冠状动脉搭桥术患者术后认知功能障碍、疼痛和住院时间的早期动员方案比较:一项随机对照试验。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Applied Nursing Research Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.apnr.2023.151731
Atefeh Allahbakhshian BSc, MSc, PhD , Azizeh Farshbaf Khalili BSc, MSc, PhD , Leila Gholizadeh BSc, MSc, PhD , Leyla Esmealy BSc, MSc
{"title":"冠状动脉搭桥术患者术后认知功能障碍、疼痛和住院时间的早期动员方案比较:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Atefeh Allahbakhshian BSc, MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Azizeh Farshbaf Khalili BSc, MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Leila Gholizadeh BSc, MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Leyla Esmealy BSc, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.apnr.2023.151731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Although coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery improves the life expectancy of patients with </span>coronary artery disease, it is associated with various short and long-term complications. Early mobilization has been shown to reduce the risk of these complications. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different early mobilization protocols on </span>postoperative cognitive dysfunction<span><span><span> (POCD), pain intensity, and length of hospital stay (LOS) in patients<span> undergoing CABG. This three-arm parallel randomized controlled trial included 120 patients undergoing CABG surgery who were randomly assigned to Intervention A, which received a four-phase early mobilization protocol; Intervention B, which received a three-phase early mobilization protocol; and the Control group, which received routine care. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction and pain were assessed using </span></span>Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and </span>visual analog scale (VAS), respectively. Groups were comparable in demographic and clinical characteristics and postoperative cognitive dysfunction at baseline. After the intervention, Group B had statistically significantly (</span></span><em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) less cognitive dysfunction (25.8 ± 1.7) compared to Group A (24.1 ± 2.2) and the Control Group (23.4 ± 2.7). Likewise, hospital stay was statistically (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) shorter for Group B (7.7 ± 1.5) than the Control group (8.9 ± 1.9). However, the experience of pain was statistically significantly lower over time in Group A than in the other groups (<em>p</em><span> &lt; 0.001). This study concludes that an early mobilization protocol based on deep breathing exercises and chest physiotherapy may better improve postoperative cognitive dysfunction and length of hospital stay than an early mobilization protocol based on passive and active range of motion activities or routine care.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":50740,"journal":{"name":"Applied Nursing Research","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 151731"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of early mobilization protocols on postoperative cognitive dysfunction, pain, and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Atefeh Allahbakhshian BSc, MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Azizeh Farshbaf Khalili BSc, MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Leila Gholizadeh BSc, MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Leyla Esmealy BSc, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apnr.2023.151731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span><span>Although coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery improves the life expectancy of patients with </span>coronary artery disease, it is associated with various short and long-term complications. Early mobilization has been shown to reduce the risk of these complications. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different early mobilization protocols on </span>postoperative cognitive dysfunction<span><span><span> (POCD), pain intensity, and length of hospital stay (LOS) in patients<span> undergoing CABG. This three-arm parallel randomized controlled trial included 120 patients undergoing CABG surgery who were randomly assigned to Intervention A, which received a four-phase early mobilization protocol; Intervention B, which received a three-phase early mobilization protocol; and the Control group, which received routine care. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction and pain were assessed using </span></span>Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and </span>visual analog scale (VAS), respectively. Groups were comparable in demographic and clinical characteristics and postoperative cognitive dysfunction at baseline. After the intervention, Group B had statistically significantly (</span></span><em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) less cognitive dysfunction (25.8 ± 1.7) compared to Group A (24.1 ± 2.2) and the Control Group (23.4 ± 2.7). Likewise, hospital stay was statistically (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) shorter for Group B (7.7 ± 1.5) than the Control group (8.9 ± 1.9). However, the experience of pain was statistically significantly lower over time in Group A than in the other groups (<em>p</em><span> &lt; 0.001). This study concludes that an early mobilization protocol based on deep breathing exercises and chest physiotherapy may better improve postoperative cognitive dysfunction and length of hospital stay than an early mobilization protocol based on passive and active range of motion activities or routine care.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Nursing Research\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"Article 151731\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0897189723000654\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0897189723000654","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管冠状动脉旁路移植(CABG)手术提高了冠状动脉疾病患者的预期寿命,但它与各种短期和长期并发症有关。早期动员已被证明可以降低这些并发症的风险。本研究旨在比较不同早期动员方案对CABG患者术后认知功能障碍(POCD)、疼痛强度和住院时间(LOS)的有效性。这项三组平行随机对照试验包括120名接受CABG手术的患者,他们被随机分配到干预A,接受四阶段早期动员方案;干预措施B,接受了三阶段早期动员方案;对照组接受常规护理。分别使用简易精神状态检查(MMSE)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估术后认知功能障碍和疼痛。各组在人口统计学和临床特征以及术后认知功能障碍方面具有可比性。干预后,B组有统计学意义(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of early mobilization protocols on postoperative cognitive dysfunction, pain, and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Although coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery improves the life expectancy of patients with coronary artery disease, it is associated with various short and long-term complications. Early mobilization has been shown to reduce the risk of these complications. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different early mobilization protocols on postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), pain intensity, and length of hospital stay (LOS) in patients undergoing CABG. This three-arm parallel randomized controlled trial included 120 patients undergoing CABG surgery who were randomly assigned to Intervention A, which received a four-phase early mobilization protocol; Intervention B, which received a three-phase early mobilization protocol; and the Control group, which received routine care. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction and pain were assessed using Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and visual analog scale (VAS), respectively. Groups were comparable in demographic and clinical characteristics and postoperative cognitive dysfunction at baseline. After the intervention, Group B had statistically significantly (p < 0.001) less cognitive dysfunction (25.8 ± 1.7) compared to Group A (24.1 ± 2.2) and the Control Group (23.4 ± 2.7). Likewise, hospital stay was statistically (p < 0.01) shorter for Group B (7.7 ± 1.5) than the Control group (8.9 ± 1.9). However, the experience of pain was statistically significantly lower over time in Group A than in the other groups (p < 0.001). This study concludes that an early mobilization protocol based on deep breathing exercises and chest physiotherapy may better improve postoperative cognitive dysfunction and length of hospital stay than an early mobilization protocol based on passive and active range of motion activities or routine care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Nursing Research
Applied Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Applied Nursing Research presents original, peer-reviewed research findings clearly and directly for clinical applications in all nursing specialties. Regular features include "Ask the Experts," research briefs, clinical methods, book reviews, news and announcements, and an editorial section. Applied Nursing Research covers such areas as pain management, patient education, discharge planning, nursing diagnosis, job stress in nursing, nursing influence on length of hospital stay, and nurse/physician collaboration.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Implementing MATRIX acuity tool to improve nursing satisfaction on a stroke and epilepsy monitoring unit Artificial intelligence in nursing practice – A Delphi study with ChatGPT Mental health misconceptions among at-risk populations: The case of hotel workers What are the attitudes and perceptions of general practitioners about the role of nurse practitioners in the community care setting: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1