不同运动项目优秀运动员肺功能、支气管高反应性和呼吸健康的差异

Guro P. Bernhardsen, Julie Stang, Thomas Halvorsen, Trine Stensrud
{"title":"不同运动项目优秀运动员肺功能、支气管高反应性和呼吸健康的差异","authors":"Guro P. Bernhardsen,&nbsp;Julie Stang,&nbsp;Thomas Halvorsen,&nbsp;Trine Stensrud","doi":"10.1080/17461391.2022.2113144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to examine lung function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and exercise-induced respiratory symptoms in elite athletes performing different sports. Norwegian national-team athletes (30 swimmers, 32 cross-country skiers, 16 speed-skaters, 11 rowers/paddlers, 17 handball players and 23 soccer players) completed a validated questionnaire, measured exhaled nitric oxide (FE<sub>NO</sub>), spirometry, methacholine provocation (PD<sub>20met</sub>) and skin prick test. Three cut-off levels defined BHR; i.e. PD<sub>20met</sub> ≤2 µmol, ≤4 µmol and ≤8 µmol. Mean forced vital capacity (FVC) was highest in swimmers (Mean z-score[95%CI]  = 1.16 [0.80, 1.51]), and close to or higher than reference values according to the Global Lung Initiative equation, across all sports. Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>) was higher than reference values in swimmers (0.48 [0.13, 0.84]), and ball game athletes (0.69 [0.41, 0.97]). Mean forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75% of FVC (FEF<sub>25–75</sub>), and/or FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC were lower than reference values in all endurance groups. BHR defined by ≤2 and ≤8 µmol methacholine was observed in respectively 50%–87% of swimmers, 25%–47% of cross-country skiers, 20%–53% of speed-skaters, 18%–36% of rowers/paddlers, and 0%–17% of the ball game athletes. Exercise-induced symptoms were common in all groups, most frequent in cross-country skiers (88%), swimmers (83%) and speed-skaters (81%).</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"23 8","pages":"1480-1489"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/17461391.2022.2113144","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in lung function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and respiratory health between elite athletes competing in different sports\",\"authors\":\"Guro P. Bernhardsen,&nbsp;Julie Stang,&nbsp;Thomas Halvorsen,&nbsp;Trine Stensrud\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17461391.2022.2113144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this study was to examine lung function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and exercise-induced respiratory symptoms in elite athletes performing different sports. Norwegian national-team athletes (30 swimmers, 32 cross-country skiers, 16 speed-skaters, 11 rowers/paddlers, 17 handball players and 23 soccer players) completed a validated questionnaire, measured exhaled nitric oxide (FE<sub>NO</sub>), spirometry, methacholine provocation (PD<sub>20met</sub>) and skin prick test. Three cut-off levels defined BHR; i.e. PD<sub>20met</sub> ≤2 µmol, ≤4 µmol and ≤8 µmol. Mean forced vital capacity (FVC) was highest in swimmers (Mean z-score[95%CI]  = 1.16 [0.80, 1.51]), and close to or higher than reference values according to the Global Lung Initiative equation, across all sports. Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>) was higher than reference values in swimmers (0.48 [0.13, 0.84]), and ball game athletes (0.69 [0.41, 0.97]). Mean forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75% of FVC (FEF<sub>25–75</sub>), and/or FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC were lower than reference values in all endurance groups. BHR defined by ≤2 and ≤8 µmol methacholine was observed in respectively 50%–87% of swimmers, 25%–47% of cross-country skiers, 20%–53% of speed-skaters, 18%–36% of rowers/paddlers, and 0%–17% of the ball game athletes. Exercise-induced symptoms were common in all groups, most frequent in cross-country skiers (88%), swimmers (83%) and speed-skaters (81%).</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"volume\":\"23 8\",\"pages\":\"1480-1489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/17461391.2022.2113144\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1080/17461391.2022.2113144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1080/17461391.2022.2113144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是研究不同运动项目的优秀运动员的肺功能、支气管高反应性(BHR)和运动引起的呼吸道症状。挪威国家队运动员(30名游泳运动员、32名越野滑雪运动员、16名速滑运动员、11名赛艇运动员/桨运动员、17名手球运动员和23名足球运动员)完成了一份有效问卷,测量了呼出一氧化氮(FENO)、肺活量测定、甲胆酸激发(PD20met)和皮肤点刺试验。三个临界值定义了BHR;即PD20met≤2µmol,≤4µmol,≤8µmol。游泳运动员的平均强迫肺活量(FVC)最高(平均z-score[95%CI] = 1.16[0.80, 1.51]),根据全球肺倡议方程,在所有运动中,游泳运动员接近或高于参考值。游泳运动员(0.48[0.13,0.84])和球类运动员(0.69[0.41,0.97])的平均1 s用力呼气量(FEV1)高于参考值。在所有耐力组中,平均用力呼气流量在FVC的25 - 75%之间(FEF25-75)和/或FEV1/FVC均低于参考值。50%-87%的游泳运动员、25%-47%的越野滑雪运动员、20%-53%的速滑运动员、18%-36%的赛艇运动员和0%-17%的球类运动员的BHR分别以≤2和≤8µmol的甲胆碱定义。运动引起的症状在所有组中都很常见,最常见的是越野滑雪运动员(88%)、游泳运动员(83%)和速滑运动员(81%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences in lung function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and respiratory health between elite athletes competing in different sports

The aim of this study was to examine lung function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and exercise-induced respiratory symptoms in elite athletes performing different sports. Norwegian national-team athletes (30 swimmers, 32 cross-country skiers, 16 speed-skaters, 11 rowers/paddlers, 17 handball players and 23 soccer players) completed a validated questionnaire, measured exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), spirometry, methacholine provocation (PD20met) and skin prick test. Three cut-off levels defined BHR; i.e. PD20met ≤2 µmol, ≤4 µmol and ≤8 µmol. Mean forced vital capacity (FVC) was highest in swimmers (Mean z-score[95%CI]  = 1.16 [0.80, 1.51]), and close to or higher than reference values according to the Global Lung Initiative equation, across all sports. Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was higher than reference values in swimmers (0.48 [0.13, 0.84]), and ball game athletes (0.69 [0.41, 0.97]). Mean forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75% of FVC (FEF25–75), and/or FEV1/FVC were lower than reference values in all endurance groups. BHR defined by ≤2 and ≤8 µmol methacholine was observed in respectively 50%–87% of swimmers, 25%–47% of cross-country skiers, 20%–53% of speed-skaters, 18%–36% of rowers/paddlers, and 0%–17% of the ball game athletes. Exercise-induced symptoms were common in all groups, most frequent in cross-country skiers (88%), swimmers (83%) and speed-skaters (81%).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of a 4-Week Multi-Exercise Isometric Resistance Training Programme on Resting and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Normotensive Adults. Physical Fitness and Device-Based Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity and Risk of Long-Term Sickness Absence-A Prospective Cohort Study With 8-Year Follow-Up. Issue Information The Effect of CYP1A2 Gene Polymorphisms on Caffeine Pharmacokinetics and Exercise Performance in Male Recreational Athletes Role-Specific Performance Profiles of Professional Cyclists in a Grand Tour.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1