血症在脓毒症患者预后和死亡率预测中的应用。

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of the Intensive Care Society Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1177/17511437211069307
Nivedita Prasanna, Benjamin DelPrete, Geoffrey Ho, David Yamane, Amira Elshikh, Amir Rashed, Andrew Sparks, Danielle Davison, Katrina Hawkins
{"title":"血症在脓毒症患者预后和死亡率预测中的应用。","authors":"Nivedita Prasanna,&nbsp;Benjamin DelPrete,&nbsp;Geoffrey Ho,&nbsp;David Yamane,&nbsp;Amira Elshikh,&nbsp;Amir Rashed,&nbsp;Andrew Sparks,&nbsp;Danielle Davison,&nbsp;Katrina Hawkins","doi":"10.1177/17511437211069307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Bandemia, defined as a band count >10%, is indicative of underlying infection and is increasingly being used for early detection of sepsis. While an absolute band level has been linked to worse outcomes, its trend has not been extensively studied as a prognostic marker. In this study, we assessed patients admitted to the ICU with sepsis or septic shock and evaluated the correlation between bandemia trends and clinical trajectory among these patients. <i>Methods:</i> This study was a retrospective chart review. Band counts, serum lactate levels, and SOFA scores at 0 and 72 h after admission to the ICU were collected. Patients were risk stratified into groups depending on their SOFA trends, and corresponding band trends and serum lactate levels were compared. <i>Results:</i> 134 patients were included for analysis. There was a statistically significant decrease in bandemia trends for patients with a reduction in SOFA scores <i>[median (IQR)-4.5 (-11, 0); p < 0.0001]</i>, and a statistically significant increase in bandemia trends for patients with worsening SOFA scores <i>[median (IQR) 4 (0, 8); p = 0.0007]</i>. <i>Conclusion:</i> Early trends of serum band levels in patients with sepsis or septic shock may help to predict a clinical trajectory and overall prognosis. More investigation is warranted as to whether incorporating bandemia trends, when used in conjunction with other known markers such as lactate levels, may help to guide bedside clinical decisions such as risk stratification, tailored therapies, and ultimately improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":"24 2","pages":"201-205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227906/pdf/10.1177_17511437211069307.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The utility of bandemia in prognostication and prediction of mortality in sepsis.\",\"authors\":\"Nivedita Prasanna,&nbsp;Benjamin DelPrete,&nbsp;Geoffrey Ho,&nbsp;David Yamane,&nbsp;Amira Elshikh,&nbsp;Amir Rashed,&nbsp;Andrew Sparks,&nbsp;Danielle Davison,&nbsp;Katrina Hawkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17511437211069307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Bandemia, defined as a band count >10%, is indicative of underlying infection and is increasingly being used for early detection of sepsis. While an absolute band level has been linked to worse outcomes, its trend has not been extensively studied as a prognostic marker. In this study, we assessed patients admitted to the ICU with sepsis or septic shock and evaluated the correlation between bandemia trends and clinical trajectory among these patients. <i>Methods:</i> This study was a retrospective chart review. Band counts, serum lactate levels, and SOFA scores at 0 and 72 h after admission to the ICU were collected. Patients were risk stratified into groups depending on their SOFA trends, and corresponding band trends and serum lactate levels were compared. <i>Results:</i> 134 patients were included for analysis. There was a statistically significant decrease in bandemia trends for patients with a reduction in SOFA scores <i>[median (IQR)-4.5 (-11, 0); p < 0.0001]</i>, and a statistically significant increase in bandemia trends for patients with worsening SOFA scores <i>[median (IQR) 4 (0, 8); p = 0.0007]</i>. <i>Conclusion:</i> Early trends of serum band levels in patients with sepsis or septic shock may help to predict a clinical trajectory and overall prognosis. More investigation is warranted as to whether incorporating bandemia trends, when used in conjunction with other known markers such as lactate levels, may help to guide bedside clinical decisions such as risk stratification, tailored therapies, and ultimately improve outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Intensive Care Society\",\"volume\":\"24 2\",\"pages\":\"201-205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227906/pdf/10.1177_17511437211069307.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Intensive Care Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437211069307\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437211069307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:带状血症定义为带状计数>10%,表明存在潜在感染,并且越来越多地被用于败血症的早期检测。虽然绝对频带水平与较差的预后有关,但其趋势尚未作为预后指标进行广泛研究。在本研究中,我们评估了因脓毒症或脓毒性休克入住ICU的患者,并评估了这些患者的脓毒症趋势与临床轨迹的相关性。方法:采用回顾性图表法。收集患者入院后0和72 h的血带计数、血清乳酸水平和SOFA评分。根据患者的SOFA趋势对患者进行危险分层,并比较相应的频带趋势和血清乳酸水平。结果:134例患者纳入分析。SOFA评分降低的患者的bandia趋势有统计学意义的降低[中位数(IQR)-4.5 (- 11,0);p < 0.0001], SOFA评分恶化的患者的bandia趋势有统计学意义的增加[中位数(IQR) 4 (0,8);P = 0.0007]。结论:脓毒症或感染性休克患者血清能带水平的早期变化趋势可能有助于预测其临床发展轨迹和整体预后。当与其他已知的标志物(如乳酸水平)联合使用时,是否合并尿毒症趋势有助于指导床边临床决策,如风险分层、量身定制的治疗,并最终改善结果,需要更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The utility of bandemia in prognostication and prediction of mortality in sepsis.

Background: Bandemia, defined as a band count >10%, is indicative of underlying infection and is increasingly being used for early detection of sepsis. While an absolute band level has been linked to worse outcomes, its trend has not been extensively studied as a prognostic marker. In this study, we assessed patients admitted to the ICU with sepsis or septic shock and evaluated the correlation between bandemia trends and clinical trajectory among these patients. Methods: This study was a retrospective chart review. Band counts, serum lactate levels, and SOFA scores at 0 and 72 h after admission to the ICU were collected. Patients were risk stratified into groups depending on their SOFA trends, and corresponding band trends and serum lactate levels were compared. Results: 134 patients were included for analysis. There was a statistically significant decrease in bandemia trends for patients with a reduction in SOFA scores [median (IQR)-4.5 (-11, 0); p < 0.0001], and a statistically significant increase in bandemia trends for patients with worsening SOFA scores [median (IQR) 4 (0, 8); p = 0.0007]. Conclusion: Early trends of serum band levels in patients with sepsis or septic shock may help to predict a clinical trajectory and overall prognosis. More investigation is warranted as to whether incorporating bandemia trends, when used in conjunction with other known markers such as lactate levels, may help to guide bedside clinical decisions such as risk stratification, tailored therapies, and ultimately improve outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Nursing-Critical Care Nursing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.
期刊最新文献
Antibiotic prophylaxis reduced broad-spectrum antibiotics and length of stay in ICU patients with alcohol withdrawal induced refractory delirium tremens. Assessment of hemodynamic parameters by PiCCO and PAC in patients treated with the Impella CP. Delivery of evidence-based critical care practices across the United Kingdom: A UK-wide multi-site service evaluation in adult units. In vivo assessment of a modification of a domiciliary ventilator which reduces oxygen consumption in mechanically ventilated patients. Management of adult mechanically ventilated patients: A UK-wide survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1