the ways in which these impact on performance and how they can be measured. We use recent developments in both regression trees and panel regression techniques to explore and then statistically test complementary alignments of management practices whilst taking into account contextual factors. We apply this to 5 years of NHS hospital trust data, examining performance on short-notice cancellation rates. We find that different alignments of management practices give rise to quite different short-notice cancellation rates between trusts, with some being substantially lower. Our research offers a data-driven approach for identifying optimal clusters of management practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":44699,"journal":{"name":"Health Systems","volume":"9 4","pages":"326-344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738292/pdf/THSS_9_1596338.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining regression trees and panel regression for exploring and testing the impact of complementary management practices on short-notice elective operation cancellation rates.\",\"authors\":\"Reza Salehnejad, Manhal Ali, Nathan Proudlove\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20476965.2019.1596338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Variation in the performance of providers across healthcare systems is pervasive. It is recognised as both a major concern and an opportunity for learning and improvement. Variation between providers is broadly considered to be due to management practices and contextual factors such as catchment-area demographics. However, there is little understanding of the ways in which these impact on performance and how they can be measured. We use recent developments in both regression trees and panel regression techniques to explore and then statistically test complementary alignments of management practices whilst taking into account contextual factors. We apply this to 5 years of NHS hospital trust data, examining performance on short-notice cancellation rates. We find that different alignments of management practices give rise to quite different short-notice cancellation rates between trusts, with some being substantially lower. Our research offers a data-driven approach for identifying optimal clusters of management practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Systems\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"326-344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738292/pdf/THSS_9_1596338.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20476965.2019.1596338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20476965.2019.1596338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗系统中医疗服务提供者的绩效差异非常普遍。这既是一个重大问题,也是一个学习和改进的机会。人们普遍认为,医疗服务提供者之间的差异是由管理实践和背景因素造成的,如覆盖区域的人口统计。然而,人们对这些因素影响绩效的方式以及如何衡量这些因素还知之甚少。我们利用回归树和面板回归技术的最新发展,在考虑背景因素的同时,探索管理方法的互补性,然后进行统计检验。我们将这一方法应用于 5 年的英国国家医疗服务系统(NHS)医院信托数据,考察短期通知取消率的表现。我们发现,不同的管理方法会导致信托机构之间的短期通知取消率大相径庭,有些机构的取消率会低很多。我们的研究提供了一种以数据为导向的方法,用于确定最佳的管理实践集群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Combining regression trees and panel regression for exploring and testing the impact of complementary management practices on short-notice elective operation cancellation rates.

Variation in the performance of providers across healthcare systems is pervasive. It is recognised as both a major concern and an opportunity for learning and improvement. Variation between providers is broadly considered to be due to management practices and contextual factors such as catchment-area demographics. However, there is little understanding of the ways in which these impact on performance and how they can be measured. We use recent developments in both regression trees and panel regression techniques to explore and then statistically test complementary alignments of management practices whilst taking into account contextual factors. We apply this to 5 years of NHS hospital trust data, examining performance on short-notice cancellation rates. We find that different alignments of management practices give rise to quite different short-notice cancellation rates between trusts, with some being substantially lower. Our research offers a data-driven approach for identifying optimal clusters of management practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Systems
Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Towards new frontiers of healthcare systems research using artificial intelligence and generative AI. Assistance systems for patient positioning in radiotherapy practice. Resilience of hospitals in an age of disruptions: a systematic literature review on resources and capabilities. From digital health to learning health systems: four approaches to using data for digital health design. Using participatory systems approaches to improve healthcare delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1